Well, they need a few women, as the wives and daughters need protection too and might not want a male to accompany her to the toilet or a few other places. And there might be a woman president one day, same thing.
But those women should very, very carefully selected, and truly only the best should have the chance to get the job. Not just because they happen to be a woman, and they want some percentage of women...
Highly trained with demonstrated skill only. Spatial awareness is a key cognitive skill in eliminating physical threats. The average man outclasses even +2 sigma best women when you match up normal distributions (due to hormone diff). So these women SS better have men working with or for them to cover that capability gap. When it comes to life and death, team capability is the ONLY thing that matters.
Overall, women should not be in jobs that require a certain amount of strength. Women are not built like men and don't have a man's strength. Jobs that require strength and toughness like policemen, firemen, SS agents are not suitable for the average woman. This puts everyone at risk: the woman, her partner and the people they are trying to help.
True in general, but I'd like to point out what I have already said: there are situations where a woman is more useful than a man. With Secret Service, they do also protect women, the wives and daughters, and even the president's job will probably one of these days be filled by a woman. And, well, toilets, showers - let's say they suspect something may be off when a young barely teenage daughter of a president is taking a shower, would you really want the first person to peek there in order to see if there is a problem or not to be a man? Especially if there isn't...
The same with police. Undercover jobs will need women sometimes, but even the street cop duties will have occasions when a woman will be the better choice. Like maybe checking a woman, or especially a teen girl, for weapons. Might raise bit of a storm if a male cop went feeling all over a young woman's body, especially if then later they found out it was something like a mistaken identity, or the girl had had nothing to do with the crime after all.
And so on.
And those women definitely should be as well trained as the men, and preferably also be able to get experience at the job if they need to do it.
The problem is of course that now they are trying to get too many women into those jobs, and they don't demand enough of the women they do take.
So, MOST of the people in those jobs should be men. And the far fewer women who are accepted into those jobs should be the ones with abilities, especially when it comes to their physical ones, at the top class of their sex.
I agree with you. There are times when it helps to have a woman. That's why I put the caveat: overall.
The head of the Secret Service, Kimberly A. Cheatle was previously a SS agent and head of security for Pepsi Cola. Her goal was to have the SS 30% female by 2030.
When the shooting first started the SS men closet to Trump acted quickly, jumping on his body to protect him.
Then other secret service bounded up the stairs to the stage for additional help. There was this petite female SS agent at the bottom of the stairs. For several seconds she just bent over so she wouldn't get hit.
The female secret service agent with the bun that led Trump out, got on the stage and didn't know what to do. Another agent told her to surround Trump. And she did that, but she was so short, his head was visible and not protected. She was just too short.
The men were calmer and more purposeful. The Director of the Secret Service is Kimberly Cheatle wants the 30% of the SS to be females. There's already an internal petition amongst the SS to have her removed before this happened.
WOMEN AND MEN ARE DIFFERENT WITH DIFFERENT SKILL SETS.
I don't know how many times I've seen female cops try to arrest someone and they can't. They don't have the strength to muscle a man who either beats them up or runs away. Most of the time regular men have to jump in to help.
I know someone who would have made a fantastic fireman. When offered the job he declined because he didn't want to rely on a woman to back him up. He thought it would be too dangerous. And I agree.
The petite female it was obvious she had no clue. I noted she was doing more ducking then protection. We used to have height resatrictions in LE. The reson being shorter Officers are more prone to be attacked then taller Officers. As a former FTO with the SD new hires were not considered any help until they had proven themselves in the Real World. Rookies had to earn respect. So consider yourself alone until the Rookie proves themselves. Your backup may be 15 to 20 minutes away. You would have a idea as they checked 10-8 10-17 with their location. Until then you are on your own.
in the military the PT Test shows proof of this as male requirements are different between males and females along with age for those very reasons.
I already noticed back then the quality of officers was slowly going downhill. We had a situation where a small town PD hired a rookie officer . He had been working for them about a year and early on we stressed the importance of learning his 10 codes. I was 5 miles out and another Deputy was also several miles out whe the call came in for the bank robbery in progress. The call was given to him. The other Deputy and myself checked 10-8 10-17 to back him up. He responded back to the dispatcher he was doing a interview with someone and would respond as soon as he cleaared the interview. This was several minutes later after he had already 10-4d the call. Needless to say informed the responding Deputy to park at the 3 'clock position at the bank and i would take the 1 o'clock position so we could have a 360 view of the bank. He was only two blocks away and we arrived before he did. When dispatch called stating the bank had called the suspects had left. There are a few more stories similar to this but made me thankful I was retiring.
They are not hiring the best and most qualified ,and now this is showing the results of this foolishness.
Great analysis of the situation. In jobs like this competency and actual ability are what matters, diversity should be the least important thing.
I wouldn't be against having female SS, I could see a slight strategic advantage in them being more unassuming and when protecting other females/kids it might make them more comfortable. I also think women are better than men at reading body language, which I think would be very useful for a job like this.
However, you need to be very cognizant in exactly what skills and ability you are losing and what you are gaining by making that decision. Women have a lot of weaknesses that the rest of the security detail will need to make up for, and everyone should be honest in determining if it's worth it; not worth it for diversity, but worth it as in "Is the team stronger or weaker now?". If weaker, they shouldn't be there.
Yes, it helps to have SOME women. But that tiny thing with the bun taking him off the stage was way too short. His whole face and neck was exposed. Also, when she ran onstage she didn't know what to do. Another SS told her to surround Trump.
The female SS with the pony tail was ducking at the bottom of the stairs, trying not to get shot when the shooting was going on. You can't have people like that, driven by their emotions.
And there was a third female SS overweight and out of shape fumbling around. They were fidgeting with their sunglasses, didn't know what to do with their guns and even fumbled putting them back in the holster.
If you hire women, make sure they are as competent as Gina Carrano or Rhonda Rousey
And the people to surround the target must be taller than the target! They must be designated in advance.
Oh, now you can imagine the flack I caught when I was discussing firefighting with some people a few years back, and how women have no place in that world. I was ridiculed, scorned, and even eschewed by a couple of family members - and this was about firefighting, not a security detail. My argument centered on physics: I am 6'3, 300#. Used to box and weightlift and have fought a few fires in my day. If I'm wearing all the necessary equipment, including oxygen tanks, and I go down for some reason and you have to drag me out of a compartment, a petite female who might be a badass back at the station is not going to be able to do it, period - and I would die. Simple physics - with equipment, I'm pushing 360#, plus there is the phenomenon of "dead weight." Rescue simply will not happen.
This is what you get, folks. This is what you get.
I was glad with we did not have that issue when I was in the Military as women were not in combat units. I did hear that would be coming down the road. They claim equality then we should have one standard PT test with everyone by age would all have to make the 2 mile runs based on one time for age. Not based on male or female and giving the females more time.
With the SD we had some that held their own and a few we had to rescue. But then we had a few males like that also. I am old school if you can not hack it then pack it and find something else. Military, LE and Fire are not games and real people can lose real lives.
Heh. I have had to call an ambulance only once in my life, I had heart arrhythmia (turned out to be a basically non-dangerous, if unpleasant, variety). The two paramedics were both women, one older, one pretty skinny younger one.
Now, I'm afraid that I have gotten pretty fat in my old age. Considering my weight, I highly doubt those two women would have been able to get me on the stretcher and into the ambulance by themselves if I had actually been having something like a serious heart attack and had collapsed on the yard before they got there. As it was I could climb inside the ambulance all by myself so no problem, but the thought certainly occurred to me, wondering what they would have done if I had been unconscious and lying on the ground. Well, maybe they would have been able to do it, but what is pretty certain it would have taken them way more time than the same job would have taken for two men, or even if just one of them had been a man. When I was younger I got some personal experiences trying to get mostly unconscious and almost totally limp drunks inside a car, out of a car, into the house, into a bed or at least a sofa, and yes, even when it's a skinny person when they go totally limp they can be surprisingly hard to lift or drag. When it's somebody with more weight, damn near impossible, and I even used to be pretty strong for a woman (I have always liked lifting weights).
Most cops are shit at doing their job, female cops are ten times worse due to trying to act like they have balls all the time.
Female Secret Service have to be even more fucking useless at their job than your typical female cop, like cluelessly getting in the way of others doing their job useless as we have just witnessed.
Give thanks to the PC from DC that made this all possible. I saw this starting decades ago and give thanks I retired from the SD back then. back then we had a few Judges and Magistrates just as ate up. We usually waited a day later to get the WFA's rather then deal with the no clue fool Magistrate that did not even know the State laws and the elements of each crime.
And I am still wondering if those unguarded roofs and a few other mishaps that seem to have happened during that shooting are just due to hires who were really unqualified for their job, or if there was something deliberate about those - somebody who could order them around knew what was about to happen and had been ordered to make sure the shooter (or shooters?) would have good chance to accomplish their purpose?
And third alternative, they had not been ordered to act in ways to give the shooter a chance, they were just bad at their jobs, but somebody had made sure that the ones Trump got in the first place were the worst qualified in the whole group. Which made the chance of some shooter or similar to succeed that much higher. So not an active attempt from the Secret Service or police side to aid a shooter, but still a deliberate one made in hopes that this might happen, and the shooter succeed, but sort of an attempt anyway even if only a passive one.
Amen, I am not buying they are bad at their jobs either. Just like I did not buy that Oswald would have been at the book Despository building waitng for JFK if the route which was known did not come even come by the Book Despository building. That change was a last second chnage and violated SOP for open limos of no turns and no stop and slaowing down. The last second chnage brought the limo right by the Book Despository building.
The shot apprears to have come from behind President Trump . Also appears he turned in the direction the shot came from . That information would all need to be confirmed by President Trump.
Trust me I live near Butler. They are the most conservative farm area people. This was done by the Deep State. No way would someone tell the police that there is a shooter on the roof with a rifle and they ignore it.
Why did the officer not engage the suspect when he went up the ladder. Suspect has rifle and goes up a ladder you better believe that rifle would be pointed at you. You would engage and the sniper would assist you. Then how was all this activity missed ?
True. Women do have a place in those jobs (there are situations when the wives and daughters and female politicians etc who are being guarded by them will mostly not want strange men around but they still should not be left alone) but there definitely should be a pretty clear divide between what the female agents are assigned to do vs what the men do.
The problem is they hire DS BS Puppets and not people who are actually qualified.
Well, they need a few women, as the wives and daughters need protection too and might not want a male to accompany her to the toilet or a few other places. And there might be a woman president one day, same thing.
But those women should very, very carefully selected, and truly only the best should have the chance to get the job. Not just because they happen to be a woman, and they want some percentage of women...
Highly trained with demonstrated skill only. Spatial awareness is a key cognitive skill in eliminating physical threats. The average man outclasses even +2 sigma best women when you match up normal distributions (due to hormone diff). So these women SS better have men working with or for them to cover that capability gap. When it comes to life and death, team capability is the ONLY thing that matters.
-Cheatle (sarcastic mocking)
Facts
DEI hire almost cost Trump his life. Fire her IMMEDIATELY.
Another example of the PC from DC failure programs. Amen to the firing her immediately.
Overall, women should not be in jobs that require a certain amount of strength. Women are not built like men and don't have a man's strength. Jobs that require strength and toughness like policemen, firemen, SS agents are not suitable for the average woman. This puts everyone at risk: the woman, her partner and the people they are trying to help.
Size matters if you're acting as a human cover.
I agree on the physical build and requirements.
True in general, but I'd like to point out what I have already said: there are situations where a woman is more useful than a man. With Secret Service, they do also protect women, the wives and daughters, and even the president's job will probably one of these days be filled by a woman. And, well, toilets, showers - let's say they suspect something may be off when a young barely teenage daughter of a president is taking a shower, would you really want the first person to peek there in order to see if there is a problem or not to be a man? Especially if there isn't...
The same with police. Undercover jobs will need women sometimes, but even the street cop duties will have occasions when a woman will be the better choice. Like maybe checking a woman, or especially a teen girl, for weapons. Might raise bit of a storm if a male cop went feeling all over a young woman's body, especially if then later they found out it was something like a mistaken identity, or the girl had had nothing to do with the crime after all.
And so on.
And those women definitely should be as well trained as the men, and preferably also be able to get experience at the job if they need to do it.
The problem is of course that now they are trying to get too many women into those jobs, and they don't demand enough of the women they do take.
So, MOST of the people in those jobs should be men. And the far fewer women who are accepted into those jobs should be the ones with abilities, especially when it comes to their physical ones, at the top class of their sex.
I agree with you. There are times when it helps to have a woman. That's why I put the caveat: overall.
The head of the Secret Service, Kimberly A. Cheatle was previously a SS agent and head of security for Pepsi Cola. Her goal was to have the SS 30% female by 2030.
DEI = DIE
I watched the entire incident frame by frame.
When the shooting first started the SS men closet to Trump acted quickly, jumping on his body to protect him.
Then other secret service bounded up the stairs to the stage for additional help. There was this petite female SS agent at the bottom of the stairs. For several seconds she just bent over so she wouldn't get hit.
The female secret service agent with the bun that led Trump out, got on the stage and didn't know what to do. Another agent told her to surround Trump. And she did that, but she was so short, his head was visible and not protected. She was just too short.
The men were calmer and more purposeful. The Director of the Secret Service is Kimberly Cheatle wants the 30% of the SS to be females. There's already an internal petition amongst the SS to have her removed before this happened.
WOMEN AND MEN ARE DIFFERENT WITH DIFFERENT SKILL SETS.
I don't know how many times I've seen female cops try to arrest someone and they can't. They don't have the strength to muscle a man who either beats them up or runs away. Most of the time regular men have to jump in to help.
I know someone who would have made a fantastic fireman. When offered the job he declined because he didn't want to rely on a woman to back him up. He thought it would be too dangerous. And I agree.
The petite female it was obvious she had no clue. I noted she was doing more ducking then protection. We used to have height resatrictions in LE. The reson being shorter Officers are more prone to be attacked then taller Officers. As a former FTO with the SD new hires were not considered any help until they had proven themselves in the Real World. Rookies had to earn respect. So consider yourself alone until the Rookie proves themselves. Your backup may be 15 to 20 minutes away. You would have a idea as they checked 10-8 10-17 with their location. Until then you are on your own.
in the military the PT Test shows proof of this as male requirements are different between males and females along with age for those very reasons.
I already noticed back then the quality of officers was slowly going downhill. We had a situation where a small town PD hired a rookie officer . He had been working for them about a year and early on we stressed the importance of learning his 10 codes. I was 5 miles out and another Deputy was also several miles out whe the call came in for the bank robbery in progress. The call was given to him. The other Deputy and myself checked 10-8 10-17 to back him up. He responded back to the dispatcher he was doing a interview with someone and would respond as soon as he cleaared the interview. This was several minutes later after he had already 10-4d the call. Needless to say informed the responding Deputy to park at the 3 'clock position at the bank and i would take the 1 o'clock position so we could have a 360 view of the bank. He was only two blocks away and we arrived before he did. When dispatch called stating the bank had called the suspects had left. There are a few more stories similar to this but made me thankful I was retiring.
They are not hiring the best and most qualified ,and now this is showing the results of this foolishness.
DEI really stands for DIE.
The modern day version of our old school term for brain dead .
Great analysis of the situation. In jobs like this competency and actual ability are what matters, diversity should be the least important thing.
I wouldn't be against having female SS, I could see a slight strategic advantage in them being more unassuming and when protecting other females/kids it might make them more comfortable. I also think women are better than men at reading body language, which I think would be very useful for a job like this.
However, you need to be very cognizant in exactly what skills and ability you are losing and what you are gaining by making that decision. Women have a lot of weaknesses that the rest of the security detail will need to make up for, and everyone should be honest in determining if it's worth it; not worth it for diversity, but worth it as in "Is the team stronger or weaker now?". If weaker, they shouldn't be there.
Yes, it helps to have SOME women. But that tiny thing with the bun taking him off the stage was way too short. His whole face and neck was exposed. Also, when she ran onstage she didn't know what to do. Another SS told her to surround Trump.
The female SS with the pony tail was ducking at the bottom of the stairs, trying not to get shot when the shooting was going on. You can't have people like that, driven by their emotions.
And there was a third female SS overweight and out of shape fumbling around. They were fidgeting with their sunglasses, didn't know what to do with their guns and even fumbled putting them back in the holster.
If you hire women, make sure they are as competent as Gina Carrano or Rhonda Rousey
And the people to surround the target must be taller than the target! They must be designated in advance.
Yep! We have a few females on our fire dept who can’t do much physically. Never going interior with them. Fuck their feelings about that.
After females were allowed to be firefighters they made it permissible to drag someone downstairs letting their head bump every stair.
Competency, intelligence and skills TRUMPS any PC crap.
Oh, now you can imagine the flack I caught when I was discussing firefighting with some people a few years back, and how women have no place in that world. I was ridiculed, scorned, and even eschewed by a couple of family members - and this was about firefighting, not a security detail. My argument centered on physics: I am 6'3, 300#. Used to box and weightlift and have fought a few fires in my day. If I'm wearing all the necessary equipment, including oxygen tanks, and I go down for some reason and you have to drag me out of a compartment, a petite female who might be a badass back at the station is not going to be able to do it, period - and I would die. Simple physics - with equipment, I'm pushing 360#, plus there is the phenomenon of "dead weight." Rescue simply will not happen. This is what you get, folks. This is what you get.
I was glad with we did not have that issue when I was in the Military as women were not in combat units. I did hear that would be coming down the road. They claim equality then we should have one standard PT test with everyone by age would all have to make the 2 mile runs based on one time for age. Not based on male or female and giving the females more time.
With the SD we had some that held their own and a few we had to rescue. But then we had a few males like that also. I am old school if you can not hack it then pack it and find something else. Military, LE and Fire are not games and real people can lose real lives.
Heh. I have had to call an ambulance only once in my life, I had heart arrhythmia (turned out to be a basically non-dangerous, if unpleasant, variety). The two paramedics were both women, one older, one pretty skinny younger one.
Now, I'm afraid that I have gotten pretty fat in my old age. Considering my weight, I highly doubt those two women would have been able to get me on the stretcher and into the ambulance by themselves if I had actually been having something like a serious heart attack and had collapsed on the yard before they got there. As it was I could climb inside the ambulance all by myself so no problem, but the thought certainly occurred to me, wondering what they would have done if I had been unconscious and lying on the ground. Well, maybe they would have been able to do it, but what is pretty certain it would have taken them way more time than the same job would have taken for two men, or even if just one of them had been a man. When I was younger I got some personal experiences trying to get mostly unconscious and almost totally limp drunks inside a car, out of a car, into the house, into a bed or at least a sofa, and yes, even when it's a skinny person when they go totally limp they can be surprisingly hard to lift or drag. When it's somebody with more weight, damn near impossible, and I even used to be pretty strong for a woman (I have always liked lifting weights).
Didn't Earn It
Amen, that is my impression also. This is why I never complied with the PC from DC.
Most cops are shit at doing their job, female cops are ten times worse due to trying to act like they have balls all the time.
Female Secret Service have to be even more fucking useless at their job than your typical female cop, like cluelessly getting in the way of others doing their job useless as we have just witnessed.
Give thanks to the PC from DC that made this all possible. I saw this starting decades ago and give thanks I retired from the SD back then. back then we had a few Judges and Magistrates just as ate up. We usually waited a day later to get the WFA's rather then deal with the no clue fool Magistrate that did not even know the State laws and the elements of each crime.
And I am still wondering if those unguarded roofs and a few other mishaps that seem to have happened during that shooting are just due to hires who were really unqualified for their job, or if there was something deliberate about those - somebody who could order them around knew what was about to happen and had been ordered to make sure the shooter (or shooters?) would have good chance to accomplish their purpose?
And third alternative, they had not been ordered to act in ways to give the shooter a chance, they were just bad at their jobs, but somebody had made sure that the ones Trump got in the first place were the worst qualified in the whole group. Which made the chance of some shooter or similar to succeed that much higher. So not an active attempt from the Secret Service or police side to aid a shooter, but still a deliberate one made in hopes that this might happen, and the shooter succeed, but sort of an attempt anyway even if only a passive one.
Amen, I am not buying they are bad at their jobs either. Just like I did not buy that Oswald would have been at the book Despository building waitng for JFK if the route which was known did not come even come by the Book Despository building. That change was a last second chnage and violated SOP for open limos of no turns and no stop and slaowing down. The last second chnage brought the limo right by the Book Despository building.
The shot apprears to have come from behind President Trump . Also appears he turned in the direction the shot came from . That information would all need to be confirmed by President Trump.
My opinion is he was Deep State.
No way would anyone just know where to show up and know where on the roof to go.
I have the same suspicions. Lets see if they hide the therapist and prescription information. Like they are with Nashville.
Trust me I live near Butler. They are the most conservative farm area people. This was done by the Deep State. No way would someone tell the police that there is a shooter on the roof with a rifle and they ignore it.
That is the same problem I have. People are warning what is going on and all LE goes silent.
Amen.
Why did the officer not engage the suspect when he went up the ladder. Suspect has rifle and goes up a ladder you better believe that rifle would be pointed at you. You would engage and the sniper would assist you. Then how was all this activity missed ?
How does a woman who comes to his arm pit place herself between him and a bullet? She is literally only able to guard his bullet proof vest.
They normally have someone close to President Trumps size around him. The worse part is you could see she was totally clueless.
True. Women do have a place in those jobs (there are situations when the wives and daughters and female politicians etc who are being guarded by them will mostly not want strange men around but they still should not be left alone) but there definitely should be a pretty clear divide between what the female agents are assigned to do vs what the men do.
Start by firing Cheatle. Contrast this clown show with the way Secret Service responded when Reagan was shot.
I waiting to see how they handle this now. Thos week should really be interesting and busy for us.
She is DEI based. She is busy at a conference in Aspen, so don’t bother her.
She can resign her job from Aspen.