It's pretty on point for republicans to take 9 months to conduct an impeachment inquiry, waiting 3 months before the election and Biden not running to release the results.
Because the requirements for a conviction of treason are not being met. Plenty of illegal acts I would suppose, but treason is defined explicitly by the Constitution and this board consistently ignores that fact and that definition. People throw "treason" around like it is some kind of legal DDT. Don't be surprised when you are ultimately disappointed.
If you want "treason" to mean something actionable under law, it has to meet the Constitutional requirement. Otherwise, it is empty blowing of steam (which is my complaint).
But as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution:
Definition: In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the U.S., or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.[2]
Only the Constitutional definition counts. Biden has not levied war against the U.S., adhered to enemies, or given them aid and comfort. I think there is also a requirement that it be witnessed by two persons (this could be satisfied by public acts). If you can find that there was war being conducted against the U.S. by a foreign power and he obeyed or helped them, that would fit. But simply being a tyrant or corrupt office-holder would not satisfy the definition. So, no.
Who? Are we at war with them, or they with us? And by what acts witnessed, by whom? If you don't have verifiable answers to these tests, you ain't got nothin'.
Constitution, Article III, Section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Disagree. Justice has already been taken care of in Joes case, we just arent aware of it yet. Same as Bush and McCain.
But Im not worried about them atm. Joes appearance in this movie is quickly coming to a close. This has to end here and now and while publicly flogging Joe would be satisfying to all, there are bigger fish to fry if we are to secure the freedom and safety of 8 billion people.
I am sure History will remark on Joes fate. Hopefully we see it as soon as our grandchildrens future is secured. Anons need to look past singular events and realize the enormity of this war, how it all fits together, and how we achieve ultimate victory. Because Justice for a puppet doesnt get us far.
What I'm saying is why did they release this without all of the evidence? It's all out there, but they failed to include a single piece in this report, it's a rush job that will get blown off by everyone who needs to read it.
The evidence they point to is Hunter saying "10% for the Big Guy" but in the next sentence Jim Jordan even says he doesn't really know who the Big Guy is, they're assuming it is Big Joe. That's bullshit.
Such brave cucks.
Knew about this for decades, but now that he is senile, as dropped out of the race, is STILL the resident President; the cucks borrowed someone else's balls and are floating the idea of impeachment.
I recall it wasn't too long ago that the DEMS filed 3 (THREE) Impeachments with fabricated data, falsified FISA Warrants and outright lies against Trump.
But the cucks were all huddled in a corner, counting the money.
Rope, we need lots and lots of strong, American made, Hemp rope.
It's pretty on point for republicans to take 9 months to conduct an impeachment inquiry, waiting 3 months before the election and Biden not running to release the results.
Just shows how much they are controlled.
or does it show that timing is everything
Agree
Not much longer
By Israel
Amen. Thank you for sharing this.
u/#ummwhat
Military is the only way .
They can't bring themselves to say the word TREASON!
I have the same impression.
Because the requirements for a conviction of treason are not being met. Plenty of illegal acts I would suppose, but treason is defined explicitly by the Constitution and this board consistently ignores that fact and that definition. People throw "treason" around like it is some kind of legal DDT. Don't be surprised when you are ultimately disappointed.
When you sell out your country for profit is treason to me. Maybe that doesn’t meet the requirements of the law but it meets mine. Keke
If you want "treason" to mean something actionable under law, it has to meet the Constitutional requirement. Otherwise, it is empty blowing of steam (which is my complaint).
The dictionary definition:
treason
/trē′zən/
noun
a crime that undermines the offender's government
disloyalty by virtue of subversive behavior
an act of deliberate betrayal
But as defined in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution:
Definition: In Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, treason is specifically limited to levying war against the U.S., or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.[2]
Joes action meet both definitions.
Only the Constitutional definition counts. Biden has not levied war against the U.S., adhered to enemies, or given them aid and comfort. I think there is also a requirement that it be witnessed by two persons (this could be satisfied by public acts). If you can find that there was war being conducted against the U.S. by a foreign power and he obeyed or helped them, that would fit. But simply being a tyrant or corrupt office-holder would not satisfy the definition. So, no.
He most certainly has conspired with enemies of this nation.
Who? Are we at war with them, or they with us? And by what acts witnessed, by whom? If you don't have verifiable answers to these tests, you ain't got nothin'.
Constitution, Article III, Section 3:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
and it will all be swept under the rug waiting for another Trump indictment .....
Disagree. Justice has already been taken care of in Joes case, we just arent aware of it yet. Same as Bush and McCain.
But Im not worried about them atm. Joes appearance in this movie is quickly coming to a close. This has to end here and now and while publicly flogging Joe would be satisfying to all, there are bigger fish to fry if we are to secure the freedom and safety of 8 billion people.
I am sure History will remark on Joes fate. Hopefully we see it as soon as our grandchildrens future is secured. Anons need to look past singular events and realize the enormity of this war, how it all fits together, and how we achieve ultimate victory. Because Justice for a puppet doesnt get us far.
That is what they are hoping for.
Thanks for releasing this after he's already been mopped up.
Gee, I wonder if that's the reason?
I suspect the DNC will repalce Horizontal and Walz .
me too. Heels up doesn't seem like she can take the heat for very much longer.
We are on the same page.
The gears of justice continue to (slowly and steadily) turn!
Amen.
If true, there must be indictments for all the FBI and CIA agents who covered it up because it's not believable they didn't know.
Amen. I suspect the same.
Great!🤷🏼♂️
They are done with Biden, they don't just want him not to run, they want him gone.
I suspect the Horizontal and Walz switchy is coming also.
I just read through this, when it comes to the evidence part, they just skip over it, wtf are they doing, it's all out in the open and available
Exactly, they can not put the genie back in the bottle.
What I'm saying is why did they release this without all of the evidence? It's all out there, but they failed to include a single piece in this report, it's a rush job that will get blown off by everyone who needs to read it.
The evidence they point to is Hunter saying "10% for the Big Guy" but in the next sentence Jim Jordan even says he doesn't really know who the Big Guy is, they're assuming it is Big Joe. That's bullshit.
We did have a while back where it was made known the Big Guy was Buyden.
Then why didn't Jim Jordan show that instead of saying that it was just a guess?
Jordan has to explain this.
...and? What action will be taken?
Lets see how this plays out.
Lol - do we have a choice?!
I have no words.
Amen. They knew.
Absolutely Lakota.
Amen
impeachment 👣👣👣👣 Treason
So where is the MSM in reporting this ? MIA ?
Only a moron would attempt to impeach a senile old man at this point.
I agree. But it reminds me of this and is it a possibility.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/vincent-gigante
Nooooo? Really? I am stupified shocked. 🙄
OOOO. A strongly worded report! Now we're getting somewhere.
Such brave cucks. Knew about this for decades, but now that he is senile, as dropped out of the race, is STILL the resident President; the cucks borrowed someone else's balls and are floating the idea of impeachment.
I recall it wasn't too long ago that the DEMS filed 3 (THREE) Impeachments with fabricated data, falsified FISA Warrants and outright lies against Trump.
But the cucks were all huddled in a corner, counting the money.
Rope, we need lots and lots of strong, American made, Hemp rope.