Yeah, I 100% know that the vax is a time bomb, but this study kind of sux if you want to use it to show evidence of that fact. There are two issues to be aware of if you want to use this, so be ready to counter: 1. There was no “control”,
Because it was a study of other ‘studies’. 2. It was only through March 2022. They need to do a study through mid-2024. 2023 was when when a shit ton of those kids who got ‘boosted’ had horrible outcomes. We need a hard core, “peer-reviewed” publication. FYI, on a personal opine, peer-reviewing anything is no longer valuable. All sciences, Medical or otherwise, have been almost completely compromised.
That is only one type of control group. There are at least three -- one of which is completely satisfied by this scenario.
Types of Control Groups:
Placebo Control Group: Receives an inert treatment (like a sugar pill), which looks identical to the actual treatment but has no therapeutic effect. This helps to measure the placebo effect.
Active Control Group: Receives an existing, standard treatment for the condition. This is used when it would be unethical to give a placebo because an effective treatment already exists.
No Treatment Control Group: Receives no treatment at all, which can be used when the natural progression of the disease or condition is well understood and withholding treatment doesn't pose ethical issues.
Yeah, where in that study did they present a control group? I didnt see one, but I might have missed it. How many werenin the control group if there was one?
BY DEFINITION, a control group is all the people who DIDN'T 'take the medicine'.
So when this study says that 'among those that didn't take the vaxx', there were ZERO kids who got myocarditis or pericarditis -- THAT is the control group.
If you disagree, please tell me what the criteria of 'being in a control group' would be? (Hint: It's 'not taking the vaxx'.)
Yeah, thats not how it works. It isnt. The control subjects are known and evaluated to present a "baseline group not presented the thing being monitored or studied". Just saying "everyone else is the control". No, sorry, thats not a control group fren. It isnt.
You say that a control group is 'known and evaluated'. All those who did not take the vaxx are 'known' (they didn't take the vaxx), and have been 'evaluated' (they don't have heart problems). Therefore, they are known to 'not present with the thing being monitored or studied'. What more do you need?
So, using your own words, all the kids who don't currently have heart problems are a control group. Unless, of course, you want to claim that they used to have heart problems, and they went away.
The “control group” in a medical study are individuals that are KNOWN, SELECTED. and EVALUATED individually.
EXAMPLE: Johnny fits the age group range for the sample set being studied in an ACTUAL MEDICAL STUDY. Johnny agrees to participate in the study. Johnny visits a medical professional and undergoes an evaluation (questionnaires, vitals, maybe blood work). Johnnys buddy Joey also, did not get the vax, but he was not interested in filling out stuff. JOEY IS NOT PART OF THE CONTROL GROUP IN THIS ACTUAL MEDICAL STUDY.
A CONTROL GROUP in an ACTUAL STUDY, is made up of a bunch of Johnnys. Not “everyone else”.
There … the next method to help you understand will involve crayons and pop-up books.
"We have all this data that conclusively proves that the vaxx is bad, but because we don't have the right paperwork -- just ignore it. tHerE wAs nO cONtroL gRoup!"
I'm a fan of truth. I'm a fan of the scientific method (and yes, when lives are at stake I'm willing to forgo the 'proper paperwork').
A control group should represent what would happen if the intervention or variable in question was not introduced, which often aims to reflect what is 'normal' or typical within a larger population. There are some studies where the control group 'signs up', and there are others where the control group is the 'background population'. See 'observational studies', 'natural experiments', 'public health interventions', some 'cohort studies', and more.
This is a review of studies with similar cohorts to analyze the data in a pool- a metanalysis. The "controls" are in each individual study in the review- 12 studies were included after removing duplicates and studies that didn't fit the criteria and/or patient age groups
"Myocarditis and pericarditis in children and adolescents after the COVID‐19 vaccines were more prevalent among males and more commonly observed after the second dose of Pfizer."
We Need Someone To Coin A Phrase Like Unrealized Capital Gains... Unrealized Crimes Against Humanity (referring to the people/children yet to be harmed) Someone coin a Phrase, please!
Some posts by www.midwesterndoctor.com I've read over the past few months mention colleagues that have patients that they think received saline jabs. I don't recall any expansion on the thought, however. Still, it's hopeful.
I personally think that Trump was able to disrupt the distribution of many harmful vials of vaccine. This thought is congruent with his constant claim of saving "millions of lives" with Operation Warp Speed, despite knowing how harmful mRNA injections are. I'm pretty sure there is a reason why he doesn't just "shut up about the vaccine" as so many in MAGA lament.
I hope it's true for the sake of my brothers and their families, as well as yours. My mother, a true Covidian, drew a poisoned jab somewhere along the chain, and was lost to turbo lung cancer not long after.
Yes, these things are obvious to us. They're also obvious to a lot of the left, but they are too stupid, too stubborn, too sinister, or too scared to admit the truth.
Yeah, I 100% know that the vax is a time bomb, but this study kind of sux if you want to use it to show evidence of that fact. There are two issues to be aware of if you want to use this, so be ready to counter: 1. There was no “control”, Because it was a study of other ‘studies’. 2. It was only through March 2022. They need to do a study through mid-2024. 2023 was when when a shit ton of those kids who got ‘boosted’ had horrible outcomes. We need a hard core, “peer-reviewed” publication. FYI, on a personal opine, peer-reviewing anything is no longer valuable. All sciences, Medical or otherwise, have been almost completely compromised.
Peer reviewing has become an incestuous and exclusive club, for sure.
Criticizing methodology is fair and important grounds though, science needs sound methodology with reproducible results.
Circular affirmations fueled by grant and royalty monies. The minute you monetize science, it no longer becomes science.
I don't understand 'there is no control'.
The 'control' group is made up of the kids that did NOT get vaxxed.
What other type of 'control' is there?
They were supposed to get a placebo shot, according to the so called experts.
That is only one type of control group. There are at least three -- one of which is completely satisfied by this scenario.
Types of Control Groups:
Yeah, where in that study did they present a control group? I didnt see one, but I might have missed it. How many werenin the control group if there was one?
BY DEFINITION, a control group is all the people who DIDN'T 'take the medicine'.
So when this study says that 'among those that didn't take the vaxx', there were ZERO kids who got myocarditis or pericarditis -- THAT is the control group.
If you disagree, please tell me what the criteria of 'being in a control group' would be? (Hint: It's 'not taking the vaxx'.)
Yeah, thats not how it works. It isnt. The control subjects are known and evaluated to present a "baseline group not presented the thing being monitored or studied". Just saying "everyone else is the control". No, sorry, thats not a control group fren. It isnt.
Using your own definition...
You say that a control group is 'known and evaluated'. All those who did not take the vaxx are 'known' (they didn't take the vaxx), and have been 'evaluated' (they don't have heart problems). Therefore, they are known to 'not present with the thing being monitored or studied'. What more do you need?
So, using your own words, all the kids who don't currently have heart problems are a control group. Unless, of course, you want to claim that they used to have heart problems, and they went away.
OK, let us try this one more time … Barney style:
The “control group” in a medical study are individuals that are KNOWN, SELECTED. and EVALUATED individually.
EXAMPLE: Johnny fits the age group range for the sample set being studied in an ACTUAL MEDICAL STUDY. Johnny agrees to participate in the study. Johnny visits a medical professional and undergoes an evaluation (questionnaires, vitals, maybe blood work). Johnnys buddy Joey also, did not get the vax, but he was not interested in filling out stuff. JOEY IS NOT PART OF THE CONTROL GROUP IN THIS ACTUAL MEDICAL STUDY.
A CONTROL GROUP in an ACTUAL STUDY, is made up of a bunch of Johnnys. Not “everyone else”.
There … the next method to help you understand will involve crayons and pop-up books.
You sound like a DC bureaucrat.
"We have all this data that conclusively proves that the vaxx is bad, but because we don't have the right paperwork -- just ignore it. tHerE wAs nO cONtroL gRoup!"
I'm a fan of truth. I'm a fan of the scientific method (and yes, when lives are at stake I'm willing to forgo the 'proper paperwork').
A control group should represent what would happen if the intervention or variable in question was not introduced, which often aims to reflect what is 'normal' or typical within a larger population. There are some studies where the control group 'signs up', and there are others where the control group is the 'background population'. See 'observational studies', 'natural experiments', 'public health interventions', some 'cohort studies', and more.
We can agree to disagree.
This is a review of studies with similar cohorts to analyze the data in a pool- a metanalysis. The "controls" are in each individual study in the review- 12 studies were included after removing duplicates and studies that didn't fit the criteria and/or patient age groups
👍👌
"Myocarditis and pericarditis in children and adolescents after the COVID‐19 vaccines were more prevalent among males and more commonly observed after the second dose of Pfizer."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10018089/#:~:text=The%20pooled%20incidence%20of%20myocarditis,the%20second%20dose%20of%20Pfizer.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346
We Need Someone To Coin A Phrase Like Unrealized Capital Gains... Unrealized Crimes Against Humanity (referring to the people/children yet to be harmed) Someone coin a Phrase, please!
You just did.
Everyone that pushed this crap and made it mandatory should hang.
That's a large list, but pretty sure some already have. Keep exposing!!
That’s why they wanted to vaccinate everyone so that no one could compare.
Starting to no longer give any fucks when I trigger cognitive dissonance chimp outs.
Whether is a tranz nazi or feminazi, I have no spoonfuls of fucks left to give
There was a theory floating around a while ago that said the white hats dropped some saline shots in the batches.
Really hope that turned out to be true because both my parents, my sister, and brother in law got the shot. 😞
So far so good, but it's still always in the back of my mind that one of them might develop something or, God forbid, die suddenly.
Some posts by www.midwesterndoctor.com I've read over the past few months mention colleagues that have patients that they think received saline jabs. I don't recall any expansion on the thought, however. Still, it's hopeful.
I personally think that Trump was able to disrupt the distribution of many harmful vials of vaccine. This thought is congruent with his constant claim of saving "millions of lives" with Operation Warp Speed, despite knowing how harmful mRNA injections are. I'm pretty sure there is a reason why he doesn't just "shut up about the vaccine" as so many in MAGA lament.
I hope it's true for the sake of my brothers and their families, as well as yours. My mother, a true Covidian, drew a poisoned jab somewhere along the chain, and was lost to turbo lung cancer not long after.
we’re not supposed to know this until 75 years from now
Ha, was just scrolling down through posts here listening to X22, Dave was just mentioning this as I scrolled.
Great, I stopped watching kek
The only reason kids were targeted was to use the "emergency" clause to sell more.
Yes, these things are obvious to us. They're also obvious to a lot of the left, but they are too stupid, too stubborn, too sinister, or too scared to admit the truth.
Absolutely criminal.
….