Why would you register anything with the government when you can vote without an ID?

Go out of state and buy it. NEVER COMPLY with such bullshit.

No law repugnant to the Constitution shall have any validity, force or effect

I'm glad the criminals will follow this law.

Do not comply.

That makes no sense. How can a state by law impose a federal requirement? They cannot.

I would choose to be a criminal in Massachusetts

I'm never registering anything associated with any of my weapons (of all kinds) with ANY government.

It is the distinct hill I will literally die on....

Null, void.

That sounds pretty repugnant to me. Remember: you are not obliged to comply with any statute, "law", or mandate that infringes upon your GOD-given constitutional rights.

How can you register ammo? It is expendable! Do you have to report every round you use??

Or lost in a boating accident??

Yeah fuck off Mass

Make your own.

Ignore those fools.

20 comments not any 2nd amendment person says...THERE IS NO FEDERAL LAW REQUIRED to register ammunition. The only law for ammunition is if you imported a large amount of Ammo outside the USA, and that is just for applying import taxes correctly so they can make a buck. Fellas are you this far gone? You guys are quickly slipping away from reality and only do REACTIVE thinking, that is when they got you. Shouldn't we lift the standard a bit on this website, it's getting bad

The only people who need to buy ammo one week before the election are Leftards and criminals. I think the rest of us have enough to last through any war they try to start.

“Register” -> “Regis” -> “It’s the king’s property now.”

Massachusetts statute violates court rulings.

They are repugnant to the constitution and can get bent.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1967702

This Article chronologically reviews the British gun control which precipitated the American Revolution: the 1774 import ban on firearms and gun powder; the 1774-75 confiscations of firearms and gun powder, from individuals and from local governments; and the use of violence to effectuate the confiscations. It was these events which changed a situation of rising political tension into a shooting war. Each of these British abuses provides insights into the scope of the modern Second Amendment.

From the events of 1774-75, we can discern that import restrictions or bans on firearms or ammunition are constitutionally suspect — at least if their purpose is to disarm the public, rather than for the normal purposes of import controls (e.g., raising tax revenue, or protecting domestic industry). We can discern that broad attempts to disarm the people of a town, or to render them defenseless, are anathema to the Second Amendment; such disarmament is what the British tried to impose, and what the Americans fought a war to ensure could never again happen in America. Similarly, gun licensing laws which have the purpose or effect of only allowing a minority of the people to keep and bear arms would be unconstitutional. Finally, we see that government violence, which should always be carefully constrained and controlled, should be especially discouraged when it is used to take firearms away from peaceable citizens. Use of the military for law enforcement is particularly odious to the principles upon which the American Revolution was based.

How is one supposed to register ammunition with the federal government when there is no process with the feds to do such a thing?

What total bullshit.

Just a reminder that the governor of that state is an insane childless lesbian who has her assiatant as her lover.

I don't think this will have an affect on any domestic conflict. I believe most of the anons are in possession of thousands of rounds already, and none of us will be complying with this bullshit laws.

Once the dust settles the 2A will never be challenged again.

This is not a box of ammo.

This identifies as a box of trainee Duracell batteries.

Violation of 18 USC 241/ 242

Hindering the enjoyment of a right secured by the constitution.

FoR YoUr SaFeTy.

LOL!!!

What Ammunition?

Good luck with that.

Marbury v. Madison: The full opinion. 1803

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/5/137.html?DCMP=google:ppc:K-FLPortal:10313486553:103002902536&HBX_PK=&sid=1021667&source=google~ppc

Are they really registering ammunition at the federal level? Perhaps this is a work around for the prohibition on the creation of a federal firearms registry. It is illegal for BATFE to create or keep a registry of firearms owners under the law. This is why they made specific language addressing the keeping of a list of NICS applicants, the legislation requires the destruction of NICS applicant's list within 24 hours of said application. In other words, when you do a background check when purchasing a firearm, the record of that application must be destroyed within 24 hours.

I lost all 15 pistols, 6 rifles, 3 shotguns and many thousand rounds in an unfortunate boating accident.

i have a friend with a big, big boat. he likes to buy in bulk, so if he bought enough to share with everyone and the boat accidentally sank, oh well.

This has got to be against the constitution...

Stores right across border will rage...like casinos