I dabble in hobby A.I. as well as train deep learning models at work. Consider predictive text on your phone. Now scale it up with neural networks and more processing power. You can now converse with it as it gives weights and values to words and phrases to arrive at the best statistical response. You're talking to math.. but it is coherent. Now, give it a black site super quantum computer that can run infinite simultaneous simulations due to parallel omnipresent juxtapositions of data and you have a system that can give you a scripted playbook for arriving at a precise desired outcome in the future. This is how I grasp project looking glass. If I've hit the nail on the head, somebody get me outa this hellride-to-nowhere job I work at.
Do you believe we have obtained full quantum in hidden labs?
I'm in cyber so I follow quantum computing to a degree. But based on everything I know so far the technology still has a long way to go and traditional computing is still faster.
I think they slow rolling AI out right now. If you think about it dedicated chips, different architectures made for AI could be way better than some GPU clusters.
I very much doubt it. The algorithms aren't there. The engineering to build the hardware to read the wind isn't there for Rube Goldberg quantum machines nor Turing complete finite state qbit solutions.
What wouldn't surprise me is prototype hardware that allows binary computers to access hardware that acts as a GPU (QPU) with 3 to 8 states per bit and sufficient parity that exceeds what academic labs are doing. It might be physically huge and full of kludgy coding and engineering and sloppy but statistically accurate enough algorithms to get a lot of hardware running in parallel. Not at all in a reasonable state to trickle down to private industry and full of dead ends but still doing things that were impossible 5 years ago.
24 (...put in submission)
Nov 01, 2017 1:27:03 AM EDT
Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No. 147448408
Any person making statements they will not be seeking RE-ELECTION was put in submission. For the betterment of the country not all will be prosecuted and all will do as told. You will see more of this occur (not normal yet disregarded) and even on the D side.
This is not a Q proof. You are cherrypicking one post out of six that have "53-47" in them and citing a coincidental numerical similarity to something unrelated. Q proofs need to be more rigorous than that.
They were just talking about the Senate balance after the 2018 midterms and assuring us that the Senate was the target and that we still had the control we needed after losing the House.
People say that trumps truth post of # was deleted after 17 minutes but I cannot find proof that is true? I don’t see any record of a deleted truth. Can anyone find confirmation. Not saying it’s not true but would like to verify somehow.
Epic, i thought Qagg just replaced it with that, but you seem to be right, other deleted posts still have their normal numbers. https://qagg.news/?read=TT24047
Any official sources publish the 53-47? I know that it’s close to that but you know how normies are. If you don’t show them some sort of “unbiased” source that literally spells it all out for them they gonna throw this in the bin
I dabble in hobby A.I. as well as train deep learning models at work. Consider predictive text on your phone. Now scale it up with neural networks and more processing power. You can now converse with it as it gives weights and values to words and phrases to arrive at the best statistical response. You're talking to math.. but it is coherent. Now, give it a black site super quantum computer that can run infinite simultaneous simulations due to parallel omnipresent juxtapositions of data and you have a system that can give you a scripted playbook for arriving at a precise desired outcome in the future. This is how I grasp project looking glass. If I've hit the nail on the head, somebody get me outa this hellride-to-nowhere job I work at.
Hari Seldon, is that you?
Do you believe we have obtained full quantum in hidden labs?
I'm in cyber so I follow quantum computing to a degree. But based on everything I know so far the technology still has a long way to go and traditional computing is still faster.
I think they slow rolling AI out right now. If you think about it dedicated chips, different architectures made for AI could be way better than some GPU clusters.
Considering (it's estimated) that U.S. military black programs are 50-80 yrs ahead of general pop access
Yeah man. Don’t need to engineer it if you already recover it from a crashed craft.
What we're allowed to see is often lagging behind. Wireless communication was being tested in 1895.
I very much doubt it. The algorithms aren't there. The engineering to build the hardware to read the wind isn't there for Rube Goldberg quantum machines nor Turing complete finite state qbit solutions.
What wouldn't surprise me is prototype hardware that allows binary computers to access hardware that acts as a GPU (QPU) with 3 to 8 states per bit and sufficient parity that exceeds what academic labs are doing. It might be physically huge and full of kludgy coding and engineering and sloppy but statistically accurate enough algorithms to get a lot of hardware running in parallel. Not at all in a reasonable state to trickle down to private industry and full of dead ends but still doing things that were impossible 5 years ago.
Yes. NSF is spearheading the charge. They are the next DARPA - AI, Quantum, Antarctica, etc.
outNC
damn why cant i be as autistic as you
Sounds like the omniscience of God.
2606 Dec 12, 2018 6:42:51 PM EST Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0836cc No. 4280202 Dec 12, 2018 6:42:27 PM EST Anonymous ID: aafacb No. 4280192
24 (...put in submission) Nov 01, 2017 1:27:03 AM EDT Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No. 147448408 Any person making statements they will not be seeking RE-ELECTION was put in submission. For the betterment of the country not all will be prosecuted and all will do as told. You will see more of this occur (not normal yet disregarded) and even on the D side.
Ok thats actually insane
Guys, please use your heads https://qanon.pub/?q=53-47
This is not a Q proof. You are cherrypicking one post out of six that have "53-47" in them and citing a coincidental numerical similarity to something unrelated. Q proofs need to be more rigorous than that.
They were just talking about the Senate balance after the 2018 midterms and assuring us that the Senate was the target and that we still had the control we needed after losing the House.
The delta connects them, which is how many proofs are are found from the crumbs, so no it is not just plucked out of thin air.
Multiple meanings exist Mr Handshake, and, out of a hell of a lot of cherry picked "proofs" recently, this is certainly a compelling one!
This is exactly what I posted.. Lol.
It's okay.
Yeah sorry, only saw that after.
No problem at all.
People say that trumps truth post of # was deleted after 17 minutes but I cannot find proof that is true? I don’t see any record of a deleted truth. Can anyone find confirmation. Not saying it’s not true but would like to verify somehow.
I can't find the link to the post on Truth Social - does anyone have it?
It was DELETED AFTER 17 MINUTES. 💥
here it is on Qagg https://qagg.news/?read=TT24402
Interesting it says "Truth Social: 171717 "
The other deleted posts are way larger numbers.
Edit: Someone on the TS team forced that post to be # 171717
Qagg.news scrapes the post number directly from TS.
Epic, i thought Qagg just replaced it with that, but you seem to be right, other deleted posts still have their normal numbers. https://qagg.news/?read=TT24047
That delta is very tasty. This pepetard approves 😋
I posted same but deleted it, cuz we don’t need redundancy. Great post OP ✊🏻
Any official sources publish the 53-47? I know that it’s close to that but you know how normies are. If you don’t show them some sort of “unbiased” source that literally spells it all out for them they gonna throw this in the bin
I think we are waiting on Arizona or Pa. Not sure which exactly
For dessert, check the post that syncs with the time of the post. Time: 20:10:27 = 2127
https://qagg.news/?q=&q2=2127
I was just looking for a Q post it's been nearly two years, this is even better! An amazing Q proof.
Trump also posted and deleted the '#' back on September 13th. There's 2435 days between that and the same 'CHECKMATE.' drop.
Q#2435 is a Nov 6 delta about voting. u/queue-anon
u/#q2435
Should be 54-46. Kari Lake should be there.