Hypothetical, if the House cannot decide upon a Speaker before 12 Noon Jan. and the Electoral College Vote has not been tallied in Congress and certified, then what?
No Speaker of the House, so next in line is the President Pro Tempore of the Senate = usually the ranking member = will be Senator Charles E. Grassley!
Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S. Code Section 19)
In the link here to the Congressional discussions, it was noted that the Constitution has succession rules to follow when the presidency is vacant and there are Cabinet Officers in a President’s administration who can fill in.
In this upcoming Jan. 2025 scenario, there is no Certification of Trump by Jan. 20 Noon and a temporary officer needs to fill in temporarily.
Interesting. Thanks for posting it. 👍
Stickying this for discussion while also noting at the same time that many Anons already called that people will start panicking about certification next. Have fun!
Just one more thing that Trump has a foolproof plan for. Whatever we know about, he knows about plus 10 times more.
👆👆👆👆👆 This.
First it was there will be no election.
Now no certification.
Quit spinning out of control.
Then once certification happens there'll be no inauguration.
They are always looking for the next shoe to drop.
Pretty sure on Jan 6 we will see the Democrats and RINOs pull a stunt that will be the REAL insurrection by not confirming the electoral votes using the 14th Amendment---Trump led and insurrection even though he was never formally charged or convicted. It seems like in the past 4 years, everything they accused Trump of doing, they themselves did or were going to do. I look for a clustermess on Jan 6. The DS is not just going to give over the reigns of power to Trump without doing something drastic.
+1 you wrote what they truly believe about Jan. 6, so we need to be ready for how they will act Jan. 6, ‘25
Remember when Google Home and Siri both said Richard Grenell was president shortly after Biden won?
This is is very similar..is this a think mirror kind of thing?
+1 interesting comparison you made. I remember that too — some thought we might have had an acting president in R. Grennell for a short time during the 2021 post-election-steal crisis, and some people thought it was just simply Google and SIRI trying to troll everyone opposing the 2020 election steal and letting people have the idea that “White Hats” were running things through R. Grennell.
The Grassley Senate Pro Tempure scenario could be like a mirror, but be different in that this would be live on C-SPAN and there would be no hidden White Hats selection process . As dec3169 and JScholl17 pointed out, the Senate would vote for who would be their Senate Pro Tempore, covered by C-SPAN and Congressional Record for all to see.
Someone shared, I forgot who, that the Grennell thing was some Google employee posted it for fun.
Congress went with the Deep State steal scam in 2020, but at some levels of intelligence and military, high ranking officers did not recognize the steal and thus Trump was considered for national emergency purposes as Commander in Chief, despite the Byden steal.
Just one correction. The President Pro Tempore of the Senate is the most tenured member of the majority party. I can definitely see Chuck Grassley taking over as Acting President especially if the House is unable to elect a speaker.
thanks, a correctiom for accuracy: “most tenured member of the majority party”!
There are exceptions including the fact that the position used to be a elected position. Plus exceptions are made for retiring members of the Senate in which they could be President Pro Tempore for a day, but that honor is rare.
Yes!!' I do remember learning that it was Chuck Grassley!
Man that was buried in the mush of my brain.
Thank you for this reminder!
The President Pro Tempore is voted on by the Senators. It is not automatically the ranking member. It traditionally is, but that is not guaranteed.
Chances are good that it will be Grassley, but stranger things have happened. Since this would be new territory I would imagine the deep state would want to have their say, and maybe force a real vote instead of unanimous consent - thus skipping the tradition. I don't believe it will get there though.
https://www.senate.gov/about/officers-staff/president-pro-tempore.htm
+1 good reminder of the process for selecting th Swnate president pro tempure, thanks.
Now imagine that the House can never come to a decision on the Speaker, and Grassley filling in as a Trump puppet for 2 years. End result is Trump able to run again in 2028.
It would almost be worth it just to watch the Left's heads explode.
This would be wild 😂🤣😂
It should be Trump before anyone else.
I searched for Jan 20 deltas and Grassley at Qalerts for any hints but did not notice any around key election and inauguration dates.
Presidential Succession Act of 1947 history / summary history summary https://www.senate.gov/about/officers-staff/president-pro-tempore/presidential-succession-act.htm
Congressional notes on the succession act https://www.congress.gov/event/108th-congress/house-event/LC15233/text#
This scenario is a “Mr. Juan” on Nino Rodriguez scenario, so please do not evaluate based on him, but based on the scenario possibility. Mr. Juan says things that are off, such as a week ago he said on Nino that Trump said under his breath, during a 2016 debate against Hillary regarding Gitmo, that he (Trump) built it for her. Well Trump did not say that, he said something to the effect that the elitists didn’t want Trump to become President because she would go to her jail (for all her wrongdoings as a politician). (I know I did notget the details exactly right here, but I did not mess it up as bad as “Mr. Juan”. https://rumble.com/v637gd5-juan-o-savin-w-nino-trump-inauguration-delay-trumps-2024-certification-dram.html. (17 min. 5 sec. long)
Juan's role is to push certain moves on the chess board that would never be played, just to panic and exhaust the enemies.
Based on this experience, I will go ahead and place a bet that this scenario will not happen, but will elicit some responses from the enemy.
All "Art of War".....
Well played fren
Excellent depiction, that makes sense, a role … as the deep state opposition to MAGA has options to make their moves, and the opposition considers making their moves, if a spotlight is placed on one scenario where they could try and get an advantage for their side, they could get frustrated and go a different direction.
Yes. Never thought of that. Wow. Needs its own sticky except the BH can’t know about this.