Exactly what I was thinking...somewhere in the Bible it talks about how you know when your country or office is in decline when God allows women to be in charge. This is a sign that your country is in a state of degradation.
As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
There is Deborah just sayingβ¦β¦ God rises up Godly Women too. The enemy likes to use women because some women want the power. Women on a power trip are THE Absolute worst. Donβt judge all by that. The Isaiah quote below may be actually referring to the fact that women rule over children and the children of the oppressors will rule over his people essentially saying they will be at the absolute bottom of the social classes. Careful throwing scripture without context. I am not saying that to say your wrong but to say that interpretation can be many faceted.
Yes...God does raise up Godly women, but God has been very consistent in letting us know He believes in chain of command. Women are not suppose to rule over man...period. This has nothing to do with better or worse, higher or lower in social status. It has everything to do with God's design for a well structured society. God was never ok with Feminism...which is where the whole idea of placing women on an equal footing with men in each and every facet of society. The whole idea of the woke mindset of taking away the difference between men and women is where feminism leads...no genders...men can have babies, etc. It's a cancer on society.
I think the more women and men each relearn their Godly places in society, the more peace and happiness the family as a whole will have. This will be the true blessing of staying in the lanes God has designed for each of the TWO genders.
One of the saddest games played has been the distortion of women by feminism. Women have their own strength with no need to borrow from men. We do have a role an incredibly important role that is completely God ordained motherhood. Not all women can be mothers but we all gain our strength from the traits required for motherhood. IMHO I believe a woman with integrity is a better leader than a man with none. The key is integrity. By the same standard a man with integrity is more likely to command respect and possess the natural abilities that can command both men and women. They lead DIFFERENTLY and this is key. Women shouldnβt be trying to be men. We have our own positions of power but as I said some women refuse to see that leading society by nurturing and teaching the generations for the profoundly important role it is.Feminism wasnβt created by women ir even embraced until generations of programming. Feminism was created to devalue the working manβs wages. It took years to indoctrinate girls into buying into the concept that their only value was in working themselves to death because as so very many women have learned the hard way we CANNOT turn off our need to nurture our young. Now the only women who stay home are typically those whose husband is willing to step forward as the sole bread winner. THAT is another conversation- men feel they are doing their wives a favor by βletting β her focus on child rearing. Instead of seeing it as a gift to himself and his children as well as to her. Men who have gladly embraced the additional income- they canβt complain that THEIR roles have been supplanted. The knive cuts both ways. Feminism isnβt about women itβs about the degradation of society and was never about empowering women. Women absolutely can do anything intellectually and many things men can do the question is should we? I respectfully disagree with your interpretation on the roles of men and women and yet we both seem to agree that feminism is a blight and that there are roles men and women should not exchange.
She also had a wedding ring on the ring finger of her left hand. So not only is she a "bishop", an activist, and a lesbian - she is in a homosexual marriage.
Did I miss all of that being allowed in the bible?
She's probably a Jesuit or a Freemason, or both. Remember, the Jesuits were created to infiltrate and destroy the Protestants. I wouldn't be shocked at all to find out she's on a mission for Rome.
Bingo.
This is the very first thing I thought when I heard about this whole ordeal.
Men and women were both made by and in the image of God; in that sense, they are equal.
But that doesn't mean they can all do the exact same things - nor should they!!!!
Men are physically larger & stronger, but women can literally create life.
On and on and on.... I dont need to list all the differences for my frens here.
But some things, women shouldn't be allowed to do, and be clergy is one of them.
I'm not impressed with this.. it's giving her power at his expense.. look.. he has basically told her "What she said bothered me", something she clearly wanted to do. He also leveled it right at her giving her validation. he also felt the need to go on the defensive of what she said, when he has just won an election that gives him a mandate to stop these criminals.. there is no need to address this person. I think he should have gone with something a bit short and curt:
"I was surprised to find out first hand that the National Prayer Service on Tuesday was lead by a Radical Left hard line preacher, leaving us bored and uninspired. I think the Church owes the public an apology for letting a world-focused person lead the service instead of a spirit focused one, like scripture requests."
A response like this keeps the focus: on the church that this so-called bishop preached at. The ineffective and boring message that was sent. A side thought that an apology should have been given because it was below the scripture, something the so-called bishop should have known. It would have defeated them every angle - not addressing their trolling or misinformation.. not wasting time in the weeds, and getting right to the point. (oh, and still being a mean tweet by indirectly saying she's unfit for her job - using her tactics against her).
Can someone get this to whoever his spiritual advisor is? This was the spiritual advisor's time to shine..
I disagree. He said what he needed to say. She was a disgrace and should not be recognizd as a spiritual leader. Yes he should have been informed who was speaking.
Agree 100%, Blessed...and I think Trump should've specifically called out that she's from the Episcopalian denomination, one of the worst mainline denominations in terms of false teaching and supporting woke bullshit.
We'll have to agree to disagree then, because i know the enemy will see this as a win, because he left threads that the enemy pick up on, and use it to waste his time in office or misdirect his focus to.
We don't have time to waste.. two to four years.. and in light of that i view it as ineffective as he lost some energy to this radical's intentional attempt add drag. I work a lot in these physiological games, using them against the enemy, turning their shit full stream back at them, so i know how they go.
Even if they do see this as a βwinβ theyβre losing unequivocally in every other aspect. It doesnβt do much for them and will quickly be forgotten by next week. The only ones that will see this as a win are so mentally inept there is no reasoning with them anyways. Their delusion will persist until theyβre met with serious crisis.
If we donβt have time to waste then Trumpβs tweet is quick and to the point. No one has time to jump thru linguistic gymnastics that is lost on the imbeciles on the Left. They have proven they will screech about everything. The heil Hitler salute being the most recent. In logic, two opposing views cannot both be true. The βagree to disagreeβ stance requires more heavy lifting than that. One of you is correct.
This fake prophet needed to be called out though and Iβm happy he did. The left will see everything he does as bad so why even worry about their judgements? We donβt need to fear the enemy or be concerned about how they will twist the next story. Trump could be a diplomat and act proper, yes but thatβs not his role in the game. God choose him specifically and he is much more effective when he is just being himself and calls it how it is.
There were times when Christ said nothing, and times when Christ called people out, even going as far as calling them hypocrites and Vipers. Trump likewise should have done (in this case) what he felt led to do. Note: When you don't say something, when you (feel led) to say something that's wrong, just as wrong, as saying something when (you're led) to say nothing. Let us trust that Trump did what he felt (in his heart) was right in this case involving this person.
I agree, engaging the libtard isnβt helpful, unless he wants to spotlight the issues in that church. Is it a church or another indoctrination center?
IMO, schools are indoctrination centers of our children. MANY churches have become indoctrination centers of adults.
Both prey (pray?) on those in need. Those who are vulnerable.
Everytime I drive by a church with a sacreligious lgbtqrainbow flag, I do not see a church, I see an adult indoctrination center. It's not religion at this point, it's the hijacking of religion to indoctrinate.
I bet this bitch is from one of those types of churches. I don't feel one ounce of guilt for calling her out because she is an impostor and a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Trump is saying what so many, many of us wanted to say. The service showed us what the deep state church looks like. This does NOT represent what it means to follow Jesus.
This episode makes it seem like there must be a traitor inside the Trump administration, or a very incompetent person who should have prevented someone like her from presiding over the service.
So weird how some people think differently. Not everything must be 4d chess.
Trumps base was in an uproar about this. It required attention from our leader. They were bold enough to behave that way at the Cathedral. Openly mocking God. We needed Trump to shine a light on how insane it was.
I thought the Episcopal Church was supposed to be Catholic-lite for Protestants. Guess they're going through a crisis of leadership just like us, and also the Methodists. We need to pray for all these people's conversion (Bergoglio, "Bishop" Mariann)
Wouldn't THAT be delightful? I'd love to see all of the false-teaching and DEI-obsessed mainline denominations be at risk of losing THAT if they're not forced to take a good long hard look at what the Bible really teaches...
Thank you President Trump for standing up for America's forgotten men and women.
I hope we can find out what SALARY this woman is receiving, what her NET WORTH is, and whether she has shared any of it with vulnerable American citizens (of which there are millions and millions) and if so, HOW MUCH of it she has shared.
Four more years of mean tweets! Man, this is gonna be LIT!!
women cannot be clergy.
She is an activist disguised as a priest. Definitely was not anointed by God.
She was "anointed" - by the "god of this world"!
She couldnβt even say the name of her god and didnβt even hear her mention Jesus at all. Thatβs how you know.
Isn't satan the "God of this world"?
I heard an old sermon from someone whose name escapes me & he said that satan is the king of this world, and God is kindom of heaven.
Yes in scripture satan is referred to as "the god of this world" - "god" with a little "g"!
That woman needed to sit down, shut up, and cover her head. Every person suffers every time she enters the pulpit.
Make coverings in church commonplace again
Exactly what I was thinking...somewhere in the Bible it talks about how you know when your country or office is in decline when God allows women to be in charge. This is a sign that your country is in a state of degradation.
Is this it? Isaiah 3:12
As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
Thank you
There is Deborah just sayingβ¦β¦ God rises up Godly Women too. The enemy likes to use women because some women want the power. Women on a power trip are THE Absolute worst. Donβt judge all by that. The Isaiah quote below may be actually referring to the fact that women rule over children and the children of the oppressors will rule over his people essentially saying they will be at the absolute bottom of the social classes. Careful throwing scripture without context. I am not saying that to say your wrong but to say that interpretation can be many faceted.
Yes...God does raise up Godly women, but God has been very consistent in letting us know He believes in chain of command. Women are not suppose to rule over man...period. This has nothing to do with better or worse, higher or lower in social status. It has everything to do with God's design for a well structured society. God was never ok with Feminism...which is where the whole idea of placing women on an equal footing with men in each and every facet of society. The whole idea of the woke mindset of taking away the difference between men and women is where feminism leads...no genders...men can have babies, etc. It's a cancer on society.
I think the more women and men each relearn their Godly places in society, the more peace and happiness the family as a whole will have. This will be the true blessing of staying in the lanes God has designed for each of the TWO genders.
One of the saddest games played has been the distortion of women by feminism. Women have their own strength with no need to borrow from men. We do have a role an incredibly important role that is completely God ordained motherhood. Not all women can be mothers but we all gain our strength from the traits required for motherhood. IMHO I believe a woman with integrity is a better leader than a man with none. The key is integrity. By the same standard a man with integrity is more likely to command respect and possess the natural abilities that can command both men and women. They lead DIFFERENTLY and this is key. Women shouldnβt be trying to be men. We have our own positions of power but as I said some women refuse to see that leading society by nurturing and teaching the generations for the profoundly important role it is.Feminism wasnβt created by women ir even embraced until generations of programming. Feminism was created to devalue the working manβs wages. It took years to indoctrinate girls into buying into the concept that their only value was in working themselves to death because as so very many women have learned the hard way we CANNOT turn off our need to nurture our young. Now the only women who stay home are typically those whose husband is willing to step forward as the sole bread winner. THAT is another conversation- men feel they are doing their wives a favor by βletting β her focus on child rearing. Instead of seeing it as a gift to himself and his children as well as to her. Men who have gladly embraced the additional income- they canβt complain that THEIR roles have been supplanted. The knive cuts both ways. Feminism isnβt about women itβs about the degradation of society and was never about empowering women. Women absolutely can do anything intellectually and many things men can do the question is should we? I respectfully disagree with your interpretation on the roles of men and women and yet we both seem to agree that feminism is a blight and that there are roles men and women should not exchange.
Well said...
She also had a wedding ring on the ring finger of her left hand. So not only is she a "bishop", an activist, and a lesbian - she is in a homosexual marriage.
Did I miss all of that being allowed in the bible?
She's probably a Jesuit or a Freemason, or both. Remember, the Jesuits were created to infiltrate and destroy the Protestants. I wouldn't be shocked at all to find out she's on a mission for Rome.
She has a lengthly wiki https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariann_Budde
All these interfaith fools...ecumenical....Roman
So wait - she's not a lesbian? I'm sure I heard that on some news show or read it on X. That wiki says she is married (to a man) and has 2 kids. Wow.
Apparently π€·ββοΈ she could've fooled me! Her whole persona just screams dyke
You ever heard the term "beard" or "cuck"? Yeah.....that's what she's got.
Not a real husband, if she is in fact married to a "man"
She not Catholic.
Bingo. This is the very first thing I thought when I heard about this whole ordeal.
Men and women were both made by and in the image of God; in that sense, they are equal. But that doesn't mean they can all do the exact same things - nor should they!!!!
Men are physically larger & stronger, but women can literally create life.
On and on and on.... I dont need to list all the differences for my frens here.
But some things, women shouldn't be allowed to do, and be clergy is one of them.
The Bible explicitly prohibits it. Itβs clear
He forgot to mention how she also demeaned the immigrants who take our menial jobs.
I couldnβt possibly love him more!!!!!!! Puts such a big old grin on my face. πππ
I'm not impressed with this.. it's giving her power at his expense.. look.. he has basically told her "What she said bothered me", something she clearly wanted to do. He also leveled it right at her giving her validation. he also felt the need to go on the defensive of what she said, when he has just won an election that gives him a mandate to stop these criminals.. there is no need to address this person. I think he should have gone with something a bit short and curt:
"I was surprised to find out first hand that the National Prayer Service on Tuesday was lead by a Radical Left hard line preacher, leaving us bored and uninspired. I think the Church owes the public an apology for letting a world-focused person lead the service instead of a spirit focused one, like scripture requests."
A response like this keeps the focus: on the church that this so-called bishop preached at. The ineffective and boring message that was sent. A side thought that an apology should have been given because it was below the scripture, something the so-called bishop should have known. It would have defeated them every angle - not addressing their trolling or misinformation.. not wasting time in the weeds, and getting right to the point. (oh, and still being a mean tweet by indirectly saying she's unfit for her job - using her tactics against her).
Can someone get this to whoever his spiritual advisor is? This was the spiritual advisor's time to shine..
I disagree. He said what he needed to say. She was a disgrace and should not be recognizd as a spiritual leader. Yes he should have been informed who was speaking.
Agree 100%, Blessed...and I think Trump should've specifically called out that she's from the Episcopalian denomination, one of the worst mainline denominations in terms of false teaching and supporting woke bullshit.
We'll have to agree to disagree then, because i know the enemy will see this as a win, because he left threads that the enemy pick up on, and use it to waste his time in office or misdirect his focus to.
We don't have time to waste.. two to four years.. and in light of that i view it as ineffective as he lost some energy to this radical's intentional attempt add drag. I work a lot in these physiological games, using them against the enemy, turning their shit full stream back at them, so i know how they go.
Even if they do see this as a βwinβ theyβre losing unequivocally in every other aspect. It doesnβt do much for them and will quickly be forgotten by next week. The only ones that will see this as a win are so mentally inept there is no reasoning with them anyways. Their delusion will persist until theyβre met with serious crisis.
I think this is the beginning of the attack on the last side of the pyramid structure (religion that's twisted and used against us)
If we donβt have time to waste then Trumpβs tweet is quick and to the point. No one has time to jump thru linguistic gymnastics that is lost on the imbeciles on the Left. They have proven they will screech about everything. The heil Hitler salute being the most recent. In logic, two opposing views cannot both be true. The βagree to disagreeβ stance requires more heavy lifting than that. One of you is correct.
No one cares what the left says. They have TDS. Trump is playing to the people that voted for him. And this was a massive win for him.
This fake prophet needed to be called out though and Iβm happy he did. The left will see everything he does as bad so why even worry about their judgements? We donβt need to fear the enemy or be concerned about how they will twist the next story. Trump could be a diplomat and act proper, yes but thatβs not his role in the game. God choose him specifically and he is much more effective when he is just being himself and calls it how it is.
There were times when Christ said nothing, and times when Christ called people out, even going as far as calling them hypocrites and Vipers. Trump likewise should have done (in this case) what he felt led to do. Note: When you don't say something, when you (feel led) to say something that's wrong, just as wrong, as saying something when (you're led) to say nothing. Let us trust that Trump did what he felt (in his heart) was right in this case involving this person.
My main issue is the time.. it's ticking.
I agree, engaging the libtard isnβt helpful, unless he wants to spotlight the issues in that church. Is it a church or another indoctrination center?
I came here to basically say this.
IMO, schools are indoctrination centers of our children. MANY churches have become indoctrination centers of adults.
Both prey (pray?) on those in need. Those who are vulnerable.
Everytime I drive by a church with a sacreligious lgbtqrainbow flag, I do not see a church, I see an adult indoctrination center. It's not religion at this point, it's the hijacking of religion to indoctrinate.
I bet this bitch is from one of those types of churches. I don't feel one ounce of guilt for calling her out because she is an impostor and a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Here is the video for those who want to see it.
Don't you understand what exposure is about?
It would be different if he weren't trump and some random.
Trump basically exposed her church to the entire country as blasphemous.
She shot herself in the foot essentially...
Someone should tell her that God makes two genders and the Democrats make the other 55.
apology! t
Interesring
lol right. It is pretty blatantly left there.
I'm pretty confidant that her cultish "church" will be exposed for having pedo connections in...3...2...1...
Damn this feels good.
Trump is saying what so many, many of us wanted to say. The service showed us what the deep state church looks like. This does NOT represent what it means to follow Jesus.
Should have known, the protestant and catholic church have fallen for the gay agenda.
Years ago. However, Christ church has not fallen for it. Maybe people are enjoined to something not of God when they denominate v
Just a mere Liberal Lesbian CUNT with a soapbox with a captured audience and i bet a pretty small one at that.
This episode makes it seem like there must be a traitor inside the Trump administration, or a very incompetent person who should have prevented someone like her from presiding over the service.
Based
What's with the "t" at the end?
Maybe a "_t" wonder what we can find on qagg
https://qalerts.app/?q=+t+
https://qalerts.app/?q=_t_
Trump is playing to the people that voted for him. And this was a massive win for him.
So weird how some people think differently. Not everything must be 4d chess.
Trumps base was in an uproar about this. It required attention from our leader. They were bold enough to behave that way at the Cathedral. Openly mocking God. We needed Trump to shine a light on how insane it was.
Except this is not a tweet. Mean "tweet" would mean on twatter/X no? He's been mean truthing for years now.
I thought the Episcopal Church was supposed to be Catholic-lite for Protestants. Guess they're going through a crisis of leadership just like us, and also the Methodists. We need to pray for all these people's conversion (Bergoglio, "Bishop" Mariann)
I think she just did something that cost them their non profit status.
Wouldn't THAT be delightful? I'd love to see all of the false-teaching and DEI-obsessed mainline denominations be at risk of losing THAT if they're not forced to take a good long hard look at what the Bible really teaches...
ππΌπ€£πβ€οΈπΊπΈ
Reeeeeeee!
Heβs Back!!!!
u/#yesss
Thank you President Trump for standing up for America's forgotten men and women.
I hope we can find out what SALARY this woman is receiving, what her NET WORTH is, and whether she has shared any of it with vulnerable American citizens (of which there are millions and millions) and if so, HOW MUCH of it she has shared.