Interesting..."we now have plenty of money - our new backers are Jews - as soon as 'we' (or 'they) take care of Kennedy
(media.greatawakening.win)
🇮🇱 ISRAEL F✡R LAST 🕎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
Wonder how many downvotes this suddenly gets cause someone mentioned the J word.
Oh, man. You are soooo close. I am nervous for you. I have spent time in Time Out for this. And I was just being silly.
Pretty sure we all have.
Same here… But it was mostly for optics because we can't let the MSN twist our movement into "merely a bunch of Jew haters."
Going to do a post on this
I look forward to it!
me too
Ok, unpopular opinion coming.
I think it's not that pointing out that a Jewish person has done something illegal or evil that people would downvote, but the impression that they are being targeted based on their ethnicity/religion.
I, personally, don't think Jewish people are any more at fault of misdeeds as any other person.
If I went around, and found every Christian who has ever done something heinous or been involved in some sort of cover up or conspiracy and used that as evidence that all Christians (or some specific branch of Christianity) are evil or untrustworthy, I'm pretty confident that I would get called out for attacking Christians.
The same if I went around doing the same thing based on people who did horrible things and were white.
I feel like that's what people are doing with this type of thing. So if I wouldn't approve of doing that to Christians or white people, why would I approve of it being done to Jewish people?
There is no one race or ethnicity or religion that doesn't have a metric shit ton of horrible people. There isn't one race or ethnicity or religion that doesn't have plenty of wonderful people.
Just...don't be hypocrites.
The biblical Israelites and the modern state of Israel are not the same. The people who actually come from what was know as the Kingdom of Khazaria are jewish converts and share no DNA with the actual Hebrews/Israelites.
When i see it posted that way my mind immediately provides the askanazi.
And on the flip side: Jesus was from Galilee, so was not seen as a 'Jew' as we understand so today.
Furthermore, the Palestinians have genetic ties to the people who lived around Christ's time. They are the Semites - which makes the whole thing very silly.
You mean all that Jesus Born in a manger in Bethlehem is a lie ? Isn't that a bit convenient for getting some off the hook ?
"And thou Bethlehem Ephrathah art little to be among the thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me, that shall be the ruler in Israel: whose goings forth have been from the beginning and from everlasting." ---Micah 5:2 --1599 Geneva
thx fren
So?
I honestly don't understand the point to these types of responses.
Are you trying to say that "modern day Jews" don't have any rights because they're not the same genetically as the original Israelites?
I just honestly don't know where you're going with this.
But, anyway, just like how modern Christians aren't direct descendants of the first Christians in terms of DNA—since Christianity has spread across the world and includes many different cultures and ethnic groups—Jewish identity is also about faith, culture, and shared history, not just DNA. The fact that some Jewish people may have different ancestral backgrounds doesn't negate their connection to the Jewish faith and tradition. Faith communities evolve over time, and their identity is shaped by both religious belief and shared experiences, not just by biological lineage.
Not all Jewish people are biologically from the same group. Specifically, converts. Not all Jewish people from the same biological origin are religious.
That's why I mentioned both ethnicity and religion in my posts. All Jewish people aren't necessarily both genetically Jewish and religious.
But based on comments I've read around here, about religious practices like metzitzah b’peh and physical attributes commonly associated with Jewish people (nose shape and size), then they're definitely being targeted based on either their religion or their ethnicity, no matter if that ethnicity is genetically the same as the original Israelites or not.
"Are you trying to say that "modern day Jews" don't have any rights because they're not the same genetically as the original Israelites?"
No, if I was trying to say that I would have typed it. What I wrote is what I am saying.
Do jewish people consider themselves a religion or a race?
Yeah no one cares, dude. There is such a a thing as a "convert."
And Ashkenazi or not, it's not like God is going to condemn an entire race of humans based on having the "wrong" Jewish bloodline, so why are we.
I think only the non believers in Christ are condemned, regardless of race or whatever.
Thank you!
Help me understand please. So someone can convert and be identified as Gods chosen? I would think there is a very big difference. And I'm not dooming you I am just trying to understand your point fren.
My best friend is Jewish and I have no doubts about them or their ethics. But I think what people are pointing out more here is that a lot of the top level conspirators do seem to belong to one particular religion. I think it's less that all Jewish people are bad (obviously silly, there are lots of great Jewish people) and more that the top conspirators all seem to belong to the same club and that club seems to stick to one religion.
Sure it seems that way if only one religion/ethnicity is consistently highlighted for such things.
Do you think because it's not consistently pointed out that white Christians are at the head of nefarious dealings that there aren't that many?
Are you familiar with the term "confirmation bias"?
lol of course I know about confirmation bias. And I just said I FULLY believe there are lots of great Jewish people. Personally, I generally find that on average, I have much more in common with your average Jewish person than your average Christian. I find on average Jewish people tend to share more interests and outlooks with me and are generally very interesting conversationalists.
But leaving personal preferences aside, I am also going to stand by my assertion that when you look at top conspirators, this one religion is overrepresented. I do NOT think this is due to a moral failing in the religion. I just think it's the religion the conspirator club often happens to use (or pretends to use as cover, I don't actually think the conspirators are what you'd call "god fearing monotheists"). If you are concerned about confirmation bias Let's talk about numbers then. Google tells me "Globally, the Jewish population is estimated to be around 0.2% of the world's population." What are the odds that this extremely small population happens to encapsulate Weinstein, Epstein, Ghislane Maxwell, George Soros, the pizza gate guy, the Rothchildes, is massively overrepresented in the liberal media, the Frankfurt school,, Marx, Hollywood, congress etc etc etc
You’re either naive, deflecting or in denial.
This’ll get you started…
https://rumble.com/v5tqte2-occupied-world-premiere-warning-sensitive-content-viewer-discretion-is-advi.html
I fully expect at this point that the Exec Producer of that film Stew Peters, renowned conspiracy firebrand, is a Mossad/CIA operative running point on inversion and limited hangout strategic psyops and that that film is a vehicle for such deception… Such is the scale and severity of the deceit and destruction we are up against…
No, don't be lazy and foist it off on some video.
Tell me, in your own words, how I'm naive, deflecting (what, exactly) or in denial about.
Sidebar:
It was only a few years ago that the word Naive had two dots on the I. I remember looking it up and striping the doubledotted I, beause I didn't want to submit to the single dot.
Just now, I went to do that, and the dictionaries have all removed the double dot.
So I suppose we will pronounce it naive, to rhyme with crave, (not Nah-eeve).
Not being lazy at all. That movie simply hits valid data points, a useful primer for normies and naive alike. Not that you need it because I suspect you know exactly what’s up, that the disproportionate over-representation of ethno-supremacist, extremist, religious cultism throughout human endeavour, history and captured institutions has run its course. The Great Awakening writ large is a people waking up to its enslavement, impoverishment, poisoning, corruption, destruction and slaughter. Beware, when the Saxon begins to hate…
No, this is trash because it's 4 degrees of hearsay. Read the entire document not just the highlight.
Someone (Marcineau) says, they heard someone (Mooley) saying, that they heard someone else (Echevarria) say something about someone else (Jews)
This wouldn't pass muster in middle school let alone an elite research board
Instead of the "J" word call em Revelation 2:9ers!
I'm sorry but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and is involved in world banking and fiat money systems, then it's probably a duck. 😁