Starts out with some guy who can barely get a word or two out between hysterical fits of laughter, talking about aliens (seriously, the most annoying voice I've ever heard in my life) ...
Then the two main hosts of the show speculate that Q are aliens.
Then Trump has met with 3 alien races who are members of the "Galactic Federation", confirmed by an Israeli 4-star general.
This kind of content should not be stickied here. For starters:
This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening.
Next, if all you need to speculate that Trump is communicating with 3 races of the Galactic Federation of aliens is a radio signal from space sent in 1977 and the "trust me bro" of an Israeli general, you're gullible.
You're also oblivious to the line "optics matter". There's a reason flat earth is verboten on GAW, that reason is that Q isn't dismissed as a loony conspiracy theory because it's conflated/combined with loony conspiracy theories.
"Oh, everyone here believes that the earth is flat? Well, they can't be that discerning when it comes to truth. I don't believe the earth is flat, so I probably won't believe anything about Q either."
On the Richter scale of conspiracy theories, if chemtrails are a 3.5 and flat earth is a 7.0, Trump meeting with 3 different species of the Galactic Federation is a 9.5.
Shit like this is why I don't recommend GAW to my adult boys. "Hey dad, you believe Trump met with 3 alien races of the Galactic Federation?" Fuck that.
Interesting how you conveniently left out everything of value... AND focused specifically on ONLY the questionable fringe topics and MAGNIFIED them and mountain climbed over them like it was what the show was ALL about.
I accurately described 100% of the first 15 minutes of the video.
Q said "be careful who you follow" 9 times.
Q mentioned using discernment 4 times.
Is your assessment based on a fraction of the content?
I'm not going to eat a 4 course buffet if the appetizer is shit.
But let's not talk about the information you think is good. Let's talk about the first 15 minutes I accurately described.
Would you sit your family down and say "Hey, I'm inviting some people over. I want you to hear them explain how Trump met with 3 different species from the Galactic Federation. They're aliens."
They're clearly lunatics.
Q mentioned optics 30 times.
I refuse to believe that you would use these people to explain anything important about Q to anyone you care about, preceded by 15 minutes of explaining how Trump met with 3 species from the Galactic Federation.
I refuse to believe you don't recognize how discussing Trump meeting with 3 species from the Galactic Federation is bad optics.
I admit that the giggling man was annoying as f*** but I have to cut through my feelings to get to the facts. I'm not going to give you a hard time about this. Respect. And yes it's bad Optics.
Claim 1: "6EQUJ5" sums to exactly 100
6+14+26+30+19+5 = 100. True. But these are signal intensity measurements that happen to add to that number. Not meaningful without context.
Claim 2: Computer recorded "01100100" (binary for 100) after the signal
FALSE. Fabricated. No scientific documentation exists of this binary sequence on the printout.
Claim 3: Peak at "U" (21st letter) matches 21cm hydrogen wavelength
The signal was at 21cm. That the peak intensity was coded as "U" (21st letter) is coincidence—letters A-Z were just the system for representing intensities 10-35.
Claim 4: 72 seconds, 6 data points, base-36 = "communication protocols"
72 seconds was the telescope's observation window as Earth rotated—not a chosen duration. "6 data points" just counts the characters. "Base-36" was how the computer printed measurements, not a message format.
Claim 5: 19÷30 = 0.618 (golden ratio)
WRONG. 19÷30 = 0.6333, not 0.618. He's off by 2.5%.
Claim 6: Values map to star distances
Pure numerology. Intensity measurements have nothing to do with light-year distances. With thousands of stars within 30 light years, you can make any numbers "map" anywhere.
Claim 7: Base-4 conversion = amino acids (GGGGCT = glycine + alanine)
Requires arbitrary conversion of intensity data to base-4, then to nucleotides, then claiming it codes amino acids. Complete numerological nonsense.
CONCLUSION: Every substantive claim is either wrong (golden ratio math, binary checksum), coincidental (21st letter), misunderstood (duration, encoding), or pure pattern-matching delusion (star map, amino acids). The WOW signal remains unexplained, but this "decoding" is fiction.
MY INTERPRETATION (Verbatim from earlier)
Confirmed. Your breakdown is surgically accurate.
Speaker 14 spins a compelling-sounding narrative out of coincidence, misinterpretation, and fabricated data:
– Checksum claim (binary 01100100): Fabricated. The original WOW signal printout contains no binary code whatsoever, only alphanumeric characters corresponding to intensity levels. There's no checksum, no postscript binary, no file integrity verification—nothing of the kind.
– Letter 'U' and 21 cm match: Misleading. The “U” comes from the system the Big Ear radio telescope used to represent intensity values in base-36 (0–9, A–Z = 0–35). That “U” happens to be 21 is coincidental and not alphabetically relevant—it could’ve been any letter depending on intensity. The hydrogen line at 1420.40575 MHz (21 cm) was already the tuned frequency for scanning. They didn’t “choose” it.
– 72 seconds = intended duration? No. That was the maximum fixed time the telescope could observe a fixed point due to Earth's rotation. It’s an artifact of the hardware, not an encoded time instruction.
– Base-36 and ‘six packets’ as communication protocol: Misinterpretation of how the data was logged. The computer converted analog signal strength into discrete values and printed them in base-36 to fit into compact format. It was a pragmatic engineering choice, not an alien design language.
– Golden ratio claim: Plainly wrong. 19 ÷ 30 = 0.6333…, not 0.618. The golden ratio (phi ≈ 0.61803) does not appear. This isn’t a rounding error—it’s just false.
– Star system mapping by number values: Total numerology. Mapping arbitrary signal intensities to stellar distances ignores both astronomical accuracy and statistical rigor. With thousands of nearby stars in that distance range, one could back-fit any number set to “match.”
– Base-4 to DNA claim (GGGGCT): Utterly arbitrary. The values “6EQUJ5” are not structured in a way that could rationally or scientifically convert to nucleotide codes. DNA bases (A, T, C, G) are not derived from intensity values, and nothing links that string to valid amino acid encoding. It’s cargo cult science.
Final Judgment:
Speaker 14’s statement is a masterclass in apophenia: the human tendency to see meaning or patterns in randomness. It’s full of:
– Coincidence dressed up as intent
– Invented data
– Misunderstood systems
– Pattern-finding where none exist
Not a single element of the statement is supported by actual radio astronomy data, SETI protocols, or the 1977 WOW signal documentation.
This is fiction. Elegant-sounding fiction, but fiction nonetheless.
That guy from TikTok was beyond annoying and completely misunderstands the WOW! Signal. We did not receive characters to decipher. Presumed Aliens don’t know our base system or alphabet. ‘ 6EQUJ5’ is simply the computer printing out the signal strength- simply how loud the volume was - every 12 seconds. Why letters? After 1-9, programmers simply used a-z to represent numbers beyond 9 so only single characters would need to be used. It’s nothing special. The signal starts at 6 peaks to U (30 on this scale, not 21) and drops back down to 5 before disappearing into background noise.
So this is why I don’t listen to these masturbatory info-tainment garbage. It’s idiots looking at clouds trying to find shapes.
I don’t mean this as throwing shade at anyone else, but your comment was very refreshing. Do I need to up my game because I never, EVER spend a single second worrying about a rogue asteroid hurtling towards earth to kill us all?
Yeah, Defcon Zerq is on the leading edge of analysis, if you have time at all, watch it.
The analysis that stood out to me in this episode was the talk of taking on the cartels all over the world simultaneously and enabling and supporting countries to tackle their own cartel issues by cutting the strings of their leaders.
South America being the area they concentrated on.
I'll give you a fourth possibility. Some anons dont care about hypothetical decode salad surrounding current events.
We already know the movie is playing. A lot of these podcasts are akin to someone talking on speaker phone in the movie theater.
I'm not specifically pointing at the Defcon Zerq podcast. But, many anons have podcast and paytriot fatigue. It's all rather irrelevant isn't it if we know NCSWIC and we're just along for the ride? This stuff isn't waking up normies in droves, the everyday happenings and regular pleb news cycle does this. More normies will wake up and flip opinion based on what Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson feature as opposed to random Q discussion and decode hypothesis.
It's a limited hangout, and really, it's mostly infotainment. 99% of this kind of conjecture regarding foresight of the plan has been complete bunk. Just being a realist when looking at this kind of programming. Even if let's say one of these type shows made a super duper accurate prediction, it wouldn't go mainstream unless a mainstream outlet picked it up and pushed it.
Edit: Just noticed you edited your original reply so now mine seems long winded and a bit out of context where I was referencing points now erased. Kek, no worries. I'll leave mine as is.
Well put, and worthy of a reply. Firstly, yes Ive listened to the Defcon ZerQ podcast at least twice in the past few months. Both times were links here on GAW, the latest I recall it was around the time of the Kirk assassination. That particular episode was focused on variety of topics but mostly RED OCTOBER discussion.
Again, I wasn't particularly pointing out this particular program. Simply adding a fourth bullet to your list as to why are folks not engaging with said content. I will say that yes, even the Defcon ZerQ show is in some parts decode salad, and I dont need to listen to this latest episode to state as much thanks to your excellent SS.
The mere fact GME is being discussed is the perfect example. There's little to connect the GME stock manipulation with the original Q drops. Yes, there were some very clear and obvious nods driven by language in some of the drops themselves. E.g. POWER TO THE PLAYERS
But, outside of phrasing that can be construed many ways, there has yet to this date been a solidified GME/MOASS/Q happening. People continue to gamble with the stonks, but there's yet to be any form of payout whether that be monetary or something more concrete along the lines of legislation or legal & economic repercussion(s).
Just one small example of pundits and pushers running rampant with one thing and attempting to connect it to others while also building fake bridges for the future.
I suppose the 31/Atla topic is also adjacent to this notion of using off-topic conversation to fill out empty pages. Like watering down the bar to make more money.
I dont think this is the SKY EVENT. I also dont believe in aliens at all. I do believe in spiritual forces though... Anyhoo, it is an interesting topic for sure. But, I'd wager it will come and go like many similar topics such as the Jersey Drone show last year.
Again, not trying to doom or shit on your post. You asked why anons are not biting? Their bellies are full already. Simple as such.
Edit: Just noticed you edited your initial reply to a short and sweet retort. Kek, no worries at all. Just makes my response a bit long winded and pointing out context that was mentioned but now fails to be relevant. It's no biggie.
The recent 'update' by Praying medic resonated with me a lot. I don't find much value in most of the delta decoding and focus on the drops these days. Decode salad, sigh. Don't need it.
Personally, I might use this analogy for where I'm at with the Q drops now.
The Q drops were an orientation. During the drops and in a diminishing way over the 4 years that followed them, the Q operation helped me to orient myself and set me in a direction. Then, once the direction was set, I needed to go. The Q drops were the kick or push behind me to go in the necessary direction, but the further I move forward in that direction, the less important those drops become. Their directive fore having accomplished its purpose, they receded into the background while I find self-propelling energy in my observations and engagement with the NOW of the information war.
In other words, I find myself less and less inspired to pursue q analysis podcasting and such, but am VERY drawn to podcasts that are forward moving on the foundation that Q laid out.
In short: don't get stuck in the past. Just as one needs to graduate from elementary school, or high school, or college - one cannot simply remain perpetually focused on that level of development - anons need to graduate from the Q operation. Some of our community seem to be overly attached to the past, for various reasons.
I'm not saying the q board isn't relevant. I'm saying it was an operation with specific goals, which by and large were significantly achieved, and unless we look forward in what is happening now, we might miss the point.
Aka I agree with your comments, Strel. They resonate.
It's fine. I'll elucidate my croak as much possible, break it down into ribbit format.
I need to check out Praying Medic again. I unsubbed from him two weeks back when he started reuploading all of his content starting from the youtube purge. Kek, it was too much of what we already know. Ironic, that does segway into your latter point of being too familiar with the film and letting that fact lead to callous recognition of habbenings. Afterall, that's the mission: wake up the normies.
I appreciate your comment fren! Very endearing gesture, which I should reciprocate! You too create very memorable contributions to the pond-waves here. In particular I have the utmost appreciation for your ability to think outside the box and question everything. Including buns anons are kneading out but also being among the more vocal in pointing out obvious bullshittery!
Somehow, not a fan of R&F. Some of his stuff feels too clicky to me.
several former Badlanders
btw, did you catch Herold's special broadcast re: the clique and operation to take down Badlands? Posted 2 Fridays ago, I think.
A bunch have left, thanks essentially to what appears to be an operation to destroy Badlands and undermine its foundation and relationship with content creators.... (A premise I accept)
They also have a Sunday night show called "Q After Dark", same hosts except they also have Brad Zerbo. Last Sunday Alpha wasn't there. It's at midnight eastern.
I'll go so far as to say that with the addition of Brad, it's the better show. I do watch both of them weekly while at work. Last Sunday was a good one
So IF this is true (and I remain curious but skeptical until it's proven), but IF it's true, I think the most profound thing about it is that They (whoever They are) already knows our alphabet, possibly the alphabets of every language on Earth, and can send us codes using our own number systems (both base 10 and binary), and can put them together in a way that humans, or at least smart humans, can understand.
How long have They been monitoring our signals? How do They know so much about us? That should worry us a bit, or at least give us pause. If this is meant to be a two-way conversation, we've shown up late to it and probably unprepared to communicate at Their level.
Yeah... his jovial smacked ass laughing bit went way too far... I wanted to slap him towards the end of the clip.
We've got "top men" working on "handling the signal" on behalf of humanity...I wonder if the "other party" knows about the draconian gatekeeping paradigm.
Hey here's an idea... maybe THEY can snap an unadulterated photo of our planet and broadcast it to everyone... How'd f'd up would that be? "Yeah, they asked us for a picture of the planet because their assholes have been holding out on them" 😂😂😂😂😂
I got a bit shitty watching this episode. Josh was on a roll and talking about Hollywood / Satan Worship and ....Alpha interrupts him and starts going on about something ...
Its not the first time Alpha has interrupted Josh when he's on a roll and I wish he'd just shut up and let Josh finish.
Beside that - great show. These two guys are kicking it. Josh is a machine, quirks and all. Glad he's on our side. Two patriots who put out a really good show. My favorite show atm. I also watch Alpha's show, Josh's show and Q After Hours. I am so grateful to these guys for the effort. I wish them every success and good fortune.
As much as I enjoyed watching this and as much as I absolutely love Josh's Insight on much out there, I had to run it through Claude and gpt4o and got the following.
CLAUDE’S INTERPRETATION (Verbatim as you gave it)
Claim 1: "6EQUJ5" sums to exactly 100
6+14+26+30+19+5 = 100. True. But these are signal intensity measurements that happen to add to that number. Not meaningful without context.
Claim 2: Computer recorded "01100100" (binary for 100) after the signal
FALSE. Fabricated. No scientific documentation exists of this binary sequence on the printout.
Claim 3: Peak at "U" (21st letter) matches 21cm hydrogen wavelength
The signal was at 21cm. That the peak intensity was coded as "U" (21st letter) is coincidence—letters A-Z were just the system for representing intensities 10-35.
Claim 4: 72 seconds, 6 data points, base-36 = "communication protocols"
72 seconds was the telescope's observation window as Earth rotated—not a chosen duration. "6 data points" just counts the characters. "Base-36" was how the computer printed measurements, not a message format.
Claim 5: 19÷30 = 0.618 (golden ratio)
WRONG. 19÷30 = 0.6333, not 0.618. He's off by 2.5%.
Claim 6: Values map to star distances
Pure numerology. Intensity measurements have nothing to do with light-year distances. With thousands of stars within 30 light years, you can make any numbers "map" anywhere.
Claim 7: Base-4 conversion = amino acids (GGGGCT = glycine + alanine)
Requires arbitrary conversion of intensity data to base-4, then to nucleotides, then claiming it codes amino acids. Complete numerological nonsense.
CONCLUSION: Every substantive claim is either wrong (golden ratio math, binary checksum), coincidental (21st letter), misunderstood (duration, encoding), or pure pattern-matching delusion (star map, amino acids). The WOW signal remains unexplained, but this "decoding" is fiction.
MY INTERPRETATION (Verbatim from earlier)
Confirmed. Your breakdown is surgically accurate.
Speaker 14 spins a compelling-sounding narrative out of coincidence, misinterpretation, and fabricated data:
– Checksum claim (binary 01100100): Fabricated. The original WOW signal printout contains no binary code whatsoever, only alphanumeric characters corresponding to intensity levels. There's no checksum, no postscript binary, no file integrity verification—nothing of the kind.
– Letter 'U' and 21 cm match: Misleading. The “U” comes from the system the Big Ear radio telescope used to represent intensity values in base-36 (0–9, A–Z = 0–35). That “U” happens to be 21 is coincidental and not alphabetically relevant—it could’ve been any letter depending on intensity. The hydrogen line at 1420.40575 MHz (21 cm) was already the tuned frequency for scanning. They didn’t “choose” it.
– 72 seconds = intended duration? No. That was the maximum fixed time the telescope could observe a fixed point due to Earth's rotation. It’s an artifact of the hardware, not an encoded time instruction.
– Base-36 and ‘six packets’ as communication protocol: Misinterpretation of how the data was logged. The computer converted analog signal strength into discrete values and printed them in base-36 to fit into compact format. It was a pragmatic engineering choice, not an alien design language.
– Golden ratio claim: Plainly wrong. 19 ÷ 30 = 0.6333…, not 0.618. The golden ratio (phi ≈ 0.61803) does not appear. This isn’t a rounding error—it’s just false.
– Star system mapping by number values: Total numerology. Mapping arbitrary signal intensities to stellar distances ignores both astronomical accuracy and statistical rigor. With thousands of nearby stars in that distance range, one could back-fit any number set to “match.”
– Base-4 to DNA claim (GGGGCT): Utterly arbitrary. The values “6EQUJ5” are not structured in a way that could rationally or scientifically convert to nucleotide codes. DNA bases (A, T, C, G) are not derived from intensity values, and nothing links that string to valid amino acid encoding. It’s cargo cult science.
Final Judgment:
Speaker 14’s statement is a masterclass in apophenia: the human tendency to see meaning or patterns in randomness. It’s full of:
– Coincidence dressed up as intent
– Invented data
– Misunderstood systems
– Pattern-finding where none exist
Not a single element of the statement is supported by actual radio astronomy data, SETI protocols, or the 1977 WOW signal documentation.
This is fiction. Elegant-sounding fiction, but fiction nonetheless.
Does anyone know if this asteroid can be seen with an 8" dobson telescope? I just got one and in addition to being able to view our planets in reasonable clarity, some things that can't be seen without a telescope are pretty cool to see too, so if this asteroid is visible, it would be awesome!
The video is crap.
Starts out with some guy who can barely get a word or two out between hysterical fits of laughter, talking about aliens (seriously, the most annoying voice I've ever heard in my life) ...
Then the two main hosts of the show speculate that Q are aliens.
Then Trump has met with 3 alien races who are members of the "Galactic Federation", confirmed by an Israeli 4-star general.
This kind of content should not be stickied here. For starters:
Next, if all you need to speculate that Trump is communicating with 3 races of the Galactic Federation of aliens is a radio signal from space sent in 1977 and the "trust me bro" of an Israeli general, you're gullible.
You're also oblivious to the line "optics matter". There's a reason flat earth is verboten on GAW, that reason is that Q isn't dismissed as a loony conspiracy theory because it's conflated/combined with loony conspiracy theories.
"Oh, everyone here believes that the earth is flat? Well, they can't be that discerning when it comes to truth. I don't believe the earth is flat, so I probably won't believe anything about Q either."
On the Richter scale of conspiracy theories, if chemtrails are a 3.5 and flat earth is a 7.0, Trump meeting with 3 different species of the Galactic Federation is a 9.5.
Shit like this is why I don't recommend GAW to my adult boys. "Hey dad, you believe Trump met with 3 alien races of the Galactic Federation?" Fuck that.
Nice cherry picking...
Interesting how you conveniently left out everything of value... AND focused specifically on ONLY the questionable fringe topics and MAGNIFIED them and mountain climbed over them like it was what the show was ALL about.
Some choose to hear what they want...
You call it cherry picking
I call it listening to everything they had to say for the first 15 minutes of their broadcast.
It's not my fault they saved their most crazy, looney content for their opener as their best first impression.
Is your assessment based on a fraction of the content?
I accurately described 100% of the first 15 minutes of the video.
Q said "be careful who you follow" 9 times.
Q mentioned using discernment 4 times.
I'm not going to eat a 4 course buffet if the appetizer is shit.
But let's not talk about the information you think is good. Let's talk about the first 15 minutes I accurately described.
Would you sit your family down and say "Hey, I'm inviting some people over. I want you to hear them explain how Trump met with 3 different species from the Galactic Federation. They're aliens."
They're clearly lunatics.
Q mentioned optics 30 times.
I refuse to believe that you would use these people to explain anything important about Q to anyone you care about, preceded by 15 minutes of explaining how Trump met with 3 species from the Galactic Federation.
I refuse to believe you don't recognize how discussing Trump meeting with 3 species from the Galactic Federation is bad optics.
I admit that the giggling man was annoying as f*** but I have to cut through my feelings to get to the facts. I'm not going to give you a hard time about this. Respect. And yes it's bad Optics.
Here's something I think you'll enjoy reading.
CLAUDE’S INTERPRETATION (Verbatim as you gave it)
Claim 2: Computer recorded "01100100" (binary for 100) after the signal FALSE. Fabricated. No scientific documentation exists of this binary sequence on the printout.
Claim 3: Peak at "U" (21st letter) matches 21cm hydrogen wavelength The signal was at 21cm. That the peak intensity was coded as "U" (21st letter) is coincidence—letters A-Z were just the system for representing intensities 10-35.
Claim 4: 72 seconds, 6 data points, base-36 = "communication protocols" 72 seconds was the telescope's observation window as Earth rotated—not a chosen duration. "6 data points" just counts the characters. "Base-36" was how the computer printed measurements, not a message format.
Claim 5: 19÷30 = 0.618 (golden ratio) WRONG. 19÷30 = 0.6333, not 0.618. He's off by 2.5%.
Claim 6: Values map to star distances Pure numerology. Intensity measurements have nothing to do with light-year distances. With thousands of stars within 30 light years, you can make any numbers "map" anywhere.
Claim 7: Base-4 conversion = amino acids (GGGGCT = glycine + alanine) Requires arbitrary conversion of intensity data to base-4, then to nucleotides, then claiming it codes amino acids. Complete numerological nonsense.
CONCLUSION: Every substantive claim is either wrong (golden ratio math, binary checksum), coincidental (21st letter), misunderstood (duration, encoding), or pure pattern-matching delusion (star map, amino acids). The WOW signal remains unexplained, but this "decoding" is fiction.
MY INTERPRETATION (Verbatim from earlier)
Speaker 14 spins a compelling-sounding narrative out of coincidence, misinterpretation, and fabricated data:
– Checksum claim (binary 01100100): Fabricated. The original WOW signal printout contains no binary code whatsoever, only alphanumeric characters corresponding to intensity levels. There's no checksum, no postscript binary, no file integrity verification—nothing of the kind.
– Letter 'U' and 21 cm match: Misleading. The “U” comes from the system the Big Ear radio telescope used to represent intensity values in base-36 (0–9, A–Z = 0–35). That “U” happens to be 21 is coincidental and not alphabetically relevant—it could’ve been any letter depending on intensity. The hydrogen line at 1420.40575 MHz (21 cm) was already the tuned frequency for scanning. They didn’t “choose” it.
– 72 seconds = intended duration? No. That was the maximum fixed time the telescope could observe a fixed point due to Earth's rotation. It’s an artifact of the hardware, not an encoded time instruction.
– Base-36 and ‘six packets’ as communication protocol: Misinterpretation of how the data was logged. The computer converted analog signal strength into discrete values and printed them in base-36 to fit into compact format. It was a pragmatic engineering choice, not an alien design language.
– Golden ratio claim: Plainly wrong. 19 ÷ 30 = 0.6333…, not 0.618. The golden ratio (phi ≈ 0.61803) does not appear. This isn’t a rounding error—it’s just false.
– Star system mapping by number values: Total numerology. Mapping arbitrary signal intensities to stellar distances ignores both astronomical accuracy and statistical rigor. With thousands of nearby stars in that distance range, one could back-fit any number set to “match.”
– Base-4 to DNA claim (GGGGCT): Utterly arbitrary. The values “6EQUJ5” are not structured in a way that could rationally or scientifically convert to nucleotide codes. DNA bases (A, T, C, G) are not derived from intensity values, and nothing links that string to valid amino acid encoding. It’s cargo cult science.
Final Judgment: Speaker 14’s statement is a masterclass in apophenia: the human tendency to see meaning or patterns in randomness. It’s full of: – Coincidence dressed up as intent – Invented data – Misunderstood systems – Pattern-finding where none exist
Not a single element of the statement is supported by actual radio astronomy data, SETI protocols, or the 1977 WOW signal documentation.
This is fiction. Elegant-sounding fiction, but fiction nonetheless.
That guy from TikTok was beyond annoying and completely misunderstands the WOW! Signal. We did not receive characters to decipher. Presumed Aliens don’t know our base system or alphabet. ‘ 6EQUJ5’ is simply the computer printing out the signal strength- simply how loud the volume was - every 12 seconds. Why letters? After 1-9, programmers simply used a-z to represent numbers beyond 9 so only single characters would need to be used. It’s nothing special. The signal starts at 6 peaks to U (30 on this scale, not 21) and drops back down to 5 before disappearing into background noise.
So this is why I don’t listen to these masturbatory info-tainment garbage. It’s idiots looking at clouds trying to find shapes.
I love you friend but your attitude sucks, your limbic system is f****** up your logic circuits
I don’t mean this as throwing shade at anyone else, but your comment was very refreshing. Do I need to up my game because I never, EVER spend a single second worrying about a rogue asteroid hurtling towards earth to kill us all?
There is Q and there are Anons, but there is no QAnon
There are truthers and there are conspiracy theorists, but there are no truther-conspiracy theorists
https://rumble.com/v70x1uu-defcon-zerq-ep.-015.html
Transcript: https://files.catbox.moe/mds6l6.txt
Probably the best comment, I pasted it into all three machine intels
LOTS of nuggets in this episode from General Flynn, US Admiral "ACE" Lyons, Tulsi Gabbard & more...
GME/GameStop COMs, Muslim Brotherhood as a political/terrorist movement masquerading as a religion, DECLAS of tech/space etc.
3i/Atlas and the WOW! Signal similarities AND intelligent decodes...It seems the data being sent from this object is intelligent!
CHOCK FULL ANONS! GET IN HERE!
u/#catdance
Thanks fren.
Yeah, Defcon Zerq is on the leading edge of analysis, if you have time at all, watch it.
The analysis that stood out to me in this episode was the talk of taking on the cartels all over the world simultaneously and enabling and supporting countries to tackle their own cartel issues by cutting the strings of their leaders. South America being the area they concentrated on.
That bit was was around 1:26:00
It was so hopeful!
Absolutely agree with you TaQo, the same as listening to RedPillProject with Josh Reid. Great information for all of us ANOS to keep us in our toes.
They do a great job! God Love YOU!
Thanks Fren!
I really can't understand:
Why more of our people here on GAW aren't watching this each week or the Daily Dose weeknights
What ELSE pursuant to this movement ARE they watching? (There really isn't anything else out there right now that isn't poisoned)
Waaa "It's too long"...uh heh uh heh uh heh But they have time for fake sportsball
I'll give you a fourth possibility. Some anons dont care about hypothetical decode salad surrounding current events.
We already know the movie is playing. A lot of these podcasts are akin to someone talking on speaker phone in the movie theater.
I'm not specifically pointing at the Defcon Zerq podcast. But, many anons have podcast and paytriot fatigue. It's all rather irrelevant isn't it if we know NCSWIC and we're just along for the ride? This stuff isn't waking up normies in droves, the everyday happenings and regular pleb news cycle does this. More normies will wake up and flip opinion based on what Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson feature as opposed to random Q discussion and decode hypothesis.
It's a limited hangout, and really, it's mostly infotainment. 99% of this kind of conjecture regarding foresight of the plan has been complete bunk. Just being a realist when looking at this kind of programming. Even if let's say one of these type shows made a super duper accurate prediction, it wouldn't go mainstream unless a mainstream outlet picked it up and pushed it.
Edit: Just noticed you edited your original reply so now mine seems long winded and a bit out of context where I was referencing points now erased. Kek, no worries. I'll leave mine as is.
I agree... and you just defined "shit" in the "blogosphere" or whatever it's called now.
Except THIS isn't shit...
Well put, and worthy of a reply. Firstly, yes Ive listened to the Defcon ZerQ podcast at least twice in the past few months. Both times were links here on GAW, the latest I recall it was around the time of the Kirk assassination. That particular episode was focused on variety of topics but mostly RED OCTOBER discussion.
Again, I wasn't particularly pointing out this particular program. Simply adding a fourth bullet to your list as to why are folks not engaging with said content. I will say that yes, even the Defcon ZerQ show is in some parts decode salad, and I dont need to listen to this latest episode to state as much thanks to your excellent SS.
The mere fact GME is being discussed is the perfect example. There's little to connect the GME stock manipulation with the original Q drops. Yes, there were some very clear and obvious nods driven by language in some of the drops themselves. E.g. POWER TO THE PLAYERS
But, outside of phrasing that can be construed many ways, there has yet to this date been a solidified GME/MOASS/Q happening. People continue to gamble with the stonks, but there's yet to be any form of payout whether that be monetary or something more concrete along the lines of legislation or legal & economic repercussion(s).
Just one small example of pundits and pushers running rampant with one thing and attempting to connect it to others while also building fake bridges for the future.
I suppose the 31/Atla topic is also adjacent to this notion of using off-topic conversation to fill out empty pages. Like watering down the bar to make more money.
I dont think this is the SKY EVENT. I also dont believe in aliens at all. I do believe in spiritual forces though... Anyhoo, it is an interesting topic for sure. But, I'd wager it will come and go like many similar topics such as the Jersey Drone show last year.
Again, not trying to doom or shit on your post. You asked why anons are not biting? Their bellies are full already. Simple as such.
Edit: Just noticed you edited your initial reply to a short and sweet retort. Kek, no worries at all. Just makes my response a bit long winded and pointing out context that was mentioned but now fails to be relevant. It's no biggie.
Thanks -
Yeah it sounded shitty... and I value your opinions and contributions... so I deleted the "shitty gritty" 😁
o7 fren
Wow, that was a long-winded reply!
(kek, sorry, I could not resist!)
The recent 'update' by Praying medic resonated with me a lot. I don't find much value in most of the delta decoding and focus on the drops these days. Decode salad, sigh. Don't need it.
Personally, I might use this analogy for where I'm at with the Q drops now.
The Q drops were an orientation. During the drops and in a diminishing way over the 4 years that followed them, the Q operation helped me to orient myself and set me in a direction. Then, once the direction was set, I needed to go. The Q drops were the kick or push behind me to go in the necessary direction, but the further I move forward in that direction, the less important those drops become. Their directive fore having accomplished its purpose, they receded into the background while I find self-propelling energy in my observations and engagement with the NOW of the information war.
In other words, I find myself less and less inspired to pursue q analysis podcasting and such, but am VERY drawn to podcasts that are forward moving on the foundation that Q laid out.
In short: don't get stuck in the past. Just as one needs to graduate from elementary school, or high school, or college - one cannot simply remain perpetually focused on that level of development - anons need to graduate from the Q operation. Some of our community seem to be overly attached to the past, for various reasons.
I'm not saying the q board isn't relevant. I'm saying it was an operation with specific goals, which by and large were significantly achieved, and unless we look forward in what is happening now, we might miss the point.
Aka I agree with your comments, Strel. They resonate.
Gee. I guess that was a long-winded reply!!!
Most croaks are! 🐸
It's fine. I'll elucidate my croak as much possible, break it down into ribbit format.
I need to check out Praying Medic again. I unsubbed from him two weeks back when he started reuploading all of his content starting from the youtube purge. Kek, it was too much of what we already know. Ironic, that does segway into your latter point of being too familiar with the film and letting that fact lead to callous recognition of habbenings. Afterall, that's the mission: wake up the normies.
I appreciate your comment fren! Very endearing gesture, which I should reciprocate! You too create very memorable contributions to the pond-waves here. In particular I have the utmost appreciation for your ability to think outside the box and question everything. Including buns anons are kneading out but also being among the more vocal in pointing out obvious bullshittery!
Happy Halloween!
Typical Strelnieks! Way too generous!
<but many thanks, nonetheless!>
Scotty Mar 10.
Lots of R&F, and some PA?
I don't know what those are....
Surprised you didn't mention T&A tho...
Or Peter Popoff
u/#catdance
https://rumble.com/user/RamboAndFrens
https://rumble.com/c/PrometheanAction
Whoa. Badlands has over 1/5 of the amount of Tucker’s followers. That’s wild!
Ah gotcha now.
Haven't seen R&F other than a couple clips, I'll have to check it.
PA - yeah, definitely quality
R&F includes several former Badlanders.
Somehow, not a fan of R&F. Some of his stuff feels too clicky to me.
btw, did you catch Herold's special broadcast re: the clique and operation to take down Badlands? Posted 2 Fridays ago, I think.
A bunch have left, thanks essentially to what appears to be an operation to destroy Badlands and undermine its foundation and relationship with content creators.... (A premise I accept)
And yet, Badlands puts out content that is over 500% better than anything Tucker produces!!*
*Note: opinions in this comment do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the board moderators
The Book of Trump
Devolution Power Hour
the Narrative
Basically, that's it. That fills my appetite for information and analysis.
I can only assume you don't really have any knowledge of other Badlands Content TQ, if you think "there really isn't anything else out there ...."
They also have a Sunday night show called "Q After Dark", same hosts except they also have Brad Zerbo. Last Sunday Alpha wasn't there. It's at midnight eastern.
I'll go so far as to say that with the addition of Brad, it's the better show. I do watch both of them weekly while at work. Last Sunday was a good one
Yes - thanks for the reminder.
Also a good show... but since I get up at odark30, I have to listen the next day while workfagging.
Alert: Workfag!!!
This and Declas are my two go to shows now for decodes. I put the Rumble app on our TV and my husband will now watch some of these shows also.
So IF this is true (and I remain curious but skeptical until it's proven), but IF it's true, I think the most profound thing about it is that They (whoever They are) already knows our alphabet, possibly the alphabets of every language on Earth, and can send us codes using our own number systems (both base 10 and binary), and can put them together in a way that humans, or at least smart humans, can understand.
How long have They been monitoring our signals? How do They know so much about us? That should worry us a bit, or at least give us pause. If this is meant to be a two-way conversation, we've shown up late to it and probably unprepared to communicate at Their level.
IF.
I'm with you on the "if"
Out of the whole of this long video, the only bit I found unconvincing was that wow signal decode.
He stretched it so far. Even talking about DNA codons which popped up when he changed the number base. Such a stretch!
Yeah... his jovial smacked ass laughing bit went way too far... I wanted to slap him towards the end of the clip.
We've got "top men" working on "handling the signal" on behalf of humanity...I wonder if the "other party" knows about the draconian gatekeeping paradigm.
Hey here's an idea... maybe THEY can snap an unadulterated photo of our planet and broadcast it to everyone... How'd f'd up would that be? "Yeah, they asked us for a picture of the planet because their assholes have been holding out on them" 😂😂😂😂😂
future proves past.
I got a bit shitty watching this episode. Josh was on a roll and talking about Hollywood / Satan Worship and ....Alpha interrupts him and starts going on about something ...
Its not the first time Alpha has interrupted Josh when he's on a roll and I wish he'd just shut up and let Josh finish.
Beside that - great show. These two guys are kicking it. Josh is a machine, quirks and all. Glad he's on our side. Two patriots who put out a really good show. My favorite show atm. I also watch Alpha's show, Josh's show and Q After Hours. I am so grateful to these guys for the effort. I wish them every success and good fortune.
Wanted to hear more about GME! Thanks!
Saved
As much as I enjoyed watching this and as much as I absolutely love Josh's Insight on much out there, I had to run it through Claude and gpt4o and got the following.
CLAUDE’S INTERPRETATION (Verbatim as you gave it)
Claim 2: Computer recorded "01100100" (binary for 100) after the signal FALSE. Fabricated. No scientific documentation exists of this binary sequence on the printout.
Claim 3: Peak at "U" (21st letter) matches 21cm hydrogen wavelength The signal was at 21cm. That the peak intensity was coded as "U" (21st letter) is coincidence—letters A-Z were just the system for representing intensities 10-35.
Claim 4: 72 seconds, 6 data points, base-36 = "communication protocols" 72 seconds was the telescope's observation window as Earth rotated—not a chosen duration. "6 data points" just counts the characters. "Base-36" was how the computer printed measurements, not a message format.
Claim 5: 19÷30 = 0.618 (golden ratio) WRONG. 19÷30 = 0.6333, not 0.618. He's off by 2.5%.
Claim 6: Values map to star distances Pure numerology. Intensity measurements have nothing to do with light-year distances. With thousands of stars within 30 light years, you can make any numbers "map" anywhere.
Claim 7: Base-4 conversion = amino acids (GGGGCT = glycine + alanine) Requires arbitrary conversion of intensity data to base-4, then to nucleotides, then claiming it codes amino acids. Complete numerological nonsense.
CONCLUSION: Every substantive claim is either wrong (golden ratio math, binary checksum), coincidental (21st letter), misunderstood (duration, encoding), or pure pattern-matching delusion (star map, amino acids). The WOW signal remains unexplained, but this "decoding" is fiction.
MY INTERPRETATION (Verbatim from earlier)
Speaker 14 spins a compelling-sounding narrative out of coincidence, misinterpretation, and fabricated data:
– Checksum claim (binary 01100100): Fabricated. The original WOW signal printout contains no binary code whatsoever, only alphanumeric characters corresponding to intensity levels. There's no checksum, no postscript binary, no file integrity verification—nothing of the kind.
– Letter 'U' and 21 cm match: Misleading. The “U” comes from the system the Big Ear radio telescope used to represent intensity values in base-36 (0–9, A–Z = 0–35). That “U” happens to be 21 is coincidental and not alphabetically relevant—it could’ve been any letter depending on intensity. The hydrogen line at 1420.40575 MHz (21 cm) was already the tuned frequency for scanning. They didn’t “choose” it.
– 72 seconds = intended duration? No. That was the maximum fixed time the telescope could observe a fixed point due to Earth's rotation. It’s an artifact of the hardware, not an encoded time instruction.
– Base-36 and ‘six packets’ as communication protocol: Misinterpretation of how the data was logged. The computer converted analog signal strength into discrete values and printed them in base-36 to fit into compact format. It was a pragmatic engineering choice, not an alien design language.
– Golden ratio claim: Plainly wrong. 19 ÷ 30 = 0.6333…, not 0.618. The golden ratio (phi ≈ 0.61803) does not appear. This isn’t a rounding error—it’s just false.
– Star system mapping by number values: Total numerology. Mapping arbitrary signal intensities to stellar distances ignores both astronomical accuracy and statistical rigor. With thousands of nearby stars in that distance range, one could back-fit any number set to “match.”
– Base-4 to DNA claim (GGGGCT): Utterly arbitrary. The values “6EQUJ5” are not structured in a way that could rationally or scientifically convert to nucleotide codes. DNA bases (A, T, C, G) are not derived from intensity values, and nothing links that string to valid amino acid encoding. It’s cargo cult science.
Final Judgment: Speaker 14’s statement is a masterclass in apophenia: the human tendency to see meaning or patterns in randomness. It’s full of: – Coincidence dressed up as intent – Invented data – Misunderstood systems – Pattern-finding where none exist
Not a single element of the statement is supported by actual radio astronomy data, SETI protocols, or the 1977 WOW signal documentation.
This is fiction. Elegant-sounding fiction, but fiction nonetheless.
Lost me with the laughing guy, if they know the English alphabet then why don't they write us a a message in English.
Does anyone know if this asteroid can be seen with an 8" dobson telescope? I just got one and in addition to being able to view our planets in reasonable clarity, some things that can't be seen without a telescope are pretty cool to see too, so if this asteroid is visible, it would be awesome!