Not so far-fetched for me. When a Prince has a birthday bash. The invitation list is people of power. Not tom dick and harry.
They all could be members of a branch of secret society that got together to plot.
But .......
I on the other hand think this may be designed as a poison pill. This story goes viral, then the mainstream media can later show it's crap, and doubt is now sewed. Look at the date. Right after Epstein gets arrested. First brick laid as they say.
I am reserving judgement for later. This is not part of what I tell when I'm trying to red pill.
I'm not gonna say that couldn't have happened, but doesn't it seem a little bit convenient that all of those figures were in the same place at the same time?
No, he is right to question it. If you do not question it, then you are simply going with your biases.
If its true, it will come out. Truth has to be tested by being questioned, pulled at, yanked at, and every weakness poked. Then, and only then, can the hammer of true justice fall.
If you are unwilling play devils advocate and question this, then this is just cheer leading, and not critical thinking.
note also that add_3 did not question "is this beyond reason?" "Is this impossible?". We know its possible, in a world full of private jets.
But you have to realize that normies and others will ask these sorts of questions. If the only retort you have is "C'mon man, try harder", will this convince them?
In any case, when you read the document, it is stated that the interviewee could not provide corroborating evidence.
was unable to provide any supporting or corroborating evidence or the identities of any witnesses to support his claim of victimization. did provide a handwritten list of his family and extended family members and it was not clear what investigative value, if any the list held. also stated that his great uncle, is in possession of video evidence of his crimes against a
Do not let bias could your ability to apply critical thinking. The entire premise of the justice system the Founders envisioned (based on common law), involves applying every scrutiny and questioning things until the truth becomes undeniable, not because of belief or bias, but because of fact coupled with reason.
Another thing to add was their initial conversation with the witness made them think there were signs of mental illness or emotional instability. I know that could be seen as a way to dismiss it easily, but it's possible that the dude legitimately was mentally ill and was going through psychosis. Also, that's a whole lot going on in one yacht. Think of the mess that would leave on a yacht. I just can't imagine. The logistics of it seem wild.
I think that someone with a form of mental illness could certainly reach delusions that create a self-vision of grandeur. For someone who feels pathologically unimportant, then having lots of important people give you focus, even if it is victimizing you, would potentially provide some sense of relief from such a condition.
On the other hand, someone who has been tormented in the manner the interviewee describes would certainly potentially exhibit signs of mental illness, etc.
But yeah, <the story> is a little too convenient.
To posit that these individuals DID gather to do this in one location, one would have to provide a reason and motive for that. I mean, the WHY of why would they do this, in this way. As opposed to having a group where one or two of them are principals and are participating in a larger gathering.
We've been prepared to accept that a certain percentage will not believe the truth.
Since this is so hard to take, did someone decide to put the most shocking out there first, to make it harder to believe what follows?
A random TikTok post as a very weak source and would not expect anyone to take it seriously especially since it can't bee seen or confirmed to be in the files.
There is going to have to be hard evidence for this to be believed by anyone.
So, which parts are true? This is just another FBI tip. This isn't an eye witness account or anything. There are other FBI tips where people say they watched Trump eat a baby and Robin Leech choke a preteen girl to death.
So what's true? Any of it? All of it? Just stuff that mentions people we don't like?
Wot? Are you somehow against critical thinking now?
It is one tiny fragment of evidence, and the interviewee was "unable to
provide any supporting or corroborating evidence or the identities of any
witnesses to support his claim of victimization".
Objectivity requires a questioning mind, not simply blind belief. That's what the communists do.
Throughout history, babies have been killed and eaten.
To think the club would change their rituals with the times is asinine.
Not creative enough to think up anything more Evil , besides still works ,Why change ?
They eat them to achieve a long life.
Depends on where you measure from and to...
They have to be eliminated because humans can’t accept them, these monsters will eat all of us.
Caanan + Baal = Canibal
The moar you know 🌈 an sheit 💩
u/#mikeyep
ooh, my British friend who is based and does word play and searches the meanings of words will be impressed when I tell him this
That's why it's called Canibal? Wow what?
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246048.pdf
Yup, that's from the doj. Good Lord.
Having all those big name people on a single yacht seems a little far fetched to me.
It’s a big club and you ain’t in it. — George Carlin
Thanks God we are not in it.
Exactly
Not when you understand that you don't get that big easily unless you are part of their sick club.
Let me ask you this.
Trump says any FBI thing that mentions him is fake and just a random tip a kook shared.
Isn't that exactly what this is? Why is it any different?
It's the victim statement not a tipster.
They are literally the same thing, look at how the source is explained. One is a written statement, the other is a call.
Not so far-fetched for me. When a Prince has a birthday bash. The invitation list is people of power. Not tom dick and harry.
They all could be members of a branch of secret society that got together to plot.
But .......
I on the other hand think this may be designed as a poison pill. This story goes viral, then the mainstream media can later show it's crap, and doubt is now sewed. Look at the date. Right after Epstein gets arrested. First brick laid as they say.
I am reserving judgement for later. This is not part of what I tell when I'm trying to red pill.
The fact that they're unredacted suggests that the real versions (except maybe Epstein) have been dead for some time now.
can't read it
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246048.pdf
thanks freedompatriot
I'm not gonna say that couldn't have happened, but doesn't it seem a little bit convenient that all of those figures were in the same place at the same time?
Because we don't live in a world full of private jets and wealth beyond reason, for those "accused"? Try harder man.
No, he is right to question it. If you do not question it, then you are simply going with your biases.
If its true, it will come out. Truth has to be tested by being questioned, pulled at, yanked at, and every weakness poked. Then, and only then, can the hammer of true justice fall.
If you are unwilling play devils advocate and question this, then this is just cheer leading, and not critical thinking.
note also that add_3 did not question "is this beyond reason?" "Is this impossible?". We know its possible, in a world full of private jets.
But you have to realize that normies and others will ask these sorts of questions. If the only retort you have is "C'mon man, try harder", will this convince them?
In any case, when you read the document, it is stated that the interviewee could not provide corroborating evidence.
Do not let bias could your ability to apply critical thinking. The entire premise of the justice system the Founders envisioned (based on common law), involves applying every scrutiny and questioning things until the truth becomes undeniable, not because of belief or bias, but because of fact coupled with reason.
Another thing to add was their initial conversation with the witness made them think there were signs of mental illness or emotional instability. I know that could be seen as a way to dismiss it easily, but it's possible that the dude legitimately was mentally ill and was going through psychosis. Also, that's a whole lot going on in one yacht. Think of the mess that would leave on a yacht. I just can't imagine. The logistics of it seem wild.
I think that someone with a form of mental illness could certainly reach delusions that create a self-vision of grandeur. For someone who feels pathologically unimportant, then having lots of important people give you focus, even if it is victimizing you, would potentially provide some sense of relief from such a condition.
On the other hand, someone who has been tormented in the manner the interviewee describes would certainly potentially exhibit signs of mental illness, etc.
But yeah, <the story> is a little too convenient.
To posit that these individuals DID gather to do this in one location, one would have to provide a reason and motive for that. I mean, the WHY of why would they do this, in this way. As opposed to having a group where one or two of them are principals and are participating in a larger gathering.
We've been prepared to accept that a certain percentage will not believe the truth. Since this is so hard to take, did someone decide to put the most shocking out there first, to make it harder to believe what follows?
This is by far not the most shocking.
A random TikTok post as a very weak source and would not expect anyone to take it seriously especially since it can't bee seen or confirmed to be in the files.
There is going to have to be hard evidence for this to be believed by anyone.
It is in the files. It's on the department of Justice's website. Standby, I'll find the link.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246048.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246048.pdf
Do better.
Yeah, the tape measure part threw me off. Its like, is that possible? Either way, these people are sick.
So, which parts are true? This is just another FBI tip. This isn't an eye witness account or anything. There are other FBI tips where people say they watched Trump eat a baby and Robin Leech choke a preteen girl to death.
So what's true? Any of it? All of it? Just stuff that mentions people we don't like?
This is not a tipster, this is the victim. What is wrong with you people.
Wot? Are you somehow against critical thinking now?
It is one tiny fragment of evidence, and the interviewee was "unable to provide any supporting or corroborating evidence or the identities of any witnesses to support his claim of victimization".
Objectivity requires a questioning mind, not simply blind belief. That's what the communists do.
The damning stuff is in the emails, not the nutters they have to interview.
Perfect, can you link me to those documents.
Thank you. I’m trying to get clarity on this too.
I dug more into that source document, and this is just a tip also, it's a letter someone sent to the FBI last year anonymously.
😬
Can't read it. Sauce please.
FreedomPatriot above has the link to the FBI site where you can read it.
Thanks
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246048.pdf
Thank you
holy fuck that q Anon shit was actually real
The thing is coming. Baby eaters next.
It’s pretty much as bad as it gets, but I’m grateful to finally see it front and center.
"also described several infants being killed and their intestines removed as well as other acts of cannibalism."
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246048.pdf
Think that might be the reason Epstein creating baby farm?
On the second page, it says that Epstein and WILLIAN JEEFERSON CLINTOIN rape a boy.
Do the redactions mean this information is being used for prosecution maybe?
Todd Blanche says no.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/01/epstein-files-todd-blanche-photos-00759045
Todd, Blondie and Kash must go. As it turns out, they aren't willing to do any fucking thing.
Of course, they see these kind of atrocities and don’t do anything? This is just crazy, they prefer these monsters still walking among us.