Whoa whoa whoa! That is all correct. I highly advise people accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.

Ruth was a Moabite and she is in the line of Jesus.

Nobody accepts Jesus, unless they are regenerated by the Holy Spirit.

That lives for me because i just spent the past month reading from 1 samuel through to ecclesiastes. I spent a lot of time in the maps getting the sight picture of what was happening and when. Your genealogy knowledge of the ismaelites, hammites, edimites etc and all their connections sre timley to overlay what i just read. Actually adding your stuff to my notes. Thanks.

This makes too much sense. I'm having my pastor review this to look for any flaws, according to his teaching. I will prove out, either way, whatever he comes up with.

The truth about a false Israel is still so highly sensitive for many evangelical believers today, but viewed through the right lens, it's clear that Jesus' words in Revelation about the "synagogue of Satan" isn't just true about the ones persecuting the faithful church of Smyrna (Rev. 2:8-11), but also about the ones who stand vehemently against Christians, against faithful Jews (the real Israel!), and against the Lord Jesus Christ to this very day.

Frens, if you have people in your life who struggle with this truth (among the many dark ones discussed on this site), please know that I am praying for God to work in their hearts today.

This is going to be a two-parter. This first comment will focus a little bit on the history of the Rothschilds, the Talmud, and how they connect with certain people and current day events. The comment that follows will give a brief description of the meaning of Revelation 2:19 and the Synagogue of Satan.

The name of “Rothschild”, which in German is “Rotes-Schild”, is a reference to them being the “red-shield” of the Vatican. If we look up the name “Rothschild” in old encyclopedias, the family will be referred to as “guardians of the papal treasure”. They were employed by the Habsburg family, one of the old families of Pagan Rome which operates under the shadows of Papal Rome, to fund the forming of the nation-state of Israel. Jacob Rothschild, in an interview on the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration, was even bold enough to declare the Rothschilds as the creators of Jerusalem and the modern nation-state of Israel. But why?

The Habsburg family desire a return to the “old order” of things. They desire a return to the Dark Ages of totalitarian control through the pen of the church, enforced by the sword of the state, all hidden under the guise of Christianity. Just as the Christian Nationalist, they describe the Dark Ages as the time of “a Christian constitutional state that had provided balance and security in Europe for centuries”. But interestingly enough, the title of “Holy Roman Emperor” was given in 1519 to Charles of Habsburg the Archduke of Austria and the King of Spain, who then dedicated himself to the eradication of Christianity. Continuing in their dedication, in 1922, as owners of the nation-state of Israel, the Habsburgs have been working under the self-conferred title of “King of Jerusalem”. But this title is not a new one.

During the Dark Ages of 1099, the Crusaders of Papal Rome established the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (LKJ) at the end of the First Crusade. Since 1100 until their apparent defeat at the Battle of Acre in 1291, the ruler of the LKJ held the title of “King of Jerusalem”. But this title dates back even further to the claim of Guillaume of Gellone, a canonized saint of Papal Rome and the son of Makhir ben Yehudah Zakkai of Narbonne.

Makhir ben Yehudah Zakkai, also known as Natronai ben Habibi, was a Babylonian-Jewish scholar who held the position of Exilarch of Narbonne. Holding the title of exilarch put Natronai as the recognized community leader of the exiles, and as a claimed descendant of king David. The position of exilarch gave Natronai complete temporal dominion over the Jewish without having to meet any of the religious oversight. He was as a “god, knowing good and evil” who had received “the promises afforded to David without any of the conditions”. To this day Benjamin Netanyahu, for example, reports to the holder of the title of “exilarch”. The current exilarch is he who is crowned as the “King of Jerusalem”, which today is a title shared by two people: Karl von Habsburg, the son of Otto von Habsburg, and Felipe VI, the king of Spain. Both families hold nobility and leadership over the Knights of Malta, and both families are intimately connected with Donald Trump.

Now interestingly enough, the whole idea of having an exilarch comes from a particular set of people who call themselves Chabad Jews. Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are Chabad Jews. Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East who also holds a senior leadership on the newly formed Board of Peace, is spiritually a Chabad Jew. As a Roman construct, they follow the “prophecies” of the Babylonian Talmud which states that “the son of David (Moshiach) will not come until two patriarchal houses are destroyed from Israel”.

Now the Babylonian Talmud (Bavli) was not compiled into a finalized, codified form until the late sixth century. The Bavli, which forms the foundation of the large majority of Jewish learning from what can be called Rabbinic Judaism, was first completed in the ancient region of Babylonia and is composed of both the Mishnah and the Gemara. These two books are collections of commentaries and discussions of rabbis from the second century to the end of the sixth century. Interestingly enough, the printing of the Bavli did not begin in the Middle East but first began in Spain, the home of the Jesuit Order, about nine centuries later, and the oldest extant complete edition of the Bavli appeared in Venice, the home of many families of Roman royalty, some forty years after its printing.

Comparing the teachings of the Babylonian Talmud and the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, we find the exact same mindset. Tract Babha Metsia, fol. 33a, tract Sopherim XV, 7, fol. 13b, and Hilkhoth Teschubhah (111,8) describes the valuing of tradition equal-to-or higher than Scripture, just as in Catechism 82. Tract Sanhedrin X, 3, f. 88b and Mizbeach, 13cap. V, describe the rabbi as being able to act in the same capacity as the Roman priest. Schabbath (116a) defines heresy just as Catechism 2089. Lore Dea (178.1) and Lore Dea (157.2, Hagah) describes the very same moral code of authority found in the oath of the Jesuit Order and the Abbot’s Oath found in the 1682 Pontificale Romanum. The Abbot’s Oath reads as follows:

I swear, that heretics and schismatics, and rebels to our Lord, the lord pope, or his successors, I will to the extent of my power, persecute and beat down.

Abhodah Zarah (26b), Choschen Hammischpat (388,10), Sanhedrin (59a), and Hilkhoth Akkum (X,2) describes the very same mindset which the agents of Papal Rome acted under during the Dark Ages. Zohar (III, 227b) and Zohar (I, 38b, 39a) even attempts to justify the acts of papal persecution committed over the millennia. The Hilchot Sanhedrin, a part of the Tractate Sanhedrin, contains the very same magick of Rome, being the Jesuit teaching of "perinde ac si cadaver", which translates to "obedience as a corpse". Sepher Or Israel (177b) and Jalkut Simoni (245c. n. 772) even seek to justify murder in no different of a way than one may read in the Islamic Qur'an, which too was heavily influenced by, if not guided completely by, the mindset of Rome.

Less than two decades after the completion of the Babylonian Talmud, Pope Boniface III was granted “Universal Spiritual Power” by the Roman Emperor Phocas, also known as the “Caesar of the Eastern Roman Empire” whose seat was in Constantinople. At the same time that Rabbinic Judaism and Papal Romanism were being codified and finalized, Mohammad Mustafa, the prophet of Islam, was married to Khadija bint Khuwaylid, a Roman Catholic nun and daughter of a wealthy merchant family. The two would have a daughter named Fatima, but since you mentioned the Rothschilds and the Talmud, let us not go into the Islamic connection for now. Just know that the connection is very real as the system of Roman Catholicism was the one to sponsor Islam just as it did Rabbinic Judaism.

Sounds right to me

You are learning.

I have several posts on GAW on this topic, but are scattered in different threads. I will give you my understanding, and maybe fill in a few missing parts that help complete the picture.

First, the Bible is fundamentally a story about the protagonists (good guys) versus the antagonists (bad guys who are always trying to cause problems for the good guys).

We know of the Israelites as the good guys -- God's Chosen. But there are two important points:

(1) We have been lied to about who the Israelites really were and are today, and

(2) we have to go back even before the Israelites to understand the full picture. We need to know WHO is WHO, in order to understand what the Bible is teaching.

One cannot understand the New Testament without understanding it in context of the Old Testament, and one cannot understand the OT without an understanding of it within the context of the NT. They interlink, overlap, and confirm each other.

Remember: Jesus said, "I have not come to destroy the Law, but to fulfill it."

So, the NT is the OT is the NT.

This is why jews and muslims will never understand. They denounce the NT, and really they also denounce the OT because their Talmud and Quran say things that violate what the OT says.

Let's start with Jacob and Esau, then work backwards and then forwards.

You said:

Esau gave up his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of food,

It was not about the food. It was really about the bloodline.

Yes, God already knew what would happen, which is why He told Rebekah that she had "two nations" in her womb. Those two nations would be at war with each other.

A "nation" is not about a land area. It is a people who are related by blood. They are family.

These two twins were related by blood, but Esau would violate God's Law and "cross over" to the evil side. This is why God hated Esau.

He married 2 Canaanite women and 1 Ishmaelite.

And THIS is where he "crossed over." He violated God's Law.

What was the first law that God created?

"Kind after kind," all the way back in Genesis 1.

Esau crossed over to race mix with a different kind.

The Canaanites were to be avoided, not to be race-mixed with. That is because they were both cursed and of the evil bloodline.

They were the descendants of Canaan. Canaan, a son of Ham, was cursed because he was the product of incest. Ham had sex with his own mother.

In Jude 1:7, the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were "giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh."

What is "strange flesh?" It is those of a different race. This is the true meaning of "fornication" in the Bible.

So, let's back up a step.

Adam was created by God, but that does not mean that other humanoids on planet Earth were also created by God. Or if they were, they were not given the same Sprit that Adam was.

We can go back about 6,000-8,000 years to find the first "White humans" on Earth, which is about when we can calculate that Adam was created, according to the Bible.

In Hebrew, "Adm" means "to be ruddy." It is the ability to become red in the face. Only White people can become red in the face, either through anger or embarrassment.

But Adam coming on the scene 6,000+ years ago does NOT mean there were not other "animals" and "man" also on Earth before then. Think: Neanderthal, etc.

Genesis 1, creation of all, is separated from Genesis 2, creation of a PARTICULAR man (Adam).

So, we get to Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden and ... the Serpent.

Again, NT is OT is NT.

In Matthew 13:35, Jesus tells us --

I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.

So, the OT did NOT tells us everything we needed to know. Jesus came back to give us more info.

And WHO did he want to give that info to?

Matthew 15:24 --

I am NOT sent (to Earth) but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

700 years before Christ (i.e. God Himself, in human form), the Israelites in the original Kingdom of Israel had been captured into slavery by the Assyrians.

And 500 years before Christ, the rest of the Israelites (those of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin) were captured from the Kingdom of Judah by the Babylonians into slavery.

When freed, those captured by the Babylonians went back to what HAD been the Kingdom of Judah, but was now (many years later) the Roman province of Judea.

Those who had been captured by the Assyrians, never went back to the Kingdom of Isreal. Instead, they migrated north into the Caucasus Mountain region. Later generations would migrate westward into the wilderness of Europe and settle. They were known as "Caucasians" because they knew their ancestors had lived in the Caucasus Mountain region.

BUT ...

They did NOT know they were ALSO the descendants of the Israelites, who had been captured centuries earlier.

Hence, the "lost tribes of Israel" were scattered around Europe and the Middle East. They were His sheep, and He came for THEM, and ONLY for them.

Notice, that Paul would write ALL of his letters (epistles) to WHITE Europeans. There were never any letters written to the Chinese or Africans, etc.

In Rev 12:7, Jesus tells us --

7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

So, Jesus tells us that SATAN was cast out of Heaven, along with his buddies.

THIS is why the "Serpent" was in the Garden of Eden.

In Hebrew, "Satan" mean "Adversary."

Satan and his people are the adversaries of God and His people.

Remember, God said at 3:15 --

And I will put enmity (opposition or hostility) between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed;

Hint: It was not about an apple, and "fruit" is not about eating an apple.

The Serpent/Satan seduced Eve, sexually, and produced Cain.

This is why "nakedness" is relevant.

And apple has nothing to do with nakedness.

But the Bible is not a porn magazine. The wording is delicate.

Fruit and seed have to do with sex and bloodlines (seed lines).

So, Adam raised Cain as his son, but Cain was not his biological son. Cain was the son of Satan (Adversary). Abel was Adam's biological son.

Cain kills Abel, and Seth becomes the "replacement."

It is Seth's bloodline that would eventually produce Noah.

Noah's 3 sons would be important to the story because Shem (aka Sem) would be the father of the Semites, and Ham would have sex with his own mother, causing Canaan to be cursed, along with his descendants.

Esau/Edom would have sex with Canaanites and Hittites (part of Canaan's bloodline).

The children/descendants of Cain would be the Kenites. This might not look right in English, but in Hebrew it does:

QYN = Cain QYNY = Kenite

The Kenites were of the evil bloodline (Satanic), and they lived among the Canaanites, who would mix with them. So, the Edomites became a bloodline that had PART Semitic blood (through Shem >> Abraham >> Isaac >> Esau), but ALSO part Satanic blood through Satan >> Cain >> Kenites & Canaanites >> Esau/Edom.

THIS is why God hated Esau. He knew that Esau would violate God's first law: Kind after kind.

Getting back to your post:

God said he loved Jacob but hated Esau. Esau rejected God. Jacob stayed faithful.

Yes, but not because of food. It was because Esau mixed with the evil bloodline.

Canaan will be servant of servants because that bloodline is subservient to Shem (especially; OG Jews) and Japheth (Gentiles). Esau mates with Canaanites and Ishmaelites (Abraham's bastard son's line). And that becomes Edom. All the tribes attacking Israel biblically are from the cursed lines. The Hittites are from the same people, but because Uriah was repentant and faithful, he is redeemed in Israel.

Err ... no.

Canaan's bloodline is of Ham, not Shem. And jews are NOT Semites. They lie about that (among many other things).

There is SOME Semitic blood, but once Esau crossed over and mixed with the Satanic and cursed bloodlines, they were no longer considered of Shem.

They were also not considered of Abraham, which is WHY Jesus told them that Abraham was not their father. Yes, he was Isaac's father, and Esau's grandfather, but once Esau mixed with the Satanic line, Jesus said their father is the devil, "the murderer from the beginning" and "father of lies."

Today's jews are NOT the Israelites or even the Semites of the Bible. And they KNOW this -- at least the ones at the top of the "pyramid" know it.

They acknowledge this in their Jewish Encyclopedia, which is the OFFICIAL history of the jews.

They know they are not Israelites, and the know that Edom is within jewry.

The word "gentile" comes from the latin "gentilus" because Rome controlled their province of Judea back in Jesus' time.

A "gentile" was one who was not a Roman citizen. That's it.

The jews have bastardized the word and turned it upside-down. It does NOT mean "non-jew," except to jews. It really means one who is not of the nation (boodline or in Roman times, citizenry).

Uriah was repentant and faithful

Uriah is an interesting side story. Do you know that Uriah is the ONLY man in the Bible that we know for sure had ONLY ONE wife?

Most of the men in the Bible had multiple wives. Abraham, Jacob, David, etc. Some, we don't know. It does not tell us if Adam had more than one wife, for example. But it does tells us that Bathsheba was Uriah's ONLY wife.

And his life turned to shit. (lol)

His only wife cheated on him with David, had a bastard son, who God despised and killed (due to being the product of adultery), and then the man she cheated with, David, sent Uriah off to battle and he was killed.

Then, Bathsheba (now a widow) hooks up with David again, become his 17th or 18th wife (or "woman" which is the Hebrew word) and they have a son that God loves.

Go figure ...

Seems like God is telling us the men should have multiple women.

Anyhoo ...

Jesus ignored the Canaanite woman with the demon possessed child ... He heals her because the only way to lift a generational curse ...

I think He healed her because her answer told Him that she understood the truth, and He took mercy on her.

If the Edomites are the liars who say they are Jews but not really , they are of the synagogue of Satan

Edomites are liars because they are of the evil seed. It is their nature to lie and deceive. And this is what the jews have been doing for a long, long time.

Why have they been kicked out of 100+ countries over the past 1,000+ years?

Because they are easy to get along with?

No, because they constantly cause trouble (are adversaries) for the true Israelites -- the White Europeans.

And the jews have perverted the scripture here. They say they are JUDEANS, not that they are jews.

They claimed to live in Judea, a Roman province, which had formally been the land of the Kingdom of Judah.

By CLAIMING to be Judeans, they were implying that they were Israelites (of Judah, son of Jacob/Israel).

But it was (and still is) a lie.

If a Chinese man moves to Texas, is he a Texan? Is a Somali occupying Minnesota a Minnesotan or American? Nope.

This is what the Edomites were doing. When the true Israelites were captured and deported (from Kingdom of Israel and Kingdom of Judah), the Edomites moved in to occupy the territory. It would later be conquered by Rome and become the Roman province called Judea by the time of Jesus.

These Edomites were pretending to be Israelites by saying they were Judeans (Judean, not Jew). But Jesus knew better.

BTW, Jesus was "accused" of being the King of the Judeans, NOT the so-called King of the Jews.

More jewish lies and twisting of facts.

(This turned out to be a LONG post -- part 1 of 2)

Just had to throw some Trump shade in there, huh.

This is the man that is allegedly Trump's handler, but I don't see proof of that necessarily. Trump has done a lot of good; however, we need to be careful, but I digress.

Eat shit doomer.

This is hate porn for idiots.

What's worse, is that this is extremely effective hate porn for idiots.

Invoke God (if God is on your side who can object?). Interject millennium-old biblical struggles. Make a 1k leap of logic to apply it to modernity. Get Israel it's desperately-required evidence of persecution.

Near the end, stick in associations between Trump and Epstein ... it's ok, nobody read that far you're safe. If they did, say there's no hard evidence so those who "notice" don't care as much.

Stoke the whole "muh Joos aren't really muh Joos" Khazarian Mafia retardedness that lost it's edge since it was proven beyond shadow of a doubt that those who coined the term are a major psyop operation. https://greatawakening.win/p/19Bst57J73/the-shady-beginnings-of-the-khaz/

Watch people come along still referencing it and wonder if they're intentionally pushing a psyop, or just a weak minded fool who fell for it.

This is what I'd really like to know though. Why only Israel?

Where the hell are the CCP haters who rant all day long about how much they hate the Chinese because they're genociding the Uyghurs?

Where the hell are the Afghanistan haters because they Bacha bazi rape boys as an accepted part of their culture?

Where the hell are the Indian haters who are bothered by the rape capital of the world sitting in a sea of human excrement in the streets?

Or Muslims ... we've been collectively forced to read how horrible muh Torrah is by a hundred+ bots over the last half decade, where are the Quran haters? None to be found. Muslms are over 1/4 of the world population, Jews are 0.2%, certainly there should be 20,000x the complaints about Muslims because they're 20,000x the population right?

But no. It's pretty much only Jews that get complained about, as if this dead horse needs yet another stickie to remind everyone to give it a few more stomps. Sophisticated complaints buried in what appears a bible sermon, who could object?

I do. It's bullshit, in-your-face psyop.

It is suspected that the Iranian Christians have the full family histories and geneologies going all the way back to Edom showing all the Israeli, British, Saudi, Spanish, Dutch, Italian, French, Swiss, Chinese, Ukrainian, and US family lines. They likely are memorized and passed down, but they appear to have been sharing that intel with the Russians via the Orthodox Church channels. Russians likely shared this info INSIDE the soccer ball at Helsinki (2018) with Trump, and they likely also shared the info with Xi to assist in his "corruption purges" at some point (unknown date, but likely post 12MAY2012 Putin inauguration and post Xi taking power in 2013).

This is the REAL REASON that Israel wants to "destroy Iran", take it over and murder all the Christians there (some hiding as Muslims, estimated @63million total) just like the zionists/Edomites did in Russia 1917-1923.

Note that modern Israel is basically re-assembly of Canaan+Phoenician occupied lands. A composite if you overlay the historical maps.

You can trace the Canaanites forward in time through Phoenicians to the Carthaginians. Then there was a split to Malta and Spain (likely Canary Islands and vicinity) after Rome destroyed Carthage for child sacrifice and other evils. Descendants in Spain took on Catholicism (faking) and were primary agitators in the murder of other Christians during the Inquisition. Descendants in Malta re-infiltrated the Roman Empire and Vatican via Amalfi maritime Republic and Venetian Republic (maritime Republics). Then a split from Venice to Switzerland and Amsterdam (city-state with identical structure as Venice, and called Venice of the North). Swiss group consolidated power ~1255 and implement private family banks as used in Venice. Amsterdam integrated Spanish branch that overstayed their welcome in continental Spain, but likely retained control over the Canary Islands to this day.

Swiss branch then split to the area that would become Prussia which would then split again, consuming Germany and repopulating their historical homeland in Ukraine (driven out/isolated by Russia around ~1200). The Amsterdam/Dutch branch then took over Londinium and re-located mercantilist HQ to Londinium city-state (now London) with help from both Swiss branch and Venetians. London HQ eventually subverted the Crowne and then took over most of the Dutch and Spanish Empires, likely with the help of their friends on the inside and Swiss financiers. Thus, the British Empire was created.

Then British Empire subverted Russian Empire, did a coup, took over Russia, renaming it USSR and proceeding to "split off" Ukraine (W Khazaria), Kazahkastan (E Khazaria), and Georgia (S Khazaria) for potential re-integration later [they were trying to do this now]. Prior to that the British Empire supported Prussia re-integration and takeover of German states to create a single German state for future battle against USSR to further destroy Russia once Nationalist Stalin took it away from them. Then the British created Israel, a RECREATION of CANAAN+PHOENICIA right on top of where they used to be with the Belfour Declaration (just after OCT1917 in NOV) and then Mossad (1947) and state of Israel (1948). With British assistance, Germany was imploded in 1945 and effectively moved into the US (as military branch of their empire) and S. America (backup money source via drugs, with help of largest landholder in SA, the Vatican via Colombia Jesuit HQ).

Edomites now control these KEY areas: US (partial), Israel, London/UK+Commonwealth+Iran (removed), Rome+Vatican+Colombia (partial), China (partial via Taiwan), Ukraine, Kazahkstan (possibly removed), Georgia (possibly removed), Switzerland, and Canary Islands (possibly a city-state there).

They'll fail regardless. There will be no third temple, as prophecy has already been fulfilled. They misread and fail to understand the new testament, so they will attempt to simulate reality by forcing a false narrative into existence. THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID.

There is no third temple in scripture.

Revelation 21:22 says there is no temple in the New Jerusalem, because God Himself is the temple.

Daniel 9:27; 11:31; 12:11, there is mention of sacrifice being stopped and an “abomination of desolation.” This was fulfilled historically with the destruction of the temple by Rome's armies in 70 AD.

1st temple: Solomon

2nd temple: post-exile, destroyed in 70 AD

The temple ultimately points to God dwelling with His people

The church is called God’s temple (1 Corinthians 3:16)

Christ Himself is the true temple (John 2:19–21)

Going back to animal sacrifices would be like reinstalling dial-up after fiber internet showed up

I doubt anyone today can trace the 1000+ generations of their lineage to know that all of their 2^1000+ ancestors are of none of those lines but yes, knowing Christ is key.

Moab and Ammon are not Lot’s daughters. They are the names of the sons conceived by Lot and his daughters. Moab mean “from my father” and Ammon means “son of my kin”.

Dissenting in part:

Ruth, an ancestor of King David, was a Moabite, and so it checks out that foreigners were in the lineage of Christ. Ruth 1:4, 22; 2:2; Matthew 1:5-6

Lot, Abraham’s nephew, created a lot of trouble. Genesis 19:36-38 with his progeny —> to both Ammonites & Moabites.

Judah married a Canaanite woman, Shua (Genesis 38:2)

King David married Maacah, daughter of th3 king of Geshur.

Solomon married a daughter of the Pharaoh of Egypt (1st Kings 3:1) and he married many foreign women, including Edomite, Ammonite, Hittite (1st Kings 11:1)

Isaiah, Jeremiah, and other prophets speak judgment on the people of Judah for following after other gods. After the Babylonian captivity, a remnant returns. These are real people of the Tribe of Judah, including the lineage of Christ.

There were communities of people of the Tribe of Judah spread across Greece, the Aegean islands, Crete, Cyprus, Asia Minor (present-day Turkiye), and Syria.

From the time Rome entered Judea in 63 BCE up to 70 A.D. and after the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, estimates range from 2 million to 10 million Judeans lived across the Roman Empire. (Some even hypothesize that Christ’s Uncle Joseph of Arimathea did business as far away as Britain)

1. John M. G. Barclay, “Jews in the Mediterranean Diadpora”
2. Cicero complained in 59 BCE of the political strength of Judeans in Rome. https://cojs.org/61-b-c-e-cicero-106-b-c-e-42-b-c-e/
3. Edict of Cicero, 41 A.D. (same cojs link as above) ”the Judeans who are in all the world under us”

From these people, Judeans, descended the people today who are known as the Jews. They are not Khazars, they are not pure Edomites. They are Judeans many of who intermarried / or procreated / mixed with Caucasians. And Hasmonean ruler John Hyrcanus forced Idumeans of the southern Judah / Negev area to get circumcised and observe the Torah.

Now they would have been following not Moses / simple teachings of the Torah, books of Moses, but all of the “Oral Torah” & Christ opposed all things contrary to Moses.

Idumeans were Edomites, and some mixed in with Judeans, but their gene pool did not erase the descendancy of Judeans from Abraham.

The Jews today are descendants of a mix of descendants of Abraham and foreigners.

Solomon, whose birth name was Jedidiah (Yedidyah, rough translation “friend of Yah”) brought in Phoenician workers to build the 1st Temple. They brought in their foreign gods + Solomon intermarried with foreign women who brought in their worship practices right in same city where the temple was built for Yahweh.

The battle is spiritual, and some descendants of Abraham might turn away from Talmudism, Kabbalism, all that stuff. The Talmud = false reactions due to their ancestors failing to walk honestly in the simple truths & ways the prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah taught.

Spiritually, sure, they are not walking with God. They might as well be Idumeans / Edomites, but Askenazi or other, many still are descendants of Abraham.

If they weren’t descendants in part of Abraham, then who did the Judeans of the 1st centuries BCE & A.D. become? There’s prophecies of God dealing in the future with restored Houses of Judah and Israel.

Christ came to fulfill, to make full to the brim, bring to fruition the Torah teaching God gave to Moses and all of Israel, and I just don’t see all Jews as being Edom.

Spiritually though, many do = Edomites spiritually: Rothschilds and kabbalistic initiates and Talmudic Judaism are far from the simple truths God said to follow through the Prophets: to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with God. Fair to call these initiates of evil “spiritual Edomites”.

Oh holy crap. THAT Lutnick? I think it was his wife who sent that email, IIRC, but you have some facts wrong. That was in the Podesta emails, not Epstein's. And it wasn't about Epstein's island.

Looks like you found Rich Tidwell on YT. He's one of the few that actually talks about this. Everything he talks about is directly linked to passages in the Bible, and in [their] own words printed in the Talmud and other writings from the modern Sanhedrin, Saducees, and Pharisees, as well as writings from the Masonic Lodges.

I happen to agree with him. I'm surprised he hasn't been cancelled and banned from YT yet.

It sounds like your minister thinks that there are certain inherently cursed people versus inherently blessed people. The Bible says that "there is none righteous, not even one (Rom. 3:10). "All have sinned and come short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23)." To sin is to "miss the mark." The "mark" is the glory of God. We were made to be in God's image inwardly (righteous and holy), and thereby to express Him as glory. Only one man fits that description--Jesus Christ. Only one man has escaped the curse of sin and death. The rest of us are under the curse, obviously, because we die, and are of our father, the devil, until we receive Christ and become children of God.

Those who are joined to Christ in spirit (1 Cor. 6:17) receive God's uncreated, eternal life (called Zoe in Greek, vs. Bios -physical life). In God's life is His nature. They are righteous in Him (Philippians 3:9) and are being transformed inwardly to be holy by partaking of the Holy Spirit (Heb. 6:4; 2 Peter 1:4). Ultimately, they will express Him in glory. To be in Christ is to escape the curse.

The difference between Esau and Jacob was their relationship with Christ. Christ came through Jacob's line. Esau's line was a persecutor of the line of Christ. He is a type of a natural person of fleshly appetites who is an enemy of God.

We are all in one line or the other, but we don't have to stay in the line of Esau and the other enemies of Christ. Ruth (from the book of Ruth) was a Moabite (from Lot's incestuous line). She switched lines by joining herself to God's people. She became an ancestor of King David who was an ancestor of Christ. And as you pointed out, Uriah, the Hittite, also joined himself to God's people.

I'm of the opinion that Ham's wife, Naamah was from the Cain line. They had relations on the Ark ( The dog, the Raven & Ham). The curse was passed to Canaan in much the same way as the blessing went to Jacob (aka Israel) later on in the narrative. The story of Ham seeing Noah naked and Canaan being cursed does not really make sense as wriiten in the Bible.