Yea this guy doesnt have any info. Paytriot at best. Probably a paid Judas Goat, controlled opposition influencer paid by the same puppeteers that control Iran.
It is worded a bit odd. But read it carefully, and pay attention to the periods.
"Every single president since Clinton received the same intelligence briefing on Iran's nuclear timeline. Every single one was told the window was closing. ...
Trump got the same briefing. (note the period) 60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout...
Substitute "intelligence briefing" for the word "meeting" and it makes more sense. Trump is not saying that he got the exact same information as prior people. He is saying that he had the same event (an intelligence briefing) happen to him.
Trump had the same briefing on the topic of the Iran timeline," but not the exact same intelligence information details.
President Trump didn't need any briefing, in 1979, the 'minister-in-chief 'Carter, 'micromanage' by the globalist demon, Brzezsinki, for decades, Iran had been building up their nuclear capability. He said as president, would have taken action against Iran.
I think that's the point: the hackneyed story had turned Iran into a the big bad wolf. By the time they tried it on Trump (list of things to scare the new president with), they had cried wolf too many times.
It wasn't just defence spending racket, it was also the insurance gravy train. The 'terror surcharge' that held up Iran as this unstable, scary bunch. Thou mun pay money to London, for the right to do trade with an oil-rich nation somewhere else, because of a giant myth. Somebody was coining it, and building great glass-covered towers to prove it. It was never meant to improve ordinary people's lives, and it was all a great big narrative. Oh and the side-racket of sex, drugs and rock-and-roll - to enhance the glass towers...
TBH, Why shouldn't Iran get the scary toll-booth fee (equivalent of 1 USD per barrel, in any currency, except for USD - what's that these days: 1%, or less)? Iran already controls the traffic through there, unlike London, who only made stories and fake news, with dubious footage and much glorious influencers to promote the tourist trade, to charge that luxurious fee and more (like 10%). Dispelling the Iran= font-of-all-evil myth may turn out good for everyone, provided more refineries (from whichever side) don't keep getting taken offline.
Meanwhile, everything that is inflicted on Iran is returned ten-fold, on Israel. I pray that cooler heads will prevail in the chaos. But that would mean negotiating with Iran, and some people think that is treasonous.
"I just got off the phone with someone who works in defense policy in Washington. What they told me should end every "Trump is reckless" argument permanently.
"Every single president since Clinton received the same intelligence briefing on Iran's nuclear timeline. Every single one was told the window was closing. Every single one chose to kick it down the road because the political cost of acting was higher than the political cost of waiting."
Trump got the same briefing. 60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout. Material for 2 bombs.
He chose to act knowing it would tank his approval to 35%.
He chose to act knowing his own base would split.
He chose to act knowing NATO allies would refuse to help.
He chose to act knowing gas prices would spike.
A senior analyst I know at a major think tank put it this way: "The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage."
Read that again.
Every president had the same file on their desk. Only one opened it and did something."
As someone who understands Iran was inevitable, and that there's more at stake than just Iran, his approval has absolutely tanked. 95% of my Trump supporting friends, including military, have lost faith in Trump.
If every single president were told they almost had a bomb, then they were lying. Because nothing was done and they built no bomb. How can the same report from 20 years ago be on the same timeline as today? That makes absolutely no sense.
A senior analyst I know at a major think tank put it this way: "The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage."
While the (X) post is nice, its an extremely normie (X) post.
Normies try to understand what Trump is doing, and come up with very normie explanations. "Trump has more courage". While that is probably true - I mean, which presidents post-Eisenhower (aside from JFK) have really had to face what DJT has faced? (Not talking about Iran or anything, but rather, the DS Cabal and corrupt wanna-be world rulers).
Nixon, perhaps, but I think he was not in a position to do what had to be done. After JFK, Nixon was already outmaneuvered.
The real difference between Trump and all the presidents (except to some exception, Reagan) who never acted on Iran's regime is that Trump puts America first, and all those other presidents served interests other than the people and nation of the United States.
They served other masters. Trump serves God and the People.
Bush snr, Clinton, Bush Jnr, Obama, Fake President Biden, they all had a vested interest in the people who created the radical Iranian regime. They all were playing a corrupted game.
Yes, DJT has the courage, but he has something more important. A true and honest purpose and a truly patriotic heart.
Carter's world view never changed, and what he did with the shah was consistent with that view. He was not weak. He was an ideologue and very sure of himself. Hence the great malaise speech. He had the support of a democrat Congress for both his domestic and foreign policy. And there were both lobbyists and protesters who demanded we withdraw support for the shah. I dealt with them and passed them every evening crossing the 14th street Bridge.
Handlers? Or advisers. He was in agreement and followed his course in his post presidency.
I don't even think that anyone opposed to the war will be remotely convinced. They'll say the other presidents did the sensible thing by strategically waiting, and that Trump should have done the same. To them, courage is the same as recklessness anyway.
Clinton sold them the uranium and profited biggly. Every president since Clinton were lining their pockets to not do anything. Trump is not and never was for sale.
The difference is that Trump is not a politician. He is first an American and he has the courage to put it all on the line to save the country he loves when the situation requires it. There is a reason God spared his life - for such a time as this.
I don’t know who Ronald Carter is, but he left out the part about Iran being an important part of the Cabal’s web of control. And, that the reason for 30+ years of claiming Iran was weeks away was to push the conclusion it was too late to do anything. All because roque nuclear states are part of their web of control.
Trump is the BEST Easter gift after Jesus. "A good egg" as the Brits would say. JUST as JESUS was sent to save us spiritually, I believe Trump was sent to save us physically by LEADING us out of slavery. And Q was "Part of the Plan". HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE!
The thing is that the post is partly true, which, imo, detracts from the message. I do wish that we would let truth stand on its own without jazzing it up with exaggeration.
This smells like bullshit too. He's been arguing the whole time that he doesn't need anyone else's approval because Iran is such an imminent threat. I think it's much more likely this post is just lying.
Blah blah blah. CNN polls even show 100% approval. Wheres the split in MAGA? Nobody in my sphere has split. Makes his entire post fan fiction even though there may be a lucky truth or two found within.
There's alot of comments on there where people want to trust that the Islamic Republic REALLY would not have achieved nuclear capabilities because they don't want to credit Trump with doinf anything good. We've all known for decades we'd eventually be at war with those people. They're crazy and filled with hatred toward the United States, who HELPED them come to power. (Stupid, yes, but Carter never did understand people.)
even if he lost some support, the truth is that the democrat policies are so bad that hes still gonna have what he needs when its time to vote cause the alternative is so insane.
Trump got the same briefing (weeks away from nuke) that's been given for 30+ years?
Clearly something doesn't compute. Maybe it was always just an excuse for gravy trains (defence spending, but not using)
Yea this guy doesnt have any info. Paytriot at best. Probably a paid Judas Goat, controlled opposition influencer paid by the same puppeteers that control Iran.
Was wondering the same.
Also, didn't Trump "completely and totally annihilate" Iran nuclear program with those stealth bombers last year?
Can't keep blaming "Iran has nukes."
It is worded a bit odd. But read it carefully, and pay attention to the periods.
Substitute "intelligence briefing" for the word "meeting" and it makes more sense. Trump is not saying that he got the exact same information as prior people. He is saying that he had the same event (an intelligence briefing) happen to him.
Trump had the same briefing on the topic of the Iran timeline," but not the exact same intelligence information details.
Ah.
President Trump didn't need any briefing, in 1979, the 'minister-in-chief 'Carter, 'micromanage' by the globalist demon, Brzezsinki, for decades, Iran had been building up their nuclear capability. He said as president, would have taken action against Iran.
I think that's the point: the hackneyed story had turned Iran into a the big bad wolf. By the time they tried it on Trump (list of things to scare the new president with), they had cried wolf too many times.
It wasn't just defence spending racket, it was also the insurance gravy train. The 'terror surcharge' that held up Iran as this unstable, scary bunch. Thou mun pay money to London, for the right to do trade with an oil-rich nation somewhere else, because of a giant myth. Somebody was coining it, and building great glass-covered towers to prove it. It was never meant to improve ordinary people's lives, and it was all a great big narrative. Oh and the side-racket of sex, drugs and rock-and-roll - to enhance the glass towers...
TBH, Why shouldn't Iran get the scary toll-booth fee (equivalent of 1 USD per barrel, in any currency, except for USD - what's that these days: 1%, or less)? Iran already controls the traffic through there, unlike London, who only made stories and fake news, with dubious footage and much glorious influencers to promote the tourist trade, to charge that luxurious fee and more (like 10%). Dispelling the Iran= font-of-all-evil myth may turn out good for everyone, provided more refineries (from whichever side) don't keep getting taken offline.
Meanwhile, everything that is inflicted on Iran is returned ten-fold, on Israel. I pray that cooler heads will prevail in the chaos. But that would mean negotiating with Iran, and some people think that is treasonous.
"I just got off the phone with someone who works in defense policy in Washington. What they told me should end every "Trump is reckless" argument permanently.
"Every single president since Clinton received the same intelligence briefing on Iran's nuclear timeline. Every single one was told the window was closing. Every single one chose to kick it down the road because the political cost of acting was higher than the political cost of waiting."
Trump got the same briefing. 60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout. Material for 2 bombs.
He chose to act knowing it would tank his approval to 35%.
He chose to act knowing his own base would split.
He chose to act knowing NATO allies would refuse to help.
He chose to act knowing gas prices would spike.
A senior analyst I know at a major think tank put it this way: "The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage."
Read that again.
Every president had the same file on their desk. Only one opened it and did something."
https://nitter.net/USronaldcarter/status/2040069559663677788
I don’t think his approval has tanked. Anyone with two brain cells knows this was inevitable.
He’s dealing with the root cause of terrorism and the excuse for the war on terror spending in one fell swoop.
I agree with you this war falls under the War on Terror, therefore Trump didn't start a new war just a phase.
Since this falls under the War of Terror Trump doesn't need a congressional declaration of war.
Hopefully he’ll manage to end it too.
That's asking a lot for some folks.
Yeah, some only have 1 brain cell.
Agreed.
As someone who understands Iran was inevitable, and that there's more at stake than just Iran, his approval has absolutely tanked. 95% of my Trump supporting friends, including military, have lost faith in Trump.
If every single president were told they almost had a bomb, then they were lying. Because nothing was done and they built no bomb. How can the same report from 20 years ago be on the same timeline as today? That makes absolutely no sense.
It makes sense if the people feeding the intel are "our greatest ally!"
My first reaction was that this has been written with AI:
The rhetorical list, for example.
Then there is the 'senior analyst that I know' reference. LOL.
i am sure
Thanks purkiss80. Spot on. Courage!!!
While the (X) post is nice, its an extremely normie (X) post.
Normies try to understand what Trump is doing, and come up with very normie explanations. "Trump has more courage". While that is probably true - I mean, which presidents post-Eisenhower (aside from JFK) have really had to face what DJT has faced? (Not talking about Iran or anything, but rather, the DS Cabal and corrupt wanna-be world rulers).
Nixon, perhaps, but I think he was not in a position to do what had to be done. After JFK, Nixon was already outmaneuvered.
The real difference between Trump and all the presidents (except to some exception, Reagan) who never acted on Iran's regime is that Trump puts America first, and all those other presidents served interests other than the people and nation of the United States.
They served other masters. Trump serves God and the People.
Bush snr, Clinton, Bush Jnr, Obama, Fake President Biden, they all had a vested interest in the people who created the radical Iranian regime. They all were playing a corrupted game.
Yes, DJT has the courage, but he has something more important. A true and honest purpose and a truly patriotic heart.
In my opinion.
Iran had a king and no nuclear bomb ambitions during Nixon. Carter did that.
Yup
I do not think or believe that Carter was running the show. At all. Useful puppet.
I don't think you can ascribe the responsibility or action to him. It was his controllers that did it.
Carter's world view never changed, and what he did with the shah was consistent with that view. He was not weak. He was an ideologue and very sure of himself. Hence the great malaise speech. He had the support of a democrat Congress for both his domestic and foreign policy. And there were both lobbyists and protesters who demanded we withdraw support for the shah. I dealt with them and passed them every evening crossing the 14th street Bridge.
Handlers? Or advisers. He was in agreement and followed his course in his post presidency.
I don't even think that anyone opposed to the war will be remotely convinced. They'll say the other presidents did the sensible thing by strategically waiting, and that Trump should have done the same. To them, courage is the same as recklessness anyway.
👌🙏🏻
Good point. A lot of traitors have occupied the White House.
Clinton sold them the uranium and profited biggly. Every president since Clinton were lining their pockets to not do anything. Trump is not and never was for sale.
The difference is that Trump is not a politician. He is first an American and he has the courage to put it all on the line to save the country he loves when the situation requires it. There is a reason God spared his life - for such a time as this.
I don’t know who Ronald Carter is, but he left out the part about Iran being an important part of the Cabal’s web of control. And, that the reason for 30+ years of claiming Iran was weeks away was to push the conclusion it was too late to do anything. All because roque nuclear states are part of their web of control.
u/#q1245.
Iran ->
Any other rogue nuclear states? -> Israel
Saving Israel for last.
Trump is the BEST Easter gift after Jesus. "A good egg" as the Brits would say. JUST as JESUS was sent to save us spiritually, I believe Trump was sent to save us physically by LEADING us out of slavery. And Q was "Part of the Plan". HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE!
And "for Such a Time as This". God bless His 'David' President Trump
Bottom line. Thank you, God.
The thing is that the post is partly true, which, imo, detracts from the message. I do wish that we would let truth stand on its own without jazzing it up with exaggeration.
So if every president got the same briefing why didn't Trump do something in his first term? This post smells like bullshit.
Trump didn't have the political capital to do much in his first term, and certainly not anything like attacking another nation.
This smells like bullshit too. He's been arguing the whole time that he doesn't need anyone else's approval because Iran is such an imminent threat. I think it's much more likely this post is just lying.
I guess you're right.
Congress totally would not have impeached him for violating the War Powers Act in his first term.
I mean it's not as if they didn't try to impeach him TWICE with nothing really to impeach him for.
Blah blah blah. CNN polls even show 100% approval. Wheres the split in MAGA? Nobody in my sphere has split. Makes his entire post fan fiction even though there may be a lucky truth or two found within.
I just got off the phone with my friend that works at McDonald's. The ice cream machine should be up and running again, in about two weeks.
What about the SLS's nuclear program? Oh that's right they don't have one......
There's alot of comments on there where people want to trust that the Islamic Republic REALLY would not have achieved nuclear capabilities because they don't want to credit Trump with doinf anything good. We've all known for decades we'd eventually be at war with those people. They're crazy and filled with hatred toward the United States, who HELPED them come to power. (Stupid, yes, but Carter never did understand people.)
I doubt Carter had a mind of his own. It always seemed to me that he took orders from his controllers.
Didn't Hillary/Obuma sell our uranium?
even if he lost some support, the truth is that the democrat policies are so bad that hes still gonna have what he needs when its time to vote cause the alternative is so insane.
I voted for this
“60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout. Material for 2 bombs” since Clinton? LOL.
Thank God for Trump