Bayer has just SUED Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson in federal court.
(twitter.com)
WE ARE THE NEWS
Comments (54)
sorted by:
This makes me want to cry. I was cleaning and going through paperwork this weekend and found my employer’s mandate from 2021 and my draft exemption with notes. Thank God for this community, I don’t know how I would have weathered that without you all.
To the point of this article, though, the fight isn’t just about who should get royalties. Admitting everyone who received it is GMO. Vaxxed are the property of these companies.
I'm still pissed off about having to beg for an exemption from my previous employer.
I'm a pretty even-tempered guy, but sometimes I think I should work on retaining my anger better and find a way to focus it on some of the scumbags.
For a cause like this (the covid forced shot), you had/have every right to go full nuclear. I still can't believe the shot was forced for some ppl to keep their jobs or kids to enter schools. Absolutely criminal and infuriating.
I've heard that some medical schools are still requiring it. It's insanity.
It’s still available too, it has a black box warning….whoopdeedo. Makes me want to cry too.
We can’t hate them enough.
Agreed, they killed millions and millions including animals for control and greed
"their agricultural genetic modification technology was copied and injected into human beings WITHOUT A LICENSE." !!
I think the Big Pharma CEOs involved with the mRNA injections should be tried for MURDER...including Bayer.
A guilty verdict gets the death penalty.
Should? Have to
This is a shocking revelation.
No kidding! I still trust Bayer aspirin. No one forced us to take it, or shut down businesses and kept kids out of school to force us to take it.
So I am glad Bayer is suing them.
Consider White Willow in lieu of aspirin - It’s what the Indians (excuse me, native Americans) used to use for minor pain. 😉
native Americans- Indigenous peoples
Oops! 😂
Not sure that they really want to be included in the LBinclabinPedoSexTrfker+++- !;!*" crap...
Kek
Do you chew the branches? Make tea? What
There is a tea I think. I actually get a bottle of capsules from Amazon.
The gel they use to make the capsules is cancerous.
I took one heart aspiring for babies and I almost die, got real stomach cramps went to the restroom and almost passed out I thought I will die.
🤔 I’m going to have to re evaluate a little.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09BK7T3D1?ref=nb_sb_ss_w_as-reorder_k0_1_15&=&crid=38DNQ6ZIALNNF&=&sprefix=white+willow+ba#averageCustomerReviewsAnchor
I teach my 7 year old to call them Injuns. 😅
Edit to add: joking, but not really. I want him aware of history, not coddled and uneducated.
😂
I love this lotion for targeted relief of body aches. I don’t use it for headaches, though. It has willow bark and a bunch of other good natural ingredients.
https://realtimepainrelief.com/maxx/?srsltid=AfmBOordjwWY9FnjKhC7wbBpgBZ-ctgK8dZM-0n5ggGjrwlGpnCAoQZg
Thank you! I’ll check it out!
I use it! Good stuff once you wean yourself away from "regular" painkillers. Just FYI - pregnant women should NOT use white willow bark.
Good to know.
I see, I chose the wrong profession. Its the lawyers who will be making all the billions.
Yup - they are arguing on how to split up and divide ‘our’ money amongst themselves. We’ll just see some price increases to cover the differences, and to cover their ‘valuable time’ for arguing about it!
I just put a new entries in my Bingo card:
People trying to detox themselves from mRNA getting sued by Bayer for violating their intellectual property.
People having to pay royalty to Bayer for using the MRNA technology inside their body.
You are right on……
They will try it :-) !
Sounds about right. If I remember correctly, there is legal precedent already established for cases of intellectual property rights in which a biological organism contains patented genes - that would include humans. I remember the concern over that case.
Remember, Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018. Monsanto used to prosecute farmers for patent infringement because their crops were infected with Monsanto genes even when they had used non-GMO seed. The Monsanto GMO crops cross pollinated their fields.
They’re probably arguing about how & when they can start collecting the royalties from surviving jabbed humans…
The legal framework for this very scenario has already been established through the courts.
Like in a financial way (paying royalties to them) or in a complete loss of sovereignty (where the patent holder takes over all decision making for their GMO humans?
The door for both scenarios has been opened.
Geesh, gotta keep an eye on that. Most of everyone I know got at least one, so grateful me or my immediate family refused
I believe there were possibly some patents or discussions about a person being a GMO after injection - GMO being a legal term in the context. Not the particular patents in the OP / article but different ones. Been a while - would not have references. Could have been the one that has 666 in it - IDK.
So, you may not be too far from an eventual reality.
We live in bizzaro world.
Or it's another way to hide the $$ they stole from us.
Long story short ..... Bayer is suing everyone for injecting us with their product ROUNDUP.
Big Pharma Suing Big Phama...
It may have the side effect of putting records into the public soace, but non of it is calculated to benefit the public. It may just be Bayer covering their ass.
Oh that's really rich...Bayer bought Montsantan- who for years has sued smaller farmers for PATENT INFRINGEMENT because their disgusting GMO seeds got mixed up in farmers crops...fucking two faced bullies
Netherlands Hearing in Bioweapons Genocide Case Against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla
https://old.bitchute.com/video/zFZ6M4OW65gN/
This is the AI translation and dubbing that of the full Netherlands hearing. It may contain a couple errors.
This was an appellate hearing on whether witness testimony would be allowed in the ongoing trial, as well as independent media and the public in the court room during the trial. The court will give a decision in a few weeks.
The five potential witnesses in the case are Dr. Michael Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt, Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone. Sasha Latypova, and Dr. Joseph Sansone attended the hearing.
Attorney Peter Stassen gave a historic presentation to the court. Please share this far and wide. People need to see this presentation.
Given that these types of cases are inevitable, I really wonder is the motive that big pharma agreed that one single company would claim “ownership” of the poison tech, so they alone could be sued.
Then this company goes wallop, and the others keep poisoning at their leisure.
Possibly so….
They could sue the crap out of each other and push the money around (between themselves) then let a big domino ( hollow shell -after redistribution ) go bust before big stuff hits from ‘the public’.
There is a misunderstanding here. Most people are thinking, OH NO, THEY INJECTED THEM WITH PESTICIDE!
The lawsuit is over a technique used to eliminate specific genetic issued during the recombination process.
It's less like being injected with pesticide and it's more like the lawsuit is over which way you turned the screw when building something because someone patented turning that screw in that direction 15 years ago.
Just so everyone is aware of the intent of this Twitter account: they recycle old headlines as news for clickbait. The suits were filed back in January of this year.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72111002/bayer-cropscience-llc-v-moderna-inc/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72111003/bayer-cropscience-llc-v-pfizer-inc/
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72112267/bayer-cropscience-lp-v-johnson-johnson-inc/
https://imgs.search.brave.com/0mNdlR-Bjwj4pYGV1wQs38HyDNSpxO5O6OgZnd1ERfE/rs:fit:500:0:1:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly90NC5m/dGNkbi5uZXQvanBn/LzAzLzA4Lzc1Lzk5/LzM2MF9GXzMwODc1/OTk5OF95RjY5dVFh/dFFHU0d4djdqSlg5/UDdjTUZyNmVjY0hT/Ui5qcGc
As the inventor of this device, I want my royalties for each head.
The deep staters are turning on each other. Problem is, they are fighting for a piece of the pie. I hope and PRAY that their stringent courtroom tactics in this case morph into damning evidence in their Nuremburg trials.
These jabs were NEVER vaxxines! They are genetic delivery platforms and should have been classified as medical devices which would have required more rigorous testing. That is why they had to go in and change the definition of what a vaxxine is in order to make the language vague. By getting the jabs classified as vaxxines, they bypassed the testing and the liability. I have claimed this since day one of this scam. The vaxxine argument from the beginning was the wrong argument to have.
This is BS< if it was patented in the 80s, it would no longer be enfoceable in litigation. Patents had a 14 year max in the 80's, its 20 now.