Of course it is wrong! Lawfare gone wrong. How did it harm parents in any way that someone on-line, whom they had never heard of before, express his opinions of what happened?? No harm, no foul.
So who paid for those legal claims??
Schroedinger's Sandy Hook. If it was real, AJ did not cause it, and his stating of his own opinion did not harm the parents, it was the murderer who did that!
And what grounds do they have to sue if Sandy Hook did not happen??
If my child had been murdered in a school shooting, the last person I would want sued is a mere media commentator! What's up with THAT?? WHY did they sue AJ and who paid for it?? The school, the perp and anyone who allowed him access, etc. OK. But a media commentator?
The corporation behind INFOwars was NOT named in the court tv lawsuit. Why? How ridiculous is that notion? Why/how did 'AJ's team hand over their defense 'by mistake'? LOL. Why was there NO discovery phase of the trial? Why is that illegal and ridiculous? Why didn't INFOwars just fire 'AJ'? What proof is there of ANY actual payout by AJ? How does fining AJ cause INFOwars to fold when they weren't named in the suit? What did DOGE uncover about NGOs operating as influencers? Did Stratfor get their moneyline cut/discovered?
Fake arranged 'agreements' in court tv to create an optic and a 'legal' precedent vs 'justice'......discuss.
Why would Onion buy INFOwar's DEBT and liability, IF they were found guilty and liable?
What idiot would do that? What lies beneath the layers of 'The Onion' that make it glow? Peel the layers to find the clews out of the labyrinth.
Why do people keep saying this? They had a discovery phase for 3 years - 2018 to 2021. Alex Jones decided not to mount a defence based on proving that his statements were true, or claiming first amendment rights, or proving no one would take what he said seriously. He did not of that.
Instead his tactic was delaying the discovery, which finally got the judge, after 3 years of this, to rule default, which is when he lost his window of opportunity to present his case.
I know what Q said about AJ, though Jones brought receipts for 9/11 originally & other claims as well. I could follow a paper trail & it was part of me waking up to the idea here in the US that we fight governments, not individuals.
Ephesians 6:12 KJV [12] For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
I am grateful that he woke so many up. I just can't understand why AJ would have drug their feet, instead of putting up a real fight, unless they were controlled opposition that couldn't let it be known that there are layers above him.
This whole law suit has cemented in my mind that he was controlled somehow. I don't know for certain by whom, but it seems pretty clear he wasn't pushing for the full truth and constutional princes at this point.
I don't know what the truth is about AJ. Some say mossad and controlled opposition. Some swear he is legit. SH was in my opinion Sandy Hoax. The fact that someone can be sued and in that process the truth was not able to be definitively revealed one way or another is alarming.
If he was legit, he blew his chance to prove that Sandy Hook was a Hoax for once and for all, between 2018 and 2021 in the discovery phase, if he mounted a defense based on proving the statements he made. But he chose not to.
He then confirmed that the SH was 100% real and that he realised that after meeting the parents. This was under oath.
The prosecuters would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial.
This was LEONARD Posner claiming defamation over the PHANTOM son Noah one of the 1st graders shot by another PHANTOM Adam Lanza. Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Noah's photo was on a poster supposedly killed in Afghanistan a year before Sandy Hook.
Noah Pozner picture looks like the young Kyle Rittenhouse, also Veronique Pozner is Rashida Talib...I followed these and other crisis actors, from one event to another...Victoria Munoz, and Christine Linenin are regulars at these staged events...Ferguson MO.."hands up don't shoot" was A-List actor worthy...all the nasties were there! We live in an Actor Based Reality...that's why Trump is using actors too to de-brainwash the masses. Central Casting....our AG is an actor, he HATES child abusers ALOT in one of many of his movies...the WAR is WON, but waking people up is the kicker!!..(I followed through research, not literally) 1776 reset is when the actor shit began..
The prosecuters would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial.
Okay, so I keep hearing people claim this. Here is how a person defends themselves in a defamation trial where you are telling the truth.
During discovery there will be depositions, when the plaintiff lawyer will ask something along the lines of "Did you do extensive research and come to the conclusion that Sandy Hook was 100% hoax"
You would answer it truthfully and say "Yes, I do"
The plaintiff would then introduce evidence whatever they think is necessary to prove Sandy Hook was real
You then introduce into evidence all the red pills you have to dismantle each and every one of those claims.
That specific timestamp shows that exact question being askwed and you can see what the response is. Instead of backing up the claim and opening the gates to submit your evidence, the lawyer keeps objecting on the "formulation" and this is how the entire deposition goes. Infact this is what happened for 3 years from 2018-2021 when finally the judge had enough and when AJ skipped a deposition, ruled against him by default.
I highly urge you to watch the entire deposition (and there are multiple parts) if you believe "Prosecutors would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial"
Please show me ONE PLACE where he actually stands ground on his claim.
There something strange about it, though, because in his schpeel last night at the end he seemed rather defiant. Was that confirmation under duress? Maybe it is a matter of timing. We weren't ready for the truth because the truth has a part to play in the bigger movie, perhaps.
The ruling pretty much took everything away from him. What exact duress would that be? And don't tell me AJ is the kind of guy who would compromise his principles if someone pointed a gun at him (figuratively) - if that were the case he already lost.
I made a timeline that you might find interesting.
That's a great timeline. Thanks. I do not have a reason as to why he did not mount a defense. But I would not be surprised that if he is/was a Mossad asset that he had been taken over by the White Hats and that he was told it was not time to divulge the truth. To help quell the situation he bowed out with his statement under oath that he agreed that it was not a hoax. Last nights final statement from him was directly opposite that under oath statement. Perhaps his punishment from the WH's was that he would lose his empire, and to be spared he had a role to play. It's been a long time since I reviewed the SH info, but there were too many questions... why so many of the murdered students seemed to be alive; why the school building was not functional or being used, supposedly, at the time of the attack; the footage of the emergency management drill with people walking in a pattern through the buildings; and other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community. So, I am not convinced it was real, and I lean towards it being a hoax, and I have no idea why AJ didn't defend himself.
other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community
I am glad you mentioned this, because this was one thing I could actually dig into and disprove as disinformation. The claim was that all the parents of those kids were given a free house based on the local government records which was some kind of an accounting database that suddenly should a house for $450,000 or so for each of the parent's addresses.
Looked very suspicious and like a smoking gun. Thats when I dug into it, and found that every house in that locality had the same entry because they moved paper recards into a digital system and seeded with initial entries.
This is the kind of stuff that makes thse "conspiracy theories" so frustrating. There are a hundred claims, many of which no one can every verify. But the ones you do verify turn out to be fake.
Its these "great amount of little lies" that can be used to effectively change the way a person thinks about a situation because its very hard to disprove a 100 small lies than one big lie.
It’s like “yeah, I ‘proved’ it, but all the foundational facts were made up.”
It gets really hard to say what the point is after that… we can’t leave these people alone because they rely on consent, which includes not saying anything, but we can’t pin them on anything because we rarely, if ever, have any facts that hold up, either.
I hadn't heard that one about the houses, so it wasn't part of my reasoning. I also believe 9/11 was an inside job. So I am prone to believe that it is very feasible to pull off something like SH and then have the right people in the right places to debunk the inconsistencies that seem to "prove" a conspiracy theory.
I urge you to watch all his depositions. Hours of them for 3 years. Not once does he actually stand up and say "Yes Sandy Hook was a hoax and I can prove it"
I watched AJ years ago UNTIL he claimed to know Q and talked with him personally. THAT told me AJ was a clown and not anyone to be believed about anything. Buh-Bye clown!
I’ve been heavily downvoted for saying this previously, but my husband was at the mass funeral and the grief in the room was 100% real and not faked. Children definitely died that day and the shooter was real. What I do believe is that the shooter was manipulated into acting out the massacre and that false actors were planted. I believe that this has been repeated in many subsequent mass shootings. I don’t understand why they are using this tactic,but I believe it to be true and have convinced my husband of it as well.
a manipulated, planned tragedy does at least 2 things, 1) scares people into wanting more gun control and 2) leads many patriots into following a leader on a tangent that does not make them look good, neutralizing Awakening
I think he should have shut down the Infowars brand as soon as he had the backup studio online. That would have greatly complicated re-branding for anyone successfully navigating the sale. Once enough time elapses, no one would care (or remember) anything about "Infowars". On a side note, The Onion peaked decades ago, just like SNL. That shit is just not funny.
Of course it is wrong! Lawfare gone wrong. How did it harm parents in any way that someone on-line, whom they had never heard of before, express his opinions of what happened?? No harm, no foul.
So who paid for those legal claims??
Schroedinger's Sandy Hook. If it was real, AJ did not cause it, and his stating of his own opinion did not harm the parents, it was the murderer who did that!
And what grounds do they have to sue if Sandy Hook did not happen??
If my child had been murdered in a school shooting, the last person I would want sued is a mere media commentator! What's up with THAT?? WHY did they sue AJ and who paid for it?? The school, the perp and anyone who allowed him access, etc. OK. But a media commentator?
u/#mikeyep
The corporation behind INFOwars was NOT named in the court tv lawsuit. Why? How ridiculous is that notion? Why/how did 'AJ's team hand over their defense 'by mistake'? LOL. Why was there NO discovery phase of the trial? Why is that illegal and ridiculous? Why didn't INFOwars just fire 'AJ'? What proof is there of ANY actual payout by AJ? How does fining AJ cause INFOwars to fold when they weren't named in the suit? What did DOGE uncover about NGOs operating as influencers? Did Stratfor get their moneyline cut/discovered?
Fake arranged 'agreements' in court tv to create an optic and a 'legal' precedent vs 'justice'......discuss.
Why would Onion buy INFOwar's DEBT and liability, IF they were found guilty and liable? What idiot would do that? What lies beneath the layers of 'The Onion' that make it glow? Peel the layers to find the clews out of the labyrinth.
Why do people keep saying this? They had a discovery phase for 3 years - 2018 to 2021. Alex Jones decided not to mount a defence based on proving that his statements were true, or claiming first amendment rights, or proving no one would take what he said seriously. He did not of that.
Instead his tactic was delaying the discovery, which finally got the judge, after 3 years of this, to rule default, which is when he lost his window of opportunity to present his case.
I know what Q said about AJ, though Jones brought receipts for 9/11 originally & other claims as well. I could follow a paper trail & it was part of me waking up to the idea here in the US that we fight governments, not individuals.
I am grateful that he woke so many up. I just can't understand why AJ would have drug their feet, instead of putting up a real fight, unless they were controlled opposition that couldn't let it be known that there are layers above him.
This whole law suit has cemented in my mind that he was controlled somehow. I don't know for certain by whom, but it seems pretty clear he wasn't pushing for the full truth and constutional princes at this point.
I don't know what the truth is about AJ. Some say mossad and controlled opposition. Some swear he is legit. SH was in my opinion Sandy Hoax. The fact that someone can be sued and in that process the truth was not able to be definitively revealed one way or another is alarming.
If he was legit, he blew his chance to prove that Sandy Hook was a Hoax for once and for all, between 2018 and 2021 in the discovery phase, if he mounted a defense based on proving the statements he made. But he chose not to.
He then confirmed that the SH was 100% real and that he realised that after meeting the parents. This was under oath.
The prosecuters would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial.
This was LEONARD Posner claiming defamation over the PHANTOM son Noah one of the 1st graders shot by another PHANTOM Adam Lanza. Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Noah's photo was on a poster supposedly killed in Afghanistan a year before Sandy Hook.
Noah Pozner picture looks like the young Kyle Rittenhouse, also Veronique Pozner is Rashida Talib...I followed these and other crisis actors, from one event to another...Victoria Munoz, and Christine Linenin are regulars at these staged events...Ferguson MO.."hands up don't shoot" was A-List actor worthy...all the nasties were there! We live in an Actor Based Reality...that's why Trump is using actors too to de-brainwash the masses. Central Casting....our AG is an actor, he HATES child abusers ALOT in one of many of his movies...the WAR is WON, but waking people up is the kicker!!..(I followed through research, not literally) 1776 reset is when the actor shit began..
“tacos for noah”
🙄🙄🙄
Okay, so I keep hearing people claim this. Here is how a person defends themselves in a defamation trial where you are telling the truth.
During discovery there will be depositions, when the plaintiff lawyer will ask something along the lines of "Did you do extensive research and come to the conclusion that Sandy Hook was 100% hoax"
You would answer it truthfully and say "Yes, I do"
The plaintiff would then introduce evidence whatever they think is necessary to prove Sandy Hook was real
You then introduce into evidence all the red pills you have to dismantle each and every one of those claims.
Here is what happened in AJ trial:
Alex Jones deposition part 1, timestamped
That specific timestamp shows that exact question being askwed and you can see what the response is. Instead of backing up the claim and opening the gates to submit your evidence, the lawyer keeps objecting on the "formulation" and this is how the entire deposition goes. Infact this is what happened for 3 years from 2018-2021 when finally the judge had enough and when AJ skipped a deposition, ruled against him by default.
I highly urge you to watch the entire deposition (and there are multiple parts) if you believe "Prosecutors would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial"
Please show me ONE PLACE where he actually stands ground on his claim.
There something strange about it, though, because in his schpeel last night at the end he seemed rather defiant. Was that confirmation under duress? Maybe it is a matter of timing. We weren't ready for the truth because the truth has a part to play in the bigger movie, perhaps.
He got slapped with such an insane fine that it just further proves to me it was totally a hoax.
AJ is part of the hoax.
the lawsuit is part of the hoax.
now they can point to AJ as “proof” SH is real
The ruling pretty much took everything away from him. What exact duress would that be? And don't tell me AJ is the kind of guy who would compromise his principles if someone pointed a gun at him (figuratively) - if that were the case he already lost.
I made a timeline that you might find interesting.
That's a great timeline. Thanks. I do not have a reason as to why he did not mount a defense. But I would not be surprised that if he is/was a Mossad asset that he had been taken over by the White Hats and that he was told it was not time to divulge the truth. To help quell the situation he bowed out with his statement under oath that he agreed that it was not a hoax. Last nights final statement from him was directly opposite that under oath statement. Perhaps his punishment from the WH's was that he would lose his empire, and to be spared he had a role to play. It's been a long time since I reviewed the SH info, but there were too many questions... why so many of the murdered students seemed to be alive; why the school building was not functional or being used, supposedly, at the time of the attack; the footage of the emergency management drill with people walking in a pattern through the buildings; and other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community. So, I am not convinced it was real, and I lean towards it being a hoax, and I have no idea why AJ didn't defend himself.
I am glad you mentioned this, because this was one thing I could actually dig into and disprove as disinformation. The claim was that all the parents of those kids were given a free house based on the local government records which was some kind of an accounting database that suddenly should a house for $450,000 or so for each of the parent's addresses.
Looked very suspicious and like a smoking gun. Thats when I dug into it, and found that every house in that locality had the same entry because they moved paper recards into a digital system and seeded with initial entries.
This is the kind of stuff that makes thse "conspiracy theories" so frustrating. There are a hundred claims, many of which no one can every verify. But the ones you do verify turn out to be fake.
Its these "great amount of little lies" that can be used to effectively change the way a person thinks about a situation because its very hard to disprove a 100 small lies than one big lie.
This kind of stuff drives me absolutely batty.
It’s like “yeah, I ‘proved’ it, but all the foundational facts were made up.”
It gets really hard to say what the point is after that… we can’t leave these people alone because they rely on consent, which includes not saying anything, but we can’t pin them on anything because we rarely, if ever, have any facts that hold up, either.
I hadn't heard that one about the houses, so it wasn't part of my reasoning. I also believe 9/11 was an inside job. So I am prone to believe that it is very feasible to pull off something like SH and then have the right people in the right places to debunk the inconsistencies that seem to "prove" a conspiracy theory.
So, he lied under oath?
He LIED probably to keep his family and himself alive. Leonard Posner (Tiny Hat)
I urge you to watch all his depositions. Hours of them for 3 years. Not once does he actually stand up and say "Yes Sandy Hook was a hoax and I can prove it"
Here is a good example
Law of the Sea can be turbulent and is often hidden far from prying eyes.
Sandy Hoax may need Law of the Land exposure , even if they used Law of the Air to perpetrate it.
“Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." ~ Sir Walter Scott - “Marmion.”
Q told us AJ was Mossad backed.
u/#q2089
The Alex Jones trial was either a fake or a staged play.
I watched AJ years ago UNTIL he claimed to know Q and talked with him personally. THAT told me AJ was a clown and not anyone to be believed about anything. Buh-Bye clown!
I’ve been heavily downvoted for saying this previously, but my husband was at the mass funeral and the grief in the room was 100% real and not faked. Children definitely died that day and the shooter was real. What I do believe is that the shooter was manipulated into acting out the massacre and that false actors were planted. I believe that this has been repeated in many subsequent mass shootings. I don’t understand why they are using this tactic,but I believe it to be true and have convinced my husband of it as well.
a manipulated, planned tragedy does at least 2 things, 1) scares people into wanting more gun control and 2) leads many patriots into following a leader on a tangent that does not make them look good, neutralizing Awakening
But MSDNC got to say whatever they could imagine..
Alexjoneslive.com
ALEX JONES RETURNS!!!
https://old.bitchute.com/video/rewWSKO7Yobk/
Where are AJ’s first amendment rights? I don’t listen to him, but it seems over the top punitive.
I think he should have shut down the Infowars brand as soon as he had the backup studio online. That would have greatly complicated re-branding for anyone successfully navigating the sale. Once enough time elapses, no one would care (or remember) anything about "Infowars". On a side note, The Onion peaked decades ago, just like SNL. That shit is just not funny.
I feel like this is old news. Wasn't it already bought
he's relocating n will continue, rt?
He should have offered free beer to anyone that says SH was a hoax
AJ Contolled Ops. SH Fake AF.
What happened was a planned and logical outcome...still being played out...