why not Q(+)'s plan? it seems to have taken into account extremely subtle variables. we can speculate how they predict dates so accurately, but to me it looks like its unfolding perfectly.
for all we know, Q's plan is straight from God. They seem to be working together one way or another.
wouldn't be the first time they've sought an emotional reaction from MAGA. they know we're human, and take that into account.
not disagreeing about the opportunities to test your discernment, though... no accidents
he does that a lot when referring to himself as a brand or public figure.
to me it seems like he's pointing out when he's being treated as an idea or a meme, like when the media talks about Qanon. It doesn't have anything to do with his character or identity, its just a figurehead, a strawman.
actually i'm critiquing doomers on our side for being unable to think of positive outcomes. they need to flex that faith muscle a little.
btw, i've never ever noticed another '289' on here. great name. do you know what the square root of 289 is?
you've got it backwards. it seriously affects the intended target, and barely impacts the employees.
they can't be forced to work harder or longer. they can't be underpaid. they just have to spend their day doing tasks which aren't productive to the company.
no makeup means no makeup. its not an objection to looking whorish. its an objection to relying on industrial chemicals to deceive people into thinking you look different.
to each their own. some natural cosmetic products can be nice, especially for occasions. but the practise of applying a plastic mask every day is just nasty, regardless of how subtly and tastefully its done.
why does this remind me of the Elisa Lam case
gets chills
https://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/mysterious-case-elisa-lam/
why though? there's nothong to suggest it was shot down