Eliminate all government agencies not specifically authorized by the Constitution, and reduce taxes to only support the few left that are authorized. No more tax funding of anything but basic government services.

It is very easy to remedy. Have Congress pass a law to the effect that no foreign company, foreign person, non-US citizen, foreign government, etc., can own land in the United States, or its territories. Make it only U.S. Citizens can do so.

Each State can pass similar laws for their individual States, as well.

Any land already owned by foreigners will be taken back, like Eminent Domain, with fair compensation paid. Or it will be placed up for sale or auction.

I didn't say anything about them caring about our rights, I said they do not have the right, power, or authority granted to it to put anything in our water or food, or anything else we consume.

Although, the primary reason for the federal government being established is to protect our individual rights. Failing that, they no longer have a valid charter, and we have the right to remove them, and replace with one that is in line with the principles upon which our Constitutional Republic was founded.

Government has no right to put anything in our water or food, or anything else we consume. It doesn't matter if they had good intentions, or not. The fact is that there is no authority or power granted for federal, state, or local governments to do this.

Government has no right to put anything in our water or food, or anything we consume. It doesn't matter if they had good intentions, or not. The fact is that there is no authority or power granted for federal, state, or local governments to do this.

The Constitution does not grant government the ability to suspend elections, enact Marshal Law, or suspend the Habeous Corpus.

The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.

Freedom loving Americans should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc. This is how you protect our Constitutional Republic in the manner intended by our founding fathers.

We have to remember, and have to remind those who serve us in government that:

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934

The same premise applies to Constitutional Amendments. An Amendment cannot go against the original intent of the Constitution, it can only add to it in a manner consistent with the original intent at the time the Constitution was written and adopted.

There are a few paths for us to right these wrongs. One is Nullification:

Yale Law Journal Quote “The right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in the colonies. In 1771, John Adams stated unequivocally that a juror should ignore a judge’s instruction on the law if it violates fundamental principles: “It is not only ... [the juror’s] right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” There is much evidence of the general acceptance of this principle in the period immediately after the Constitution was adopted.” ~ Yale Law Journal Note: The Changing Role of the Jury in the Nineteenth Century, Yale Law Journal 74, 174 (1964).

"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)

The Constitution does not grant government the ability to suspend elections, enact Marshal Law, or suspend the Habeous Corpus.

The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.

Freedom loving Americans should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc. This is how you protect our Constitutional Republic in the manner intended by our founding fathers.

We have to remember, and have to remind those who serve us in government that:

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934

The same premise applies to Constitutional Amendments. An Amendment cannot go against the original intent of the Constitution, it can only add to it in a manner consistent with the original intent at the time the Constitution was written and adopted.

There are a few paths for us to right these wrongs. One is Nullification:

Yale Law Journal Quote “The right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in the colonies. In 1771, John Adams stated unequivocally that a juror should ignore a judge’s instruction on the law if it violates fundamental principles: “It is not only ... [the juror’s] right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” There is much evidence of the general acceptance of this principle in the period immediately after the Constitution was adopted.” ~ Yale Law Journal Note: The Changing Role of the Jury in the Nineteenth Century, Yale Law Journal 74, 174 (1964).

"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)

The Constitution does not grant government the ability to suspend elections, enact Marshal Law, or suspend the Habeous Corpus.

The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.

Freedom loving Americans should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc. This is how you protect our Constitutional Republic in the manner intended by our founding fathers.

We have to remember, and have to remind those who serve us in government that:

“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934

The same premise applies to Constitutional Amendments. An Amendment cannot go against the original intent of the Constitution, it can only add to it in a manner consistent with the original intent at the time the Constitution was written and adopted.

There are a few paths for us to right these wrongs. One is Nullification:

Yale Law Journal Quote “The right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in the colonies. In 1771, John Adams stated unequivocally that a juror should ignore a judge’s instruction on the law if it violates fundamental principles: “It is not only ... [the juror’s] right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” There is much evidence of the general acceptance of this principle in the period immediately after the Constitution was adopted.” ~ Yale Law Journal Note: The Changing Role of the Jury in the Nineteenth Century, Yale Law Journal 74, 174 (1964).

"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)

I have a 70% blockage of my LAD that they want to treat with medication. I do not want to be on medicines for the rest of my life, so I just started this today and will stick with it for the full 4 weeks to see how it works for me.

I am taking both the 2000mg of L-lysine and the 2000mg of Liposomal Vitamin C together twice a day. I am leaving 2 hours of no eating anything before and after taking each dose.

I have a 70% blockage of my LAD that they want to treat with medication. I do not want to be on medicines for the rest of my life, so I just started this today and will stick with it for the full 4 weeks to see how it works for me.

I am taking both the 2000mg of L-lysine and the 2000mg of Liposomal Vitamin C together twice a day. I am leaving 2 hours of no eating anything before and after taking each dose.

That would not be legal since it is an elected office. Well, since he stole the office, it would be even less legal.

That would not be legal since it is an elected office. Well, since he stole the office, it would be even less legal.

Land Patents here: https://teamlaw.net/land.htm

The only way this will be stopped Constitutionally is to go back to conveying actual title and ownership of land through Land patents. Our property needs to be removed from the government rolls of zoning altogether. They actually have no legitimate authority to have ever gone away from the way it was done originally, and no authority to rob us by granting Color of title in lieu of actual title.

You can learn more about Land Patents here: https://teamlaw.net/land.htm

Actually, as much as i like Trump, it is untrue that he hasn't violated the Constitution. He has on more than one occasion. One would hope that he is willing to learn more and not do so in the future through ignorance.

Some specific examples:

Acting Officials exceeding the limit of 210 days: Congress enacted the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) to allow the president to appoint “acting” officers, people already holding certain positions within the federal government who can serve in a vacant office for a maximum of 210 days after it becomes vacant. Keeping an officer in such an “acting” position past the statutory limit violates the appointments clause. Chad Wolf had served as acting secretary of Homeland Security beginning on November, 2019 — and was there well over the 210 days limit. **Bombing Syria: **bombed without notifying or getting approval from congress. Bump Stock ban: Violated 2nd amendment **COVID-19 Executive Orders: **These orders extended unemployment benefits and placed the onus on states to top them up, suspended the payroll tax for many workers, facilitated an eviction moratorium later declared by the Centers for Disease Control (the extension of which President Biden is now pursuing), and suspended student-loan repayments. While these may or may not be sensible policies to provide relief to low-income people economically hurt by the global pandemic, even leading progressive legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky found them unconstitutional. Violated Separation of Powers numerous times: Used money for the border Wall that was not authorized by Congress, Tried to force States to to assist the federal government to enforce immigration laws by taking a slew of federal law-enforcement grants to so-called sanctuary cities which was a direct violation of the “anti-commandeering doctrine,” among other principles of federalism. That is, states are independent sovereigns that can’t be forced to assist the federal government, and although they can be enticed to help willingly with the promise of federal funds, the federal government can’t place additional strings on those enticements without congressional approval.

Many Presidents have violated the Constitution, but it is never okay, regardless of who, or if it was with good intentions.

I will be voting for Trump again, but I also do not want him to violate the limits of his executive powers.

You are mistaken, the States always had the right to secede. Our Republic was established with a voluntary confederation of independent States. Each state had the right to leave that confederation, if they so chose.

The States did not abdicate their sovereignty, Abraham Lincoln declared war on the Confederate States to prevent them from exercising their right to secede. It had nothing to do with slavery. That was just a cover story.

There is a lot more to it, but that is where the loss of States Rights began.

We have the right to deliver "vigilante" justice. We are the sovereigns over government, and in our founders day, people could take action against those causing harm to their person, family, or property. Stealing was a hanging offense, and you did not need a courtroom to serve justice.

Today, our "government" would have you believe you are a criminal for protecting yourself, your life, your family, or your property. They would also have you believe government can press charges independently of the victim, and this is simply not true. Government cannot be a victim, and cannot press charges, only the victims can opt to do so. Restitution's now goes to government in the form of fines, and the victims get nothing.

Government has turned justice upside down.

Jill Biden has no authority to be in those meeting, let alone run them. She also doesn't have the security clearance, and, most importantly, she was never elected to any office.

This is a blatant crime.

I support and take gun control very seriously. I make sure I only aim what I intend to hit, only shoot to stop the threat, and keep my weapon within my control at all times. That is what real gun control is all about.

Because the federal government checks and balances have all been compromised, likely beyond redemption. The Declaration of Independence tells us what we can do about it, but it seems most Americans today are waiting for someone else to save us, and fix it. All they have to do is look in the mirror to know who is responsible for actually fixing it.

They had no legitimate authority to delegate any of their powers, period. They never have, and never will, have that option. Same with the other branches.

Absolutely correct. This is how the federal government was set up, and how the power flows:

All power originates with The People, and flows from them through a contract / license to government (Constitution). These powers are limited and specific. Anything that doesn't go to the federal government goes to the States, and what doesn't go there is reserved to The People.

Any act outside of those limited powers is usurped, or stolen. Back in the founders day, people who betrayed the public trust were dealt with quickly and decisively. hence government fearing The People, and not the other way around.

The People are sovereigns without subjects. meaning every one a sovereign within their own property, life, and limits of their own individual rights. Government was primarily founded to protect those rights. When they fail to do that basic duty, they are no longer a viable government in accordance with the founding principles of our constitutional Republic.

The Act originally applied only to the United States Army, but a subsequent amendment in 1956 expanded its scope to the United States Air Force. In 2021, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 further expanded the scope of the Act to cover the United States Navy, Marine Corps, and Space Force. The Act does not prevent the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor. The United States Coast Guard (under the Department of Homeland Security) is not covered by the Act either, primarily because although it is an armed service, it also has a maritime law enforcement mission.

So if Joe Biden is not the real President (I believe he is not), then anything he signs into "law" is null and void.

It should be fundamental law that you need to be a U.S. citizen to qualify to have a drivers license in the USA, if a DL is able to be used as ID to vote in elections.