Missing from the extract:
Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture.
In-vitro. The article doesn't deal with in-vivo testing.
"<deranged leftist> says President <insert Democrat here>'s recent sinking poll numbers are because he inherited a wounded country from former President <insert Republican here>"
Recycling the Obama/Bush Jr narrative, I see.
I think it's a panic tactic.
"We are gonna mandate a vaxx!
-Ok, let's vax everyone before the mandate drops so we don't have any more downtime. We've already been hit hard, no need to wait for harder repercussions.
-It's not useful anymore since everyone already did it, but here is the mandate anyway so I can look good on camera."
"also." Meaning they use EUA for populations the FDA didn't approve, like teens.
Gotcha.
Pfizer vaccine is fully FDA approved.
From what I understand there are two "versions" of the Pfizer vaccine with just a smidge of difference: the pre-approval one, and the one approved here (Comirnaty). This difference has had people questioning which one they are gonna get (for legal protection) and not receiving any clear answer.
Not sure why that's so important to people. The FDA is not some magical place immune to the cabal.
I'm 100% with you here.
The argument was that the lack of FDA approval was a huge no-no when it came to legal protections, and a major sticking point about "alternative treatment" when FDA-approved "normal treatment" didn't (and IMO still doesn't) exist. I'm still on the fence about this last one, as Pfizer is coming up with a drug treatment and at this point I doubt anything coming out of Pfizer related to the treatment of COVID. This is part when the drug they are coming up with, despite being different, has a similar effect to ivermectin and the demonization of this molecule instead of praising a possibility of an effective existing and cheap drug is ridiculously apparent.
Nope. The "approval" is a EUA. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
First paragraph:
The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA)
I've been looking for this picture, but the only places I could find it were a tweet, and a right-wing website. The text is also used with another drawing, found in a Facebook post (although I couldn't find the photo itself within the myriad of photos) The drawing is also used much more widely with the text reading "Together we can beat this", which sounds tamer and in direct reference to "the virus" rather than "the unvaxxed", as "the enemy" is much more vague and can indeed refer to both; and the text "Veterans, this is a call to arms. Yours!", also tamer. I'm hesitant to share this. Have you seen it yourself?
You don't deserve the vaccine.
I don't want it.
quietly die so the rest of us can go back to normal life.
Government took my and your freedoms away and I decided to take them back and you didn't. So fuck me, right?
please refuse hospitalization if you get the virus
- Check your hospitalization privilege. 2. Check real hospitalization risks.
PLEASE keep to yourselves.
Right back at you, fucknugget.
Ok. "Protease" just means "breaks down proteins".
- It doesn't say which protein.
- It doesn't say how long it breaks proteins for.
- It doesn't say how fast it breaks proteins.
- It doesn't say a whole lot, to be honest...
Proteins come in all shapes and sizes. They fold precisely and can even have various 3D "configurations". The spike "protein" is literally just that too. Hemoglobin is a protein. Insulin is a protein. There are proteins meant to inhibit other proteins, like syncytin, the protein of the placenta that makes it so the baby is not attacked by the immune system of the mother. The world of proteins is GIGANTIC.
Ivermectin is one molecule. For all we know, their molecule looks nothing like ivermectin. Or it just has the same active part and the rest is different. For instance, the same protein breaks down methanol into formaldehyde and ethanol into acetic acid, because the alcohols present the same characteristics allowing the protein and them to bond. You can call it a "carbohydrate catalyst" because alcohols are carbohydrates, except there are more types of carbohydrates that aren't alcohol and don't get broken down by that same protein...
Who knows, not defending Pfizer here, just looking to broaden the view of people who see "X" here and "X" there and put a red wool thread between the tacks without more looking into.
I won't hold my breath for it or take a COVID-related Pfizer product though. Looking to create new molecules and make us pay out our collective ass instead of repurposing old molecules? Away with you.
Is it true for a recount of the ballots? Yes. And that's not the point of what happened. What happened isn't a recount of all the ballots, it's an audit of the ballots to check their validity.
This information is worthless. Anyone publishing this worthless information is complicit of opinion-shaping at the benefit of the establishment.
they should've just hit us with it on all cylinders months ago!
From the sidebar:
WHY Q?
"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc., should not be participating in discussions." Q
Things are meant to run slowly. Patience.
What the MSM didn't tell you is that there are MORE FRAUDULENT BALLOTS THAN BIDEN "WON" BY!...
Now the question becomes, where do those ballots come from, and who cast them?
And for the sake of being thorough, how many of those fraudulent ballots were in favor of each candidate?
I just looked them up.
First of all it must be realized Ancient Egypt didn't live in a bubble, had significant trade routes, and gold was a universal currency at the time, alongside other metals. Egypt had its own gold mines in ancient times, so not only did they have their own "currency printers" (miners) they knew where the gold was coming from.
The spiritual aspect I suspect, comes from the Sun God, Ra. The shining Sun, like the shining gold. Cue the spiritual tokens and trinkets made of gold.
However what they lacked was the knowledge about the intrinsic of chemicals. Gold is a metal found in nature that doesn't need to be processed to return its shine? And it's rare too? It must be a blessing of the Sun. Coincidentally, all atoms were formed in stars, being the massive fusion reactors they are. Humanity is literal star dust! Ancient Egyptians had no idea though, so long as the knowledge wasn't passed on to them. Was it passed on to them? "Ancient Astronauts theory says yes!" I can hear in the background. (It must be noted that "leaded salt" was a common condiment at the time, revealing their ignorance of chemicals even more.)
Leucippus and Democritus in Ancient Greece (Ancient Greece which had significant mercantile and familial relationships with Ancient Egypt, Cleopatra wink wink, thus shared knowledge too) theorized "the atom", "the uncuttable", the smallest unit of matter at the base of everything we see that cannot be sensed directly by human senses, however those ideas didn't take root and the dark ages still happened across Europe, with Socrates' ideas for the nature of matter propagating instead (the four elements of Earth, Fire, Wind and Water, and the Ether).
So why does gold, the "skin of the Gods" matter? I think it's a riddle, just like everything Q does when he's being cryptic and/or wants plausible deniability. We know gold has been seized by the FED which forbid the hoarding of gold by private citizens. By hoarding all the gold themselves, Q might be hinting the FED appointed itself as God. False God. False idol. Self-idolizing, even. In fact Q also said clearly that gold would be the end of the FED. Will The People need to reclaim the Gold? Will The People even need to detach itself from the Gold, and rework its trading system to use decentralized currency? If gold becomes valueless from the lack of a market, the FED is done. The fact gold can still be exchanged on the market is what is giving it its value, as hoarding ALL the gold makes it valueless to the people outside the one hoarding it, since they can't access it.
Q also made several drops mentioning "Silence is golden". Having dipped my toes in infosec, one of the first tools I stumbled upon was Backtrack Linux (known today as Kali Linux, a Linux distribution specialized in "pentest" or Penetration testing, for the trade known as "aggressive security", or attacking a target information system from without to discern its weak points and remedy them), of which the slogan was "The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear." In the era of fast information transmission and the propensity for lies to spread, Truth is power, and making noise isn't advisable to discern the true data and find the Truth. The Truth is gold, the Truth is valuable.
Neurons emit signals electrically and transmit signals chemically.
Their axons, their "biggest, output dendrite", are covered with a "myelin sheath" to increase the speed of signal transmission. The "sheath" is actually a lot of little sheaths with spaces without sheaths to let ions through, leading to what's known as "action potentials". The ions used are potassium (K+) and sodium (Na+), and they traverse the surface of the axon through tiny holes to propagate the action potential.
The fact they are ions should tell you that gold isn't it as a stand-in, as gold doesn't ionize (lose or gain electrons that can form bonds) easily in solvents like water. In fact, instead nitric acid hydrochloride is used to dissolve gold and make gold oxide out of it.
Additionally. Lead is poisonous in high concentrations because it replaces one of those ions necessary for the propagation of the action potential, but obstructs the aforementioned tiny holes, leading to a loss of potential until the signal cannot be propagated anymore, impairing the normal function of neurons. Lead's atomic number is 82, rather close to gold's 79. They are BIG atoms, compared to the smaller potassium (19) and sodium (11). Gold in neurons for electrical transmission doesn't look like a good idea.
Chemically, the transfer of an action potential is done from the end of the axon of a neuron to the next neuron through hormones, huge proteins. We aren't talking individual species of atoms at this point, and I am not versed enough in the proteins' composition to tell you whether they contain precious metals, and whether "enhancing" such proteins with precious metal would lead to any improvement in the transmission of action potentials.
Although, considering the mechanism of transmission of information through hormones (chemical bonds with the receptors at the surfaces of cells, that must be released) and the fact hormones are degraded quickly, leaving free-floating atoms and ions that could wander wherever and cause damage, I'll attempt a guess and say gold once again, isn't it. Silver, perhaps, but I'm once again faced with ignorance.
Physical strength is derived from the mass of muscle tissue, fibrous cells stuck together and reacting to action potentials (electrical voltage and salt contract the fibers). Muscle is essentially red meat and is common to all "red-meatted" mammals. Precious metals pretty much have nothing to do with the strength of the fibers and is not specific to humans, meaning the evolution of "red meat" predates humanity.
Imagine if our blood had gold, or silver instead of iron as the primary metallic element.
That'd make oxygen-consuming life pretty much impossible.
First of all, hemoglobin is the ordered agglomeration of four hemes, four proteins that each contain 1 iron atom. That makes for 4 iron atoms per hemoglobin. The role of the iron atom is to make a bond with oxygen (to be oxydized) to transport it, and release it in a volume containing low oxygen.
In fact, our very DNA contains traces of events collectively known as "the war for iron", which are evolutions and mutations of the DNA to make different proteins to protect against different evolutions of other organisms that would use their proteins to steal the iron of their victims. Friendly reminder that such evolution can take place over hundreds of thousands of years, predating the people of Ancient Egypt.
Now here's a big problem: gold doesn't bond with oxygen very well, rendering it useless as a substitute for iron in hemoglobin. That's why you can find shining gold in nature (look up Brasilian gold extractors in French Guyana, I'm sure you'll find pictures of a pan or two with gold flakes inside), unlike iron, usually found oxidized, like in rust and in ochres, and needing either chemical or thermic treatment to be returned to its non-oxidized state (see: high-furnaces).
Silver binds to oxygen, however not 1 but 2 silvers are needed to bind 1 oxygen, and 5 silvers can bind 4 oxygens in a crystalline form. This combination doesn't release the oxygen easily to its surrounding, making it ill-suited as a stand-in for iron in hemoglobin.
THIS. My place of employment has 2 electric Renault Kangoo, and just driving them has been a lot of pleasure. True the range isn't that great, at about 250km (155 miles), and recharging 120km takes the night on the small charger.
Environment-wise, in France we are mostly powered by nuclear fission with a bit of solar and wind, except where I live, powered by fuel generators and a bit of solar. The benefits of electric cars here is thus reduced, which is why additional solar panels have been installed over the parking of my place of employment, helping charging the cars and making them greener.
Do I want the end of petrol? No. Do I want less CO2 in the oceans? Yes. It follows that the solution lies in recycling CO2, not cutting energy sources.
The source-in-comments describes agents as "Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19". It's unclear what each agent status is.