1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea and its not the same at all because the margin in iowa was 30% and in arizona it was less than 5%

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Theyre calling it because its clear from the #s that hes gonna win. No one knows how close it will be but when you get a large enough sample and its this lopsided you know its indicative of the population.

6
BurnerAcct42069 6 points ago +6 / -0

Whatever happened to that big press conference Trump announced that was going to blow the doors off on the scope and scale of the fraud? Am I mandela effect-ing that?

4
BurnerAcct42069 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doesnt that give everyone the same right to privacy in public spaces?

2
BurnerAcct42069 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think this has been relatively well known for a while now but lots of people are either misguided and blame business or completely unprincipled and condone it just because its a way to disagree with us

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats 6 months away. iirc fetterman had his stroke only like 4 months before the election. Its gonna be impossible for them to ride this out

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes me wonder if the whole thing is being orchestrated. Democrats have a 'majority' in the senate that they cant even use

8
BurnerAcct42069 8 points ago +8 / -0

Muh loyalty test. Imagine being asked to demonstrate loyalty to the entity you are required to be loyal to

2
BurnerAcct42069 2 points ago +2 / -0

SBFs brother is the the chairman of an anti-pandemic NGO

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea i do. Because you should already know this but there are millions of people whove actually lost everything in the past 3 years. Its completely fair for them to question after covid lockdowns, the vaccine, blatant fraud until something materializes

11
BurnerAcct42069 11 points ago +11 / -0

The term 'fossil fuel' is bullsit as well

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +2 / -1

I dont think thats fair. Its been almost 3 years since the beginning of covid, which is the same peroid of time from the start of his term until then. Its been over 5 years since the first Q post. No one makes it this far without commitment but theres always a component of 'what have you done for me lately?' if you stretch that out too far anyone who is rational is going to start thinking theyre being played

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

Id be getting 100% upvotes 2 years ago. Some people have short memories

1
BurnerAcct42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have some preliminary thoughts but itll be a lot easier to identify them if he gets out of the way. He could even pick them out. Trump took a lot of baggage onto himself by calling out the fraud without settling it so he either needs to cash those checks or step off. If we want to win, which is the only thing that matters now, we need to be pragmatic and cover all of our bases

5
BurnerAcct42069 5 points ago +5 / -0

He should be getting treble damages no matter what. We make the rules now. They dont get any input

view more: Next ›