Jesus said it best. We don’t know His sheep. There are followers of Christ that can make that decision if a person requires a death penalty or not. If a person is conflicted, no matter the situation, then they are not suited for this job. And it’s stated in the Bible, once you’re in the Fathers hand, you cannot be removed. So the “executioner” can be forgiven, esp if they are a child of God. Doesn’t mean he couldn’t try and get the soon to be executed saved before hand. There is God’s justice and the worlds justice. Sins and greater sins. Just because you get saved and forgiven, doesn’t mean you escape the worlds justice. And a person in this position should understand this. If they truely believe God’s word. For the rest of those who cannot be apart of something like the death penalty, don’t need to be. And shouldn’t be. They don’t have to like it. But it’s what happens. I used to be different. I was the one who wanted to make them suffer. Spend weeks killing them for what they’ve done. But today, I feel different. I completely understand why the death penalty exists. Some people cannot live along side the rest of us. But can I pull the trigger nowadays? I don’t know. I want to say yes. But I don’t want to. But, I know in my position, Jesus will help me. He’ll send along a fellow sheep who can. And he’ll make his peace afterwards. And he’ll understand my position. And together we’ll continue to walk with Christ. Brothers.
The gamers really came together to get rid of woke trash as well. They are tired of AAA gaming companies and are holding their feet to the fire on near everything. Basically if these companies like money, they have no choice but to concede to what gamers want. Kinda like what’s happening everywhere nowadays. Which is good. As Trump says, let the people decide. We know better than anyone else. I love seeing people stick together. We don’t always speak our minds together, but silently, we stop watching, spending, and overall bankrupt these garbage companies who seem supported by other sources. But not anymore. And man they fall fast.
The whole strategy here is eliminating the various ways “they” cheat. It’s not the Dems my fellow friends, it’s the deepstate. The system. They made a new set of rules that helps create and fill their agenda. Every way has to be severed. Back to what works and the people understand. Hopefully laws passed to implement the actual laws of the land our founding fathers made. How ridiculous that sounds, but it’s where we are now. This is a major one. One of many.
And that was rare from it’s time. Like 1980. Was massively controversial. And even Shields said herself, she was ignorant of the sexual innuendo it represented. She was very young, 15 I think. Taking advantage of imo. So yea, it’s been a problem. Today people recognize these problems, the pedo situation, finally. Does Sweeney, and future others, help or hurt that situation? That’s an easy answer. So why do men start foaming at the mouth at the first chance of some skin? Have we learned nothing? What happened to respect? Men and woman dressing as men and woman. It can still be very attractive. But young girls in provocative clothing and positions is what the world wants now. We should be different. Better. Going away from all of this and bring back some civility. And protection for our youth from this trash, on all sides. But as I’ve seen before. One side goes so far over the edge, men in drag, the overcorrection is girls+sexy. Who cares about age as long as my eyes are having a ball. Ridiculous. I just hope parents are smarter than this. And don’t let the world shape their children. As it has always tried to do.
How do we know? I don’t think shes going to be wearing a sweater. That jeans commercial, who targets youth mostly, was a great ad for a 14 yr old to what? Show their cleavage? Do you remember ads from the 80’s, 90’s etc? I don’t remember soft porn in them. Was usually guys and girls, being guys and girls, and wearing the cloths advertised? Why is that not acceptable anymore? Why do we either have to have guys in dresses, or soft porn to counter that? As I said, Satan have a field day.
So again…let’s dump the men in dresses for T and A on our screens, that’ll teach”em! Seriously? Satan have a great time with this crowd. I guess “think of the children “ is just something folks say to sound decent. Why not dump both and just have PG rated content for public ads? Like the good ole days. Rather have women wearing stickers over her nips and a string up her….just to sell you a hat?
There’s are several states that do all elections by mail? 8-10, something like that. And I think all “blue” states ironically. California being the most known. Just curious why Washington state was singled out? Am I missing something here? Not sure why they would be separated from this executive order?
I’m waiting for the “at least it’s male and female” comments. This is what I’ve been referring to, with “over correcting” to things like the Sweeney ad. We want to be so done with lgbtq123 that we’ll accept an ad, aimed at children, that has all the ingredients of soft porn. I mean, do we really want 12 yr olds wearing nothing but an unzipped jacket. And then flirting with the guys who point out their bare chest? And then it’s off to this crap, the video. The music videos are basically sex. Our youth cheer it on as exciting! Why not, everything nowadays is about sex. I’m not surprised at all by this vid. Well, I’m actually very shocked, but then again, not at all. Didn’t we cheer this on with Sweeney? America is back! That’s what I heard. Can’t play both sides.