“Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee: and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: and I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” Genesis 12:1-3 KJV
This is the verse people are talking about when they say that God blesses those who bless Israel.
It’s a biblical notion, but one that many take too far. I highly doubt that God meant “send billions of dollars to Israel’s government and look the other way when they attack US ships”.
It is not the nature of Hamas or Hezbollah to indiscriminantly kill hostages.
Press X to doubt.
Even if they didn’t indiscriminately kill hostages, we do have ample video evidence of them indiscriminately killing civilians. What’s the difference?
If Israel is guilty of war crimes, then so are they at least as much.
If hordes of people from the ME are crossing the southern border, then they would first have to be flown in en mass into Central/South America first. Does anyone have any evidence that such a large movement has occurred?
“For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words.” 1 Thessalonians 4:15-18 KJV
It’s right there in Scripture. The doctrine of a Pre Trib Rapture has been taught at least as far back as Iraneus, a 2nd century church father who was mentored by Polycarp, who in turn was a disciple of John, who wrote Revelation. Pre Trib Rapture is based both in scripture and the earliest church fathers. Not a uniquely American phenomenon in the slightest. And even if it were, that doesn’t mean it’s not true.
Daniel 8 and 11, taken together, indicate that the Antichrist is from Turkey. He is described as the king of the north from the 4 kingdoms that arose from Alexander the Great’s empire. The northern kingdom started out as Turkey and Syria, and had its capital in Turkey for its entire existence.
We won’t know exactly who it is though, until he signs a 7 year covenant with Israel that lets them rebuild their temple. Since this event kicks off the Tribulation, the Rapture will happen right before or during the signing of this agreement.
I personally think there will be a war between Israel and a combo of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Palestine. If Isaiah 17, Amos 1, and a few other prophecies are considered together, Israel wins this war but at heavy cost. Then comes the Ezekiel 38 war, where Russia and Iran (Gog and Persia) come against Israel, possibly as retaliation for Syria’s destruction since they are allies. God miraculously intervenes. At least one scripture (I’ll find the reference in a little bit) says that God blows a trumpet here. Where else does “the trump of God” sound? During the rapture. Note that the 7 trumpets of the Tribulation are blown by angels, not God; this is a different event.
It is after this Ezekiel 38 war and the Rapture that the Antichrist makes a covenant with Israel, so that the Antichrist can be viewed as a peace bringer. Then the Tribulation begins.
“Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: I will break also the bar of Damascus, and cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, and him that holdeth the sceptre from the house of Eden: and the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir, saith the LORD.” Amos 1:3, 5 KJV
“For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four” is the key. Syria (Damascus) has attacked Israel thrice since its reformulation in 1948. The war in 1948, the 6 Day War, and Yom Kippur. If Syria attacks a fourth time, it seems that Amos 1 and Isaiah 17 kick in and spell the utter destruction of Syria and any other country attacking Israel.
The descendants of Ishmael and Esau are playing with fire.
I don’t think all Jews are sneaky, subversive, and greedy. I think the actions of a few Jews that make up the cabal is being unfairly attributed to all Jews purely because of shared ancestry. Other than that you’re spot on; I wish more had your nuance instead of swinging from one extreme to the other.
They are God’s chosen people, but they have rejected Him for thousands of years. The Tribulation is coming soon, when they will be chastised and brought back to their true Redeemer.
Syria is bombing Israel now? I thought it was just Hamas. Is Hezbollah entering the fray?
1913, establishment of the Federal Reserve. That’s when America was put into submission under the global cabal.
Yeah, because the opinion of one loudmouth on X represents an entire nation. That checks out.
The mood has shifted considerably since the outbreak of fighting between Israel and Hamas.
Happenings in that part of the world seem to always grab people’s attention and put them on edge.
90% of the time I see an ad for some prescription, suicidal thoughts is listed as one of the side effects. The fact that Big Pharma pushes this garbage is criminal.
Dispensational Second Coming madness?
That’s not a Zionist thing, that’s been the clear teaching of scripture since the beginning.
It’s due entirely to people being incapable of distinguishing Mossad and the Jewish members of the Deep State from the Jewish people as a whole.
Atrocities committed by the former are being blamed on the latter without cause because both are Jewish. It’s the same logical fallacy as the Left claiming “some white people do bad things, so all white people are racist”. It’s collectivism and group identity politics over individualism.
Israel existed as a nation millennia before the Rothschilds, and will exist millennia after they are all sent to hell.
Israel, for all of its government’s faults and corruption, is still God’s people. Israel is God’s timepiece for the world.
Because when you read the act of 1871, it’s about incorporating DC to be its own city with its own municipal government. Congress originally governed DC directly. They shifted this responsibility to a new municipal government so that they could focus more on taxing and regulating the rest of the US.
Either some idiots or some scam artists hyper fixated on the word “incorporated”, completely ignored it’s common usage in the organization of city governments, and spun a tall tale about how the entire US is an economic corporation and we’re all judged under admiralty law in our court system. Or at least some nonsense along those lines; the story has changed several times since its inception.
The entire theory is predicated on ignorance of commonly used legal terms, and they’re counting on their listeners to eat up the theory based on an emotional reaction instead of actually understanding 1871 for themselves.
Maybe, just maybe, it’s because the US isn’t a corporation. If you think 1871 turned the US into a corporation, you’ve been conned by people who don’t understand legal terminology.
Everything from Nazism to GOP should be on the same line. But that would make it harder to read.
We should probably work on getting MAGA closer to FF as well.
He has, in essence, built an infrared solar panel. Which is neat for the purposes of demonstrating that all objects emit some level of infrared radiation.
But he cites being able to charge your phone just by having it near your body. Let's see if that checks out.
The human body generates 40-220 watts per square meter from every day activities. Not all of that is going to be emitted as infrared, but let's say it is. Let's say you have a Monothermal device that is the same size as a power bank or smartphone. which according to Reddit is about 12.8 square inches for a 5.8" screen.
Plugging in all the numbers, this would generate 0.33 to 1.817 watts of power, or 0.33 to 1.817 Wh per hour. Smartphones burn through 6-7 Wh minimum, so at some point you have to recharge the phone anyway. Wall chargers and power banks employ much more power and are much more efficient than this set up despite being the same size or smaller.
Your Monothermal device would have to have a surface area of 0.0318 to 0.175 square meters, which are squares with side lengths of 17.8 and 41.8 cm respectively. You could carry those in your backpack, but not your pocket, and now the backpack is going to absorb a lot of that radiation and make the device less efficient.
We've been assuming that Monothermal works at 100% efficiency, which of course is impossible. Solar panels are 25% efficient at most at 25 C, and higher temperatures spell less efficiency. I don't see any reason why Monothermal doesn't behave the same way.
So far Lovell isn't necessarily wrong, just incredibly inefficient. He does go wrong by saying that his device "creates" energy. He may not have meant it that way, but that kind of phrasing has apparently caused multiple free energy communities to latch on to his company as the next energy revolution. As a general rule, when "free energy" types get hyped about something, it turns out to be a dud.
He also goes wrong by saying that his device works without a temperature differential. The photons of infrared released by the human body have to have a higher energy level than the electrons in the device in order for the device to receive energy. Otherwise either no energy transfer would happen at all, or the device itself emits its own infrared and loses energy. Since photon energy levels emitted by black bodies are proportional to that body's physical temperature (which is a decent enough approximation for any room temperature to human temperature object), his device must be stay colder than a human to extract energy from said human. But if it is in contact with the human to get the infrared, it will naturally warm up and rapidly lose its ability to extract useful energy. At best he is imprecise with how he uses scientific terms, at worse he doesn't understand basic concepts of thermodynamics.
His site has a chart detailing how much power Monothermal generates at each ambient temperature, but it does not show who tested it or what methodology they used. Some independent testing from multiple labs or end users would be nice.
At the end of the day, trying to capture and reuse waste energy or ambient heat will only get you so far. No process is 100% efficient; there will always be waste heat no matter what you do. Sometimes waste heat can be put to good use; Teslas use regenerative breaking, and combustion engines use some of their excess heat to heat the air in your cabin when you turn the heater on. But some applications are just too inefficient or impractical for certain use cases. Which is probably why Monothermal hasn't caught on anywhere and all of its testing data is from 20+ years ago.
Would evidence of crimes against humanity or crimes against children fire them up? Or would they react with “meh” even to that?
All done by me. Not a fan of AI since virtually all of them are heavily censored in what they can talk about. Plus I like forming my own opinions and doing my own research instead of Google telling me what I should think.
And it appears that the saltier the body, the higher the tidal amplitude.
This is contradicted by the amphidromic points that we discussed earlier. These points are places in the salty ocean where there is no net tidal rise since the forces involved effectively cancel each other out. So even salty bodies, or at least parts of them, can have virtually no tidally-induced motion.
There is another variable you are overlooking: size. The peak to trough distance of an (uninterrupted) tidal bulge is 1/4th the earth's diameter (about 10,000 km or 6,000 miles). Oceans are large enough to span these kinds of distances, so one side of the ocean is going to experience substantially different tidal forces than the other side at any given time. Even the largest lakes do not span a small fraction of these distances. Hence that differential in tidal force from one side to another is going to be smaller. A smaller difference in forces means a smaller net force on the water and, therefore, smaller tides.
Oceans are also all connected so the water can freely flow. This makes it easier for tidal waves to "follow" the moon. Lakes are landlocked and thus can't move as much.
In addition, one must also consider the effects of land tides. The earth's crust is pulled by tidal forces just like water is, just to a lesser degree. Land is more dense and can't flow or "pile up" like water can. Land tides have an average vertical movement of 30cm. So in the case of a landlocked lake, the crust supporting the lake rises and falls almost in tandem with the lake itself. Small relative motion between the land and the water once again results in smaller tides.
Despite all this, tides actually have been measured at freshwater lakes; they're just smaller. Lake Ontario has 5cm tides. Source: https://www.rochesterfirst.com/weather/weather-blog/fact-or-fiction-do-our-great-lakes-have-tides-like-the-ocean/
Which is more likely:
- Some cataclysmic force altered the moon's orbit without utterly shattering the moon itself or throwing earth off its own orbit.
- Some cataclysmic force altered the earth's rotation without utterly shattering the earth itself, and no one has detected the dozens of other effects that would result from such a change.
- The Deep State wiped everyone's collective memories of the past 3-10 days.
- Your personal recollection of the moon's position and understanding of its motion is off.
Apply Occam's Razor as needed.
No, this is not a good explanation at all.
He utterly dismisses the concept of "amphidromic points" without explaining why it's wrong. Even a cursory reading on the subject shows that several complex mechanisms are simultaneously in play:
- The sun's tidal force on the earth.
- The moon's tidal force on the earth.
- Wave reflection off of coastlines.
- Wave amplitude increase and propagation speed decrease as the wave passes over the continental shelf.
Each of these 4 effects creates its own wave pattern. What happens when you have different wave patterns in the same medium? They will constructively interfere at some points and destructively interfere at other points.
But Stolen History dismisses all of this because they think 1 small spot on the earth (New Zealand) doesn't conform. Not only does he not explain how New Zealand violates the principle of amphidromic points, even if he did demonstrate an anomaly, the presence of an anomaly does not discredit the entire theory. Of course, he also dismisses it all as "mainstream science", as if a fact's popularity or lack thereof determines its validity.
He then goes on to say that tides rotate around New Zealand "like a magnet". While magnetic fields can rotate, they do not have to. And just because A rotates like B does not mean that B causes A, or vice versa. This is such a weak argument that it doesn't even deserve to be called one.
Can water be moved with magnetism? Yes.
How strong of a magnetic field do you need? A minimum of 10 Tesla (T), and you need 16 Tesla to levitate a frog a few centimeters. Earth's magnetic field at sea level is 16 - 65 microTesla, about a million times weaker than that.
Earth's magnetic field is not strong enough to deflect any kind of diamagnetic material, and other forces (gravity, coriolis force, ocean currents, etc.) are going to overwhelm by several orders of magnitude any magnetic affect that could theoretically be present.
So not only does Stolen History make the colossal fallacy of assuming that one unproven anomaly discredits all the evidence in favor of gravitational tides, he doesn't even come close to providing a viable, testable, alternative explanation.
In other words, SH is not engaging in anything remotely approximating science. All he has are baseless accusations that the "mainstream" explanation is wrong and that his idea is right because (insert phenomenon here) "rotates like a magnet", even though magnets don't rotate unless an external force makes them. What external force is causing SH's magnet under New Zealand to rotate? No explanation is provided because it's a lot easier to spout of ideas than actually support them with evidence.
Moral of the story: when a website's premise is that substantial chunks of human history have been suppressed or erased (which is an untestable and unfalsifiable proposition), you can safely discredit any of their incoherent ramblings on any given subject.
Sources on tides and amphidromic points: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphidromic_point https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tides_in_marginal_seas https://www.briangwilliams.us/marine-ecology/tides.html https://rwu.pressbooks.pub/webboceanography/chapter/11-2-dynamic-theory-of-tides/
Sources on diamagnetic levitation and the magnetic field strength required: https://www.ru.nl/hfml/research/levitation-explained/diamagnetic-levitation/ https://www.hellovaia.com/explanations/physics/electricity-and-magnetism/diamagnetic-levitation/ https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=diamagnetic-levitation http://www.geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/earthmag.html
Uhhh, freshwater bodies absolutely do have tides. And the moon doesn’t have a magnetic field. And even distilled water is polar and diamagnetic, so freshwater should respond to magnetic fields about the same as salt water.
Good!