Amazon's employee vote to unionize or not had the same restrictions. ONLY VOTE IN PERSON. NO MAIL IN VOTING. hmmmm...
https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/how-can-we-be-angry-and-not-sin this link gives some good insight regarding the right kind of anger.
I like this one! Joshua 1:9 Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous! Do not tremble or be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.
The issue is not necessarily the number of shorts but the physical quantity to deliver on shorts. My thought is best to buy actual bullion/physical
Can i get permission to have some posters printed. These would look great around town.
Forming entities in Delaware is very common for tax and legal purposes. It is also common to have companies serve as register agents. I don’t think the implied nefarious activity is what you think
I am proud to be in good company. Did the world think Noah was crazy or off his rocker? How about the Apostles? John the Baptist? and so on. Should beliefs be challenged? Is the world flat? Does gravity exist? Do we advance by asking questions? seeking proofs? Are you awake yet?
I used to register as Democrat to vote in primary and select the biggest idiot to run against Repub. This trick no longer works as they are all idiots from whatever party.
The idea of creating my own Micro Nation is becoming more appealing by the day.
Good analysis!
Very interesting. Where’s Waldo?
I put this post in the "SUSPECT" category. Why would the salutation start with "calm down niggers"?
Some valid analytical points are made:
-
There are important SCOTUS cases pending.
-
Avoiding Civil War has merit by making things flow thru legal channels; however, anyone with eyes to see know how fraudulent the election was. So I fail to understand how allowing a fraudulent election to stand can possibly avert Civil War.
-
Point 6 of the text states that "he was denied a legitimate public inauguration on the steps of the Capitol" - Then why is there news footage of such?
-
How is it treasonous to invoke the Insurrection Act?
Overall there are too many inconsistent statements for me to consider valid.
Unfortunately we don't have a truthful investigative media anymore, so yes, it's very messy to discern fact from fiction in the free-for-all approach. But since there is no alternative, we're stuck playing the hand we are dealt.
I find myself getting upset seeing "quick" posts without anyone doing in-depth research, but knowing in advance that it is the wild west, I take everything with a grain-of-salt and work on discerning the TRUTH.
Here is further commentary that can be found: https://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm
Are different "opinions" ok? Is that not the essence of freedom and the 1st amendment? However, do personal attacks cause loss of credibility?
I personally pray for discernment. Also see:
1 John 4:1-6 King James Version
4 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.
6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
My view of Shills:
Romans 16:
17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
There should always be Plan A, B, C, etc.. Discussion is always good. Is it a good idea to listen to alternate paths/theories? Can there be only one path to a final solution? As steel sharpens steel so we sharpen one another. Please respect, research, and listen to other viewpoints. Should someone's thinking be dismissed out-of-hand without due consideration?
There should always be Plan A, B, C, etc.. Discussion is always good. Is it a good idea to listen to alternate paths/theories? Can there be only one path to a final solution? As steel sharpens steel so we sharpen one another. Please respect, research, and listen to other viewpoints. Should someone's thinking be dismissed out-of-hand without due consideration?
Hang in there. It takes courage to own it. Been there before.
I think it was "...for the Big Guy..."
Understood. Your point?
Is this relevent?
Declaration of Independence, which was passed by the Continental Congress in 1776 which affirms “That whenever any Form (sic) of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…” This proves that the United States was founded on the idea that the people have a right to declare independence and to rule themselves through a government by the people if the government does become authoritarian or undemocratic in nature.
Hope he is working for you. I am my own MicroNation.
What is he the President of? You?
How to discern reality from falsies? Greatly in need of discernment!