By the by, in case anyone wants further proof of British Intelligence Services complicity in the Marxist infiltration, you need only look at MI5s own website talking about the threat of subversion. They try to kid on that the threat of subversion died with the Soviet Union whereas we are all obviously aware that we have been getting subverted for generations and they also know the mechanisms by which it is done, as laid out by Yuri Bezmenov in his lectures in the 80s.
Here is MI5 talking about subversion. Note the year in which it was declared that the threat of subversion was ‘low’ - 1987. ‘Coincidentally’ 1987 was also the birth year of Queer Theory - the ‘academic’ discipline, or Critical Theory, inspired by lover of underage boys Michel Foucault who campaigned in France to abolish the age of consent down to toddler and who also testified about the lack of harm caused to children by having sexual relations with adults in the trial of a man accused of the statutory rape of a couple of 13 year old girls. The essay which announced the arrival of Queer Theory was called Thinking Sex by someone called Gayle Rubin, in which she framed paedophiles and communists as marginalised and oppressed minorities, champions what she calls ‘cross-generational encounters’ (ie adults having sex with minors) and laments the plight of “boy-lovers” as in this excerpt:
“ It is easy to see someone like Livingston as a victim of the child porn wars. It is harder for most people to sympathize with actual boy-lovers. Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation. Consequently, the police have feasted on them”
Note at the bottom of MI5s landing page, under ‘Awards and Support’ all the external ‘Diversity and Inclusion’ organisations that shape and advise MI5. You will see that they, like most other public and private institutions in the UK today, are under the influence of Stonewall - the main vehicle for the implementation of Queer Theory and gender identity/trans Theory which is aimed at children. Stonewall are a subversive group, getting into organisations and dictating policies, hiding behind LGB folk and dining out on the credit they built up in their original incarnation as defenders of gay rights.
Here is one article, from the pedo news agency BBC of all things, talking about how lesbians have been coerced into having sex with men in frocks using slurs like bigot and transphobe to weaken their resolve. Queer Theory gets a mention. One victim says she was brainwashed by Queer Theory such that she allowed it to override her natural revulsion to penises and engaged in a sex act she didn’t want to. Stonewall were aghast at this article shedding some light on in their warped ideology.
Let’s take a closer look at Stonewall for a minute. On Stonewalls website you can look for resources aimed at schools where you can input certain criteria and have some educational resources recommended to you. I’ll focus on one in particular and disclose some of the wider meanings.
The criteria I have selected to land on this page were:
I am a teacher based in the UK looking for resources on awareness and visibility for a primary school (elementary school for most of you reading).
From there, I select LGBTQ+ inclusive books for children and young people
And from there I am going into the ages 2-4 bracket.
From there into the Challenging Gender Stereotypes section
Scrolling through the list of books there is one called Julian is a mermaid. (More on what Mermaid might mean later).
The spiel that accompanies that book reads:
Julián Is a Mermaid
by Jessica Love, published by Candlewick, ISBN 9780763690458
Julián sees three women dressed as beautiful mermaids on the subway and decides he wants to be a mermaid himself. Julián worries his Nana will be angry when she sees his beautiful new outfit, but instead she takes Julián to see many other mermaids, all dressed up and beautiful and loving themselves. This book is a hymn to celebrating creativity, individuality and intergenerational love.
What I want you to pay attention to is the phrase ‘intergenerational love’. It is purported to reference the love between a wee boy and his granny but it is a dog whistle. Intergenerational love is NOT how you describe familial love. So what might it mean?
Using my Microsoft Edge search engine, the very first return when I put in the phrase ‘intergenerational love” returns this website - warning! This is an essay defending pedophilia. Read if you like but I wanted to draw your attention to the heading and how the person who wrote this refers to himself. The heading says New Stories with a smaller printed subheading that reads ‘for minor attracted adults’.
This attempted rebranding of paedophila to minor attracted adults or minor attracted persons should be familiar to most on here as it was how Queer Theory teacher Allyn Walker referred to pedos in her defence of them.
If anyone has any doubts about the book Julian is a mermaid being a paedophilic dog whistle then please take a look at the artwork and some of the unnecessary poses they put the wee boy in - like wearing a backless thing whilst looking over his shoulder, as you might see a female do as a seductive ploy.
Now, Julian is a mermaid. There is a ’trans’ charity called Mermaids so that word has some deeper significance which I haven’t been able to nail down yet but I think it’s fair to say that it is part of an argot or patois known only to insiders - another dog whistle.
The Mermaids website is aimed at children and is designed for children to communicate on these matters with strange adults without their parents knowledge. The website contains a button which, if pressed, closes down the website and automatically deletes it from your history. I have just had a look and that feature appears to be done away with now but I can assure you it was there at one point and I’m confident I won’t need to expound upon the significance of such a thing. If I do, just ask. (But if you really need to ask then I would urge you to get a clue!)
Our current PM Liz Truss (who is a WEF puppet and not to be trusted anyway), in her former guise as Minister for Women and Equalities, urged government departments to leave Stonewall. Some did, most didn’t - including MI5 as you have already seen. I’m not entirely sure about MI5s status as a government department or whether Intelligence services are counted as something else but the British Military haven’t quit.
Let me just revisit the 80s briefly again. As we know, Queer Theory seeks ultimately to recognise paedophila as a legitimate sexual orientation and to have those rights recognised in law. It began in 1987. Three years earlier we saw the disbandment of an organisation called the Paedophile Information Exchange who had previously toured college campuses gaining support amongst idealistic students by framing their predilections as Civil rights issues.
Here is a video of a couple of members defending their perversions.
They enjoyed the support of Harriet Harman who was the legal officer of the civil rights group they were affiliated to, now known as Liberty.
Harriet Harman then became an MP and parliamentarian who introduced guess what? The Equality Act 2010. Nothing in there legalises paedophilia but there are protections for sexual orientation. I submit that this legislation at least in part has laid the groundwork for the long game of paedophile acceptance, amongst other more fair minded things.
Paedo acceptance has transformed from overt civil rights campaigns like PIE and NAMBLA into adopting an academic, social science guise through the formulation of Queer Theory whilst co-opting trans and gay rights causes to lend it more credibility but in reality the emperor has no clothes on. I can see his little inch of evil flapping about in the wind.
So that should let you know something about where MI5s loyalties lie and in their abrogation of their responsibilities/downright treason.
Thanks both - the vid eventually worked on my device as is.
Great speech from this chap. I wonder if this is the same fella who called it Rutte and asked him to speak on The Great Reset book he was given by Klaus Schwab. Anyway, well in to this guy.
It’s particularly good to have gay folk speak out against this type of thing as the Queer Theorists and gender ideologies who push their harmful, immoral and criminal agendas try to use them as a shield from criticism
this is wisdom I think.
Take nothing for granted. I'm a sinner for sure and only hope I make the cut. If I don't it's no surprise because I know lots of my shortcomings and transgressions. And like you say, there's always the possibility that we're all just wrong in some profound ways.
When Jesus said forgive them Father for they know what they do, that can apply to everyone, which is probably part of the reason why Jesus instructed us to love our enemies.
We all know how easy it can be to inhabit a world of illusion and not see and just because we've graduated from some illusions doesn't mean we have the full picture at all.
Here's the description from Strongs for those interested:
G2638 καταλαμβάνω katalambanō 15x: to lay hold of, grasp; to obtain, attain, Rom_9:30; 1Co_9:24; Php_3:12-13; to seize, to take possession of, Mar_9:18; to come suddenly upon; overtake, surprise, Joh_12:35; 1Th_5:4; to detect in the act, seize, Joh_8:3-4; met. to comprehend, apprehend, Joh_1:5; mid. to understand, perceive, Act_4:13; Act_10:34; Act_25:25; Eph_3:18.
I know religious folk (Christians, Muslims, Sikhs etc) who just do what they are told by their particular church/mosque/temple etc. No real critical thinking, repeat actions only out pure fear or habit.
yeah,this is true. Catholics don't read the Bible. You can't be a catholic if you read the Bible. Or perhaps more accurately, you can't be a Catholic if you read the Bible and apply it. They're incompatible. I'll probably catch flak for that but I'm referring to things like Matt 6:19-21 vs the hordes and hordes of priceless treasures and golden bullion in the Vatican
and
Matt 23:9 vs calling priests 'Father'
and
Matt 6:7 vs praying the rosary
and plenty more besides. I don't know how one could justify themselves as a bona fide Christian by directly defying the guidance of Jesus as given on the Sermon on the mount. Mutually exclusive in my view. How might one reason away doing the exact opposite things which Jesus taught?
In this day and age you just don’t know what’s real and what’s not.
Regarding this photo, this may be what that Nate fella says it is, but he might not be being truthful.
How do we know, for example, that this fella in the photo isn’t just showing folk some kind of disease? His neck has a rash not dots. Why? Why does his neck have a rash instead of pellet marks?
The only reason we believe them to be pellet marks is because Nate says so.
The chap in the photo is also wearing a mask. Why? The wearing of the mask suggests to me that this photo is a lot older than the recent events in Iran. How do we know this wasn’t from last year with him showing off vaccine injuries for example? Because Nate says? Who’s Nate and where did he get this photo?
Finally, although I don’t really know exactly what Iran looks like, wherever they are looks western to me with those tenements and paving stones and play park. It just looks like it could be in Germany.
Actually finally, we don’t even know that these people are Iranian, only that they are Middle Eastern.
And actually actually finally. Nate says this is from a protector of people at an anti-hijab protest but there’s a hijab-wearing lass right in front of him…
Too many questions I’m afraid.
I'm going to give Hare Krishna a pass - they are what turned me onto spirituality when, in exchange for a jug of milk, a Hare Krishna gave me 3 books by Swami Prabhupada whose writings helped me to make sense of a confused time of introspection.
From there the Vedas, then Buddhism, then Taoism then finally Christianity.
“It actually helps boost credibility significantly” in reference to devolution not being associated with Q.
This is a tacit admission from you that being associated with Q is discrediting.
How, then, can you show such militant confidence in Q? Is it overcompensation? Is it a swan song?
All, if you have read Sunsteins paper at all then you should view this blowhards foot stomping theatrics as a TRUE shill losing the soft control he had over his little Internet fiefdom.
When soft control no longer works, hard control in the form of bullying, intimidation, demands have to break out. They are a sign of a bad actor losing their grip on power and of the narrative though, just like you see in the real world with a lot of the authoritarian stuff.
I think what we are witnessing is Camaros artificially inflated testicles deflating and this is him hurriedly trying to pump them back up again.
Camaro, people have legitimate questions about the nature of things today - including the nature of Q. You can’t police people’s thoughts and you can’t stop people from speaking.
Petty tyrants aren’t welcome anywhere so reel yourself back in again.
No no - you’re quite right. The best plan was to coerce everyone to take an experimental poison jab under pain of losing their job, crash the economy anyway, and hand everybody over into the transhumanist slave system rather than risk Looking bad for the cameras and have the media criticise Trump!! I mean, think how Trumps presidency might have panned out had he faced a hostile media!
You’re right - he dodged a bullet there. Phew!
How silly of me.
dunno, what did he say about Christmas? Unless he acknowledged that it is a celebration of the Winter Solstice from the Old Roman calendar and therefore Pagan and nothing whatsoever to do with Christ then I'm not going to give it any real credit