5
Knotnow 5 points ago +5 / -0

I bet they have bugs in their food too.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember Ross Perot talking about the "giant sucking sound" we'll hear as companies moved out of the country.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

"...a story for another time?" We'er waiting. Was the the Vault 7 release?

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, God did make the sheep, "All we like sheep have gone astray (Is. 53:6). "My sheep hear My voice (Jn. 10:27)."

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

The day before your child was born, he was in the womb. He was still your child and he was still him. And the day before that, and the day before that, and the day before that....

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either he controls his people so those who rioted were not his people. OR, he doesn't control his people, therefore he's not guilty of inciting a riot.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

We knew that Dominion machines were crooked. We knew that mail in voting was a cheat. There's no pretend disease to even justify it. Heck, even the Democrats told us these things are subject to fraud. So, why did our candidates participate? Why didn't the Republicans reject the cheating conditions? They could have said, "No election until these things are fixed." Why are we, after the fact, trying to undo a cheat that we knew was coming?

5
Knotnow 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just saw a post that law schools were dropping entrance requirements. I thought, "Hmm, I wonder what kind of positions they want to shove minorities/maybe gang members into that requires a law degree." Judgeships, of course.

2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Runbeck was allegedly caught printing ballots with ~30% adjudication rate programmed in.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

This poll on the same page has 20 hours left: Daniel Uhlfelder@DWUhlfelderLaw 3h Replying to @elonmusk Indict former President Trump Yes 76.8% No 23.2% 110,449 votes · 20 hours left Tip

3
Knotnow 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're the investigative arm, not the prosecution or enforcement arm. Blame those who failed in prosecution and enforcement. Whatever testimonies both got under oath are permanent and admissible in a court of law whenever such court appears in our utterly corrupt system.

1
Knotnow 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, if I have this right, McCarthy became powerful because he controlled the firehose of money to support his desired candidates. It was money from FTX to put the globalist selected candidates in place. What happens when the firehose is out of "water."

3
Knotnow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe it went from the Black Hat military to the White Hat military running it.

by MAGULQ
2
Knotnow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't it curious that even though all the Old Testament saints had the practice of calling on the Lord, and God said He would answer and help those who call on Him, like in Ps. 50:15 and Jer. 29:12, and Peter in the New Testament says that everyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved (Acts 2:21), and it was the common practice of the New Testament churches (1 Cor. 1:2), not many of God's people practice this today. Paul told Timothy, "...pursue...with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart (2 Tim. 2:22)." Btw, this calling is not metaphorical. The practice of calling on one's God is described 1 Kings 18:24-39).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›