2
Kunkussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been firmly of this decision since he "lost" the election before. Plus COG is still in play.

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Upstate SC, I would say facing ENE. It looked like it would be about 2-300 miles away. A meteor would be quite a bit brighter the closer you get to it

3
Kunkussion 3 points ago +3 / -0

I swore I saw two last night in the distance. First thing I thought was "either that's munitions or a meteor going towards the ground"..

3
Kunkussion 3 points ago +3 / -0

Chuck Wright is the law enforcement version of Lindsey Graham. Just fyi

2
Kunkussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell, CWA announced support for her the same day she said she was "running".

2
Kunkussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

A flag raised in Appalachia

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop posting Tranny Doomer..he's a Mossad grifter taking advantage of the situation and always tells half truths. Well poisoning.

2
Kunkussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have to be merciful to those who are unaware and unable. You are posturing with your comment, and it's quite offensive. In more cases than not, what you describe won't happen. Red Cross is definitely evil up top, but that doesn't mean that some working for them do not have good intentions.

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real conspiracy is them calling it a "tropical storm", when it got here, when it was a CAT 2, at least.

4
Kunkussion 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lake lure and Chimney Rock area is gone. Its like fallout 76 here, no shit. There's a lot of refugees coming into Spartanburg and Greenville from Asheville area.

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be considered an act of terrorism.

The Patriot Act will be used for its true intention now. Signed in 45 days after 9/11. May be the notion of "think mirror"

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Better question; what's the need to point it out?

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because he didn't make a claim that the Constitution references "the bible or Christianity or any particular religion". You made a standalone claim irrelevant to the topic, intentionally, to straw man.

You could phrase your statement as a question, but that didn't happen.

0
Kunkussion 0 points ago +1 / -1

So there's this thing, its called google. Its a great thing, amazing thing actually. And there's this thing, called reading, it works a lot to help you understand. I could explain it, but every tenant and belief of the constitution has relations with the good will of the Christian belief. Not my job to explain it, plus its baiting into an argument.

No one said or is incenuating there were "references" to the Bible or Christianity (by quote directly) in the Constitution, pertaining to the posted content. Which is what you are straw manning about.

You good?

1
Kunkussion 1 point ago +1 / -0

Canny the constitution references biblical principles, mostly pertaining to the teachings of Jesus, and not be somewhat influenced by it.

2/10 strawman pump it up

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›