One of the replies on her tweet was exposing that her education credentials are not legit; she says she did her PhD at a university (now defunct) during years it didn't exist.

Wow. What he says confirms my long held suspicion that they want to kill off the elders and brainwash the children to mold them into the slave class. COVID was engineered to kill off the conservative commonsense generation and spare the rainbow flag generation.

I didn't know that was Catturd. Are you sure or just slightly cat-racist? Is he wearing contacts? He's severely nearsighted.

Q also posted "Every dog has its day." Relevant? Maybe?

That was good. In the history books that discuss the Great Awakening, they should quote your post.

Thanks for taking the time to respond in such detail. I do see what you mean and am ready to believe it as a possibility. I also see you know more about the law than I do. I do think you make good arguments and I've always been prepared to be wrong on this. However, I think your example of the definition of State, you will notice that they say "the term State means" whereas in the other example they say the term State "includes". I'm not 100% convinced about what you're saying, but I'm far from 0% convinced too. I can't say whether they are deliberately trying to make things confusing, but they are. I know enough from hanging around here that the powers that be are not above obfuscating creating loopholes and cheat codes to screw us over to their benefit. Anyways, thanks for the intellectual stimulation.

Plus GME is taking off.

It keeps happening and happening!

If Clandestine was half as smart as he thinks is, he'd be one quarter as smart as anons here who called all this long ago.

To clarify, the House Republicans passed a law to count citizens on the census instead of just total population. Dems voted against it but it still passed in the House.

First of all, OP, excellent dig and a very commendable post. Thank you. However, I am going to respectfully poke a hole in some of its 2nd half.
Notwithstanding my user name, I am not an expert in the law. If I may be so bold, then, I think you are mistaken about your points about the definitions of State and of employee. Anyone may correct me if I'm wrong.
In regards to the excerpts you posted in the 2nd half of your post, you argue that those excerpts don't apply to something that the legislation supposedly defined. Your excerpts follow the pattern "x includes y."
I don't think you can take that to mean the definition, but rather an expansion of the definition. You cannot equate that with "x is defined narrowly as y." It means that x contains y as well as everything commonly known to be x.
For example, mammals include dolphins. However, you cannot accurately say mammals are defined narrowly as dolphins. So where you said:

What is a "State?".

(a)(10) The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
...it implies that "states" (not actually being defined here) include the 50 states... plus DC.
Likewise, employees, not actually defined, include those particular salesman with all other typical employees.

I had to look this up, not being American, and learned that the American legislative procedure to table a motion is very different from the British parliamentary phrase to table a motion. For Americans, it means to put an indefinite pause on debate, essentially mothballing it. Bringing it back to the floor would require majority as well.

Don't you see? Any time anyone connected to Trump or the military makes any reference to anything in one of 4000 Q posts, people here go bananas. They wet themselves with glee because ... Well, I don't really understand why, but they do. And if you ask a rational question like a person who thinks critically, you will get downvoted into oblivion. Happened to me just last week as a matter of fact. Some here are still stuck in 2018, where any link between Q and team Trump or the military was a big deal because there was still a question about whether the Q op was legit or not. Personally, I know that Trump and the military are at the very least leveraging Q if not directly involved in it, and they're giving a wink and a nod to Q followers, so something like this is mildly interesting, but that's all. It's not giving us meaningful Intel or telling us anything new. I'm open to have my mind changed if anyone has anything thoughtful to say.

You're expecting normies and lefties to connect dots... on their own?

One of those dudes is clearly an antlered animal.

Thought it was a Minecraft Caribou with massive diarrhea, but I do see your perspective as well.

Maybe it was the Vax? Did Boeing require employees to get the clot shot?

Anybody can make 4 videos that add up to 114. This is meaningless.

But I don't understand how to realize any gain. When do you sell? You don't gain anything unless you sell the stock high, and if the system collapses under the MOASS, how do you collect from amidst the smouldering ruins of the system we are supposedly about to bring down?

If we are thinking that the Trump/Nunes moves might have an effect, wouldn't that lead other retailers to the same conclusion and bump up the price as retailers buy in more?

If one pays attention to the other side, they always agree that sex is biological, but they claim that GENDER is a matter of personal preference, and there are dozens to millions of genders.

Good. I'm glad. And I enjoyed the video. Not sure why it's posted on GAW and why it got a sticky ... on GAW .

Not just funding protesters, but funding the worst kind of protesters: violent and rowdy mobs.

Going off on a tangent, here.... Yesterday my wife asked me, "Did you hear about Kanye? He's starting a p_rn site." I had not heard anything about it. It's not something I want to be looking at web search results for either. What do anons know about this?

And looks like the clock face is smiling at the viewer.