What's obvious is this bill has no teeth anyway. It would be a QUESTION of citizenship on the census that any illegal can still answer YES to, the same way they do for voting.
The govt mails the census to every mailing address so this is literally the exact same problem as mail in voting with no voter ID.
I mean all the rinos who have helped get us to this point over the years, state and federal levels. Who only care about us during election season and then sell us out the rest of the time. They are worse than the dems because they pretend to be homest and conservative while stabbing us in the back.
You gotta give the SOBs credit; they are coming from all sides. This is a big one but not unexpected at all because we knew it was why they let so many illegals in in the first place. Some genius republican mind will come up with a solution. In the meantime pray like you have never prayed before. We must crush this big time.
Please stop misrepresenting things with hyperbolic or sensationalist claims. EXISTING LAW ALREADY DOES THIS, the Bill in question would change it to not do that. So what the Democrats unanimously voted to do was to let this continue to happen or to not prevent it.
To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Equal Representation Act”.
SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP STATUS ON DECENNIAL CENSUS.
Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
“(g) (1) In conducting the 2030 decennial census and each decennial census thereafter, the Secretary shall include in any questionnaire distributed or otherwise used for the purpose of determining the total population by States a checkbox or other similar option for the respondent to indicate, for the respondent and for each of the members of the household of the respondent, whether that individual is a citizen of the United States.
“(2) Not later than 120 days after completion of a decennial census of the population under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make publicly available the number of individuals per State, disaggregated by citizens of the United States and noncitizens, as tabulated in accordance with this section.”.
SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF NONCITIZENS FROM NUMBER OF PERSONS USED TO DETERMINE APPORTIONMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES AND NUMBER OF ELECTORAL VOTES.
(a) Exclusion.—Section 22(a) of the Act entitled “An Act to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial censuses and to provide for apportionment of Representatives in Congress”, approved June 18, 1929 (2 U.S.C. 2a(a)), is amended by inserting after “not taxed” the following: “and individuals who are not citizens of the United States”.
(b) Effective Date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the apportionment of Representatives carried out pursuant to the decennial census conducted during 2030 and any succeeding decennial census.
SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
If any provision of this Act or amendment made by this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of the provisions of this Act and amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provision or amendment to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected.
Amend the title so as to read: “A bill to require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all individuals.”
To clarify, the House Republicans passed a law to count citizens on the census instead of just total population. Dems voted against it but it still passed in the House.
To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons.
This bill requires any questionnaire used in the decennial census to include a checkbox or other similar option for respondents to indicate whether the respondent and each household member is a U.S. citizen.
The Department of Commerce must make public the number of citizens and noncitizens in each state.
The bill also requires that the statement sent by the President to Congress indicating the number of persons in each state (related to the reapportionment of U.S. Representatives) excludes noncitizens.
Here's the link to the office of the clerk for the House, for this bill #7109
THANK GOD the DEMS didn't have enough votes TO ACTUALLY PASS IT...
These RADICAL POLITICIANS are actively WORKING TOGETHER TO RUIN AMERICA and let every crazy radical FOREIGNER take over our elections and destroy what we hold dear...SHAME ON THESE DEVILS!!!
The Dems are showing one of their reasons for mass illegal invasion. The great replacement project will be the tougher one for us to make our libtard family and friends understand.
Actually there is a tradition in the House that when a member of one party who supports a bill needs to miss the vote, a member of the opposition party who opposes the bill will agree to miss the vote also. Despite the partisanship in the current congress, a tradition such as this will hold especially on a bill such as this that has no chance of becoming law.
There is no level that the Democrats are afraid to stoop. Blatant treason for each and every vote that voted for this takeover.
I will contribute $10K (and I am by no means rich - but I'm good for it) towards American made hemp rope. I will also volunteer 2 weeks of my annual vacation to pulling the lever. Not worried about blisters - I'll buy my own leather gloves.
Maybe I’ma little slow, but where does it say this? What I see is needing a checkbox for being a non citizen. I sent this to a Libtard friend and I didn’t have a rebuttal.
Gotta give the Dems credit. They are together. They form plans and execute them. With precision. Meanwhile the Republicans have HUGE, BIG TALKS…we’re gonna do this and we’re gonna do that! We’re gonna make illegal crimes illegal again! We’re gonna send protesters to the kill zones in Gaza! What a bunch of idiots. I mean talk about a joke. It’s not even serious litigation. I sometimes wish I was a democrat. But it’s all the murdering of children and going against God I have problems with. Both parties are just…terrible. How can electing one man fix this? Unless we start talking about abolishing the branches of government…this can’t be fixed. We are way past fixing all this crap. We need a hard reset. Massive reset! Honestly I don’t see how that’s possible.
Draft them all to the front lines - see how they like being a 'real' American! Do I laugh, cry, or eat popcorn?? Even knowing most of this already happened ... I'm angry that it ever happened! But I am most happy and delighted to be awake. I don't want to die stupid lol!!
I think this is click-bait. They already did this for the 2020 census. Trump tried to fight it and was overruled by the courts.
Also Miller makes it sound like they are adding new seats and/or electors. NO. There are 538 electors - should be 535 but DC was given 3. There are 100 Senators and 435 Representatives (535).
That number is not changing. That is also why the number of electors required to win the Presidency is 270 instead of 269 (which would result in a tie).
Do you guys not remember that after the 2020 census, California lost a seat and Texas gained a seat? That was because CA lost population and TX gained. It will be the same for the illegals. It is all a numbers game. That's why illegals are being moved around to places like New York, Illinois, and of course California. They are losing population and the left can't let them lose electors.
Trump will try again to get CONgress to add back the citizenship question by law. It used to be there and the left got it removed for 2020. Go figure.
I'm not sure what Stephen Miller is trying to do, but what he is saying is not true. If you add a seat/elector to one state you have to subtract one from another. It is all based on population and not "areas with the most illegals". It could end up that way, but it depends on whether the illegals even answer the census. A lot of them are paranoid about responding to govt crap (huh, me too).
BTW - I'm not fan of wikipedia but they do have a good page explaining the numbers and why electors for each state can change but the overall number (538) can not.
3 years of open borders and this wraps it up.
Nice that they are making it obvious.
Why would you want to be a citizen? Free housing, free education, free food, and medical care, exempt from crime, no taxes, and they get to vote.
Right before elections!
What's obvious is this bill has no teeth anyway. It would be a QUESTION of citizenship on the census that any illegal can still answer YES to, the same way they do for voting.
The govt mails the census to every mailing address so this is literally the exact same problem as mail in voting with no voter ID.
Dems. are. traitors.
So are republicans
You mean the 206 yeas ?
I mean all the rinos who have helped get us to this point over the years, state and federal levels. Who only care about us during election season and then sell us out the rest of the time. They are worse than the dems because they pretend to be homest and conservative while stabbing us in the back.
That's a massive misspelling of evil cunts who need to be executed for treason.
Not traitors, treasonous and subject to execution.
You gotta give the SOBs credit; they are coming from all sides. This is a big one but not unexpected at all because we knew it was why they let so many illegals in in the first place. Some genius republican mind will come up with a solution. In the meantime pray like you have never prayed before. We must crush this big time.
Cloward-Piven overwhelm the system.
Wait till the black swans start rolling in.
I'm waiting with camera in hand.
Please stop misrepresenting things with hyperbolic or sensationalist claims. EXISTING LAW ALREADY DOES THIS, the Bill in question would change it to not do that. So what the Democrats unanimously voted to do was to let this continue to happen or to not prevent it.
Article- https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/breaking-house-democrats-vote-unanimously-give-illegal-aliens/
Edit: Here's the link to the office of the clerk for the House, for this bill #7109
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109/text
H. R. 7109
A BILL
To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Equal Representation Act”.
SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP STATUS ON DECENNIAL CENSUS.
Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
“(g) (1) In conducting the 2030 decennial census and each decennial census thereafter, the Secretary shall include in any questionnaire distributed or otherwise used for the purpose of determining the total population by States a checkbox or other similar option for the respondent to indicate, for the respondent and for each of the members of the household of the respondent, whether that individual is a citizen of the United States.
“(2) Not later than 120 days after completion of a decennial census of the population under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make publicly available the number of individuals per State, disaggregated by citizens of the United States and noncitizens, as tabulated in accordance with this section.”.
SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF NONCITIZENS FROM NUMBER OF PERSONS USED TO DETERMINE APPORTIONMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES AND NUMBER OF ELECTORAL VOTES.
(a) Exclusion.—Section 22(a) of the Act entitled “An Act to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial censuses and to provide for apportionment of Representatives in Congress”, approved June 18, 1929 (2 U.S.C. 2a(a)), is amended by inserting after “not taxed” the following: “and individuals who are not citizens of the United States”.
(b) Effective Date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the apportionment of Representatives carried out pursuant to the decennial census conducted during 2030 and any succeeding decennial census.
SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
If any provision of this Act or amendment made by this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of the provisions of this Act and amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provision or amendment to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected.
Amend the title so as to read: “A bill to require a citizenship question on the decennial census, to require reporting on certain census statistics, and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all individuals.”
R's are trying to pass a bill that would require citizenship on the census and ONLY citizens could vote.
All R's voted in favor.
All D's voted against.
Won't pass Senate.
So, we have status quo, which I guess Miller is saying the D's will corrupt the vote via illegals.
How is this going to be a law? Dems voted no but were outvoted by repubs voting yes? Explain exactly how this is going to be a law?
The law was to prevent it. Dems voted against the law to prevent it.
So, it isn't a new law they passed - it's status quo unless this bill passes in the Senate. Thank you
Yup, the phrasing probably could have been better.
Maybe he’s trying to bait discussion by being obtuse.
Or, he could have phrased it better…!
To clarify, the House Republicans passed a law to count citizens on the census instead of just total population. Dems voted against it but it still passed in the House.
Thank you
Here's the link to the office of the clerk for the House, for this bill #7109
Summary of the bill:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109
Text of the bill:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7109/text
Thank you
THANK GOD the DEMS didn't have enough votes TO ACTUALLY PASS IT...
These RADICAL POLITICIANS are actively WORKING TOGETHER TO RUIN AMERICA and let every crazy radical FOREIGNER take over our elections and destroy what we hold dear...SHAME ON THESE DEVILS!!!
Military trials, and conventions, which will lead to firing squats… that or slow and painful injections of JABS
Frogs in a pot. They are gaining ground every day.
This is a direct attack to every American citizen. This is an act of war.
Period.
The Dems are showing one of their reasons for mass illegal invasion. The great replacement project will be the tougher one for us to make our libtard family and friends understand.
"They all swill from the same trough"
Did go along Speaker Mike vote with them?
It says right there, 0 nays from Republicans.
11 Repugs abstained though. Hilariously, so did 11 Democrats.
Almost like they are playing a game to keep it close.
The uniparty wouldn't do that /S
Who were the 11 Republicans abstaining?
I think I read the list on GatewayPundit.com if I remember correctly
Thanks 🙏🏻
Actually there is a tradition in the House that when a member of one party who supports a bill needs to miss the vote, a member of the opposition party who opposes the bill will agree to miss the vote also. Despite the partisanship in the current congress, a tradition such as this will hold especially on a bill such as this that has no chance of becoming law.
Democrats: the representatives of non-americans and what the want done America.
Isn’t this what the Supreme Court is for?
There is no level that the Democrats are afraid to stoop. Blatant treason for each and every vote that voted for this takeover.
I will contribute $10K (and I am by no means rich - but I'm good for it) towards American made hemp rope. I will also volunteer 2 weeks of my annual vacation to pulling the lever. Not worried about blisters - I'll buy my own leather gloves.
Maybe I’ma little slow, but where does it say this? What I see is needing a checkbox for being a non citizen. I sent this to a Libtard friend and I didn’t have a rebuttal.
How does the Q plan fit in with something like this???
Stunned into silence. But don't expect me to stay that way.
Gotta give the Dems credit. They are together. They form plans and execute them. With precision. Meanwhile the Republicans have HUGE, BIG TALKS…we’re gonna do this and we’re gonna do that! We’re gonna make illegal crimes illegal again! We’re gonna send protesters to the kill zones in Gaza! What a bunch of idiots. I mean talk about a joke. It’s not even serious litigation. I sometimes wish I was a democrat. But it’s all the murdering of children and going against God I have problems with. Both parties are just…terrible. How can electing one man fix this? Unless we start talking about abolishing the branches of government…this can’t be fixed. We are way past fixing all this crap. We need a hard reset. Massive reset! Honestly I don’t see how that’s possible.
War never changes
Not going to pass the senate.
Draft them all to the front lines - see how they like being a 'real' American! Do I laugh, cry, or eat popcorn?? Even knowing most of this already happened ... I'm angry that it ever happened! But I am most happy and delighted to be awake. I don't want to die stupid lol!!
These people have already shown they'll pick up and move the moment things become difficult or dangerous, so lets make things difficult.
DemActors
I think this is click-bait. They already did this for the 2020 census. Trump tried to fight it and was overruled by the courts.
Also Miller makes it sound like they are adding new seats and/or electors. NO. There are 538 electors - should be 535 but DC was given 3. There are 100 Senators and 435 Representatives (535). That number is not changing. That is also why the number of electors required to win the Presidency is 270 instead of 269 (which would result in a tie).
Do you guys not remember that after the 2020 census, California lost a seat and Texas gained a seat? That was because CA lost population and TX gained. It will be the same for the illegals. It is all a numbers game. That's why illegals are being moved around to places like New York, Illinois, and of course California. They are losing population and the left can't let them lose electors.
Trump will try again to get CONgress to add back the citizenship question by law. It used to be there and the left got it removed for 2020. Go figure.
I'm not sure what Stephen Miller is trying to do, but what he is saying is not true. If you add a seat/elector to one state you have to subtract one from another. It is all based on population and not "areas with the most illegals". It could end up that way, but it depends on whether the illegals even answer the census. A lot of them are paranoid about responding to govt crap (huh, me too).
BTW - I'm not fan of wikipedia but they do have a good page explaining the numbers and why electors for each state can change but the overall number (538) can not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reapportionment_Act_of_1929
Makes complete dem sense.
They have only been able to give citizen criminals (incarcerated or released felons) voting rights in a few states.
So foreign criminals will have to do. Bussing them around to spoil your vote isn’t going to cut it in ‘24—they know that.
They need to steal those representatives numbers because places like CA and MI are loosing so many.
🤡
I’m sure they’re relieved that at least their dead voters can’t relocate.
Git a rope
Real Glad we are only watching a Movie..they are showing everyone what WOULD have been instore for us...IF we were not, watching a Movie.
All I can say is WTF is going on in the World.?
Here are the VOTES -
https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024193
The Republicans that DID NOT vote:
Banks Republican Indiana NOT VOTING
Burgess Republican Texas NOT VOTING
Carter (TX) Republican Texas NOT VOTING
Granger Republican Texas NOT VOTING
Hageman Republican Wyoming NOT VOTING
LaMalfa Republican California NOT VOTING
Luna Republican Florida NOT VOTING
McCaul Republican Texas NOT VOTING
McHenry Republican North Carolina NOT VOTING
Murphy Republican North Carolina NOT VOTING
Sessions Republican Texas NOT VOTING
The Dems that DIDNOT vote:
Carson Democratic Indiana NOT VOTING
Cleaver Democratic Missouri NOT VOTING
Foushee Democratic North Carolina NOT VOTING
Grijalva Democratic Arizona NOT VOTING
Jackson Lee Democratic Texas NOT VOTING
Jacobs Democratic California NOT VOTING
Krishnamoorthi Democratic Illinois NOT VOTING
Landsman Democratic Ohio NOT VOTING
Magaziner Democratic Rhode Island NOT VOTING
Thompson (MS) Democratic Mississippi NOT VOTING
Tokuda Democratic Hawaii NOT VOTING
You bring up an important point