No offense to the OP, but this was one of the worst edited videos ever, and the title is click bait since Maher's lone positive statement about Trump was in a one-on-one with Chris Cuomo and no crowd erupted.
The rest of it was just a mish-mosh of stuff that has been around for awhile and could have been polished with better editing if the desire was to red pill some more Normies.
Kash Patel, a traitor?!!!
Where did you come from, a scotch ad?
This was one of the most captivating interviews I have ever watched. This is one that will be front of mind for a while.
Taking a bit of a pragmatic approach and not dismissing that the DS would love to have everyone locked down again, there is some validity to the concerns of dangerous fungi that unfortunately are going to be dismissed by the public because of how bad the CDC f*cked the COVID response (either on purpose or through pure incompetence):
-
Drug-resistant fungi have been known as a potential danger for at least 2 decades (since the early 2000s).
-
There are far fewer antifungal drugs and most are from 1-2 classes like Azoles.
-
Fungi are eukaryotes, like humans, so it makes them harder to kill without harming human cells, which is the reason why antifungal development has lagged behind the others.
-
Azoles like Fluconazole have been used for treatment in humans, but also in agriculture, accelerating resistance. Warnings were starting to come out regarding overuse of Azoles in the early-mid 2000s.
-
Candida auris is the main drug-resistant one and the first big wave was in 2016 since it is deadly and lingered in healthcare facilities and came back to the forefront during COVID with more outbreaks. This is what they are warning about today.
However, there is a quite a bit a fear-mongering since Candida Auris is not airborne, no known fungi has high human-to-human transmission, and their 30-60% sounds way overly inflated since a simulated uncontrollable and drug-resistant fungi with human to human transmission and one that can linger on surfaces for weeks would have a CFR rate of 30-65% and be classified as worse than any pathogen pandemic ever as far as kill rate.
Whose head is gonna roll for this one? Or was it all part of an elaborate ruse? According to the article, it does appear to be a legitimate thread.
NICE find! It's interesting how much of what is being uncovered tracks with and then expands on things that have been brought up in other mediums in the past.
I know there is a lot of controversy about Stone's JFK film (1991), even so much that it and other documentaries and books about the assassination have been said to actually be produced and published by the CIA to ensure a narrative away from the actual truth.
But there is a scene about 50 minutes into the film where Garrison and his staff are meeting at lunch and "Susie" lays out what they know of Oswald's background.
During this exposition, she mentions Oswald joining the Marines, learning Russian, and being stationed in Japan where U2 flights over Russia initiated.
He is discharged on the account of his mother being sick, and then "with a $1500 ticket from a $200 bank account" flies to the Soviet Union and defects, etc. etc.
Shortly after, Gary Powers U2 flight was shot down and it was suggested that Oswald may have given the Soviets enough data to hit the plane that was considered untouchable, and as a result, the talks between Khrushchev and Eisenhower that year were cancelled.
"Susie" then posits that there could have been elements in our military industrial establishment that did not want those talks to happen and when told by her colleague to stick with the facts, she begins to lay out some facts with some date ranges until "Garrison" cuts her off and asks her how Oswald gets back to the US.
I had always wanted to hear more of "Susie's" timeline.
Later on in the scene during "Garrison" suggests that Oswald was never a true defector, but an intelligence agent on some mission for the government until the day he died (where he truly was the patsy).
GAW fren Silex shared a video in the main thread (https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ae3wNXbo/magathread--jfk-files-drop--marc/).
It's from 7 years ago and is a very intriguing watch.
It discusses this photo in detail beginning at 26:10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk_7TCe_Fkk
While I do not doubt the negative impact of the jab on new, aggressive cancers, there is something to be said about several other potential mitigating factors:
-
mammograms, first recommended at age 40 (annually) and then every 2 years starting at age 50. Some women with breast cancer in the family are urged to get annual mammograms in their 30s. Nothing like a dose of radiation into susceptible breast tissue every year. Ironically, health insurance does not typically cover Ultrasound Mammograms (obviously much safer since there is no radiation) which are commonly used for more detailed analysis if a standard mammogram finds something, but that's common among health insurer bullshit.
-
a wild card happens to be sunscreen. Now while this is more relevant to skin cancers, could the toxins common in sunscreens also play a part in breast cancer development since even in a bikini or one-piece, breast tissue can still be exposed to the sun, and there would be a desire to lather that shit everywhere?
The pancreatic cancers, especially in young adults, are most certainly a result of the jab, and it could certainly be causing rises in early breast cancer (under the age of 50), but I think there may be a perfect storm situation when tied to the mammogram component, at the very least.
Interesting watch. Also the "storm drain theory" was used in the X-Files/Lone Gunmen universe and it was the "Cancer Man" character who fired the low-angled shot. This doc appears to use the footage from the episode that flashed back to "Cancer Man" firing the fateful shot as the theory in the episode posited that the angle of the last shot was too steep for the grassy knoll.
Technically not the Keys since it's still part of the "mainland" stretch of road heading from Homestead and Florida City in southernmost Miami-Dade into Key Largo.
There are some marinas dotted along the way, but for the most part it's also uninhabitable since it's the eastern most part of the Everglades.
The Glades are always under drought conditions during the Winter since it's the dry season, so wildfires spark-up all the time, and the lack of any rain has been more severe this Winter, but this is the first time in a long time this particular area had a fire.
The critical part of the story is that stretch of road is the main thoroughfare in and out of the Keys. There is a secondary 2 lane road running parallel called Card Sound Road that locals use to bypass the traffic jams that often occur on that stretch of US 1. During Irma, they shut down southbound traffic and opened up those lanes for people escaping the Keys.
If this was during the Wet Season of the Summer Months, my BS Meter would be chiming, but fires happen all the time in Florida in the Winter, just a part of the yearly cycle.
Supposebly is considered correct and valid in Miami along with words like Irregardless. lol
Agreed, they are going after her because she still has a lot of followers of her bullshit for some reason, and she's young and has been considered the future of the party by insiders. Take out the threat before she gets more of a foothold in the Swamp.
We all know there is a ton of waste going on with government spending (it's been going on for decades) and what DOGE has audited and uncovered is just the beginning, but the strategic brilliance of going after USAID first is very much paying off immediately with the shrunken size of the protests.
POTUS has essentially cut off the fuel to the fire because MONEY is the driver to those NGOs.
The elimination of the wasteful spending on those stupid projects like studies on transgender mice and an Iraqi Sesame Street is a bonus.
I agree he is desperate and cornered and irrational enough to make really bad choices and go scorched earth, but I think if he had access to nukes, he would have already tried to use them.
After the fall of the USSR and Ukraine's independence in August 1991, they had the 3rd largest nuclear arsenal in the world (~1900 strategic warheads) but did not have the launch codes since those were controlled by Russia.
Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum (with Russia, US and UK) where they agreed to give up the former USSR's nuclear arsenal in 1994. Belarus and Kazakhstan also inherited nukes and signed similar agreements.
Between 1994 and 1996, Ukraine transferred all of its nukes to Russia which either disposed of or repurposed the warheads into its own arsenal.
After 1996, Ukraine signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear state. They dismantled silos and bombers often with the financial and technical assistance of the US.
My scenarios would be either last ditch efforts to strike deep into the heart of Russia (i.e. Moscow and the Kremlin, even Putin himself) or some Enormous False Flag event that they will claim Russia did to elicit international fury and try to reverse course to bring NATO forces onto Russian soil and into WWIII.
The Wild Card would be if he actually came to his senses and acquiesced the fact he is not in a position of negotiating power and accept whatever terms are presented for the betterment of his nation and people, and forgoing his ego and narcissism. But that would likely mean ceding territory taken by Russia, unless POTUS has a nice carrot for Putin that could get him to agree to that part of the deal.
I mentioned something like this in another post (without the Q drop reference, TY for sharing!) that everything needs to be buttoned up tight before acting.
We know the list includes very high-profile people and all of them are flight risks.
Things do take time and you can't just go off all willy-nilly without a plan in place that will ensure success in prosecution according to the rule of law.
This is especially important since the Dems have been shouting for months that POTUS will become a dictator and arrest his opponents. Pam and Kash have all said during their confirmation hearings that they would not go after political opponents for the sake of politics, but follow the rule of law and prosecute those who have committed crimes, so it needs to be handled effectively.
So, there could be some legitimate scenarios playing out behind the scenes:
-
They have the evidence, but Pam and Kash maybe didn't know the exact extent of all the names on the list and any and all evidence of crimes committed that is in the hands of the FBI and DOJ that was not acted on in prior DOJ regimes, so there is more to go through, which takes time.
-
There is a lack of evidence either because it was never there or because there are reports that there are employees of DOJ and FBI that are wiping servers and destroying evidence. We do not know which cases or information are allegedly being wiped, but if it involves Epstein, and they lost a good amount of evidence that was already collected and organized, they could be at a significant disadvantage in moving forward in a prosecution and they need to work on a plan around it.
Regardless of either scenario, If they were to simply release the list prior to having indictments (likely sealed) and signed arrest warrants, it would result in a shit show, because it would absolutely alert those named and give them time to either flee, get the PR wheels moving, and/or get their ducks in a row for their eventual defense.
It doesn't speak of a cover-up unless it's never released or released but heavily redacted. There are murder investigations and trials that go on for months and years before a resolution, and the cases around Epstein could be some of the biggest in history.
I would rather them slow-walk something this big to ensure success at trial, than get the short-term joy of seeing the names officially released and not get the proper resolution because they shot their wad too soon. They cannot get away with it.
That was my thought as well along with maybe trying to coordinate legal proceedings and arrests since everyone would be high profile and a significant flight risk.
Sealed Indictments anyone.
Exit Poll #s right now according to BBC and ARD:
Conservative CDU-CSU leading with 29%
AfD in 2nd with 20%
Current Chancellor's SPD in 3rd with 16%
And these are also the same Dems that wanted to lower the voting age to 16 and also believe that minors are able to make life altering decisions about their bodies on their own.
The Democrat Party has been built on hypocrisy for decades.
At the legally required book value, set in the 1970s, of $42.44 an ounce and the total of 248 million ounces across all facilities, the total book value is $10.4 billion.
Based on the current market value of $2,899.44 (at this writing) an ounce, the total market value of the gold is $719,063,365,252.29.
When I asked ChatGPT about the impact of the $42.44 book value on US financial policies and the national debt, it gave me this...
Impact of the $42.44 Gold Valuation on U.S. Financial Policies and National Debt
1. Understated National Assets Because the U.S. Treasury records its gold holdings at $42.44 per ounce, the official value of gold reserves is significantly lower than their actual market worth. This means:
-The U.S. government underreports its assets in financial statements. -If gold were valued at market prices (e.g., $2,000 per ounce), the Treasury’s gold reserves would be worth over $500 billion, instead of the $11 billion recorded on the books.
2. No Direct Impact on National Debt -The U.S. national debt is the total amount of money the government owes to creditors. Since gold reserves are not actively sold to reduce debt, their valuation does not directly affect the debt level. -However, if the government decided to revalue its gold holdings to market prices, it could, on paper, reduce the debt-to-assets ratio, making the country’s financial position look stronger.
3. Why Doesn't the U.S. Revalue Gold to Market Price? -If the U.S. revalued its gold reserves to market prices, it could theoretically create “paper wealth” to offset national debt. -However, doing so might signal to markets that the U.S. government is considering using gold reserves to back financial obligations, which could create instability. -Additionally, a revaluation could increase political pressure to sell gold reserves to pay down debt, which the Treasury prefers to avoid.
4. Potential Use of Gold to Back Currency or Reduce Debt Some policymakers and economists argue that the U.S. could:
-Revalue gold to market prices, creating an accounting surplus. Issue gold-backed bonds or digital currency backed by gold to stabilize the dollar. -Sell small portions of gold reserves in extreme situations to help reduce deficits. -However, the U.S. government prefers to keep gold as a strategic asset rather than actively using it in monetary policy.
5. Geopolitical and Economic Considerations -Gold as a Strategic Reserve: The U.S. holds significant gold reserves as a hedge against financial crises and global instability. -Confidence in the Dollar: Since the U.S. dollar is the world’s primary reserve currency, revaluing gold could send mixed signals about confidence in fiat money. -Inflation & Market Impact: A sudden revaluation could impact inflation, interest rates, and global gold markets, leading to unpredictable economic effects.
Bottom Line -The $42.44 per ounce valuation does not affect the national debt but understates U.S. assets. -The U.S. could revalue gold to improve its balance sheet, but this would likely have unintended financial and political consequences. -Gold remains a reserve asset rather than a tool for debt reduction.
"G.O.A.T." That was my thought exactly. A statue that is a tongue-in-cheek reference to "greatest of all time" in the Trump-iest way possible... with gold hooves, horns and tail, and covered in Trump $100 bills that say "In Trump We Trust," which to me is not an affront to G*d because it's fake money and actual printed USDs are bullshit fiat currency anyways.
We also don't know the origin of it, but my guess is that it was a gift by a fan, unless it was commissioned by POTUS.
I just don't get why are some automatically call it an idol? Not everything needs to be tied directly back to the Old Testament.
Also, any relevant Q drops talking about GOATs?
Yeah, that's just a repost of the same list. There is still no source to the alleged release. If they officially released it, there would be a link to something, a press release, a PDF, anything other than a list typed in by an X user.
It would also be getting major front page and top of the hour air time by conservative media.
I don't doubt that the list posted is probably pretty accurate, and I want to see Pfizer fry and be able to shove the list in every person's face that dismissed my concerns and decision to not take it, but there needs to be some sauce and I don't see it yet.
I can't find it anywhere. The x post only had the list. No source or link.
There are a number of things that catch my eye as red flags. But there are two main glaring ones...
#1 is naming Elon Musk in Affidavit 3 and claiming they witnessed him and other high-profile boys in the "blasphemy ritual" in 1982 with "Cardinal Dolan" and 2 other Archbishops. There are some immediate problems with this:
Dolan was not the Archbishop of St. Louis at the time, he was only a recently ordained priest (1976) working on his Doctoral thesis from 1979 to 1982 in DC, but he was supposed Grand High Quadrant Priest?
John May was not the Archbishop in Chicago in 1982, rather he was the Archbishop of St. Louis from 1980 to 1992.
Thomas Grady was not nor ever the Archbishop of Rockford, IL. He was born in Chicago, but he was the Archbishop of Orlando from 1974 to 1989.
The biggest red flag though is naming Elon Musk. He was 11 and in school in South Africa and according to all official records, his first confirmed visit to North America was in 1989 when he and his Mother moved to Canada. He finally entered the US in 1992 when he transferred to UPENN. There are other claims about Elon being a part of Looking Glass and Star Wars Now for this cabal.
#2 is naming Flynn and his wife and daughter as being instrumental members of this trafficking cabal. Really?
Any time things like this pop up and there is only one source and the affidavits read like an ADHD fever dream, instead of what affidavits actually read like, I become more and more skeptical.
Haven't gone through all of them, but I am really doubting this.
The 420 connection to pot has a number of different theories, most of which are unsupported (420 criminal code, 420 ingredients, etc), but the most widely accepted one is it evolved from a group of friends, called the Waldos, at San Rafael High School in Cali where they had tried, on numerous yet failed attempts, to find a long, lost cannabis crop in the area.
They chose the Louis Pasteur statue on the High School grounds as the meeting place and the time to meet at 4:20pm. The search plan became known as "4:20 Louie." It eventually was shortened to 4:20 after those failed attempts.
At some point, 420 evolved into the codeword teens used to mean getting high.
An article in High Times magazine cemented this story as the rightful origin and suppressed any others. Its mention in the magazine and its location close to San Francisco, home of the Grateful Dead, allowed it to spread across the country to the point where Grateful Dead posters mentioned 420-ing.
The HT article also did a bit of retconning by suggesting 4:20pm was the socially acceptable hour of the day to consume cannabis. In reality, the time was likely chosen since it was well after the close of school and any extra curricular activities.
This is a new one for me, so I had to find out more.
It's a Canadian short film that started production in 2006 and was released in 2012 from Louis Lefebvre and is “a story about the fire at the heart of suffering.”
The title is a reference to The Pet Goat, the book that George W. Bush was reading to the class in Sarasota, FL the morning of the 9/11 attacks.
It has also been said the film takes a critical look at the events of the past decade (2001-2010) that have shaped our world, and visualizes a global-scale spiritual awakening featuring spiritual entities from various cultures across the world.
According to Louis himself in an interview with Webneel, here is where the idea came from:
The film came to me in a visual form. I had been seeing the central character on his boat for a while and it was as if I could no longer avoid him. I needed to know what he had to tell me. I had always been interested in spiritual traditions and philosophies and it’s as if I felt that I would find some sort of resolve in this exploration of my internal landscape using all these universal symbols. I felt that I would be lead to a deeper peace.
Throughout the process I tried not to let my intellect get in the way, choosing to let the images pass through me even if I didn’t fully understand them on a conscious level rather than censoring everything, even if I was a bit shocked by some of the imagery. I followed the story in its visual form. When things made sense visually and rhythmically, I went with that. In the course of doing this work I have found many explanations for all the micro stories and I have had many other people give me various other explanations. I think it works well that way – evoking different things for different people.
Having said that, the story is clearly about the crumbling away of the hierarchical world based on control and the rising up of the spiritual man, awakening to his divine nature, free of intermediaries.