Alternative interpretation: he was trying to emphasize that those kinds of dangerous people are why we need strong borders. Like, look guys, there's no way you want human traffickers and the like in the country, right? We should be able to get bipartisan support on that, RIGHT?
I don't recall saying anything about that. I was saying that his particular argument, logically speaking, does nothing to disprove flat earth theory.
X is round, Y is round, therefore Z must be round is not a logical argument.
This is a specious argument and doesn't disprove flat earth theory. Whatever its shape, we know that the earth is three dimensional. Look at a hill, or stick a shovel in the ground, or any number of other things to prove this to yourself. Just because the shape of the moon and sun are spherical doesn't mean that the earth must also be spherical. I'm not saying flat earth believers are right, but your arguments here do nothing to disprove their theory.
"For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth." - Romans 10:4
We are not under the law, but under grace. Anyone who attempts to be justified by the law is accountable to do the whole law.
"For this, Though shalt not commit adultery, Thou shall not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore LOVE IS THE FULFILLING OF THE LAW." Romans 13:9-10
I get the point. Equal application of the law. But hate speech laws are just censorship under a different name and should be done away with completely.