2
LiquidSun 2 points ago +2 / -0

Were they not kneeling symbolically on the necks of all would be drug fiends, in solidarity with Officer Chauvin?

5
LiquidSun 5 points ago +5 / -0

John Langan, the man with the world's highest IQ, has said that he thinks Trump is very smart, at least on par with a Harvard grad. Personally I have no doubts about Trump's intelligence.

1
LiquidSun 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've lived here for close to thirty years. Unless you also live here, I think I'm in a better position to judge. This place is rife with illegal immigrants, voter fraud, the blue hair brigade, homelessness, drug abuse, increasingly strict gun laws, etc.

4
LiquidSun 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looks like he doesn't understand the meaning of coercion, or choices made under duress.

1
LiquidSun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, along with Washington. I didn't mean literally all. Do you not understand figurative language?

Yeah, Colorado is beautiful. It should be obvious that I'm not talking about the landscape, though. Do you live in Colorado? I do. Been to Denver lately? It's a fucking shit hole. The state is way worse off than it was before weed was legalized. Which I don't think is necessarily due to the weed itself, but to the sort of people it drew during the "green" rush. Denver has become a haven for degeneracy, like Seattle.

5
LiquidSun 5 points ago +5 / -0

But Colorado was the first state to legalize and it drew all the dregs of society to itself when it did so.

3
LiquidSun 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which is summed up in the verse you quoted above:

"Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." John 15:13

And in this:

"For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." Romans 13:9-10

1
LiquidSun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women hating and not believing women should have the right to vote are not equivalent, but if you need to claim that false equivalence in order to slap a label on me so that you can muddy the issue, then I suppose you're within your rights to do so.

But, just to follow that train of thought, do you also believe that the founding fathers were all "women hating faggots"? Or do you just draw the line on that arbitrarily?

2
LiquidSun 2 points ago +2 / -0

He doesn't have to say it. Noem, Bondi, Gabbard, Coney-Barret, to name a few. No woman should be in any position of governmental power. If that is what the founding fathers had intended when they wrote the Constitution, they would have given women the right to vote.

2
LiquidSun 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eh. I don't like this attitude that every outcome we don't like is the result of rigging. Obama was enormously popular.

4
LiquidSun 4 points ago +4 / -0

The people at the top are transnational globalists. Globalism and the centralization of power into fewer and fewer hands is their goal. The people under them are the useful idiots doing their bidding.

4
LiquidSun 4 points ago +5 / -1

You're black, gay, neurodivergent, and have three nipples?

1
LiquidSun 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get the point. Equal application of the law. But hate speech laws are just censorship under a different name and should be done away with completely.

4
LiquidSun 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, but I also don't know very many wealthy people. Most "adopted" kids I've known were adopted by a family member.

view more: Next ›