2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/former-president-trump-announces-2024-presidential-bid-transcript ____ at around 33 minutes 28 seconds, that’s where DJT talks about the Pause, and the pause being for 4 years

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

Additional, Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries: on the Laws of England” p. 239 “ To encourage also foreign commerce, it was enacted by statute 25 Edw. III. st. 2, that all children born abroad, provided both their parents were at the time of the birth in allegiance to the king, and the mother had passed the seas by her husband’s consent, might inherit as if born in England; and accordingly it hath been so adjudged in behalf of merchants.(a) But by several more modern statutes(b) these restrictions are still further taken off: so that all children, born out of the king’s ligeance, whose fathers (or grandfathers by the father’s side) were natural-born subjects, are now deemed to be natural-born subjects themselves to all intents and purposes….” ____Difficulty: does the USA follow the Continent— Vattel (Swiss)— or English on this subject? Blackstone p. 239 The children of aliens, born here in England, are, generally speaking, natural-born subjects,15 and entitled to all the privileges of such. In which the constitution of France differs from ours; for there, by their jus albinatus, if a child be born of foreign parents, it is an alien.(c)16 ____ link http://files.libertyfund.org/files/2140/Blackstone_1387-01_EBk_v6.0.pdf. ____The Dissent in Wong Kim Ark knew that some Congressional promoters of the 14th Amendment intended to make it so birth on US soil would confer citizenship, but Chief Justice Melville Fuller and Justice John Marshall Harlan” did not agree with the majority opinion and some of the 14th Amendment promoters in Congress.

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

James Kent, author of “Commentaries on American Law” vol. 2 (pp. 18ff in pdf link) did not intend to exclude “of parents who are citizens” from his definition of natural-born citizenship, and neither did Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story in his “Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States” volume 3, sections 211-213. Each author merely focussed on the aspect of the territory of birth, but their discussions do not imply that we should neglect Vattel and his complete definition. ____ Kent: https://lonang.com/wp-content/download/Kent-CommentariesVol-2.pdf. Key statement p. 22 The staute of 7 Ann., c. 5. was to the same general effect; but the staute of 4 Geo. II. c. 31. required only that the father should be a natural born subject at the birth of the child, and it applied to all children then born, or thereafter to be born. Under these statutes it has been held, [28] that to entitle a child born abroad to the rights of an English natural born subject, the father must be an English natural born subject, the father must be an English subject….” ____ Kamala is not a natural-born citizen, it appears based on Vattel and Kent.

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

I gave +1 for the research. I think the Great Awakening principle is that we are going back to Founding principles. U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark was a 14th Amendment citizenship case, and I think the direction of judicial philosophy we need to go back to includes natural law — The Law of Nations as written by Emer de Vattel, published in 1758. ”The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” ____The 14th Amendment did not alter this constitutional requirement which had a clear purpose as understood by the Founders when the Constitution for the United States of America. Vattel, “The Law of Nations” Book 1, chapter 19, section 212 ____ Link to online book: https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/whatmore-the-law-of-nations-lf-ed

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is odd, yes, in the rumble link comments “CheeMiss” addressed the claim by certain commentators that said Trump was asked to run for president by 200 military generals. I am wondering if the narrative “Trump was asked to run” narrative could be true, concurrently with Steve Bannon’s narrative in this Rumble interview that Trump had been already planning MAGA as a “populist” candidate for years.

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://rumble.com/v54zqbi-free-steve-bannon-the-interview-that-made-him-a-marked-man-to-the-fed.html ____ posted on Rumble c. July 2, 2024, by “Bannons War Room” ____ This interview covers Breitbart and Steve Bannon’s observations about Trump and development of MAGA from 2010 - 2016. ____ Trump did not run because generals asked him to run, Trump was already in the arena. Possibly generals wanted Trump to run, but Steve Bannon’s role in working with Trump was before 2016. ____ As a key theme, Bannon notes at 1 hr. 14 min. 12 seconds: the American elite, media and corporate America have been running America down by “managed decline” … “that’s whereTrump is a rallying cry” [for America].

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

The chart seems kind of skewed before 1888. Maximum gold US federal reserve/tresury ever had was 22,500 tons. a) 2,000 tons financed the Marshall Plan to rebuild European countries (UN vassal states) after WW 2, ____ b) 5,000 tons at $35 per ounce in 1950s for balance of trade payments to other countries with USA had deficits with, ___c) 3,000 tons to UK and Switzerland during American Vietnam War and LBJ Great Society inflation period in order to “stabilize” the gold pool, ____d) 1970 International Monetary Fund got 1,000 tons for “currency support” and ____ e) 1971 sales and trades of 2,000 tons getting ready for the end of dollar (actually Federal Reserve Notes) convertibility = 13,000 tons accounted for as traded and given away. Note: Americans hold 26,000 tons of gold in private so do not worry when they come out and tell us that China has 30,000 tons

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

+1 puppets seem to include the politicians who are the visible actors for all of the elitists and their fraternities; possibly George Bush the younger caught the drift of the message from the envelopes

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lego original patents expired in 1978, so they have name Trademark rights, copyright and design patents for sets and likely each individual figure. Then they have new patents for each new featured design piece that they create that is compatible with their bricks and figures and other parts shapes that they have.____ Artists and 3-D toy makers are needed to MAGA and make toys great again!

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, Papau New Guinea as it shares the island New Guinea , and Borneo too, as Borneo is split between Malaysia, A tiny country Brunei, and Indonesia. You commented another important matter, that the spiritual leader of Tibet is working with Elites, agreed, disappointing.

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for mentioning, Indonesia has a 270+ million population spread across all its islands (and shared islands ), 1,300 ethnic groups, 231 million practice Islam, mostly Sunni,. I had a classmate I did not know well but she who was friendly and always said hello to me when walking by. It might be the “Rohingya” people who fled Myanmar for refuge in Indonesia, but they are not getting treated well there.

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just wondering, maybe conversation can get some people away from thinking that Russia is the problem and get them back to thinking about freedom for Tibet instead of killing and maiming hundreds of thousands in Ukraine and Middle East.

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you too, that article showed some important details.

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Las V. battle occurred Sunday, October 1, 2017 (the concert attendees were caught in it as the deep state’s cover for their operation, shooter Paddock, took shots at the crowd). Q first posted Oct. 28 (27 days after). The truth might come out soon, but possibly later. The truth is possibly leverage by White Hats to make sure the former sheriff, now governor, does not allow cheating in the state.

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

In 1992, author Kai Bird revealed that George Bush was the “scion” of John McCloy who created the OSS, and who had served during World War 2 as assistant Secretary of War under Skull and Bones member Henry Stimson. The Office of Strategic Services was the intelligence organization during WW2. (second to the last sentence in the book, pp. 671-672, book, “The Chairman” https://archive.org/details/KaiBirdTheChairmanJohnJ.McCloyTheMakingOfTheAmericanEstablishment2017SimonSchuster/page/n671/mode/2up )

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

The principle is true, people like Julian Assange who live outside of the USA and who are not Citizens of the United States do not have the 1st Amendment and other protective rights (4th Amendment, 5 Eyes spying…) and freedoms as Citizens and legal residents in the USA enjoy. (here’s a link to the case summary: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/19-177 and here is the summary New York Times v. United States 1971 famous Pentagon Papers case: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/1873) ___ Now let’s think of some distinctions as to why NY Times “Pentagon Papers” case might not be helpful in the case of Julian Assange. 1) Julian Assange is accused of hacking. That is like an intrusion, an attack. Generally there’s no 1st Amendment right to do that (when you hack to save the world, you do this at your own risk). National Constitution Center explains (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-assange-indictment-and-the-first-amendment — note, they are not fully “based” yet, they still write as if Russia did the hacking of HRC and Democratic Party, but otherwise this is a good article) ****2) The Law of Specialty might apply (international law lawyers’ trick in Assange’s favor): but we don’t know yet, as the U.S. appellate court where Assange could be tried has not decided upon this “Law of Specialty” issue yet. a) It’s an international law treaty right and it limits countries from tacking on extra charges against an accused when the extradition process has begun. b) Other U.S. Appellate Courts are split, so this “right” is open for debate. 2) Not sure if U.S. and UK have signed a mutual agreement to this principle in extradition rights and / or other human rights treaties / systems like OAS Organization of American States (“Law of Specialty” is discussed in USA / Canadian relations here: https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/831/1.0077580/2 ). 3) When you hack to save the world, it’s an uphill battle, but this brings people of different political perspectives together and strengthens the cause of The Great Awakening.

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

from Bill Cooper: They can draft you, but when it comes time to taking the oath [as a draftee] don’t open your mouth. (sorry, I cannot remember the episode radio broadcast #). If drafted, you can show up to the recruiting / draft reporting station. This way they cannot arrest you for not showing up. When it comes to signing your name and / or verbally taking the military oath, don’t do that part. They cannot force you.

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right! The 16th Amendment, which as improperly ratified, does not implement an income tax. Purportedly it allows Congress to enact taxes on income (a gain derived by investment of capital) without apportionment among the States. ____ If someone works and gets compensation or remuneration, that’s a fair trade of one’s time and energy for “dinero”. But the taxation judges and attorneys say you are not worth your pay. Your effort is capital invested and the remuneration is a gain, not an equal exchange, so people who work get their life effort taken away by them. A Louisiana guy prepared this argument, which is rejected by the courts, but he is correct anyways — his “Power to Tax” argument is rejected by the courts, but he provided the Supreme Court with the truth: (filed 2019) https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-7887/87908/20190213113417802_00000007.pdf ____ Attorney L. Becraft shows that the courts are not in agreement with what the income tax actually is. http://home.hiwaay.net/%7Ebecraft/UNCERTAIN.html

2
Malachi3vs16 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wayne Benson, R.I.P. 1927-2021 https://thelawthatneverwas.com/ ___ He went to all of the States which “ratified” the 16th Amendment and found all the errors. Some errors seem to be punctuation errors, but some errors seem to serious and in some cases there seems to be outright fraud.

8
Malachi3vs16 8 points ago +8 / -0

7779 km = 4833 miles, Q post 4833 miles, “Nothing is random. Everything has meaning”. https://qalerts.app/?n=4833. The Q post also looks back to missile launch attempt to take out Trump.

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

hope he will do it by exposing the fraud of the IRS and its history of destroying America ____ Bill Cooper and Dan Meador research docs at SupremeLaw.org: http://supremelaw.org/authors/cooper/index.htm

1
Malachi3vs16 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I figured, but I’m kind of blonde intellectually, so I ask, what’s a RINO doing with 3…? I’m waiting to hear the next medical evolution and pharmaceutical developments and then a substantive due process and equal protection class discrimination case in a Massachusetts court setting

3
Malachi3vs16 3 points ago +3 / -0

excellent history comparison: Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Joel Barlow: Advice to the Privileged Orders (https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=evans;idno=N22719.0001.001), Columbian Order of the Bavarian Illuminati (whether an actual organization or not), and Aaron Burr

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›