14
NOT_ADMIN 14 points ago +15 / -1

This has been significantly altered to enhance the contrast. Please observe the intensity of the shadows within the soldiers hair.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not the point. The law itself states you must "knowingly" , meaning that ignorance in this case would disqualify the charge.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was it a shitpost or something? Be sure to use the flags to let people know if you are joking as a shitpost flag or if you are actually providing content please postwhatever it is, if it's a statement of fact or a news, provide a source, and if it's something else give explanation as to why it's on a Q board.

4
NOT_ADMIN 4 points ago +4 / -0

Enjoy getting the "knowingly" part. Anyone could say, "I was just following the crowd there were no closed gates, everyone was there. I could not have known it was restricted at that time. "

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's acceptable. I apologize if I caused any discomfort. I have an inclination to engage in debates as it aids me in consolidating my perspectives.

5
NOT_ADMIN 5 points ago +5 / -0

No... holograms are additive. They cannot make the foreground darker, nor do they cast a shadow. The planes did both.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

No thanks I will just ask his butt chin, how it grew so suddenly

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Just as individuals who firmly believe in the objective truth of mathematics can still encounter errors in their solutions.
  • The origin of morality holds significant importance, as morality lacking objectivity only holds as much value as a personal preference.
  • You are right, we seem to be starting from scratch again, addressing the fact that your moral beliefs are purely subjective, much like arguing with someone over their preference for red Kool-Aid when you prefer blue. In a theistic perspective, morality is seen as a reflection of God's nature, representing a flawless moral standard. When we assert that something is morally superior to another, we are essentially comparing it to a benchmark. However, if this benchmark keeps changing over time, it implies that there is no ultimate standard; no definitive good or bad, just varying shades of complexity and uncertainty.
1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • I believe that individuals have an intuitive understanding of what is right or wrong. However, as an atheist, you may not have a solid foundation for making claims about morality. While you can argue that it lacks wisdom to cause harm to others, it is important to consider the basis for such claims. Ultimately, personal opinions are subjective and hold no more validity than those of others, including individuals who may engage in immoral practices. Moreover, societal opinions, which could differ greatly from our own, cannot be deemed as universally correct or incorrect, much like in the case of a tribal society that practices child cannibalism. Your argument regarding Muslims does not undermine the objectivity of morality; it simply demonstrates that individuals, societies, or religions can err in their moral judgments. It would be akin to different groups thinking that 2+2 equals 3 or 5—it wouldn't alter the fact that 2+2 equals 4, as mathematics represents an objective truth.
1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct, one does not grow a buttchin.

12
NOT_ADMIN 12 points ago +12 / -0

He is talking about electromagnetic driven elevators "meglev elevator"

3
NOT_ADMIN 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it requires more. I just need to believe one miracle which is that Jesus rose from the dead after 3 days. An athiest needs to believe in 4 miracles: everything came from nothing, order came from chaos, information came from non-information, life came from non-life.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +2 / -1

The assessment of what is good or bad is subject to relativity, particularly if one adheres to an atheist materialist ideology. It becomes a matter of personal opinion or societal norms specific to a given time and place. An individual following an atheist perspective cannot definitively state whether someone's notion of what is morally acceptable is correct or incorrect. They must acknowledge that certain acts such as pedophilia or child rape might be considered good if the person or society involved deems it so. Only with the presence of objective morality can one assert that irrespective of individual or societal beliefs, pedophilia and child rape are universally wrong

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop with this super fake disinformation. A hologram is made from fentosecond to nanosecond laser technology. This prodices a plasma. It produces light, light is additive. It cannot make what's behind it darker only lighter. It also does not cast a shadow. The planes did both. You need to learn how to spot the real news from the disinformation injected to discredit. You fell for the disinformation.

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any news that worthy is bombarded with disinformation to confuse those trying to find the truth. Thats why.

2
NOT_ADMIN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where does it say white men? I know more Asians that didn't take it than white people.

5
NOT_ADMIN 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agnosticism you mean? Because atheism requires far more faith than either of the other options.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›