They switched out the juries in that film? I need to watch it again, don't remember that part at all.
My biggest memory connected to the film is being dispirited that, as with the population in general, the film shows the violent government agents as heroes instead of as the proximate CAUSE of the "drug violence" and total lack of consumer protection brought about in the formerly civil and non-violent alcohol industry -- while not stopping or even slowing alcohol use in the least (although studies and other data vary on that last part).
They can’t have us still loving America and get us to accept a One World Government at the same time.
That's an excellent summary, AtomicBlonde. Your comment makes sense out of almost everything we see them doing lately.
High dose melatonin is worth consideration for adding to whatever he's doing now.
Matthew: 18:1 At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?
18:2 And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,
18:3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
18:4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
18:5 And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.
18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Matthew: 18:1 At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?
18:2 And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,
18:3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
18:4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
18:5 And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.
18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
I don't have a Twitter account but was able to access the Tweet -- and in case that was an anomaly and others can't get access (I haven't heard that Musk removed the restriction but then, I've just brought my computer on-line today), I'm pasting the rest of the Tweet below:
Brenden Dilley @WarlordDilley Just to be clear, there are trillions of dollars at stake in the 2024 election. The "machine" or "deep state" recognizes that you're waking up and are becoming ungovernable.
Your support of Trump after two indictments (and gaining momentum) is proof that America has had enough, and rightfully so.
Global trade, big pharma, military industrial complex, mainstream media, the WEF, and not to mention foreign adversaries are ALL panicking over Trump's rising poll numbers.
This is YOUR 1776. This is YOUR revolution. This is YOUR chance to serve your country and save our great nation.
#Trump2024
I'm certain you are right, although "late 60s" might be optimistic. With so many infants and children getting jabbed -- which wasn't the case in the first round of death jabs -- we could see even lower life expectancy numbers before long.
They're doing a good job with that, I'd say. Between this and the jabs -- and throwing away so much of our armament in Ukraine and Afghanistan, reports of poor readiness levels in various areas, recruiting problems, and more -- it seems more like appearing weak when you actually ARE weak.
Yes. It's been happening almost since Day One of the "vax" -- and 95% of normies haven't come to grips with reality yet. But some have, and a few, like Steve Kirsch, are working overtime to get the message out there.
Twitter is now a red-pill machine on this topic as well as others. Plenty of other places on the web also.
Normies are catching on; the topics of Vax damage and Died Suddenly are being spoken of in polite society now, between friends and co-workers and even among strangers.
I don't know how long before the mass unrest and panic mentioned by Emerald happens, but I do believe it's coming. And (to paraphrase Wyatt Earp in Tombstone), Hell's coming with it.
I don't know about the "fake Biden" idea but I think you may be on to something with the rest: China interferes in the election (and is involved in human trafficking and perhaps other actions that Trump's EOs cover), and when Trump visibly returns to the WH, confiscations begin.
I'm sure most of us have wondered about the details of how the White Hats plan to destroy and remove the Fed without turning working and retired Americans into paupers; this could certainly be among the tools to be used.
Yes, brake dust (from millions of cars, trucks, buses, and so on) is an environmental issue. Also tires: The tread of umpteen zillion tires is ground to dust every year, with that dust disappearing into the air, water, and land.
Meanwhile, a tiny increase in the amount of CO2 in the air lets every living plant breathe easier, and most of the actual exhaust pollutants were cut to near-zero years ago.
I remember what the air was like in SoCal back in the Seventies. It wasn't as bad as Beijing is now, but it was close.
What a horrifying story, Karmlik. I hope your GF recovers and never has a relapse.
I'll also point out that the whole "cut, poison, and burn" approach to cancer treatment does no favors to one's immune system, so I hope she's doing everything possible to boost immune function.
MY THOUGHTS: All evidence suggests the fire that started in Canada was deliberate. It’s hard to refute after seeing video evidence of numerous fires starting in so many places over such a vast area, on a clear day.
For What purpose? It’s only speculation, but my opinion is that I am just about 100% certain the Covid Jabs & boosters disabled millions of peoples immune systems. All of the sudden, cancer rates are skyrocketing? Add formaldehyde & Benzene, both carcinogenic.
Your thoughts and speculation make perfect sense, Excelsior. Regarding the jabs' disabling of immune systems, see https://greatawakening.win/p/16biYZ0onZ/in-2022-those-breast-cancer-numb/ -- breast cancer cases have skyrocketed and we could end 2023 with 500,000 or more, versus 26,561 in 2021.
The Canadian fires, clearly not accidental and somehow seeded with cancer-causing chemicals, is basically an act of war against the American and Canadian people.
Important post, not only for the LGBT vs groomer etc element but also for the reproduced Q posts reminding us of how common sexual predators are in the political sphere. Cleaning the scum out of politics is important, and there is far more and worse corruption there than anyone wants to think about.
Canada continues the slide into truly Draconian tyranny. In the US, a few honest people in Congress and elsewhere have slowed the corruption over the years, but our FDA has been trying to ban supplements or make them Rx-only for decades. F'rinstance (from https://www.fdareview.org/issues/history-of-federal-regulation-1902-present/#p21 ) --
In 1973, the FDA published regulations (to take effect in 1975) expanding its control over supplements by declaring that any dietary supplement that it considered to lack nutritional usefulness was a drug and thus under the FDA’s control. High-potency vitamins, by which the FDA meant vitamins sold in dosages as little as twice the federal recommended daily allowance (RDA) for example, were ipso facto considered a drug (i.e., regardless of manufacturer claims or lack thereof). High-potency vitamins were effectively made illegal by this ruling because they could not be sold without FDA approval, and the FDA would not approve supplements that it considered to be unnecessary. Vitamin manufacturers and consumers fought back, and in response Congress passed the Proxmire Vitamin Mineral Amendment of 1976, which stated that the FDA could not classify a mineral or vitamin as a drug “solely because it exceeds the level of potency which [the FDA] determines is nutritionally rational or useful” (21 USC 350 [1994, originally enacted 1976], [a][1][B]).
It is worth pointing out explicitly, although it will come as no surprise to anyone who follows today’s health news, that numerous scientific studies have since validated many of the health claims for vitamins and minerals that the FDA had earlier suppressed. The FDA suppression of information concerning vitamin E and heart attacks, for example, may rank alongside its suppression of information concerning aspirin as one of the most deadly regulations of the post–World War II era.
In 1985, the FDA lost a related turf war with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Under recommendation from the National Cancer Institute, a division of the NIH, the FTC permitted Kellogg to claim that a high-fiber diet reduced the probability of certain types of cancer. The FDA wanted to sue Kellogg, but the FTC argued that the ads presented “important public health recommendations in an accurate, useful, and substantiated way” (quoted in Calfee 1997, 25). Under pressure, the FDA backed down, and as a result it was established that food products could advertise a “substantiated” health claim without going through the FDA drug approval process.
Under the protection of the Proxmire Amendment, the dietary and nutritional supplement industry expanded, but the FDA stepped up enforcement again in the early 1990s after thirty-eight deaths were attributed to L-tryptophan, an amino acid widely used for treating depression and building muscle mass. (The Centers for Disease Control later exonerated L-tryptophan in the deaths, which were caused by a contaminant, but the FDA did not lift its ban on OTC sales of L-tryptophan (Beisler 2000). In 1993, the FDA announced that it planned to regulate as drugs all amino acids, herbs, and other supplements including fibers and fish oils. The FDA soon found itself under a furious attack from millions of consumers of nutritional supplements. The DSHEA, passed in 1994 and taking effect in 1996, explicitly required the FDA to revoke its Advance Notice on supplements.
Under the DSHEA, nutritional supplements can make substantiated “statements of nutritional support” that do not thereby invoke FDA control. Supplements, however, cannot make claims regarding disease without becoming regulated as drugs. The distinction between statements of nutritional support and claims regarding disease is vague. Manufacturers of St. John’s Wort, for example, may claim that St. John’s Wort “promotes healthy emotional balance and well-being,” but they cannot say St. John’s Wort “is useful in the treatment of depression.” The distinction is mostly for lawyers, not consumers, considering that many consumers do take St. John’s Wort for depression. (Such consumers are in fact justified in doing so; a number of studies indicate that not only is St. John’s Wort effective at relieving mild cases of depression [e.g., Woelk 2000], but it does so with fewer side effects than many antidepressive pharmaceuticals. In addition, St. John’s Wort is considerably cheaper than pharmaceuticals and does not require a prescription.)
Dietary supplements that make nutritional claims must carry the following two disclaimers: “This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” In the section Reform Options, we suggest that the first disclaimer is useful and that this split-label approach be extended to drugs proper. The second disclaimer is not informative.
Subject to certain conditions, such as that the information presented is not false or misleading and not biased in favor of a particular manufacturer or brand, the DSHEA also restricts the FDA’s ability to ban the dissemination of information on dietary supplements (Pinco and Rubin 1996). Health food retailers, for example, can now market books, magazines, and scientific articles describing the uses of dietary supplements. As a result, in recent years consumers have become much better informed about the role of vitamins and other supplements in optimal health.
The full text of the DSHEA can be found here.
I don't have any reason to think a human author (EDIT: didn't write) this, and it fits right in with much of the liberal writing on this and other sites I've sampled. Importantly, it includes more than enough TRUTH, despite the obvious slant, to make the case for the movie's premise: that child sex trafficking is REAL, that it is an epidemic, and that the public as well as those In Power have been ignoring it or worse for a long, long time.
Not only is the film a direct and powerful red-pill for all who see it, but the popularity of the film is causing those who support sex-trafficking or hide the problem to expose themselves in ways that are ALSO red-pilling the public.