1
Paul_Revere 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Incoming Presidents dont give a SOTU speech."

Will Peelousy be there to tear up a transcript behind him, anyway?

3
Paul_Revere 3 points ago +3 / -0

"The National Park Service says no, there is no secure surface on the mountain."

Pardon me if I don't consider the NPS to be a reliable source of information. But in any case, I believe it comes perilously close to idolatry to put any living president's image on Rushmore.

God knows, DJT deserves it. But not while he's still in office.

4
Paul_Revere 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those "US diplomats" can eat shit and shove their "exceptions" where the sun don't shine. Their obvious schemes to keep the war going indefinitely have no place in any of DJT's peace plans.

Next we'll be seeing the MSM airing heart-rending videos of crying Unkranian children.

3
Paul_Revere 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get where you're coming from, but I've never needed anyone's permission to buy Ivermectin or Fenbendezole. Where do you live?

1
Paul_Revere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I'm sure the OP meant "begun." But in this case, I'm pretty certain this whiney demonrat sabotage attempt will "begone" fairly quickly.

3
Paul_Revere 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cn we ditch "Presidents' Day" now, and go back to "Washington's Birthday" and "Lincoln's Birthday" please?

8
Paul_Revere 8 points ago +8 / -0

Jimmy Carter had his strong points and his weak points. But he was a Democrat, so the hive mind around here only wants to look at the weak points.

The deep state hated Carter's guts from the beginning. And it did its infernal best to sabotage his presidency at every step of the way. Would anyone have trouble recognizing the failed Iranian hostage rescue as a Deep State Operation if it had happened during the Trump administration?

PS: Piss on the UN. Its time is past.

3
Paul_Revere 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm with you. I want to see that sadistic bastard get the same treatment he gave to those poor pooches.

1
Paul_Revere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regardless of how anyone feels about PP, there was never any justification for supporting it with taxpayer money.

11
Paul_Revere 11 points ago +11 / -0

Not a good idea. The reason we have the two-term limit in the first place is because FDR wanted to stay in office till he died. Which he did.

2
Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt it. But this is the Trump Era, so maybe some coats might turn in Harrisburg.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›