I never thought q was a larp, my main concern is if they (q) were over confident in some areas and not everything was in control as much as we thought. Now they have gone silent and dark to regroup and plan. Who knows, but I'm not holding my breath. For all I know the DS is too strong, too ingrained. It was a good try, regardless.
This is true, but, we aren't born red pilled. There may be many Trump supporters that were on their way there, that then trusted Trump, got vaxxed, and faced dire fallout because of it.
That's part of why I'm not too sure about the excuses about optics and such for Trump. If I was a Trump fan, trusted him, trusted the plan, etc and then got the vaxx because of his stance, and I lost someone I loved or had them injured, I'd be mad as hell if it was done for optics.
Maybe. Maybe not. At this point I've been holding my breath for so long, with so many disappointments along the way, it's becoming a lot more of "sounds nice, I won't hold my breath". If it happens and this is 5d chess, great. If not, I've got low expectations at this point anyways.
All of those already don't work on the globe model. Lol I'd love to walk you through it, but over the last 7 years I've met plenty of cocky time wasters like yourself. Join up on our discord, discord.gg/flatearth (24k members) We'll be happy to walk you through it. Judging by these comments though, it'll probably take a while to break you out of your dunning Kruger state.
Sounds like excuses honestly. Just like after the election was stolen. There were people tripping over themselves to explain why it went the way it did and why it was part of the plan, and it was only 30 more days before the military came in to fix it. Every 30 days (or whatever arbitrary time frame) there were new justifications and new plans. Nothing ever came close to being true. At this point, if Trump is talking up vaccines (which he doesn't have to do, he could just stay quiet and say they shouldn't be forced) for optics, or as the article indicates, that the media would skewer him, then that's a failure in my book. If he's doing that so he can run in 2024, that's the end of it for me probably. I'm not voting for Trump again if he runs. The election system needs to be fixed, faith restored, and the 2020 election overturned. If that's the case, I think it shows clearly, while maybe there were good intentions, whoever comprised the q group, in reality they had much less control, power, reach, and ability to affect outcomes than they said they did.
Call me a doomer if you want, but that's where I'm at.
I need to see action at this point. He'll, even another q post answering some questions or just giving a hopium booster that things are still in the works would be nice
You're a complete religious zealot for your version of "science", obviously.
You mock, science questions. You act like it is settled, real science is never settled. You're invested in your belief system and your faith in your heigh preists that tell you what to think when they are practicing, at best, philosophy, not science.
Actually, the dumbest people on the plane are brainwashed individuals like yourself that have no grasp of science other than as a religion, worthy of fervent defense and blind devotion.
Did you know there's no experiment that can pass through the scientific method that can prove either spherocity or motion of the earth?
Even if there were, science is only "settled" until more information comes along that disproves the previous theory.
I'll leave you a quote. Maybe you'll be more willing to have a better understanding of how science works from a cosmologist.
"People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations… For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations… You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds… What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that."
George Ellis (cosmologist), “Profile: George F. R. Ellis,” Scientific American, October 1995, Vol. 273, No.4, p. 55
Sure, this is on topic for this meme https://youtu.be/_X-weMibYeY
I emailed them to tell them exactly why I won't be a customer any longer