7
S11houette 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nothing. They would have to flip almost half of the delegates. It's not going to happen.

1
S11houette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course they will cash the check. It's an admission of guilt. The only question is what non monetary damages are there.

9
S11houette 9 points ago +9 / -0

I remember Rush talking about this twenty years ago. This issue has been intentionally unaddressed for twenty years... Now why would they do that?

1
S11houette 1 point ago +1 / -0

This rule

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

3
S11houette 3 points ago +3 / -0

He doesn't need any.

Conversations about this topic have been banned from day one.

It is a good decision. There are some valid points to make and there are some elements of what is commonly believed about history that was written by the USSR. But... It's not worth having all the shills. And it's mostly off topic.

1
S11houette 1 point ago +3 / -2

We all know what subject you are talking about.

I'd like to thank cats for his hard work.

3
S11houette 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump said plenty of times during the 2020 election that he would be running in 2024. We all thought it was a joke. I think he knew.

3
S11houette 3 points ago +4 / -1

You probably shared a link which was then changed to link to something malicious.

That is probably why they won't show the link. They don't want you to click it. The question is, why claim you broke the rules then?

I'm all for hating on Facebook, but there are times where they are correct for taking things down. It's impossible to know what happened. Add this to the millions of reasons to never be on Facebook.

2
S11houette 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. He said that he can not bless sin.

The latest controversy is that the said that homosexual couples can be blessed as a couple. Essentially their friendship can be blessed. Very naive.

Their logic is weird and wrong, but they still hold that homosexuals can't wed.

10
S11houette 10 points ago +11 / -1

Catholic here.

It could be a lot worse.

There is a pretty good chance that the selection of a new Pope would end up with something better though. The bishops are more frustrated than we are.

5
S11houette 5 points ago +5 / -0

Plate scanners. They had the vaccine database connected to the vehicle registry.

1
S11houette 1 point ago +1 / -0

We might have something different to say when the market corrects and these corporations go under.

I think no foreigners should be able to purchase land nor corporations with more than five percent foreign investment.

Leases to foreigners should also be limited to twenty years.

2
S11houette 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've been thinking the same thing.

The left doesn't appear to like her. Why? The only reason they ever dislike people is on an ideological basis.

She is a prosecutor. She is an attorney general. What happens when you put such a person in a sea of corruption?

by PepeSee
1
S11houette 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no Adams Apple.

There is a chance that this is an ugly woman.

I feel bad for all the ugly women who now get confused for being trannies.

2
S11houette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›