2
SixTeaNine 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Bring it"

16
SixTeaNine 16 points ago +16 / -0

Agree, Emerald Robinson's take is a bad one for this exact reason.

My take is that Trump pulled some of these people to the forefront because they have key roles in the cabal and so that everyone knew their names. Fauci is a perfect example of this...he's been doing bad things for many years but it would have been tougher to pin things on him had he not gotten the visibility from Trump that he has now.

4
SixTeaNine 4 points ago +4 / -0

I saw some college friends this weekend for the first time in awhile, and it is clear that they aren't even remotely prepared to start the redpilling process. These are very smart people who are buying the MSM propaganda hook, line, and sinker because they don't have time, energy, or inclination to question what they are hearing. They repeat the same talking points, that while quickly debunked, make them fall back on "feelings" rather than unvarnished truth. The needle needs to be moved slowly for them to digest it and pivot.

Most of us pivoted quickly because we were seeking out the answers to such questions. Most of our countrymen are still not there yet.

4
SixTeaNine 4 points ago +4 / -0

A question that needs to be answered: is there normally a recurring flight from Madrid to the US?

3
SixTeaNine 3 points ago +3 / -0

OP did you get this from Brian Cates? He's wrong. It's the same building.

7
SixTeaNine 7 points ago +7 / -0

Correct. OP needs glasses.

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +1 / -0

IF AN INTEL AGENCY IS INTERESTING IN DEMOCRACY WHY WOULD IT SABOTAGE DEMOCRACY

Organizations are most interested in their own self-interest and control of power. In the CIA's eyes, if their growth and success aligned with democratic interests, then great. If not, then so be it.

15
SixTeaNine 15 points ago +16 / -1

VP of Tech for an energy service company here. 100% agree with you, this is the homeowners' fault. As I said on another thread, in the industry we call this "Demand Response", and normally you get paid for it. It's actually a very mutually-beneficial program for industrial companies. I would not advise residential customers to do this however.

So for the homeowners to turn around and belly-ache about smart thermostats is uneducated at best, and self-serving+untruthful at worst.

3
SixTeaNine 3 points ago +4 / -1

"I think this place is restricted Wang, so don't tell them you're Jewish"

11
SixTeaNine 11 points ago +12 / -1

I am a VP of Tech for an energy services company. This is nominally NOT about smart thermostats. This is happening because these idiot families signed up for a program where they ALLOWED the energy company to do this. It's literally right in the article:

The agreement states that in exchange for an entry into sweepstakes, electric customers allow them to control their thermostats during periods of high energy demand.

In the industry we call this "Demand Response", and normally you get paid for it. It's actually a very mutually-beneficial program for industrial companies. I would not advise residential customers to do this (hence why I called them idiots).

So for them to turn around and belly-ache about smart thermostats is uneducated at best and self-serving+untruthful at worst.

3
SixTeaNine 3 points ago +4 / -1

Exactly. Work vs invest is a huge point. But yes he's a bit of a clown too.

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agree with your thoughts. The critiques aren't wrong per se. I should have clarified that. It just raises a question when the critic clearly has an agenda.

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +2 / -1

Fair point. I should probably then add that part of doing your research is also determining the financial health/stability of the CU you are looking to join.

The world is full of risks...there are no true safe havens. Diligence prevails.

3
SixTeaNine 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Some readers have said that if I am going to criticize Kiyosaki’s book, I must offer a version of how to better yourself that does not have the flaws of Rich Dad Poor Dad. No problem. That would be my book Succeeding, which, somewhat to my surprise, is my top seller of the 38 different books I sell."

John T Reed isn't exactly unbiased here.

I found the value of RDPD not in the exact advice it gave, but in the mindset change. Basically it prods you to start thinking and acting more like the 1% does.

15
SixTeaNine 15 points ago +16 / -1

Yes, this. But do your research...not all credit unions are insured. All federal credit unions and many state-chartered credit unions are federally insured by the National Credit Union Association. Some state-chartered credit unions cover themselves by private deposit insurance. But the remainder are not. If they are, their insurance status should be displayed somewhere obvious on their website.

3
SixTeaNine 3 points ago +5 / -2

Your posts deserve more attention and upvotes. We all agree Joe is an absolute creeper, but we should also present context wherever possible.

5
SixTeaNine 5 points ago +6 / -1

I've stopped going to ChickFilA specifically because of that. Yet the crazy lines continue to exist every single time I drive past, no matter what time of day.

The silver lining is that it was pretty much the only fast food I ever ate, so now I'm fast-food-free and eating mostly at home, which is healthier. Inflation has helped spur that on too.

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +2 / -1

She's an "executive in recruiting" because any Tom Dick or Harry can be a recruiter. Zero barrier to entry. She places one person per year she can call it a proper job. She's probably an executive of a one-person recruiting shop.

And the other poster was right...nobody refers to it as Oil and Gas except maybe executives of one person recruiting shops.

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +2 / -1

I live in one of the most liberal suburbs of Philly and even here the masks are starting to come off. The hardcore crunchy Lefties still wear them, but nobody is challenging anyone any longer if they aren't wearing them. Or at least, nobody has challenged me yet for not wearing one.

0
SixTeaNine 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do we know what the actual date of the TikTok was filmed? I would suppose after Jan 20 given the context provided by the guy in the vid, but it might be much earlier than June 6.

Also is there a possibility that the letter was requested prior to Jan 20 and either received and held onto until the retirement ceremony, or somehow otherwise delayed until now?

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +2 / -1

Maybe its just really cold there, and the reporter is a wimp?

/s

1
SixTeaNine 1 point ago +2 / -1

FWIW, this image has been floating around for at least a year. The network has been mapped...people have been arrested...but were let off.

Beating this enemy requires knowledge of the puppet masters, not just the foot soldiers.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›