9
SkepButOpen 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not only are we collateral damage, but kids scarred forever in public schools with masks apparently are also acceptable collateral damage.

Their emotional development and their language development was permanently stunted, they don’t get those years back, and children need to be able to see lips moving in order to develop their language skills.

All of the Covid related suicides, I guess they are also collateral damage that’s acceptable losses.

It’s awfully convenient that “we got them this time” always becomes “we were never supposed to win that one anyway” among the exact same people who said “we got them this time.”

They wait until we lose to move that goal post. I called it out here last week, when I saw people preemptively moving that goal post. Once it becomes crunch time they realize that it’s going to become incredibly inconvenient to what they said was going to happen if it doesn’t happen.

They want you to trust a plan that they can’t even articulate.

Look, maybe this is part of the plan. Awesome. I hope it is. But the people who told me for weeks that this was super important to get the conviction, and who are now telling me that losing was necessary, they’ve got no credibility with me ever again. I’m running out of people that I even trust.

At some point, results need to matter. This isn’t supposed to be a cult, it’s not supposed to be based on faith in messages we received, it’s supposed to be based on research, logic and not just faith. That’s a cult. That’s not what this is supposed to be.

I’m actually seeing people here talking about faith in the plan. That’s disturbing. It’s not supposed to be about that.

3
SkepButOpen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Better question: why are we waiting for them to wake up? If the military is the only way, we already know it, and are in complete control, why in the fuck are we still waiting on people that are just refusing to ever wake up? We’re in control or we aren’t. Years upon years, more than half a decade, of waiting for people to “wake up.” Trump on the escalator was, what, seven years ago now?

And why would we need to introduce this evidence into the record now? He was given freedom to pretty much prosecute whoever he wanted. Prosecute the bitch for what she did and introduce the evidence in her trial. Why do you need to introduce it in the Sussman trial? In anyone who thinks we needed to do this, this way, we didn’t. That’s absolutely false.

You don’t need to lose a trial to set up a victory in another trial. In fact, that actually hurts us. Badly.

2
SkepButOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

So we needed to lose the conviction on top of it? Why?

by BQnita
6
SkepButOpen 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was criticized for asking out for the last six years. Timing. Blah blah blah timing. Blah blah blah getting their ducks in a row. Blah blah blah need everyone to open their eyes.

Everything people keep telling me to put my eyes on falls through. But then I’m told it’s OK that’s a fake loss, it’s a secret victory behind the scenes because of the next thing. The next thing is the big one, that’s the real one. And then that one falls through. And the same people that keep telling me what’s going to happen, and are always wrong, are the ones that tell me to trust the same plan they can’t explain.

So apparently everything I’ve ever been told is going to happen didn’t happen but that’s also part of the plan that they can’t articulate. Literally cannot tell me what the plan is but, but they trust it, and they know that these losses are part of it. It’s become faith, not reason.

by BQnita
9
SkepButOpen 9 points ago +9 / -0

Okay, but to be fair we can’t keep moving goal posts and kicking cans down the road and expect people to believe anymore. It’s incredibly convenient that every loss is a secret victory that’s necessary for the advancement of the plan. It’s an amazing coincidence that every time we lose we point at the next thing as the “real“ one, until we lose that one, and it’s the one after it that’s the real one. You didn’t notice a pattern there? Everyone else does.

When the people telling me to trust the plan never get the plan right because they keep changing it, why should I believe them anymore? After the election was stolen I was told to hang on tight because that was going to be reversed real quick. Then that time frame kept getting pushed back and pushed back and pushed back and then got cast aside all together because Durham was the big thing now. And devolution. Well where is the Devolution? I was told that all the other stuff we were supposed to focus on for the last five years didn’t compare to the importance of Durham. OK, if there are no prosecutions this year, no one is prosecuted next year, then what? Are you still going to be telling me to trust the plan? You don’t even know what the plan is. Every time someone tries to explain to me what they think the plan involves, it never happens. But I’m told by those exact same people to just keep trusting it.

We can’t know what it is, it’s impossible to know what it is, but that’s a good thing. See? How convenient. That way we’re never wrong!

It’s absolutely transparent and you could see it beginning last week, people already shifting the goal posts because they knew this was going to happen. You could see it coming a mile away. All the big talk was going to go nowhere so people started quietly dragging that goal posts from one side of the field to the other talking about how conviction here isn’t even important anymore. But go ahead and trust the plan you can’t explain because some dates match other dates and they were put into little red squares and rectangles with arrows between them. You do understand that with thousands upon thousands of dates, times, timestamps, number sequences, sequences of words in key phrases, there should be thousands upon thousands of things that qualify as “hits“. That’s not reason enough to trust the plan. We need results.

by BQnita
9
SkepButOpen 9 points ago +9 / -0

OK. Keep shifting the goal posts. Keep doing it. I mean why not? It’s funny because over the last five years I’ve seen it shift from one thing to another, and I watched loss after loss after loss be shrugged off as necessary with people pointing to Durham‘s work being the “real“ endgame to pay attention to. OK. So what’s it going to be next year when no one else has been prosecuted successfully and Durham wraps of his work without any convictions? What then? What about “all Eyez on Arizona“ I mean we keep taking losses and claiming that the next can we kick down the road is the real one.

At some point we may need to come to grips with the question about whether or not secret Internet messages are actually real and if we’re truly getting secret info from secret agent superspies, or maybe, just maybe, we’re not.

by BQnita
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
by BQnita
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
SkepButOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shoot out was Germany. Italy was bigger in my opinion and was a much more believable story. I never bought the shoot out story but I’ve been wrong MANY times before. Fingers crossed I’m wrong again.

2
SkepButOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s either lying or this is a game changer.

Whichever one it is - we need to remember him for it.

1
SkepButOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

WOW. Funny and tragic and poignant all at the same time.

1
SkepButOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re not sure they existed in the first place? Do you have kids? Do they go to school?

The news media flat out invented children that didn’t go to that school, there are literally thousands of people who would know it. Again, it’s shit like this that prevents me from sending people here to get red pilled. Some of your people are fucking bonkers.

5
SkepButOpen 5 points ago +5 / -0

In that district? The teacher who called this out is probably a lefty, but congrats to them for not being completely evil.

The librarian needs to be tarred and feathered.

3
SkepButOpen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, but, we don’t explicitly know that putting him back in before 2024 is part of the plan, do we?

Couldn’t (for example) the plan be to have him win a legit election that is secured by (again, for example) the military?

And I haven’t seen anyone say yet that Devolution must be “completed” by 2024.

For all we know the plan involves the Dems cheating yet again and getting caught OVERTLY by the military in real time, right in front of the world.

3
SkepButOpen 3 points ago +3 / -0

As kind of a half doomer, I can 100% back you up on that. You’re right. It is my bias that makes me wonder about this. And while I understand the concepts necessarily agree with the board’s take on optics all the time.

You nailed the two issues.

But like I said in another comment, if this is how it’s happening… getting close, time to be more open, time for Kash (who I do love) to be more direct… now would seem the time and this is what it would look like.

So I’m a little less doomery today than I was before.

2
SkepButOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, they’re not even trying to be sly about it.

7
SkepButOpen 7 points ago +7 / -0

One thing I will say about Ricky Gervais is not to trust him. He is the left version of a RINO.

He is an atheist pig who will put his finger to the wind to find out what would get him the most publicity.

He’s only pretending. He is a leftist through and through. He’ll bend the knee as soon as he needs to.

He is doing what George Carlin did, which is pretending to be some kind of maverick who will say anything to offend anyone regardless of politics. But he is deeply entrenched on the left, don’t be fooled. He will do whatever it takes to advance his career and right now it advances his career to be a FAKE renegade outsider. He will bend as soon as he needs to, he will bend the knee to the left as soon as he needs to to keep his career going. He’s a phony just like George carlin.

Listen to his appearances on the Opie and Anthony show, Howard Stern, etc., he’s very entrenched on the left. He has done this before, where he has played the middle ground to advance his career. He’s a fucking phony. Just because he saying things that we like to hear, don’t trust him. At all. He’s a fucking asshole.

5
SkepButOpen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Even for a person like me, who is incredibly skeptical, this tastes like a hit.

2
SkepButOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well this is what gets me. If nothing happened at the school, then every single student, every single parent, the relatives of the students and teachers, the teachers at other schools in the district(they communicate almost daily) would have to be in on it.

The police would have to be in on it too, because if the police on television are crisis actors, other police who work in that same area would call it out, which would mean also that the relatives neighbors and friends of those police officers are also in on it, the EMS workers would notice that there are actors in the news clips and not their peers, there would be, literally, tens of thousands of people who would know that this was fake.

I mean this is before you get into cafeteria workers, janitorial, the people hired as team coaches, PTA members, the other schools in the district that have interacted with these teachers and students, they would say “hey! That (actor) isn’t the science teacher!”

It’s one of the things that pisses me off the most about the “truth” community. Everything is a false flag. Everything. There’s never a real school shooting.

This went off the rails from me a few shootings ago when I was told that a school where a shooting took place wasn’t even open. So all of the neighbors that live around that school never noticed that it was empty. Or, “actors“ were attending school there every day for years upon years and not going to regular school somewhere else. So 700 kids were bussed in every day to pretend to attend the school for two decades. The hundreds of cars dropping off students in the morning, obviously driven by actors. And then the same actors would show up at 3 o’clock to pick up all the fake kids. For 20 years. The delivery drivers who brought school lunch supplies, garbage pick up, the post office delivering mail and picking up mail from the school, all of them were in on it. Their friends, their relatives, for 20 years.

There is productive skepticism and then there is paranoid schizophrenia.

Isn’t it just so much more likely that they sent some brainwashed puppet in to do their dirty work? Do you know how much easier that is the convince tens of thousands of people to be quiet? I mean if people want to say that these are staged events with real shootings, that makes much more sense to me. We’ve seen them rile up patsies before.

We’ve seen them give some deranged lunatic a weapon and pointing in the right direction before. Doesn’t that make much more sense than all of this other bullshit?

14
SkepButOpen 14 points ago +14 / -0

What’s really funny to me is that we have this information now only because this greedy bastard got handsy over 13 lousy bucks. He created a paper trail instead of just taking the $12.99 plus tax hit in the wallet.

Look, if these guys end up going down over this? It’s very obviously the funniest thing that’s ever happened in the process of law. The only way it would be more ironic is if it was over 30 pieces of silver.

7
SkepButOpen 7 points ago +7 / -0

He’s a reporter. I don’t want him to emerge as a voice “on the right”. I want him to stick to straight news, whether he agrees with the right or the left I want him to keep it to himself. I just want him to report the facts. Reporters shouldn’t be taking sides.

I mean for all we know he leans to the left but is just reporting things honestly.

You can be pretty neutral and still see through this administration. That’s the way it should be, reporters should be neutral as best they can.

Of course we all know the left won’t play by this rule.

But if we have integrity, that’s what we want. We want reporters to be as neutral as possible.

3
SkepButOpen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plus wouldn’t they have nuked it if it wasn’t serving a purpose?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›