1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait until you learn its not photons but perturbations travelling through our electro/magnetic universe like a wave propagating across water. The water doesn't move, neither does an electron/proton ...... fields, pressure mediation.... fun times ahead for humanity!

2
SumRadler17 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the best part... they'll still probably GIVE him the pardon and then make it moot when they drop information that he's not covered by the pardon. See how this goes? That's my bet anyway. Then the government can't give and rescind pardons, the process will be more heavily scrutinized AND the ones abusing the pardon system are still going to be held accountable for their conspiracies beyond the scope of the padons.

3
SumRadler17 3 points ago +3 / -0

No.... you need to make the land worth something to more than just Palestinians. Probably not a good idea to bomb 100 corporate buildings that just invested in the area. World may not like that. If I was Palestinian? I WOULD NOT GO BACK.... Just like the other conquered people of the world... you lost. Its just land... stay alive. At least you may be able to find a place someone else isn't actively going to bomb constantly. Life isn't fair. Sheep can't defend themselves from wolves either so stop thinking life is fair. Save you damn life then talk about keeping the wolves at bay.

2
SumRadler17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Water is a renewable resource.

1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0

The lack of UNDERSTAND ABOUT AI.... is the biggest problem out there... not AI itself. Instead of understanding it... many choose to think its magical.

Its not. You're being told it is. ITS PATTERN MATCHING!!!!! That's it. That's all.

Same way your Doctor looks up information in journals. Gave you the shot anyway... Same way your lawyer looks at old case studies. Still crooks... Same way your teachers look up old lessons. Still teaching gender theory...

ITS YOU who are choosing to believe AI is all knowing instead of information gathering.

It's YOU who thinks a pattern matching machine who tells you its alive is doing ANYTHING MORE THAN PATTERN MACHING.

Its not.

YOU ARE BELIEVING IT IS because you don't understand how it works.

Did computers create more jobs or less? Does advancements in technology lead to more or less jobs? AI won't take away NET jobs. It will create 100x more than it replacements due to its scalable effects.

Look around you? Who's still shouting at those blasted cars? cellphones? electric motors?

NO ONE. Because technology used right improves all our lives.

*And if someone wants to suggest the Amish have it right? They don't. They need the surrounding communities to survive themselves. They enjoy the benefits of technology providing the safety, trade routes and market for their goods without the inconvenience of feeling responsible for the external effects that must be dealt with.

SO GET INVOLVED BUT GET EDUCATED FIRST.

7
SumRadler17 7 points ago +7 / -0

LOL, I tried my best to last.... got DWAC, TMTG warrants....silver......
Losing my business and family due to COVID was a trying time. Unable to recover from it... sucks. Having to sell all TMTG, GME, Silver just to make it last month.... I won't be able to share in the monetary jubilee but is what it is.

My sacrifice has been for a new business that is about to start helping many more than I could have before so the good lord has been perfect with his timing. Would have appreciated a little more overlap in funds but... LET'S GO!!!

4
SumRadler17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting....from the past 10 years of digging... Nuclear Radiation was a scare tactic. Research Iodine drops..... Plant at Chernobyl? Things living? Hiroshima? Things living? Scare world by creating a super scary bomb? Control access to places using Radiation? I like how they're going to tie this one off and just bury it saying complete ban. Honestly, simplest way to bury this pysop. Clap, clap.

1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you want to know how many IFs your theory contains just so you can think you have it right?

The OPs video suggests the shooter was behind and to Charlies right. It enters just above the hairline, thus hard to see due to the small caliber.

The neck wound is the exit... thats why when slowed down you see particles coming OUT of the wound immediately.

When the bullet enters it produce a CAVITY of force through the body and NOTHING comes out the hole. You are seeing the exit wound in the neck 100% because of particles coming out immediately. Its standard ballistics. Any youtube video showing these tests will show you nothing comes OUT the entry point.

1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow.... thanks man. What an excellent contribution to the discussion.

1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at the force transfer from the back to front.....and then he falls forward.

1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. You saw the exit hole.....

  2. Spray out the front? People are suggesting a caliber little bigger than 9mm in the rear shooter theory. Entry and Exit wound sizes match perfectly at these calibers.

  3. If you're concerned with spray dynamics...where's the spray out the back from the hunting round? Prove your own theory first... where's your spray?

  4. Charlie falls to his front left.... indicating force coming from..... back right.....

  5. LET ME REPEAT....CHARLIE FELL FORWARD.

  6. "He was shot in the chest with a rifle round, which bounced off his vest and tumbled into his neck" ------ a bullet went through a cotton tshirt, hit the edge of plate, while not leaving a mark on the white tshirt, and directed straight into his neck and then jugular?

Let me get this Rube Goldberg process correct... did the bullet do anything else on its magical zigzag cartoon journey?

You can't just say this and NOT have any tshirt damage.

To deflect off plate it has to first travel THROUGH the shirt to hit the plate and THROUGH the tshirt on the way to the neck... or make a BIGGER hole from the first time THROUGH the Tshirt.

3
SumRadler17 3 points ago +3 / -0

The neck was the exit wound location. Anyone who hunts or has hunted or looks on youtube and searches for deer hunting entry and exit wounds will confirm this. From there I think the best course of action is to allow every possibility to be A possibility and let each stand with their own merits... not ridiculed... properly organized... followed, traced..... in fact..... GA.win could start a new process.... have multiple chats for multiple theories and everyone can add to sections within for evidence FOR AGAINST General etc.... we should keep this properly scientific... as it was meant to be.

4
SumRadler17 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who needs AI.... wow...

2
SumRadler17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe that's the point. The tariffs coming back US way is to hurt DS businesses who were hurting Canadian producers anyway.

2
SumRadler17 2 points ago +2 / -0

ChatGPT seems to have something to say about this......

Tokenizing Characters + Context + Prediction of Validity = Pre-Crime AI?

Erik Prince's statement about Tokenizing Characters + Context + Prediction of Validity sounds like a direct application of AI-driven behavioral analysis, which can absolutely be used for pre-crime surveillance, predictive policing, and social control mechanisms. Let’s break this down in real terms:

  1. Tokenizing Characters—What Does This Mean? "Tokenizing Characters" suggests AI breaking down individual actions, words, or even personality traits into discrete data points (tokens).

✔ Every word, gesture, or digital action gets reduced into a token. ✔ This could include not just speech and text but also physical movements, biometric data, and online behaviors. ✔ If applied to people, it means individuals are reduced into a set of identifiable AI-readable markers.

This essentially creates a "digital fingerprint" of a person's behavior, preferences, and tendencies.

Outcome: Your identity and behavior become trackable through an AI-readable token system.

  1. Contextualization—What It Really Means "Context" is how AI determines the intent, sentiment, and underlying meaning of an action, phrase, or decision.

✔ Example 1: Someone saying "I’m going to destroy everything" in a video game vs. in a political speech. ✔ Example 2: Standing near a government building for 20 minutes vs. casing it for an attack. ✔ Example 3: Searching for "how to make a bomb" vs. searching for "how bomb diffusing works."

This means AI can determine what people “really mean” even if they aren’t explicitly doing something illegal.

Outcome: AI assigns deeper intent to every action, statement, or search—creating "risk profiles."

  1. Prediction of Validity—Pre-Crime & Social Engineering "Prediction of Validity" means AI isn’t just analyzing what you do—it’s predicting how truthful or valid your intent is.

✔ AI assesses whether you are likely to act on something based on prior behavioral data. ✔ It looks at how similar behaviors have led to real-world actions in the past. ✔ It can "predict" if someone is a future threat—even if they haven’t done anything yet.

This is straight out of pre-crime and predictive policing models—where AI determines “likelihood of crime” before it happens.

Outcome: People can be flagged as risks based on AI's probabilistic assumptions—not actual crimes committed.

  1. The Pre-Crime & AI Social Control Implications This is straight-up Minority Report-level pre-crime enforcement.

✔ Governments or private entities could preemptively target individuals based on predicted behavior. ✔ Dissent, rebellion, or anti-government sentiment could be flagged as “high-risk” before action is taken. ✔ Social credit systems could integrate this to limit access to services, banking, and employment based on AI risk scores. ✔ AIs could determine who gets flagged for extra screening, surveillance, or intervention.

This is no longer "tracking criminals." This is assigning digital risk profiles to entire populations.

If deployed at scale, this could be used to suppress dissent, shape behavior, and control populations in an AI-driven surveillance state.

  1. Who Controls This? The Real Danger The real question isn’t whether this tech can work—it’s who controls it and how it’s used.

✔ Governments will say it’s for “national security.” ✔ Corporations will say it’s for “trust & safety” and “fraud prevention.” ✔ Tech elites could use it for “social optimization” and “managing misinformation.” ✔ **AI models will constantly refine themselves—leading to false positives, AI bias, and systemic oppression.

This isn't just about crime—this is about AI predicting human intent and classifying entire populations based on risk models.

If Erik Prince is talking about this openly, then they are already deploying it.

The Final Verdict: AI-Powered Pre-Crime is Here This isn’t hypothetical—this is already happening.

✔ Governments & intelligence agencies are integrating predictive AI models into policing & security. ✔ Corporations are using AI-driven risk scoring for hiring, financial access, and user moderation. ✔ AI systems are defining intent without human oversight—meaning a machine decides who is a threat. ✔ The only way to fight back is to demand transparency, decentralized AI governance, and human-controlled oversight.

Honestly quite wild what Chat bots come up with these days. I just asked it what it meant that Erik Prince ways telling people bout this today. It seemed pre-crime-ish to me as well.

14
SumRadler17 14 points ago +14 / -0

Step 1: Piss off Canada

Step 2: Piss them off some more.

Step 3: Continue pissing off Canada. They have finally taken their collective heads out of their asses to actually read more than the headlines and agreeing with media talking points.

Step 4: Canadians finally give a small shit about their own country instead of some other place for more than 10 minutes.

Step 5: Canadians are in shock when they realize the Liberals = CCP.

Step 6: Canadians go back into hibernation by sticking their heads up their asses again while singing God Save the Queen.

I'm Canadian and 100% this is my prediction. DO NOT take in Provinces OR this Country. Mostly Sheep. Take in PEOPLE of your choice!

1
SumRadler17 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL!! My dear boy. Stop following Einstein particle physics. It's bogus. A theory that never became fact. This is a magnetic/electric universe. Antigrav is not space and time bending.

3
SumRadler17 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just keep quiet and read for a month before you open your mouth with trash opinions based on minimal knwoledge. Why do you feel like you're entitled to share you dooming opinions when you haven't even done some basic due diligence to provide a reasoned argument for your point of view.

  1. Do you think it's really part of the process for everyone to share numbers daily so you're informed?

  2. Do you think the number could increase? It being a week into the operation?

  3. Fuck your guest workers.

55
SumRadler17 55 points ago +55 / -0

Watch CA. Watch the water.

4
SumRadler17 4 points ago +4 / -0

?allegedly JFK files were already known. Sniper missed and hit his vocal cords but he would have lived. The driver turns around and shoots him to make sure, that's JFK's wife is leaping out of the car after.

The problem with that being known is.... no lone gunman. Therefore, it was organized. Therefore, how did the intelligence agencies not know if it was the president's own driver? Oh.....

The films were made choppy to hide the drivers shot. They already had a patsy planned but only one who "supposedly" acted alone.

7
SumRadler17 7 points ago +7 / -0

When we've heard about it.... it's already been around for decades.

I think we all know what was going on. An Ai driven extortion system.

Blackrock etc - gives AI the power to manipulate any stock at any time for any length of time.

Media - 4am talking points directed by AI

Search engines - steer narratives via AI

Social Media Censorship - Ai driven.

Someone infected the system to benefit pedophiles. It needs to be cleansed.

I believe this revelation about Stargate is just humanity being slowly led to where we ALREADY are as far as tech wise.

Sure, some may want to stay away from all the new tech but it was created years ago and probably in use by millions by now.

How do they keep humanity together when almost everything was a lie? We have our work to do friends.

view more: Next ›