2
Thecloudsurfer91 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would like to agree with you but no one is perfect. We are all sinners. I’m starting to think it’s impossible to ask for someone with a “clean” background. Everyone has dirt somewhere.

2
Thecloudsurfer91 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly - people will just create a parallel society where we can barter or buy things with alternate currency, silver, bullets, liquor, whatever.

The reason I get paid in US Dollars is because the company I work for gets paid in US Dollars. That cycle doesn’t just “stop.”

7
Thecloudsurfer91 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don’t see how that’s possible. Offline transactions are susceptible to double spend attacks and other fraudulent transactions.

4
Thecloudsurfer91 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why is he moving so slowly? It’s kind of sad to watch. He’s clearly struggling.

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

So it’s not the tallest one? Which is it then?

5
Thecloudsurfer91 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here’s the thing though… the apocrypha contains historical inaccuracies and fallacies. There’s a reason it’s excluded from Protestant bibles. It was included to further the Catholic narrative - such as almsgiving, prayer for the dead, and others.

If you actually look at the scriptures referenced by Josephus, or Jesus himself, the 66 are the only true ones the Jews would’ve had access to in 1st century AD.

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

The data is easy - they use Wikipedia and a large book corpus. But the training time is 4ish days on a large cluster of extremely expensive hardware.

Microsoft bought OpenAI so they’re not really hurting for cash now. The numbers I’m quoting from are here: https://www.semianalysis.com/p/the-inference-cost-of-search-disruption?publication_id=329241&isFreemail=true

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

It costs $600k per day to host ChatGPT… that doesn’t even include the training time/cost.

0
Thecloudsurfer91 0 points ago +1 / -1

We’re still a long way from that. These bots don’t know fact from fiction. They aren’t able to “reason” in the way you’re describing. They learn patterns of speech and replicate answers by prediction. These AIs have no concept of what they’re saying, it’s just a language generation model.

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

The people who study these types of algorithms and frameworks - we know. They publish lots of research and talk about what’s under the hood. These things are pretty complicated and yet the tech is nowhere near sophisticated enough for general intelligence.

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

For coding applications, sure. But not for facts.

9
Thecloudsurfer91 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is completely wrong and fundamentally misunderstands how a Large Language Model actually works. These models simply predict what “sounds right” - they severely lack ACCURACY. On top of that, the models themselves don’t understand what they’re doing, it’s simply following a pattern that it learned from training material. ChatGPT can’t do anything without a prompt.

11
Thecloudsurfer91 11 points ago +11 / -0

Here’s the thing… it’s not just about watching your assigned hour of video. It’s about identifying the people, connecting the dots, and building profiles of the different actors/agents. It’s incredibly difficult to do that, even WITH a large team.

You’re better off with 3-5 skilled people who can focus on some of the wider view camera angles, and can start documenting interactions and what they see.

Telling a story here is way more impactful than just finding a handful of clips that show the police letting people in. Sure, that would be great too, but real investigation is a lot deeper.

This is a full time job for many people!

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I read it’s just a QR code. That’s about as safe as you can get technology wise. And it was completely optional, HIPAA compliant. You choose what information to include.

1
Thecloudsurfer91 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough but this is optional. It says it’s for people who don’t have easy access to medical information on their phones.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›