I'm fine with CEOs making bank, but some of them get totally absurd.
For any gamers out there, Bobby Kotick was basically paid a small country's GDP.
I feel bad for the people who are sent to "serve their country" by fighting for an entirely different country.
Truly awful.
Separate issue.
The chances of you breaking a federal law is just about 100% at some point or other due to how bloated the laws have gotten.
Have you gone to prison for it?
Doubtful.
Legalizing it is a red line, period. The snark about how "it doesn't stop them from spying" is true, but it makes it much more difficult to actually prosecute.
Which is why I said it stops them in courts, and not that it stops them from spying to begin with.
To be clear, we need to get the reins on this -- on said "easy warrants", and on spying. But the way to get reins on it is not to act apathetic to them spying regardless while they attempt to legalize it. The first step is to aggressively oppose that legalization. It is always harder to repeal.
No, my answer is objectively correct.
They are spying on us, but they can't do anything about it because it's illegal to do so.
They can't admit any evidence into court, but they absolutely would be able to if you allowed them to legalize it.
Get over yourself. It's just because you don't like the answer. Because you didn't grasp the distinction between what they can do with this information if it is legalized.
Your inability to grasp that distinction is not my problem.
But they cannot admit it into court, and that's what protects most people.
Frankly I don't give a fuck if you don't like the answer, the fact is that because it is inadmissible is what has stopped them and that's why legalizing it is a red line.
Where legality stopped them is in court.
Apparently some ordinances forbid it in Michigan, although I do not know which municipalities. Probably Detroit-adjacent areas. Just what I've been told when advising this.
Betrayal is too grave to forgive.
Probably one book, but usually the word count is referred to as the trilogy.
188K words is still too many for a bill.
I don't think that it's nearly 1.1 billion words, but I accept your exaggeration and agree.
...More boolets!
https://us.vwr.com/cms/history-of-mRNA-vaccines
The first use case was specifically created for use as a vaccination for prostate cancer.
mRNA was created for the purpose of dealing with cancer, though.
It wasn't meant for this vaccine garbage.
I still wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole, but clearly the secret to defeating different kinds of cancers are withheld from us.
None of this vaccination bullshit is even what mRNA was meant for.
So stupid.
I hate that shit. Like you're already getting my views, is that not enough?!
As expected, the "he resigned from this Congress, not the race he won!" did not pan out.
Seems he wore it too.
This is why I hate non-profits. You can pay top people more or expand endlessly.
Sounds like it could be used in chemtrails.
😗
Anything to avoid portraying criminals as criminals anyway.
Perhaps invite them on a mandatory tour at the very least. Let them see how bad it could get for them.
Well, you're not wrong. That's exactly what it looks like.
Who knows. Best to keep both in mind.
Of course but the people who have to vote for stopping it are the ones who do this. Insane, huh?
It doesn't even make sense. I'm sure there are a few fringe radicals (or perhaps one of the many obvious trolls that now seem to have the run of Patriots) but most of us, and Trump in general, wouldn't be in favor of something so stupidly unconstitutional.
It's really insane that they managed to gaslight so many people into believing that big government is a right wing thing.
Healthcare is such a complex and multifaceted issue.
Big Pharma has no interest in cures, but government regulations often go too far for promising treatments but not far enough for truly dangerous or new treatments.
Do we put it in the hands of government, or private sector?
One thing we need to do is demand cures, not just treatments-in-perpetuity. We also need to prosecute those who would do harm.
There is also a government grant conflict of interest for research and studies, but if the government has no control then the private companies will stick to their treatment as a subscription philosophy.
Difficult questions all spiraling out of control due to a lack of accountability. An honest government would be coming out against vaccinations. An honest government would never give immunity for bad practice in medicine either.