7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +7 / -0

Too bad we didn't have secure borders, otherwise they wouldn't have anywhere to go.

23
Wtf_socialismreally 23 points ago +23 / -0

Laughing my ass off that a leader of a third world country is referring to the fact that our stores are locking their wares up behind glass no matter the item's value.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, the two ingredients in the organic Swerve is just erythritol and monk fruit extract. https://swervesweet.com/products/organic-granular

What makes it easier to digest isn't really the other ingredient, but rather keeping from having it be 100% erythritol. Erythritol can be pretty hard on some people in large amounts, so by padding it out with monk fruit extract they can reach an amount of sweetness that they want while also using less of it.

Erythritol is ~70% as sweet as sugar, whereas monk fruit extract is 100-250 times sweeter than sugar so the idea is that you can use a small amount of two naturally made sweeteners to reach the same level of sweetness as real sugar, without needing to pour in a massive amount of erythritol which can upset people's stomachs.

Edit: I saw the non-organic Swerve, which I'm not as much of a fan of, does not have monk fruit extract but instead bulks with Allulose, "flavor" and Xanthan gum.

I do not like bulking with Allulose, I found the taste of it less enjoyable when using it separately but the more you know.

Allulose is another natural sugar extract, about 70% as sweet as sugar like Erythritol.

I tried to make caramel with it once based on a keto recipe. That was a disaster, haha.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not likely the Stevia. How sedentary is she? At that age, they're a major risk for clotting when they're inactive.

If she hasn't seen a doctor for the past 30+ years, it could mean something has developed under the radar.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Erythritol is very easy to pronounce.

Actually, all of the major sweeteners -- both natural and artificial -- are pretty pronounceable.

Erythritol.

Stevia.

Monk fruit extract.

Aspartame.

Sucralose.

Acesulfame potassium -- Ace K.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

Honey is broken down into the same base carbohydrates as sugar in the end.

You only really get the benefits with raw honey as well.

Honey is also a sugar substitute, since it is a sweetener.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Important note though: Sometimes your body must acclimate to it and some people's bodies don't like it at all. Because it is not readily digestible, and a small amount of it "ferments", it can give gas and bloating.

I don't experience this issue, but I also tend to prefer sweetener mixes that use a combination of erythritol and monk fruit.

12
Wtf_socialismreally 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes. It's a substitute, and one of the better ones. It is passed nearly whole through urine, with a mostly insignificant amount absorbed as energy in your stomach.

Monk fruit is another substitute that is also not a "fake sugar".

Interesting that all these sugar substitutes are being attacked now, but of course actual artificial sweeteners and actual sugar are propped up.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree, it could absolutely be a play to make her seem like the underdog. After all, she was just fielding criticisms that Trump was the only one going on hostile networks, and Fox is their "hostile" network.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have been taking two steps forward and one step back, that's true and a good way to look at it. It's a recent trend though and we need to keep hammering it home.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not sure we've successfully strengthened them the whole time. We've had a more recent push in some states for Constitutional carry, and that's great. But states like California and New York which make up a major number of citizens in the country subvert that and keep us dangerously close to a major loss if they get just one more vote in the Supreme Court.

We definitely need to remain cognizant of their overall strategy, and I don't know that their strategy gets talked about enough because people are afraid of being called "doomers".

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's all fine and dandy, but that they can pervert the Constitution so easily and readily shows that wording was not strong enough and should have made stronger.

Founder intentions do not matter; they use the words as written to deconstruct it, and they have had quite a number of years to think tank how to do so.

Inconsistent wording is exactly what they used to separate citizenry from "the people" in order to stretch the Constitution to non-citizens.

7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +7 / -0

Reducing the criticisms of Baier to the calling of Arizona is out of touch, and I will continue to think it's pathetic that people prove they're not as awakened as they think when the same old strategy of doing ONE positive thing seems to outweigh all of the negative things they've done still works on them.

Baier has not been very pro Trump for years. When people criticize him, they are criticizing him for those years. That he was at the desk is just a galvanizing focal point for vocalizing those frustrations.

No. One positive thing does not outweigh negatives. Anyone who thinks that it does is still asleep, and may as well vote for their next RINO when they are up for reelection and start to do something. Hell, it clearly worked for Empress Whitmer in Michigan.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I were an evil mastermind that is a part of a think tank of secret society, like minded evil masterminds, and I wanted to get rid of pesky "obstacles" such as amendments like the first and second, well..

I would be buying governors and legislatures across the country, and I would pretend to make them compete, fight and put on a show of strife.

I would make people crave a convention of states to modify the Constitution, and when it came time I would activate every major player to agree on stripping those protections from us.

Honestly, I have a few things I wish the Founders had laid down more in stone. That the Bill of Rights is immutable and unable to be modified in any circumstance nor for any reason, and to ensure that the Constitution only applied to legal citizens.

Would save us a lot of headaches in today's climate.

4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nope.

But we have free will and are expected to use it wisely instead of acting entitled to God's intervention for every aspect of our lives.

At a certain point we have to willfully push back against evil, not just let it freely spread.

And so that is why we do not sit complacent expecting God to turn 10000 votes for Kamala into 10000 votes for Trump. We don't sit complacent waiting for Him to inform and register people to vote.

We have to do our part to reject evil too.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't hate whites in my view. Because the most of them are white.

Self loathing and more importantly being snowflakes is not exclusive to other races.

You can hate your own race, as many people repeatedly show.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Justice system is broken, and this is one of the reasons why. Deals are just there to get an easy conviction, because the alternative is losing everything due to the process being the punishment.

You're damned both ways, and that's pretty shit.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they used to, back when teachers of all levels were saying "Wikipedia is not a source" and were vigilant.

Now they just follow their Fagotus Supremus curriculum. They only care if they can push the agendas on the kids.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do, I do!

A miserable pile of secrets!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›