It's an interesting case, and thanks for your overview, but SCOTUS will tie themselves into knots to avoid making a decision so disruptive as to depose the other two branches of government.
We should calibrate our expectations accordingly.
Ratio'd refers to the ratio of comments to likes. It's an inexact way to judge a post's popularity. Many likes and few comments means people like it, fewer likes and many comments means people hate it and are saying so.
Well, here's the thing: every time someone appears that might take that burden, Trump and his most ardent supporters slap that person down. See: "DeSanctimonious" the "WEF sleeper agent."
You don't get to have it both ways.
You know, I've seen people ask you several times where you're getting 2025 from. I haven't seen you answer yet. Do you have an answer? Because I've been following Q for 4+ years, and this is the first I've heard of it.
Yeah, that argument stopped working with me on inauguration day after the false promises and high expectations made a fool out of me in front of all my friends and family.
The White Hats squandered the high expectations, and now it's put up or shut up. I try to learn from my mistakes.
I come here every day looking for evidence that my low expectations are wrong. So far, they've been right on the money.
It'd be hilarious if we ended up with a Democrat speaker with a Republican majority because ten people refused to support McCarthy. Pity about the committee assignments, but it might be worth it.