Tagged by @Kash here:
Speaking of which where's Scavino!? Still waiting on that one.
You have links to the July 2022 posts? Or somewhere they may have been archived to?
The ones allegedly Q with a different tripcode (imo not Q, but not sure how else to describe the posts) ... can't find them.
How is MULTIPLE apps and websites DOWN "nothing" just because one is working?
Not nothing.
Yup. I know quite a few people who used to have one of these. Maybe still do I don't know.
Bring it!
3 hours MINIMUM is proven incorrect with a basic internet search. It often does take that long, but calling it a minimum is manipulation.
And yes in fact I would argue that cars of the 40s are basically the same today.
The technology has incrementally improved but is fundamentally the same.
They have improved considerably in efficiency. But it's efficiency in producing kinetic energy. Which has room for improvements in efficiency in ways simply producing heat does not.
That is why I didn't use a car analogy. But thanks for the strawman.
Since you decided to quote the part that I already SPECIFICALLY admitted was wrong, and argue that point I really don't see any evidence you're interested in a good faith discussion even if you are right.
Every day man. Especially the days I feel smart, I realize especially I am not.
D E C E R T I F Y
A crematorium is basically just a furnace. Why would a 1940s crematorium be THAT different than a modern one. Calories are calories. It takes a certain amount of energy to break down a body like that and it's not going to be any less or more now than it was then. Efficiency of heat creation by just straight up burning fuel is pretty damn efficient and we haven't figured out a way to magically make today's fuel burn any hotter, and I'm pretty sure concrete or other insulation also wouldn't have changed SO MUCH that it would make a difference of HOURS of efficiency.
If anything they could have been MORE efficient. After all if they were starving them, boom right there half the body mass to burn. Then you stuff a whole bunch into ONE furnace. BOOM now you're utilizing more of the heat and losing less to being radiated out the walls due to a high filled volume.
Go ask a modern cremator. They'll turn a person to ash bones and all in two hours. Stuff a 50 people in there at once, use some more fuel now you're at 50/hr PER furnace. Run that thing full time that's 300,000/yr. I'm assuming they didn't run it full time however. But they probably did have multiple going over multiple years. I'm not saying you're wrong about some of the high victim numbers being worth some skeptism. But it ain't because they couldn't cremate them all. At least theoretically it's possible and even if negligible difficulty.
** shit reading that my math is off but you're still within an order of magnitude of the low estimates with just a few furnaces
Thanks fren ☺️ appreciate your analysis.
DEW?
Directed energy weapon? Not sure what that stands for.
Pompeo is quite the wild card. I feel he could be either or neither. My gut leans white hat.
But if his role is to lead the black hats right into the trap, he'd definitely have to appeal to the black hat agenda to a significant degree or he'd be blocked out if doing anything meaningful in the way of swaying their decision making.
He plays the role well if this is the case.
"We're winning and we need more money." - White House
There I'm fucking Nostradamus. Thank me later.
I'm pretty sure most gas stations CAN'T lower their prices, even if they wanted to sell at loss, or they'd lose the contract to have fuel delivered to their station.
You sound like you would know, is that true?
I don't think ANY are listed for today yet, 06/30.
To my knowledge they don't list them until they're announced at the last minute. 10am Eastern I think.
yup yup 👍👍
Sounds like WV v EPA won't be released until tomorrow.
Huh? The water level is like HALF what it was in 2009 ... how can that look less dire to you?
Agreed. Maybe it's just me, but I can't wrap my head around HOW Trump won 2016 if the election wasn't somehow protected. So if they can theoretically protect 2016 in some way, why couldn't they protect the upcoming midterms?
2020 was just what happens when they turn the "protection" off and expose their crimes to their world.
I have good feelings about the midterms also. I think we'll be okay.
I'm more worried about what the RINOs will do with the win.
But presumably we have counter-moves for that too.
It's possible that TS_Q or whatever we're calling him now IS part of the op but NOT "the Q we're looking for"
Like an " official" LARP (by the Q team) to bring attention to Q to people on TS that have previously been uninterested.
I agree for multiple reasons, including "no outside comms" that TS_Q isn't OG_Q.
I just don't discount the possibility that TS_Q is a part of the op however.
It's also possible this is NOT an "official LARP" by the Q team and is ..
1 a LARP by the admins at TS for fun? or the same reason above - to bring attention to normies on TS to Q just not done "officially" by the Q team
2 a LARP by some rando asshat with BAD intentions (strikes me as unlikely given - how in the WORLD did they get that user name)
Anyway I basically agree TS_Q is a LARP.
But calling it a LARP, even if true, says NOTHING meaningful positive or negative about who TS_Q is and why they're playing like they're OG_Q.
Maybe this is interesting? Maybe not. I was just under the impression that only @q had a single-character username and that nobody could create a single-character username.
Is @d someone important? How did they join so early?
Why only one post? From Bosnia!?
Who is it that would be followed by several notables?
Is this even important? Or maybe they're just like a friend of someone and not important? I always default towards important until proven otherwise.
It at first appeared perhaps @Kash was mistaking tagging @DL357 as @D ... but he tagged BOTH so it seems like it's not a mistake. And it still doesn't answer the question how they got a single-character username and so early.