Yeah that kind of language invokes concepts that can't be said around here

He also fell for a meme that showed a World War Z screencap overlaid with chyrons claiming to be from a MSM broadcast

He doesn't deny the inflation of reported value of assets, but it's my understanding that it's common practice with real estate holders. Can anyone comment to that?

But would the contents of the tweet being posted put them in the hospital?

What they're allowing is the administration to communicate with social media platforms, the "censorship" thing is spin.

That's why we're allowed to have opinions about other people's opinions :) I'll let it go, have a good one.

So what do you make of people who disagree with those God messages about planes, like catsfive below?

"Trump was right about everything" ?

Nice catch, makes the title here misleading

Yeah..... yeah.

Did any of those things come directly from Q?

MSM don't report "THAT" because it's just another website on the internet? You're making it sound like they're an internationally recognized org like the WHO.

But but he said it was "exclusive" eye roll

How do you know that's what it says?

It means they were aware of the information that was redacted.. which is.. unknown.

And what content is that?

Did you get that from the white pages?

Because it shows that the white house redacted contents in emails? Like that's something new?

It was also the initials of some low level lawyer(?) who was indicted.

No it's not possible for someone to edit an image he posted

Y'know I wasn't expecting "I believed something without researching it because it confirmed by pre-existing beliefs" but at least something like "thanks for the heads-up"

I'm just saying the video that you're referring to is fake. You may not like the source, but you can see for yourself the edited and the real video. Touting it does cost you credibility.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-911-pentagon-attack-footage-415983695442

Yeah you fell for a fake video

Did you feel that way during the previous presidency?

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-white-house-keeps-editing-its-transcripts-curious-ways-msna1149631

More misleading phrasing to make people upset.

"All of the Trump supporters and non-members" implies that some Trump supporters were members and were specifically singled out.

Should have read "All of the non-members, which includes all the Trump supporters" or something to that effect