If you're excited now, think how excited people were to read that in 2018

With big pharma? People have been pointing out that revolving door for a while, nothing gets done.

Trump was the first to say he'd introduce a mandatory wait between government service and lobbying, don't remember if anything came of that.

And did he tell you that was a false assumption? The expression "come after x" can be read either way in either scenario. It's simply not possible to prove What his intent was, or how he intended people (recipients or his supporters) to perceive it.

I wonder if it's the strategic use of the word "unfairly"

Is he really though? Sounds more like an appeal to the court of public opinion

"happen again", "happen against". If you don't think it's a reach, and you don't think that him retruthing Q followers eclipses something like this by a long shot, cool, enjoy

Oops, excuse the derp, thanks

DOJ, CIA, FBI, all work under the orders of the democratic leaders. Just saying.

Who were they working under 2017-2021? Hell, Chris Wray is still director of the FBI and he was nominated by Trump in 2017

Edit: updated per the one sent by tp

"baiting then"? It's been clear the indictment was coming for the last number of weeks

Ragebait article is misleading?!

(Thanks for finding the actual source)

Who controlled congress for the last 30 days ;)

Do you not see polls posted on GAW asking people to skew results to the right? Pretty much how the internet works

You can look at how much was added per presidential term if you go searching

Yep, but how does it tie into SBF?!

It does, if you understand crypto and con artists

And what about people that believe tweets without doing their own research

Their 24-year-old sex partner who is committing a crime would commit another crime by buying illicit goods for an underage person? Yeah probably

Call me a cynic too but I would have preferred to see "pay if someone wants to sit in that seat". Or maybe your "donation" becomes an actual donation to fight child trafficking rather than paying for an empty seat that ends up in the pockets of a movie theatre.

Fair point, pay-it-forward helps to keep it in theatres longer so that people who may have held off or not heard of it get a chance to watch it.

But still makes it impossible to measure viewership, should that even matter.

Still not "butts in seats"

We'd need to know how many pay-it-forward tickets were actually used

edit: missed Nomadic's comment, sorry to repeat the point!

It does have a geocities-era internet vibe to it. Just needs some rotating flaming skulls.

I am surprised that so many are onboard with the new age mysticism, "extradimensional entities", etc found on the graphic.

Maybe if we send them to the center for reading more good first

Sound of Freedom doesn't talk about adrenochrome for one, and adrenochrome can be produced synthetically.