2
conservatarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Midler is just stupid. No propaganda needed for her.

3
conservatarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's a certifiable liar who promised to destroy the 2A. He'll say literally anything to get elected to have a shot at joining the "big club."

2
conservatarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone have another source or more information about this video? The original tweet was deleted. It was around Feb 27. The original tweet claimed, "Ukrainian Soldiers Burning Documents Next to Govt Building Kiev Why?" and was here: https://nitter.net/BigBluexlt/status/1496949520222982155

This video could be from any place, from any time. I can't tell what country the soldiers represent. The closest vehicle is a Mitsubishi. Can't determine the make of the emergency/fire truck. There's no snow on the ground.

Wonder if there's any authentication or if this was fake news.

11
conservatarian 11 points ago +11 / -0

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-putin-idUSKCN18D1EA

The quote is within that link but the context makes it unclear if he's speaking of the MSM or of the uniparty establishment. But, what's the difference anyway?

by Mutoto2
5
conservatarian 5 points ago +5 / -0

"He doesn't want his bubble burst."

It's not memes and frogs and "cartoons and clowns" keeping him from inquiring further. That's a convenient excuse for him to disregard what you consider to be valuable source of information that you tried to share with him. That's a him problem, not a site problem.

4
conservatarian 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://nitter.net/VerumBellator1/status/1499324129484615684 (https://archive.ph/lJ2Gi)

The "helpless Ukrainian people" video was filmed in England in 2013 for the movie "Invasion Planet Earth." Still Shots from video have been used to fuel what's going on in Ukraine 🤥🪖🎪

It was actually shot in 2019, but whatever. Here's the part of the trailer where the people running towards the camera is used:

https://youtu.be/okNzOq0R8yE?t=41

Skip to 0:41. Lasts a couple of seconds. Pause and compare.

8
conservatarian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Big red pill on energy. Nuclear is the only viable answer to replacing fossil fuels. Solar and wind are hippy fairy tales that are unreliable and enormously harmful to the environment. The scale of wind turbines and solar farms needed to supplant coal and natgas grid electricity is an unrealistic, unsustainable, and unaffordable road to nowhere. The negative public perception attached to nuclear energy stems from fears of reactor meltdown as a result of failure to maintain the constant flow of water coolant that must be kept at extremely high pressures. Pressurized water reactors (by far the most common reactor design deployed in the world) are the result of 70 year old technology. There are dozens of newer, safer reactor designs including types such as the Molten Salt Reactor which does not use water as a coolant, does not require extreme pressures, and has inherent safety. Combined with the Thorium fuel cycle, an element which is vastly more abundant than Uranium throughout the Earth's crust, would provide us with cheap, safe energy for thousands of years. I don't like the idea of buying yet something else from China, but China (and India, and others) are actively developing MSR technology which we demonstrated in the 1960s at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory but promptly abandoned, chiefly due to the ignorance of politicians. We should hope China is successful. Imagine a world where fossil fuels are no longer the principle factor in dictating national economic security for all nations.

5
conservatarian 5 points ago +6 / -1

Provides great background info. Thanks for posting. Recommend others to also watch the first 12 minutes if not the whole thing.

3
conservatarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I disagree. This theory makes a few assumptions:

  1. That drunkard Pelosi is not insulated from the decision making process. I'd expect even these dummies to maintain some degree of compartmentalization.
  2. That drunkard Pelosi was responsible for communicating a "go" instruction.
  3. That drunkard Pelosi was doing something other than exhibiting a physically manifested version of "Good morning... Sunday morning." Her brain is fried and the bits that work are fried by alcohol and senility. If you've watched her for any length of time, she frequently exhibits unusual, involuntary physical movements.
  4. That they would use broken ASL to communicate an instruction and not something far more benign, like pointing an ink pen at something, or fiddling with her lapel pin.

I'd be willing to yield one or even two of these, but to assume all are true is too much of a stretch.

6
conservatarian 6 points ago +7 / -1

Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee

We know their track record.

3
conservatarian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know, and I'm not asserting the fake t-shirt negates it, but it does call for more scrutiny.

10
conservatarian 10 points ago +10 / -0

Appears fake.

  1. Note the author "Daniel Dale" and timestamp of the posting in the screenshot. "Updated 3:15 AM ET, Sat March 5, 2022"

  2. See the following link(s) and note the author and timestamp are identical.

  1. The author's profile, which presumably would list all of xher's postings, does not include anything resembling the OP image.
1
conservatarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't remember where, or even the context, and could not validate its authenticity, but I remember reading something about the Russians being concerned or should be concerned about the Ukrainian army (or some other actor) setting off a dirty bomb just inside the Russian border.

It may have just been someone spitballing.

16
conservatarian 16 points ago +16 / -0

The photo of Kolomoyskyi wearing the black T-shirt has been photoshopped multiple times (placing different insignias on his shirt). The one used in this collage appears to be fake. Reverse image search.

2
conservatarian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it were in anyone's interest to force acceptance of cash, it would be the Federal Reserve, but...

Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment?

There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise.

Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," states: "United States coins and currency [including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve Banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all U.S. money as identified above is a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm

See the comment from u/Narg

5
conservatarian 5 points ago +5 / -0

FYI, the camera at the plant that's provided most (all?) of the footage appears to be mounted 200 feet south of the southern most reactor containment building, looking eastward over Promyslova Street. The building that was on fire is about 1/4 mile southeast of the camera. Looks like some sort of administrative building.

Sharing this for those who want to get the lay of the land when looking at the satellite photos.

Also, the building that was being attacked does not appear to be inside the security perimeter of the plant. There is a security station immediately to its west on Promyslova Street.

1
conservatarian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get off the line and get a hot shower and a hot meal.

5
conservatarian 5 points ago +7 / -2

Yep. Anyone who flies just a moderate amount recognizes carriers. United had a distinct livery then, as recognizable as Southwest is today. It's not some spook skill like some in this thread are implying. And on that note, he's definitely not a planefag because he called it a 737 - it was a 767.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›