1
exarch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q talks about future events and then creates these events.

So you think that Q manufactured a FUCKING AIRPLANE CRASH in order align with some gibberish post three years ago

Does that sound even a little bit rational?

3
exarch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ve seen multiple comments by leftist retards on Reddit claiming that not even gynecologists can tell the difference. Back before Reddit essentially shut down r/drama for making fun of trannies, they used to feature comments like that all the time.

Leftists really are completely delusional

5
exarch 5 points ago +5 / -0

It’s not so much that “the world” is waking up. It’s that the cartoonist, Scott Adams, had a momentary slip up where he stated a red-pill truth and as a result he was cancelled. Dilbert doesn’t run in any newspapers anymore. So now he’s a little more free

1
exarch 1 point ago +1 / -0

He didn’t win. The election was stolen and the next one will be too.

3
exarch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope this guy knows not to ride in any convertibles

2
exarch 2 points ago +3 / -1

So you seriously believe Q is from the future. Do you know how fucking retarded that sounds?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
exarch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope. Laws only apply to whites and republicans. They sent a white republican to jail for joking on Twitter that you could vote by text. A non-white dem made the same joke and will not be arrested.

I have lots of examples like this.

5
exarch 5 points ago +5 / -0

If I had to pick the precise moment that soul was cut out, I’d say it was the legalization of pornography. The left made the case that pornography was speech and thus protected by the 1st amendment. The right acquiesced in the name of fairness (not wanting to have a “rules for thee but not for me” situation).

Now the left is in charge and they’re perfectly happy having rules for us but not for them and as you say, the soul of the nation is gone.

It’s hard today to believe that both Reagan and Nixon won with huge majorities. We never should have given an inch on the issue of pornography. Freedom of speech is about expressing ideas, and there’s no particular idea being expressed in pornography. But that was the first step on the road to hell

3
exarch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wish he was just laundering money. No, all of Soros money is perfectly legit - ill gotten to be sure, but legit as far as the government is concerned

I wish he was just a thief. I that case his interests may sometimes not conflict with mine (and yours). There’s are neighborhoods and towns controlled by gangsters and cartels where people still live somewhat freely. This is because if you’re just living your life a gangster doesn’t necessarily care.

No, this guy is much worse. He’s on a mission to harm us. He hates us because of the color of our skin.

2
exarch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone know how to contact him? I’ve got a great idea. He should tweet that he’s going to live forever in heaven because he’s saved. When an atheist inevitably disagrees with that, he can say that the atheist is “denying his existence”

That’s what the left does with regard to trans people. If you disagree they frame it as though you think they don’t exist

4
exarch 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s not “transgender” since that’s a completely made up thing.

It’s a hermaphrodite - maybe. But more likely it’s just a depiction of a twisting and perversion of the natural order, because that’s what they actually worship, and once you realize that, you’ll see them doing it everywhere including comparatively harmless things like having unnatural hair color

2
exarch 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same military that says their primary mission is stopping “white rage” and whose diversity chief tweets out “I’m so tired of these white people” - that military?

2
exarch 2 points ago +2 / -0

You think the rules will apply to them??

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
11
exarch 11 points ago +11 / -0

Spokesperson

Let’s take some courage from the basedness of the talis and stop using politically correct gender neutral terms. This is a spokesman

1
exarch 1 point ago +1 / -0

mentally contact these people via 5G

You’re implying that a government with trillions of dollars at its disposal needs some novel way of “contacting” people it wants to mkultra. That’s kind of ridiculous. When the government wants to manipulate someone, there are far simpler and more effective ways of contacting them. In this case (assuming for a moment this person was mind controlled and not just generally crazy) they would just have an agent pretend to be a tranny and make friends with them. Not like they had any other friends.

Hell you don’t even have to meet in person. Just get on their tumblr and start saying “omg you’re so right - you really are oppressed!”

They do this to people on the right all the time. Remember the whitmire “kidnapping” plot? 14 people in total and 12 of them were feds. You don’t need drugs to manipulate someone. You just need to be their friend.

1
exarch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's an important skill for dealing with leftists

Because the tweet is absolutely right - they do try to control what words you can use.

When they say bullshit like, "a trans woman is a woman" and "a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman" say this: okay fine, you win, a woman is this amorphous thing that you can't define and anyone can claim to be. Fine. But now, I want to refer to adult, human, females. So, if you taken away the word that I used to use for that purpose, then give me a new word so that I can continue discussing the concept that I want to discuss.

...and they wont. Of course they wont! Because the whole purpose, every time they do this (be it with racism, gender, whatever) is never about being inclusive or helpful. It's always been about controlling you.

And this technique reveals it. They are not happen if you say, "fine, trans women are women" - what they really want is to deny you the possibility of thinking about and talking about that concept: adult, human, female.

So, when you go down this road with them, and they demonstrate very clearly that they're not willing to let you have any word for adult, human, female, then you can say, "in that case, I'm just going to use the word I've always used - since you've just demonstrated that you're not being honest."

6
exarch 6 points ago +6 / -0

They didn’t keep all of their earnings. There were sales taxes and real estate taxes, right?

Regardless, the government at every level was vastly more efficient then than it is now. And a big part of the reason for that efficiency was that government was run by high IQ people with a shared culture that was mostly Christian

2
exarch 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is the significance of the number Hs1Jjq13jV6

I’m curious if any of you know how that works at a technical level.

view more: Next ›