3
ghostsage 3 points ago +6 / -3

They mostly have. Racism is a punch line today, but there was certainly some in the past; and more than that, a lot of (leftist) propaganda that other races couldn't succeed, which was demoralizing enough that, in large part, they didn't succeed. White people fully embraced the advantage of freedom.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

To divide, destabilize, and destroy the country. It's the same purpose of everything they've been doing. Food shortages send the message that we're not prosperous, we're not self-sufficient, and that your fellow man is your competition. They don't need to nationalize anything, they just want us to suffer - as long as we can't blame it directly on them.

12
ghostsage 12 points ago +13 / -1

If anything, it's probably not as deadly when administered wrong.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I need to build a registry where trannies are paired up as going opposite directions and just undergo complete genital-region swaps with each other. If you get the cuts right, it'd be practically outpatient and modular. You could change it up for a fun-filled weekend and be back to normal Monday morning. I always wanted to grow up to be like that pimp from the Star-bellied Sneeches. Oh man, Swap-a-Crotch here I come.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm afraid I can't let you mix metaverses like that, Dave.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

It does have a standard. Currently, each state's elections satisfy that state's standard. Those states know they will lack chain of custody and they don't care. The authorities know it's tainted, and often prefer it that way. It's still not a federal issue - all federal cares about is if they send delegates. The rest is the state's problem and the people of that state can, Constitutionally, choose to condone a corrupted voting system. Several do. The states have to fix it, the people of those states have to fix it; and now they have to do it by some means other than the ballot box.

6
ghostsage 6 points ago +6 / -0

States determine the manner of their elections, election fraud must be handled at the state level. Brunson is a federal issue - violation of Oath.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +3 / -2

States determine the manner of elections. It's none of SCOTUS' business.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd hear their thoughts on what Jesus did so wrong. Seems a decent fellow by all accounts. Thoughts, that is; I don't really give a rat's ass about anyone's 'feelings'.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the world was ever good, they'd have nothing to screech about, they'd have no purpose for existing; so they have to make sure that never happens.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

She went into enemy-held territory which is patrolled by unaccountable enforcers, as she should know better than anyone. Protest someplace less stupid, people; DC is not run by America right now.

4
ghostsage 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a successful and deadly biological attack using genetic manipulation that we know was launched by eugenicists who openly call for rapid depopulation and racial redistribution. We're beyond giving them the benefit of the doubt; and still trying to do so actually diminishes your credibility. You seem to have missed the massive surge in adverse effects and deaths that has come since the biological weapon landed. It isn't coincidence.

4
ghostsage 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. They knew and they asked this dead guy to tell people, while they said NOTHING. Cowards, traitors, thieves, killers. If they didn't scream bloodclotty murder from the hilltops, their little jobs be damned, then they were absolutely in league with the devil.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd much rather this be a flow of evidence than a flow of information, though.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah beat, it's pronounced like 'bait' and it means 'gullible'.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all desolate tundra though, eh?

16
ghostsage 16 points ago +16 / -0

Election problems have no standing in the SCOTUS, it will be at the Appeals Court or AZSC that she can make the case. And yes, once you've let the enemy completely infiltrate your armory, it becomes a whole lot of work overthrowing them.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's exactly the violation they didn't use on child porn for, like, a decade.

1
ghostsage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually this was explained here a few days ago (re: the Texas vs Fraud States case). States have the authority to conduct their elections; so vote and election issues can't be pursued at the federal level or across state borders.

3
ghostsage 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is what we have, and it was built of appropriate conservative ideology. It has been overrun by RINOs in our time; but we don't retreat, we take it back.

5
ghostsage 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you think US dollars are 'actual freaking money', you're not quite up to speed yet.

2
ghostsage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems fine to me. Raise some money and some hell. This may be a counter-move for the FTX situation. Either way, it's a neat thing for some and a decent troll for others. We have big problems in this country, and this is comparatively a very little thing. We're all waiting on the 'wheels of justice' here. It's not like he chose to do this INSTEAD of fixing the country.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›