Diesel was... an engine. The engine was originally designed to run on plentiful, renewable vegetable or legume oils (corn, soy, peanut, etc.), and its invention made fuel cheap and abundant for as long as humanity can still farm. However, propaganda kept us on gasoline - because important people make their money in the gasoline industry. Then, regulations drove changes to the diesel engine so that it requires special, colored, approved, taxed 'diesel fuel' and can no longer run on veggie oil without significant modifications - and these are fairly recent changes; there are cars from the 80's that will run great on veggie oils without any modification at all.
Lots of people missing the point here. He isn't saying anything bad about tattoos, he's saying if you are white, fit, and DON'T have tattoos in 2023, you're definitely conservative. I haven't seen evidence to the contrary myself. But this is not to say you can ONLY be conservative if you don't have tattoos, or if you're fit, or white. If you don't tick all those boxes, someone might ask your politics; but if you do, they should already know.
Only men get Selective Service because only men get to vote; that way they're invested in this country. Then someone needed more votes so they let women vote but skipped the part about the draft. Chivalry. Now, half of our voters aren't adequately invested in the success of the country. We really don't want women in the draft, but they also don't need to vote. We had it right to begin with.
Once the machines pass mandatory inspection, changes like this are illegal, that's why they're sealed. This invalidates the inspection approval and therefore invalidates the results of those machines... according to the unenforced law.
Nobody has a responsibility to act as jury in a case they are bringing their bias to. Certainly, juries are frequently corrupted by biased liars (mostly from the other side), but the solution is to somehow improve that, not give in and desperately stoop to their level. We don't do 'by any and all means', even if they do.
No, it doesn't. You've put quotes around some flawed interpretation of it. It says "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." and subject to the jurisdiction thereof means that the parents must be Americans, not visiting foreigners (non-Americans (non-citizens), and the children they make, are under the jurisdiction of their home country, not this one).
Just to be clear, he had to be born on American soil to Americans for the presidency. Soil is not 'natural born' if your parents aren't citizens. Kamala violates this as well, because people don't care to comprehend the difference. You can't crawl over the border, drop a baby, and have it grow up to be President - you have to immigrate legally, become a citizen, then have your baby.
These 'fumbles' suggest they have no faith in the dollar anyway and are banking some 'social currency' amongst themselves. Perhaps moves like these integrate with Big Data and are fueling the algorithms for when AI calculates how to custom-manipulate individual consumers; and they'll just make up the losses then.
Right, the spike proteins will be destroyed; but the mRNA messengers (that rewrite your code to begin creating spike proteins) seem to survive digestion and still convey their instructions. So a pork chop will be a booster. They're finding vax-type clots in people who eat vaccinated meat. The better question is why the fuck are farmers choosing to employ a "vaccine" that DOESN'T FUCKING WORK?
You voted for them to represent you, and you are regularly offered a vote to replace them if you don't like the manner in which they do it. It's a perfect system. So why do they keep giving our money away? Either people do vote for it, or the vote is broken.