2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Angel Almeida. Just another one of those pesky hispanic, "white supremecists."

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

That has happened to me a couple of times too.

I copied the URL from my firefox browser into Edge, and it went to the site.

After that firefox would go there.

So, I don't know the issue, but I did get it to work.

Maybe some kind of shadow blocking or other weird stuff.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't it even more odd that Jussie Smollett faked his attempted lynching at the exact time when the legislation was coming up for vote, with little support, and it was given 24/7 news media coverage, until after the legislation passed, and after it passed, his fake hate crime got little to no coverage, and he got little to no punishment for faking the crime?

Isn't that odd?

And isn't it odd that politicians are much less afraid of committing treason against the people they represent now that they have Federal protection against the people they betray?

Isn't that all just odd?

4
huhWHAThuh 4 points ago +4 / -0

**In a related story, the Clinton Foundation has been asked to provide transportation services for the children...

3
huhWHAThuh 3 points ago +3 / -0

If anyone wants to do a deep dive into who the Deep State are and where they come from, here is a link to a couple of hundred detailed videos on the subject, many of them filmed on location to document the visual evidence of his research.

I was surprised to discover that they are still up on youtube. It is most probably because he hasn't posted in 6 years. I suspect he may no longer be among the living.

https://www.youtube.com/@chatzefratz/videos

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

She may not know it, but the Courts have ruled consistently that Second Amendment rights may not be infringed ESPECIALLY IN TIME OF EMERGENCY.

The Public has not only the right to keep and bear arms, but it retains the right engage in transport and commerce of fire arms and ammunition.

This came up big time back when Bush had the National Guard attempt to confiscate the public's guns in Louisiana after the Hurricane.

If there is a rash of gun violence, that is the point in time that the 2nd amendment is most critical in guaranteeing the Public's right to self defense.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

90% or more of the world's population support this ideal for the future of their nations.

But their tiny minority Satanic Governments forbid it and impose the opposite on them.

How can this happen?

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

As President, Donald Trump had the final authority on declassification.

I'm sure there are bureaucratic procedures that are standard in the normal process, but bureaucratic procedures have no power in law or constitutional authority.

If Trump says, "this is declassified," as president it is declassified. Full and final authority.

And who can prove he didn't. He's innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is not on him.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not a lawyer or Constitutional expert, but if President Trump is re elected while serving a prison term, can he pardon himself?

I sincerely believe if an honest vote would take place, he would only pick up support from the public after this obvious stunt to block the will of the voters.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

What sealed the deal for me was back during the protests in France a couple of years ago. She appeared on the Steve Bannon show, and introduced a french woman friend who would act as a special correspondent on the ground. I did a google search of the woman's name, and it came back as her claim to fame was writing how to books on witchcraft.

I already didn't trust her because of her resume. That sealed it in my mind.

3
huhWHAThuh 3 points ago +3 / -0

She's a Rhodes Scholar, same as Bill Clinton.

That's basically an internship for the Deep State NWO.

She has tried to worm her way into the truth movement for years, but too many people know what she is.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obviously, you won't read it. It will contain plain direct truth.

You publicly lie about the Scriptures. You will be publicly corrected by the Scriptures.

And I don't need to twist anything. They will speak for themselves.

LIE #1.

Ezekiel makes clear that the sin of Sodom was cruelty, specifically how they treated the poor.

You apparently are referring to Ezek.16. In Chapter 16 God, through Ezekiel, is speaking to Jerusalem, and saying that Jerusalem is more wicked than many of it's surrounding cities, including Sodom. ONE OF Sodom's shortcomings is it's bad treatment of the poor. For more, continue reading:

[22] And in all thine abominations and thy whoredoms thou hast not remembered the days of thy youth.

Abominations and whoredoms? Oh yeah, that seems to refer back to Lev.18 [22]

Lev.18

[22] Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

But I don't want to forget your statement that you are not under Levitical Law.

This is God himself speaking, condemning homosexuality as an abomination. We know that the word "abomination" means a stench in the face of God.

Here is the obvious question that your statement begs: Law or no law, are you contending that the sure way to endear yourself to the Creator is by essentially farting in his face on a regular basis?

I think that ^ surely qualifies as LIE #2

LIE#3

Your attempt to make Sodom and Gomorrah about mistreatment of the poor is also directly contradicted by the story itself:

[4] But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: [5] And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. [6] And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, [7] And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.

The men of Sodom surrounded Lot's house and told him to bring them out that they may "know them." No one disagrees at what that means.

Lot immediately responds:

[6] And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, [7] And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.

What is the wickedness? The lines before just said what it is. And it isn't saying the wickedness Lot is talking about is mistreatment of the poor.

LIE #4 is most everything you said about Paul and the New Testament.

It's a difficult mish mash to try to untangle, but you apparently are attempting to say that because Paul condemns all forms of fornication, or forbidden sexual behavior, that means he is excluding homosexuality? Well, forbidden sexual behavior is defined in Leviticus of the Old Testament, and it certainly included the "abomination" of homosexuality. Paul further includes the "effeminate" and "abusers of themselves with mankind," and just about every other way to describe the variety of homosexual activity. If you want to deny that, it is clearly covered in "fornication."

LIE #5

That I am a hypocrite for correcting childish lies that are more and more pushing themselves into the mainstream, without any basis in fact.

Lie in public and you must be corrected in public, that others be not deceived.

No one has to believe a word I say. All believers are required to believe what the Scriptures say. As the Apostle Paul tells us, it is given with great plainness of speech. And no one has the authority to change it to fit their desired narrative, or play any game of mental 3-card-monte to deceive others into believing their false narrative.

Don't read this and continue in your delusion. It is your decision to make.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy shit, your brain is scrambled eggs.

But with all of your issues, I guess it's understandable.

One thing you can be absolutely 100% certain of is that if you asked God what to do about your perverse tendancies, and the answer was, "practice them," IT WAS NOT GOD WHO ANSWERED YOU.

Sorry, I won't dare you to demonstrate your scriptural prowess. I have already heard the childishly absurd arguments twisting the language into a bag of pretzels.

I read the Bible daily, and have done so for decades, including the Blue letter Bible and the Interlinear Bible, along with the original languages and translations.

Without question, except from those with undeniable nefarious intentions, the Bible condemns homosexual behavior. You will find it clearly and in context in both the old testament and new.

It is so clear, so obvious, and in such plain and direct language, and in full context, that it takes DELIBERATE EVIL INTENT to attempt to twist it into something it is not.

Excuse me while i go wash my hands after being required to respond to your childish blubberings.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL - As expected, the first words out of your mouth are a poor attempt at mental three card monte. The vast majority of child molestation is committed by straight people? Straight people, by definition, are one adult male with one adult female. If you think your sleight of hand is working, it is only working in people who have already greased their minds to accept any level of absurdity that they can pretend supports what they want to believe.

My assumption is that you are referring to peds who hide their orientation behind heterosexual relationships the same way many homosexuals do? Again another childish attempt at mental gymnastics that only work for those who are eager to accept any morsel that they (and only they) can file away in their mental "this proves it" file, no matter the level of absurdity.

You then move on to ignore that 3 out of 4 child molestations are same sex in nature...umm...doesn't same sex mean homosexual - having nothing whatsoever to do with "straight" people?"

If homosexuality were so self-terminating, why do we keep on showing up?

Uhh....maybe the same self evident reason pedophilia orientation keeps showing up - 80& of peds were molested by adults during childhood.

As for your "victim" point, I've not engaged in that here so I don't see how it's relevant beyond your desire to kvetch

Aren't you the one who expressed your self-immolation at the hand of God, who refused to obey your command for his action, while hearing the prayers of so many others who testify to his transformation of their lives?

If you have any desire to understand, there is an entire book written on that subject. I highly recommend you look at it. It's explanations are clear and to the point. It takes no mental gymnastics to understand why and how everything works.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, the best indication of how sexual orientation is determined is indicated by the sexual orientation of pedophiles in 80% of cases was determined by childhood sexual abuse.

Add to that that the feverish search for the "gay gene" has gone on for decades, with no result.

Add to that Darwin's science of natural selection. Are you aware that sexual acts between same gender individuals PRODUCE NO OFFSPRING? If it had ANY basis in genetics, the behavior would have extinguished itself in a few generations, many millennia ago.

That's just skimming the top of the reasons rational thought excludes that as a possibility. The attempt to excuse responsibility for behavior by magically transforming oneself into a "victim" is a childish tactic of the loonie left. And they are wearing it very thin.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

It seems to be

It might be. It could be.........on and on.

But you do, know what you're talking about by ignoring all fact and proof in favor of your personal feelings?

4
huhWHAThuh 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is well established science that 80% of adult pedophiles were sexually molested as children. That is learned behavior from childhood trauma.

So pedophilia as sexual orientation is well known to be caused by behaviors, but any other orientation is said to be fully a genetic issue?

And those who hold the genetic view have been searching to find a genetic cause for decades, with zero results to back that assessment.

The obvious conclusion is: blatant lie, but with powerful backers.

2
huhWHAThuh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure if you ever listened to the youtube presentations of John Todd.

He claimed to be ex Illuminati who converted to fundamental Christianity many decades ago.

In one of his talks he said that their sign to everyone that they had established full control of every mainstream Christian denomination would be that they would have the President of the United States change the location of his oath of office from the front of the Capitol Building to the rear, where he would be facing the obelisk, which is the DC monument to Baal (also known as Satan) when he makes his oath.

That occurred with the swearing in of Ronald Reagan in 1980.

1
huhWHAThuh 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like the things he says, and I read his statements, and watch his videos.

But I do wonder how he wound up appointed as the Papal Nuncio to Washington DC. A high power position in the seat of power and corruption of the United States would be highly unlikely for a pious and sincere man.

Sewer duty is normally relegated to sewer rats because it's the environment they thrive in.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›