She's a Rhodes Scholar, same as Bill Clinton.
That's basically an internship for the Deep State NWO.
She has tried to worm her way into the truth movement for years, but too many people know what she is.
Obviously, you won't read it. It will contain plain direct truth.
You publicly lie about the Scriptures. You will be publicly corrected by the Scriptures.
And I don't need to twist anything. They will speak for themselves.
LIE #1.
Ezekiel makes clear that the sin of Sodom was cruelty, specifically how they treated the poor.
You apparently are referring to Ezek.16. In Chapter 16 God, through Ezekiel, is speaking to Jerusalem, and saying that Jerusalem is more wicked than many of it's surrounding cities, including Sodom. ONE OF Sodom's shortcomings is it's bad treatment of the poor. For more, continue reading:
[22] And in all thine abominations and thy whoredoms thou hast not remembered the days of thy youth.
Abominations and whoredoms? Oh yeah, that seems to refer back to Lev.18 [22]
Lev.18
[22] Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
But I don't want to forget your statement that you are not under Levitical Law.
This is God himself speaking, condemning homosexuality as an abomination. We know that the word "abomination" means a stench in the face of God.
Here is the obvious question that your statement begs: Law or no law, are you contending that the sure way to endear yourself to the Creator is by essentially farting in his face on a regular basis?
I think that ^ surely qualifies as LIE #2
LIE#3
Your attempt to make Sodom and Gomorrah about mistreatment of the poor is also directly contradicted by the story itself:
[4] But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: [5] And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. [6] And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, [7] And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
The men of Sodom surrounded Lot's house and told him to bring them out that they may "know them." No one disagrees at what that means.
Lot immediately responds:
[6] And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, [7] And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
What is the wickedness? The lines before just said what it is. And it isn't saying the wickedness Lot is talking about is mistreatment of the poor.
LIE #4 is most everything you said about Paul and the New Testament.
It's a difficult mish mash to try to untangle, but you apparently are attempting to say that because Paul condemns all forms of fornication, or forbidden sexual behavior, that means he is excluding homosexuality? Well, forbidden sexual behavior is defined in Leviticus of the Old Testament, and it certainly included the "abomination" of homosexuality. Paul further includes the "effeminate" and "abusers of themselves with mankind," and just about every other way to describe the variety of homosexual activity. If you want to deny that, it is clearly covered in "fornication."
LIE #5
That I am a hypocrite for correcting childish lies that are more and more pushing themselves into the mainstream, without any basis in fact.
Lie in public and you must be corrected in public, that others be not deceived.
No one has to believe a word I say. All believers are required to believe what the Scriptures say. As the Apostle Paul tells us, it is given with great plainness of speech. And no one has the authority to change it to fit their desired narrative, or play any game of mental 3-card-monte to deceive others into believing their false narrative.
Don't read this and continue in your delusion. It is your decision to make.
Holy shit, your brain is scrambled eggs.
But with all of your issues, I guess it's understandable.
One thing you can be absolutely 100% certain of is that if you asked God what to do about your perverse tendancies, and the answer was, "practice them," IT WAS NOT GOD WHO ANSWERED YOU.
Sorry, I won't dare you to demonstrate your scriptural prowess. I have already heard the childishly absurd arguments twisting the language into a bag of pretzels.
I read the Bible daily, and have done so for decades, including the Blue letter Bible and the Interlinear Bible, along with the original languages and translations.
Without question, except from those with undeniable nefarious intentions, the Bible condemns homosexual behavior. You will find it clearly and in context in both the old testament and new.
It is so clear, so obvious, and in such plain and direct language, and in full context, that it takes DELIBERATE EVIL INTENT to attempt to twist it into something it is not.
Excuse me while i go wash my hands after being required to respond to your childish blubberings.
LOL - As expected, the first words out of your mouth are a poor attempt at mental three card monte. The vast majority of child molestation is committed by straight people? Straight people, by definition, are one adult male with one adult female. If you think your sleight of hand is working, it is only working in people who have already greased their minds to accept any level of absurdity that they can pretend supports what they want to believe.
My assumption is that you are referring to peds who hide their orientation behind heterosexual relationships the same way many homosexuals do? Again another childish attempt at mental gymnastics that only work for those who are eager to accept any morsel that they (and only they) can file away in their mental "this proves it" file, no matter the level of absurdity.
You then move on to ignore that 3 out of 4 child molestations are same sex in nature...umm...doesn't same sex mean homosexual - having nothing whatsoever to do with "straight" people?"
If homosexuality were so self-terminating, why do we keep on showing up?
Uhh....maybe the same self evident reason pedophilia orientation keeps showing up - 80& of peds were molested by adults during childhood.
As for your "victim" point, I've not engaged in that here so I don't see how it's relevant beyond your desire to kvetch
Aren't you the one who expressed your self-immolation at the hand of God, who refused to obey your command for his action, while hearing the prayers of so many others who testify to his transformation of their lives?
If you have any desire to understand, there is an entire book written on that subject. I highly recommend you look at it. It's explanations are clear and to the point. It takes no mental gymnastics to understand why and how everything works.
Well, the best indication of how sexual orientation is determined is indicated by the sexual orientation of pedophiles in 80% of cases was determined by childhood sexual abuse.
Add to that that the feverish search for the "gay gene" has gone on for decades, with no result.
Add to that Darwin's science of natural selection. Are you aware that sexual acts between same gender individuals PRODUCE NO OFFSPRING? If it had ANY basis in genetics, the behavior would have extinguished itself in a few generations, many millennia ago.
That's just skimming the top of the reasons rational thought excludes that as a possibility. The attempt to excuse responsibility for behavior by magically transforming oneself into a "victim" is a childish tactic of the loonie left. And they are wearing it very thin.
It seems to be
It might be. It could be.........on and on.
But you do, know what you're talking about by ignoring all fact and proof in favor of your personal feelings?
It is well established science that 80% of adult pedophiles were sexually molested as children. That is learned behavior from childhood trauma.
So pedophilia as sexual orientation is well known to be caused by behaviors, but any other orientation is said to be fully a genetic issue?
And those who hold the genetic view have been searching to find a genetic cause for decades, with zero results to back that assessment.
The obvious conclusion is: blatant lie, but with powerful backers.
Plea bargained to an illegal parking ticket.
Citation issued.
Move along now.
Not sure if you ever listened to the youtube presentations of John Todd.
He claimed to be ex Illuminati who converted to fundamental Christianity many decades ago.
In one of his talks he said that their sign to everyone that they had established full control of every mainstream Christian denomination would be that they would have the President of the United States change the location of his oath of office from the front of the Capitol Building to the rear, where he would be facing the obelisk, which is the DC monument to Baal (also known as Satan) when he makes his oath.
That occurred with the swearing in of Ronald Reagan in 1980.
I like the things he says, and I read his statements, and watch his videos.
But I do wonder how he wound up appointed as the Papal Nuncio to Washington DC. A high power position in the seat of power and corruption of the United States would be highly unlikely for a pious and sincere man.
Sewer duty is normally relegated to sewer rats because it's the environment they thrive in.
Constitutional Democracy with a Bill of Rights clearly stated for every Citizen is the most dangerous extremist ideology for any Communist/Terrorist Ideology in existence.
It is so because Communism is the most bloody and murderous ideology in the history of Planet Earth. It cannot exist in the presence God given individual human rights such as freedom of speech, and the right to keep and bear arms.
And they know that very well.
Go screw yourself Chuck.
And go drink some horse piss while you're at it.
If you can tell people what to drink, they get to return the favor.
Does anyone think that a man who has received $15.3 billion in government subsidies since 2003 is not laundering huge chunks of it back to the politicians who are voting to send the money to him?
SpaceX alone got a whopping $2.8 billion in government contracts last year, according to The Information, and has gotten a total of $15.3 billion from the government since 2003.Apr 15, 2023
How could he not be on a short leash to the Satanists in DC ?
Hell no, I don't trust him.
It was just a leaky urinal.
I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but the business bailouts you mention I believe came in the form of government backed loans which had to be repaid.
If you are referring to the recent student loan forgiveness being struck down, they already got their government backed loans and invested it in their educations.
What they are asking is for the books to be wiped clean after the fact.
Totally different situation.
And I'm not a fan of government bailouts either.
"Diversity is our strength."
The official Epstein suicide story could not have happened.
According to John Alite, a former mob associate of John Gotti, who has spent time in solitary at the facility, a call is made to the security guards, who supposedly fell asleep, at 10 pm every night. If they don't answer and cannot be contacted, they are assumed dead or captured, and the entire facility automatically goes into total lock down.
Sorry, I didn't save a link to the interview. It was on a youtube vid i watched a while back.
Great, but they forgot to stop the war in Ukraine.
EDIT: One state done - 49 to go.
They wrote a manifesto years ago stating specifically that they were coming for everyone's children.
If memory serves, I believe the man in charge at the time it was released later became Obama's Secretary of Education.
It's not a secret conspiracy theory. They state it publicly.
I remember an Interview with Renee Richards back in (or around) 2009 in People Magazine where she/he said she/he regretted having the surgery and wishes she/he had just taken antidepressant meds and skipped the knife part. And one of the things they discussed was the astronomical suicide rate of those who had undergone the change. The numbers they were talking about was around half of those who had gone the surgery route regretted doing it.
Now the mainstream line is that only a tiny % have any regrets. If you listen to Jordan Peterson's interview with "Cloe," a teenager who fell into the surgery trap and is now suing the Dr's and Hospital for what they did to her, you will understand why. She has been viciously attacked and hounded by the perv patrol for going public with what happened to her.
Also note that "Renee Richards" now says she/he was misquoted in the interview. But there is no indication that she/he protested or asked for a retraction back at the time.
EDIT: For those who don't know, Renee Richards was a male transvestite tennis player back in the 1970s and/or 1980s who played on the women's circuit after surgery.
No they are not the government's kids.
And we are not the government's property either.
Contrary to their current ideas, the government belongs to the people.
Not the other way around.
There has never been any serious controversy about these things.
The President is the CHIEF EXECUTIVE.
Everyone in the Executive Branch WORKS FOR HIM.
He chooses to delegate portions of his authority to various agencies to carry out HIS ORDERS due to the sheer volume of work he is responsible for.
If there is ever any controversy about what is to be done - HE WINS.
Harry Truman kept a plaque on his desk saying: "The Buck Stops Here."
That is the legal and constitutional FACT.
Tolerance or intolerance is good or evil in direct proportion to what is being tolerated or resisted. It is not evil or good per se.
And protecting children from the indoctrination that is teaching them that sexual perversion is a good thing is not a phobia. A phobia is a neurosis - a mental illness.
The clear, self-evident, mental illness is attempting to play childish word games against sound moral beliefs that have existed in every society that has ever existed and flourished on planet Earth from the beginning of time to the present.
And it is backed up by nature itself, along with every major moral/religious system that has existed on planet Earth from the beginning of time to the present.
That behavior is even condemned by the Egyptian Book of the Dead.
The overwhelming majority of people on this planet are not buying it, and are not going to buy into it.
It is being unleashed for the explicit purpose of destroying civilization, to be more specific, to destroy Western, Christian, Civilization.
We don't need the color revolution they are so eagerly trying to push down everyone's throat.
Just say no, and mean it.
What sealed the deal for me was back during the protests in France a couple of years ago. She appeared on the Steve Bannon show, and introduced a french woman friend who would act as a special correspondent on the ground. I did a google search of the woman's name, and it came back as her claim to fame was writing how to books on witchcraft.
I already didn't trust her because of her resume. That sealed it in my mind.